ASSESSING THE FACTORS OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR IN URBAN AREA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/jcest.3976.2021Keywords:
Energy consumption behavior, Energy demand, Environmental Performance Index, Environmental health, Ecosystem vitalityAbstract
This paper focuses on delineation of ecological viability due to changes of household energy consumption behavior. Then the research also explored the factors (Environmental resources) behind growing ecological footprint. For having a lot of natural elements and high residential characteristics ward-4 of Khulna city was selected as study area. The research followed a three step approaches. At first, geographical and topographical data are analyzed in geo-spatial environment. Which helped to draw the Environmental Performance framework. Geographical Information system (GIS) helps to evaluate the current scenario and past scenario of the resource compatibility of some existing assets. The second phase is all about assessing the residents’ behavior towards energy consumption practice and the influencing factors behind this. The third part showed the environmental performance index (EPI) that include both the socio-economic problems and environmental circumstances using NSA method under the explanatory variables of environmental impact assessment (EIA). Essential natural assets especially water body and the vegetation has decreased at tremendous rate in recent time in Ward-4 with the enhancement of buildup area. This research is totally based on stakeholder perception towards energy consumption pattern and all the further assessment depend on this concept. To assess the behavioral changing factors, it seems that the correlation between income range and energy consumption is positive and linear. It represents that people want to switch high energy consumption appliances with growing wealth. Third phase assess environmental health (measure threat to human health) and ecological vitality (measures ecosystem service and natural resources) under environmental performance index. As the study is mostly involved local residents of study area so the method of neighborhood sustainability Assessment (NSA) is combined with EPI method for scoring the indicators. The approximate score of Environmental Performance Index (EPI) is around 53 percent demarcating the areas existing situation is in moderate rate and diverted from the standard value. This research draw attention to find out environment viability of ward-4 by measuring environmental stress to human health and ecosystem for providing practical guidance to government that aspire to move towards sustainable future.
References
OECD (2007). Instrument Mixes for Environmental Policy, Paris, France.
EECA (2006). Situation Assessment Report on the National Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy. Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority, Wellington.
Hubacek K., Guan D., Barrett J. & Wiedmann T. (2009). Environmental Implications of Urbanization and Lifestyle Change in China: Ecological and Water Footprints. Journal of Cleaner Production,17(14), 1241-1248.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.03.011
Moore J., Kissinger M. & Rees W. E. (2013). An Urban Metabolism and Ecological Footprint Assessment of Metro Vancouver. Journal of Environmental Management, 124, 51-61.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.009
Scotti M., Bondavalli C. & Bodini A. (2009). Ecological Footprint As a Tool for Local Sustainability: The Municipality of Piacenza (Italy) As a Case Study. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29(1), 39-50.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.07.001
Stephenson J., Barton B., Carrington G., Gnoth D., Lawson R. & Thorsnes P. (2010). Energy Cultures : A framework for understanding energy behaviours. Energy Policy, 38(10), 6120-6129.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.069
Asici A. A. & Acar S. (2015). Does Income Growth Relocate Ecological Footprint? Ecological Indicators, 61, 707-714.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.022
Danish &Wang Z. (2019). Investigation of the ecological footprint's driving factors: What We Learn From The Experience of Emerging Economies. Sustainable Cities and Society, 49.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101626
Duro J. A. & Figueras J. T. (2013). Ecological Footprint Inequality Across Countries: The Role of Environment Intensity, Income and Interaction Effects. Ecological Economics, 93, 34-41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107439
Rashid A., Irum A., Malik I. A., Ashraf A., Rongqiong L., Liu G., Ullah H., Ali M. U. & Yousaf B. (2018). Ecological Footprint of Rawalpindi; Pakistan's First Footprint Analysis from Urbanization Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 362-368.
https://doi.org/10.33687/008.03.3438
Zhang J., Teng F. & Zhou S. (2020). The Structural Changes and Determinants of Household Energy Choices and Energy Consumption in Urban China : Addressing the Role of Building Type. Energy Policy, 139.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111314
Conrad E. & Cassar L. F. (2019). The Environmental Performance Index.Routledge Handbook of Sustainability Indicators, 10(5), 294-307.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051688
Esty D. C., Kim C., Srebotnjak T., Levy M. A., Sherbinin A. D. & Mara V. (2008). Environmental Performance Index. Center for International Earth Science Information Network, Columbia .
Kamble T. & Bahadure S. (2019). Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment In Developed And Developing Countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(6), 4955-4977.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00412-6
Yigitcanlar T., Kamruzzaman M. & Teriman S. (2015). Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment: Evaluating Residential Development Sustainability In A Developing Country Context. Sustainability, 7(3), 2570-2602.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su7032570
Shari A. & Murayama A. (2013). A Critical Review Of Seven Selected Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment Tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, 73-87.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.06.006
Haque M. N., Mamun M. A., Saroar M. M. & Roy T. K. (2019). Application Of "DPSIR" Framework To Assess The Status And Role Of Blue Ecosystem Services (BES) In Khulna City. Journal of Engineering Science, 10(2), [26] -60. http://www2.kuet.ac.bd/JES/images/files/v102/06_JES_234_28-10-2019.pdf
Simion I. M., Ghinea C., Maxineasa S. G., Taranu N., Bonoli A. & Gavrilescu M. (2013). Ecological Footprint Applied in The Assessment of Construction and Demolotion Waste Integrated Management. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal, 12 (4),779-788.
https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2013.097
Haque M. N., Sresto M. A. & Siddika S. (2020). Nexus Between Urban Green Streets And The Sustainability: Case on Khulna City Corporation (KCC) Area, Bangladesh.THE CREATIVITY GAME - Theory and Practice of Spatial Planning,8, 37-45.
https://doi.org/10.15292/IU-CG.2020.08.037-045
Haque M. N., Sresto M. A. & Siddika S. (2021). Suitable Locations for Industrial Setup in Urban Context: Way Forward To Meet the SDGs for Khulna City, Bangladesh," International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability ( IJBES), 8(2). [Accepted]
https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v8.n2.679
Israel G. D. (1992). Determining Sample Size. Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, Florida.
Esty D., Kim C. & Srebotnjak T. (2008) . Environmental Performance Index.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470061596.risk0280
Emerson J., Levy M. A., Esty D. C., Mara V., Kim C. & Sherbinin A. D. (2010). Environmental Performance Index. Center for International Earth Science Information Network, Columbia.
Wendling Z. A., EmersonJ. W., Esty D. C. & Sherbinin A. D. (2020). Environmental Performance Index. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, New Haven.
Pan Y., Yin R. & Huang Z. (2008). Energy Modeling of Two Office Buildings With Data Center for Green Building Design. Energy and Buildings, 40(7), 1145-1152.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.10.008
Dobbie M. J. & Dail D. (2013). Robustness and Sensitivity of Weighting and Aggregation in Constructing Composite Indices.Ecological Indicators, 29, 270-277.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.025
Haque M. N., Saroar M., Fattah M. A., Morshed S. R. & Ishra A. K. (2020). Environmental Risk Zone Identification of An Urban Unit Using GIS and Remote Sensing. BAUET Journal, 2(2), 25-39.
Haque M. N., Rahman N. & Nanjiba M. (2020). Geospatial Monitoring on Land Surface Temperature and Vegetation Dynamics: A Case of a City Area. Trends in Undergraduate Research, UNIMAS, Malaysia, 3(2), 35-43.
https://doi.org/10.33736/tur.2172.2020
Haque M. N., Fattah M. A., Morshed S. R. & Saroar M.(2020). Public-Private Partnership for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of Khulna, Bangladesh.Public Administration and Policy: An Asia-Pacific Journal, 23(3), 283-298.
https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-04-2020-0023
Morshed S. R., Fattah M. A., Rimi A. A. & Haque M. N. (2020). Surface Temperature Dynamics in Response to Land Cover Transformation. Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology, 11(2), 94-110.
https://doi.org/10.33736/jcest.2616.2020
Ahsan M. and Bhuiyan M. R. (2010). Soil And Water Salinity , Their Management In Relation To Climate Changes In Coastal Areas Of Bangladesh..Khulna University Studies Special Issue (SESB), 31-42.
"Global Footprint Network," 2016. [Online]. Available: https://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/.
Dieckmann J., Little A. D. & Magid H. (1999). Final Report to the Alliance for Responsible Atmospheric Policy," Global Comparative Analysis of HFC and Alternative Technologies for Refrigeration, Air Conditioning, Foam, Solvent,Aerosol Propellant,and Fire Protection Applications, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Muller R. & Howe M. (2017). Small Farm Permaculture And Sustainable Living.[Online]. Available: https://small-farm-permaculture-and-sustainable living.com/ecological_footprint_components/.
Hassan S., Hotlz W., Tansey J. & Whitelaw G. (2017). Sustainability Assessmet : Criteria and Processes., Perth: Murdoch University.
Singh B., Roy P., Spiess T. & Venkatesh B. (2015). Sustainable Integrated Urban & Energy Planning, the Evolving.The Centre for Urban Energy,01-41.
Kabir, A. (2019). Report on Sustainable Urban Transport Index for Khulna, Bangladesh. ESCAP. Khulna University.
Moore J., Kissinger M. & Rees W. E. (2013). An Urban Metabolism And Ecological Footprint Assessment Of Metro Vancouver. Journal of Environmental Management, 124, 51-61.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.009
Wackernagel M. & Rees W. E. (1996). Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth.
Srinivas H. (2015) "GDRC". [Online]. Available: http://www.gdrc.org/uem/disasters/disenvi/tools/index.html. [Accessed 23 2 2019].
Fabien D. (2006). Environmental Profile Of Rwanda. European Commission, Kigali.
Das P. K. (2016). An Introduction to The Concept of Environmental Management: Indian Context. International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development,2(4), 25-34.
https://doi.org/10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.24.2003
Twidell J. & Weir T. (2015). Renewable Energy Resources, New York: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315766416
Wackernagel M. (1998). The Ecological Footprint of Santiago de Chile. Local Environment,3(1), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839808725541
Chambers N., Simmons C. & Wackernagel M. (2000). Sharing Nature's Interest: Ecological Footprints as an Indicator of Sustainability, London: Earthscan.
Levett R. (1998). Footprinting: A Great Step Forward,But Tread Carefully. Local Environment, Santiago de Chile, 3(1), 7-26.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839808725545
Wiedmann T. & Barrett J. (2010). A Review Of The Ecological Footprint Indicator Perceptions And Methods. Sustainability, 2(6), 1645-1693.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su2061645
Fare R., Grosskopf S. & Sancho F. H. (2004). Environmental Performence: An Index Number Approach. Resource And Energy Economics, 26(4),343-352.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.10.003
Stern N. H. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: the Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434
Hubacek K., Guan D., Barrett J. & Wiedmann T. (2009). Environmental Implications Of Urbanization And Lifestyle Change In China: Ecological And Water Footprints. Journal of Cleaner Production,17(14), 1241-1248.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.03.011
Bisset R.(1996). Environmental Impact Assessment: Issues, Trends and Practice.United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Upon acceptance of an article, the corresponding author on behalf of all authors will be asked to complete and upload the Copyright Transfer Form (refer to Copyright Issues for more information on this) alongside the electronic proof file.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and refer the publication in the Journal.
2) For open-access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds the copyright or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subjected to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) are responsible to ensure their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. The corresponding author has obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If the submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare that the researches which they have conducted comply with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving humans or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from the Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that they have no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor(s) or UNIMAS Publisher.
