COMPARING COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHS OF LAYERED AND RANDOM PLACEMENT OF EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE WASTES IN QUARRY DUST BLOCKS

Authors

  • Clement Kiprotich Kiptum Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Eldoret, P.O. BOX 1125-3100, Eldoret, Kenya
  • Victor Muroki Mwirigi Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Eldoret, P.O. BOX 1125-3100, Eldoret, Kenya
  • Steve Ochillo Ochieng Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Eldoret, P.O. BOX 1125-3100, Eldoret, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33736/jcest.2110.2020

Keywords:

Compressive strength, density, expanded polystyrene wastes, quarry dust

Abstract

Despite intense research on building materials, the challenge of finding cheap and lightweight construction materials still persist for persons wishing to construct a house. A material that is getting attention of researchers and lightweight is Expanded Polystyrene (EPS). The aim of this study was to compare compressive strength and mass of blocks made when EPS were mixed randomly or in layered manner in cement-quarry dust mortar. The EPS wastes were placed randomly and in a single layer so as to give percentage volume of 0% (control), 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% and 50% EPS of the cube of 150 mm. The results showed that the average compressive strength of mortar was 18.67 ±1.33 N/mm2. The strength reduction proportionality factor for layered mixing was 0.76 to 1 and 0.29 to 1 for random mixing. This showed that reduction of strength was greater in random mixing than layered mixing. Increase of EPS above 30% randomly, resulted in lightweight blocks of between 1319 and 1669 Kg/m3, whereas increasing EPS in layered manner above 50% resulted in lightweight blocks of densities less than 1679 Kg/m3. This research showed that 40% EPS randomly mixing resulted in a light block which met the minimum strength criteria of 3.6 N/mm2.

References

Allen, E. and Iano, J., 2009. Fundamentals of Building Construction. Materials and Methods (5th Edition), John Wiley & Sons Incorporation, New Jersey.

Pavlu, T. Fortova, K., Divis, J. and Hajek, P., 2019. The Utilization of Recycled Masonry Aggregate and Recycled EPS for Concrete Blocks for Mortaless masonry. Materials 12.1923, pp. 1-18.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12121923

United Nations Development Programme, 2015. Sustainable Development Goals booklet,1-24.

Plastics Smart, 2019. Marine Plastics x innovation. Public private innovative cooperative Framework on Marine Plastics. Ministry of Environment. G20.2019 Japan, 09.

Kenya Association of Manufacturers,2019. Kenya Plastic Action Plan. Accelerating a circular Economy in Kenya. pp. 109.

Savija, B., Babafemi, A.J., Suvash, C.P, Anggraini, V., 2018. Engineering Properties of Concrete with waste recycled Plastic: A Review. Sustainability 10, 3875.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113875

Ngugi, H. N., Kaluli, J. W. And Gariy, Z.A.,2017. Use of Expanded Polystyrene Technology and Materials Recycling for building Construction in Kenya. American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2(5), pp. 64-71.

https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20170205.12

American Society of Testing Material, 2019. Standard Specification for Mortar for Unit Masonry (ASTM C270-19ae1), ASTM International, West Conshohocken,PA.

Arya, C., 2009. Design of Structural Elements ( 3rd Ed.), Spon Press, London.

https://doi.org/10.1201/b18121

Jayanth, M. P., and Sowmya, S.M., 2018. Experimental Study on replacement of coarse aggregates by EPS beads in concrete to achieve lightweight concrete. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. Volume 5(7), pp. 610-616

Herki, B.A., Khatib, J.M., and Negim, E.M., 2013. Lightweight Concrete Made from Waste Polystyrene and Fly Ash. World Applied Sciences Journal 21(9), pp. 1356-1360.

Haghi, A.K., Arabani, M. and Ahmadi, H., 2006. Applications of Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) beads and polyamide-66 in civil engineering, Part One: Lightweight polymeric concrete. Composite Interfaces, Vol.13, No.4-6, pp. 441-450.

https://doi.org/10.1163/156855406777408575

Kenya Bureau of Standards, 2005. KS EAS 18-1:2001-Cement Part 1: Composition, Specification and conformity Criteria for common cements, Kenya Bureau of Standards, Nairobi.

BS 812 : Part 103.1:1985;Methods of Determination of Particle Size Distribution: Sieve Test

ASTM Standard C90-11: 2007. Standard Specification for Laboratory Concrete Units. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

BS EN 12390-2:2009, Testing hardened concrete. Making and curing specimens for strength tests

BS EN 12390-3:2009, Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength of test specimens.

BS 1881 Part 111:1983. Testing Concrete (Method of normal curing by test specimens 20oC.

Code of Practice for Dead and Imposed loads, 2011. Building Department Hong Kong

Rashidi, A., Rosli, M.F., Ahmed, E. and Sarudu, N.H., 2011. The Effect of Reinforcement, Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) and Fly Ash on the Strength of Foam Concrete. UNIMAS E-Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol.2 (2), pp. 1-7.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-26

How to Cite

Kiptum, C. K., Mwirigi, V. M., & Ochieng, S. O. (2020). COMPARING COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHS OF LAYERED AND RANDOM PLACEMENT OF EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE WASTES IN QUARRY DUST BLOCKS. Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology, 11(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcest.2110.2020