SIMULATION OF GROUNDWATER FLOW REGIME: A CASE OF YALA RIVER CATCHMENT, KENYA

Authors

  • James Odiero Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega, Kenya
  • Basil T. Iro Ong’or Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega, Kenya
  • Edwin K. Kanda Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega, Kenya
  • Khaemba W. Alexander Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33736/jcest.10765.2026

Keywords:

Aquifer, groundwater, hydrogeology, recharge, visual-MODFLOW

Abstract

The hydrogeological regime that includes the vadose and phreatic zones significantly supports the hydrological cycle and influences surface and groundwater bodies for a sustainable ecosystem. Since these zones are unseen, they are prone to anthropogenic threats, which include groundwater overabstraction, reduced infiltration or aquifer recharge, and adversity from climate change. There is also inadequate knowledge of groundwater capacity and flow regime in catchments. This study developed hydrogeological knowledge to understand the groundwater flow regime and provide a decision tool for catchment management. The model was developed using Visual MODFLOW and ran through a set of scenarios to widely understand hydrogeological aspects in the Yala River catchment. While running the model through day 147 to 190, the trends indicated a maximum head of 0.00624 m and a minimum of -0.00676 m. The head changes recorded a maximum of 0.00524 m and a minimum of -0.0068 m with the residual of less than 2, indicating that the verifications were within acceptable levels. It was observed that the catchment storage improved from 0.050238 m3/day in the reference scenario to 7.16 m3/day, and when the catchment was assumed to be well managed, the model’s groundwater inflow-outflow difference increased to 429 m3/day, an increase of 422.4 m3/day in the zonal unit, which gave a 98.33% increase. There was evidence of groundwater backflow at the midblock, indicating the development of a cone of depression that requires further research. It is worth noting that the boundary conditions used in the calibrated model were representative combinations of selected parameter values and boundary conditions. This model can be replicated for simulation of the hydrogeological flow regime in other catchments with similar or relative geographical characteristics.

References

Nyakundi, R. M., Makokha, M., Mwangi, J. K., & Obiero, C. (2015). Impact of rainfall variability on groundwater levels in Ruiru municipality, Kenya. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 7(5), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2015.1085157

Kuria, Z. N. (2018). Groundwater Resources Assessment of Lamu Island along Coastal Kenya.

Okune, P. (2019). Threats to the survival of river Yala in Kenya. GRIN Verlag. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/4830852/threats-to-the-survival-of-river-yala-in-kenya

Mogaka, H., Gichere, S., Davis, R., & Hirji, R. (2009). Climate variability and water resources degradation in Kenya- improving water resources development and management. World Bank.

Kiluva, V. M., Mutua, F. M., Makhanu, S. K., Ong, B. T. I., & Mwikali, K. V. (2011). Rainfall runoff modeling in Yala River basin of Western Kenya. Journal of Meteorology and related sciences, 10(5), 1–11. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1834/7242

Okungu, J., Adeyemo, J., & Otieno, F. (2017). Scenario Analysis of Water Supply and Demand Using WEAP Model: A Case of Yala Catchment, Kenya. American Journal of Water Resources, 5(4), 125–131. Retrieved from http://pubs.sciepub.com/ajwr/5/4/5

Kanda, E. K., Avulala, M. K., Olendo, E., Mukolwe, M. M., Awandu, W., Lutta, V. O., Ong’or (T), B., & Khaemba, A. W. (2023). Assessment of groundwater quality in Vihiga County, Kenya. Progress in Sustainable Development: Sustainable Engineering Practices, 1, 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99207-7.00010-5

Anderson, M. P., Woessner, W. W., & Hunt, R. J. (2015). Simulation of Flow and Advective Transport (second.). ed. U. S. Geological Survey, Wisconsin Water Science Center, Cross Plains, Wisconsin: Applied Groundwater Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-21563-7

Waswa, G. W., & Lorentz, S. A. (2019). Dynamics of groundwater flow and upwelling pressure heads at a wetland zone in a headwater catchment. SN Applied Sciences, 1(9), 1052–1059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1052-9

Fitts, C. R. (2012). Groundwater Science. Groundwater Science. Science Ltd: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-62950-0

Bradford, R. B., & Acreman, M. C. (2003). Applying MODFLOW to wet grassland in-field habitats: A case study from the Pevensey Levels, UK. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 7(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-7-43-2003

Fatapour, E., Afrous, A., Aminnejad, B., Saremi, A., & Khosrojerdi, A. (2026). Mapping Flood Zone in Khorram Abad River by Integrating Hydrological and Hydraulic Models. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications, 39(5), 1122–1138. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2025.39.05b.07

Kumar, P., Thakur, P. K., Bansod, B. K. S., & Debnath, S. K. (2016). Assessment of the effectiveness of DRASTIC in predicting the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination: a case study from Fatehgarh Sahib district in Punjab, India. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5712-4

Naji, L., Tawfiq, M., & Jabber, A. K. (2016). Global Journal of Engineering Science and Researches Mathematical Modeling of Groundwater Flow. C) Global Journal Of Engineering Science And Researches, 3(10), 2348–8034. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.160914

Dung, N. V., Merz, B., Bárdossy, A., Thang, T. D., & Apel, H. (2011). Multi-objective automatic calibration of hydrodynamic models utilizing inundation maps and gauge data. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(4), 1339–1354. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1339-2011

Babu, R. G. (2015). Sensitivity Analysis of Modflow Used For the Simulation of Ground Watertable Fluctuations. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 7(13), 828–833. Retrieved from www.india.gov.in

Pradeep Kumar, G. N., & Anil Kumar, P. (2014). Development of Groundwater Flow Model Using Visual MODFLOW. International Journal of Advanced Research, 2(6), 649–656. Retrieved from http://www.journalijar.com

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Odiero, J., Ong’or, B. T. I., Khaemba, E. K. K., & Alexander, K. W. (2026). SIMULATION OF GROUNDWATER FLOW REGIME: A CASE OF YALA RIVER CATCHMENT, KENYA. Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology, 17(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcest.10765.2026