COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF FOAMED CONCRETE IN RELATION TO POROSITY USING SEM IMAGES

  • Paybar Ali Shawnim School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment, Nottingham Trent University, Burton Street, Nottingham, NG1 4BU, UK http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5805-7577
  • Fouad Mohammad School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment, Nottingham Trent University, Burton Street, Nottingham, NG1 4BU, UK
Keywords: Compressive strength, foamed concrete, porosity, SEM, toner

Abstract

Foamed concrete specimens were examined for compressive strength at (28 and 180) days air sealed curing, as well as at 28 days water cured. Also, the microstructure of fifteen selected FC specimens was investigated for porosity in relation to compressive strength using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images. Twenty two batches of FC specimens of the densities (1100, 1600 and 1800) kg/m3 were made with fine sand and brick aggregates with toner and metakaolin (MK) inclusion as additives, they were casted in polystyrene cube moulds of (100x100x100) mm. Results show, it is possible to produce FC with high compressive strength in the range of (28.5 to 59.2) N/mm2, with a variety of materials, while the 1600 kg/m3 density with the inclusion of toner and MK20 is the favourite, which can be used for structural elements. Conventionally, compressive strength is in an inverse relationship with porosity, as porosity increases, compressive strength decreases, but using toner and MK20 can alter this relationship between porosity and compressive strength, where by it is possible to produce a relatively light weight high porosity FC matrix to exhibit high compressive strength. Maturity of the FC at 180 days, can demonstrate an increase in the compressive strength. The microstructural investigations through SEM images revealed, the FC mix made with sand or brick only, exhibits an irregular shape factor of the micro pore system with the pore size in the range of (10 to 70) µm, while those made with the inclusion of toner and MK20 have a regular shape factor of a matrix of finer micro pore system of the sizes in the range of (0.01 to 10.0) µm, all of which are evenly distributed, and have a big influence on the properties of the FC, particularly, on compressive strength. Contrary to the conventional method of air sealed curing for FC, water curing method can equally give the same or a slightly better result in respect of compressive strength for some particular densities.

References

Nambiar E.K.K and Ramamurthy K., 2007b. Sorption characteristics of foam concrete, Cement and Concrete Research 37, pp. 1341-1347.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.05.010

Mydin, M.A.O. and Wang, Y.C. (2011). 'Structural performance of lightweight steel-foamed concrete-steel composite walling system under compression', Thin-Walled Structures, 49(1), pp. 66-76.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2010.08.007

British Cement Association, Ref. 46.042, 1994, pp 4. Foamed concrete; Composition and Properties.

Dransfield J.M., 2000. Foamed Concrete: Introduction to the Product and its Properties, one-day awareness seminar on 'Foamed Concrete: Properties, Applications and Potential, University of Dundee, Scotland, pp.1-11.

Jones, M.R. and McCarthy, A., 2005b. Preliminary views on the potential of foamed concrete as a structural material. Magazine of Concrete Research 57(1), pp. 21-31.

https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2005.57.1.21

Jones M.R., 2000. Foamed concrete for structural use, one-day awareness seminar on 'Foamed Concrete: Properties, Applications and Potential', University of Dundee, Scotland pp. 54-79.

Ramamurthy K., Nambiar E.K.K., and Ranjani G.I.S., 2009. A classification of studies on properties of foam concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites 31, 388-396.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.006

Visagie M. and Kearsely E.P., 2002. Properties of foamed concrete as influenced by air‐void parameters. Concrete Beton 101, 8-14.

Luping T., 1986. A study of the quantitative relationship between strength and pore‐size distribution of porous materials. Cement and Concrete Research 16, 87-96.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(86)90072-4

Durack J.M and Weiqing L., 1998. The properties of foamed air cured fly ash based concrete for masonry production. In: Page A, Dhanasekar M, Lawrence S, editors. Proceedings of 5th Australasian Masonry Conference, Gladstone,Queensland, Australia, pp. 129-38.

Ambroise J., Murat M. and Pera J., 1985. Hydration reaction and hardening of calcined clays and related minerals. Cement and Concrete Research 15: 261-268.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(85)90037-7

Khatib J.M. and Wild S., 1996. Pore size distribution of metakaolin paste. Cement and Concrete Research 26(10), pp. 1545-1553.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(96)00147-0

Gleize P.J.P., Cyr M. and Escadeillas G., 2007. Effects of metakaolin on autogenous shrinkage of cement pastes. Cement and Concrete Comp 29: 80-87.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.09.005

Khatib J.M. and Clay R.M. 2004. Absorption characteristics of metakaolin concrete. Cement and Concrete Research 34(1):19-29.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00188-1

Bai J., Wild S. and Gailius A., 2004. Accelerating Early Strength Development of Concrete, using Metakaolin as an Admixture. Materials Science (medziagotyra). Vol. 10, no. 4.

Debieb F. and Kenai S. b., 2008. The use of coarse and fine crushed bricks as aggregate in concrete. Construction and Building Materials 22, 886-893.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.12.013

Khatib J.M., 2005. Properties of concrete incorporating fine recycled aggregate. Cement and Concrete Research 35:763-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.017

Poon C.S and Chan D., 2007. The use of recycled aggregate in concrete in Hong Kong. Resources, Conservation Recycling, 50(3): 293-305.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.06.005

Cachim P.B., 2009. Mechanical properties of brick aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials 23, 1292-1297.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.07.023

Ibrahim N.M., Salehuddin S., Amat R.C., Rahim N.L and Izhar T.N.T., 2013. Performance of Lightweight Foamed Concrete with Waste Clay Brick as Coarse Aggregate. APCBEE, Procedia 5, 497 - 501.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2013.05.084

Aliabdo A.A., Abd-Elmoaty A.M., and Hassan H.H., 2014. Utilization of crushed clay brick in cellular concrete production. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 53, 119-130.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2013.11.005

Sandra V.P, 2014. Harvard Physico-chemical and toxicological studies of engineered nanoparticles emitted from printing equipment. Harvard school of public health.

Jones, M.R. and McCarthy, A., 2006. Heat of hydration in foamed concrete: Effect of mix constituents and Plastic density. Cement and Concrete Research 36(6), pp. 1032-1041.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.01.011

Nicholas B Winter, 2012. Scanning Electron Microscopy of the Cement and Concrete.

BS EN 12390-3:2009, Testing hardened concrete.

Published
2019-04-25
How to Cite
Shawnim, P. A., & Mohammad, F. (2019). COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF FOAMED CONCRETE IN RELATION TO POROSITY USING SEM IMAGES. Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology, 10(1), 34-44. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcest.1005.2019