A Model for Determining Appropriate Speed Breaker Mechanism for Power Generation

Authors

  • Ikuobase Emovon Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Technology, Federal University of Petroleum Resources, Effurun, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33736/jaspe.601.2018

Keywords:

Speed breaker mechanism, decision criteria, AHP, WASPAS, power generation.

Abstract

The key to sustainable economic development is having adequate electricity to power homes and industrial machines. However, electric power supply in majority of developing countries is grossly inadequate. To improve on the power generation different renewable energy sources have been explored. One of the sources of renewable energy is the application of speed breaker system to convert kinetic energy of moving vehicles into electricity using various mechanisms. The purpose of this paper is to develop a methodology for determining the most appropriate mechanism of speed breaker system for effective power generation. The proposed approach aggregated the AHP and the WASPAS methods. The efficacy of the methodology is illustrated with a numerical example. From the analysis, the optimum speed breaker mechanism for power generation is the roller mechanism. A sensitivity analysis was also carried out to determine the effect of one of the parameters of the proposed method on the performance of the different mechanisms. The result of the sensitivity analysis showed that the optimum solution remained unchanged.

References

Mishra, A., Kale, P. and Kamble, A. (2013). Electricity Generation from Speed Breakers. The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES),Vol. 2, No. 11, 25-27.

Bhagdikar, P., Gupta, S., Rana, N. and Jegadeeshwaran, R. (2014). Generation of Electricity with the Use of Speed Breakers. International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7, No. 2, 589 - 595.

Das, C.K., Hossain, S.M. and Hossan, M.S. (2013). Introducing Speed Breaker as a Power Generation Unit for Minor Needs. In Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV), 2013 International Conference,1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEV.2013.6572532

Patil, B., Gaikwad, S. S., Halankar, M.S., Patil, S.P. and Sandilya, A.V., (2017) Power Generation from Speed Breaker, SSRG International Journal of Mechanical Engineering (SSRG-IJME), Vol. 4, No.3, 11-14.

https://doi.org/10.14445/23488360/IJME-V4I4P103

Olugboji, O.A., Abolarin, M.S., Ohiemi, I.E. and Ajani, K.C., 2015. Modelling and design of an auto street light generation speed breaker mechanism. American journal of mechanical engineering, 3(3), pp.84-92.

Jagtap, P.D., Pardeshi, S.D., Khade, A.G. and Sathe V. A. (2014). Review: Comparison of different Mechanisms for Electricity Generation using Speed Breaker. Multidisciplinary Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, Vol.1, No 2, 202-206.

Emovon, I. (2018). Automobile Speed Breaker System Mechanisms Analysis: Complex Proportional Assessment Approach, Indian Journal of Engineering, Vol.15, 1-8.

Rokonuzzaman, M. and Hossam-E-Haider, M. (2015) Analysis of Speed Breaker Mechanism for More Effective Electricity Generation. International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial and Materials Engineering 2015 (ICMIME2015), RUET, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning. Priority Setting. Resource Allocation, MacGraw-Hill.

Štreimikienė, D., Šliogerienė, J. and Turskis, Z. (2016). Multi-Criteria Analysis of Electricity Generation Technologies in Lithuania. Renewable Energy, Vol. 85, 148-156

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.032

Emovon, I., Norman, R.A. and Murphy, A.J. (2017). The Development of a Model for Determining Scheduled Replacement Intervals for Marine Machinery Systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, Vol.231, No.3, 723- 739

https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090216681345

Emovon, I., Norman, R.A., Alan, J.M. and Pazouki, K. (2015). An Integrated Multicriteria Decision Making Methodology Using Compromise Solution Methods for Prioritising Risk of Marine Machinery Systems, Ocean Engineering, Vol.105, 92-103.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.005

Dağdeviren, M. (2008). Decision Making in Equipment Selection: An Integrated Approach with AHP and PROMETHEE, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol.19, No.4, 397-406.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0091-7

Goepel, K.D. (2014). BPMSG AHP Online System: Multi-Criteria Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.

Chakraborty, S. and Zavadskas, E.K. (2014). Applications of WASPAS Method in Manufacturing Decision Making, Informatica, Vol.25, No.1, 1-20.

https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2014.01

Petkovic, D., Madic, M. and Radenkovic, G. (2015). Selection of the Most Suitable Non-Conventional Machining Processes for Ceramics Machining by Using MCDMs, Science of Sintering, Vol.47, No.2, 229- 235.

https://doi.org/10.2298/SOS1502229P

Yazdani, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Ignatius, J. and Abad, M.D., 2016. Sensitivity Analysis in MADM Methods: Application of Material Selection, Engineering Economics, Vol.27, No.4, 382-391.

https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.27.4.14005

Downloads

Published

2018-03-31

How to Cite

Emovon, I. (2018). A Model for Determining Appropriate Speed Breaker Mechanism for Power Generation. Journal of Applied Science &Amp; Process Engineering, 5(1), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.33736/jaspe.601.2018