Evaluation of Sorghum Residues Valorization as an Alternative Non Wood Raw Material for Soda Pulp Production

Authors

  • Orrawan Panichjarern Innovation and Product Development /Plantation and Bioproduct, SCG Packaging PLC, Ratchaburi 70110, Thailand
  • Phungjai Tinnasulanon Innovation and Product Development /Plantation and Bioproduct, SCG Packaging PLC, Ratchaburi 70110, Thailand
  • Samart Khamthawee Research Laboratory and Services, SCG Packaging PLC, Ratchaburi 70110, Thailand
  • Somkid Sitichai Research Laboratory and Services, SCG Packaging PLC, Ratchaburi 70110, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33736/jaspe.13204.2026

Keywords:

Sorghum bicolor, Soda-Anthraquinone Pulping, Non-Wood Fiber, Agricultural Residues, Packaging Paper

Abstract

This study investigated soda-anthraquinone (soda-AQ) pulping of Thai Sorghum bicolor residues in two forms: whole stalks with leaves and stalks only. Whole stalks with leaves were pulped at NaOH charges of 12–24%, whereas stalks only were evaluated at 8–18%, with NaOH charge expressed as Na₂O on an oven-dry raw-material basis and AQ maintained at 0.1%. Increasing NaOH charge reduced kappa number and screen rejects but also decreased screened pulp yield. At 12% NaOH, whole stalks with leaves gave a screened yield of 37.71% and a kappa number of 28.80. For stalks only, increasing NaOH to 18% reduced the reject to 0.30%, with a screened yield of 37.54% and a kappa number of 10.44. Ring crush values reached 431 N (vs. 296 N for reference eucalyptus handsheets), and corrugating medium strength reached 398 N (vs. 384 N). The whole-stalk-with-leaves pulp exhibited a tensile index of 91.1 N·m/g, approximately 41.9% higher than the 64.2 N·m/g of the eucalyptus reference pulp. These results support the technical potential of undepithed sorghum residues as an alternative non-wood fiber source for unbleached packaging-paper applications. Further studies are required to establish multi-response criteria for selecting pulping conditions and to evaluate industrial, economic, and environmental performance.

References

Gullichsen, J., & Paulapuro, H. (2000). Papermaking science and technology: Chemical pulping. Finnish Paper Engineers' Association, TAPPI. ISBN: 9525216004

Kocurek, M. J. (1989). Pulp and paper manufacture: Alkaline pulping. TAPPI Press, Atlanta USA.

Sixta, H. (2006). Handbook of pulp. Wiley-VCH.

Belayachi, L., & Delmas, M. (1995). Sweet sorghum: A quality raw material for the manufacturing of chemical paper pulp. Biomass and Bioenergy, 8(6), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9534(95)00046-1

Belayachi, L., Delmas, M., & Gosse, G. (1997). Sweet sorghum bagasse: A raw material for the production of chemical paper pulp: Effect of depithing. Industrial Crops and Products, 6(3–4), 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6690(97)00012-5

Saeed, H. A. M., Liu, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Chen, H. (2017). Evaluation of Sudanese sorghum and bagasse as a pulp and paper feedstock. BioResources, 12(3), 5212–5222. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.12.3.5212-5222

Monot, N., Grelier, S., Brosse, N., & Navard, P. (2015). The use of a sulfur-free process for the production of cellulose fibers from mixed softwood species [Conference presentation]. Annual Convention of the Society of Wood Science and Technology. https://www.swst.org/meetings/AM15/pdfs/presentations/monot.pdf

Khristova, P., & Gabir, S. (1990). Soda-anthraquinone pulping of sorghum stalks. Biological Wastes, 33(4), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7483(90)90128-F

Wilson, J. R., Mertens, D. R., & Hatfield, R. D. (1993). Isolates of cell types from sorghum stems: Digestion, cell wall and anatomical characteristics. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 63(4), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740630406

Gençer, A., & Şahin, M. (2015). Identifying the conditions required for the NaOH method for producing pulp and paper from sorghum grown in Turkey. BioResources, 10(2), 2850–2858. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.10.2.2850-2858

Haile, A., Gebino, G., Tesfaye, T., Mengie, W., Ayele, M., Abuhay, A., & Yilie, D. (2023). Utilization of non-wood biomass for pulp manufacturing in paper industry: case of Ethiopia. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 13(9), 7441-7459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01424-x

Jahan, M. S., Rahman, M. M., & Ni, Y. (2020). Alternative initiatives for non-wood chemical pulping and integration with the biorefinery concept: A review. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 15(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2143

Worku, L. A., Bachheti, A., Bachheti, R. K., Rodrigues Reis, C. E., & Chandel, A. K. (2023). Agricultural residues as raw materials for pulp and paper production: Overview and applications on membrane fabrication. Membranes, 13(2), 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020228

Li, P., Xu, Y., Yin, L., Liang, X., Wang, R., & Liu, K. (2023). Development of raw materials and technology for pulping: A brief review. Polymers, 15(22), 4465. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15224465

Danielewicz, D. (2023). Industrial hemp as a potential nonwood source of fibres for European industrial-scale papermaking—A review. Materials, 16(19), 6548. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16196548

Abdallah, A. F., Jawaid, M., Mohamed, A. Z., Tahir, P. M., Osman, F. A., & Abdullah, U. H. (2024). A review on alkaline sulfite anthraquinone methanol as an alternative pulping process for non-woody biomass. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 14(24), 30861–30880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-05006-x

Wistara, N. J., & Fatriasari, W. (2023). Pulping and papermaking of sorghum bagasse. In Pulping and Papermaking of Nonwood Plant Fibers (pp. 213–231). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91625-7.00013-8

Karimah, A., Solihat, N. N., Hastuti, N., Ismayati, M., Ermawar, R. A., Sohail, A., Iswanto, A. H., Ariyanta, H. A., Ilyas, R. A., Dungani, R., & Fatriasari, W. (2023). The effect of active alkali and sulfidity loading on the kraft pulp properties of sweet sorghum bagasse. Sugar Tech, 25(5), 1196–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-023-01291-y

Li, M., Yan, G., Bhalla, A., Maldonado-Pereira, L., Russell, P. R., Ding, S.-Y., Mullet, J. E., & Hodge, D. B. (2018). Physical fractionation of sweet sorghum and forage/energy sorghum for optimal processing in a biorefinery. Industrial Crops and Products, 124, 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.07.002

Silva, T. N., Thomas, J. B., Dahlberg, J., Rhee, S. Y., & Mortimer, J. C. (2022). Progress and challenges in sorghum biotechnology, a multipurpose feedstock for the bioeconomy. Journal of Experimental Botany, 73(3), 646–664. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab450

Panichjarern, O. (2026). Potential of sorghum for pulp, paper and bioenergy industries. Journal of Applied Science and Innovation, 1(2), Article 26205. https://li02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jasi/article/view/1881

Lee, C. L., Chin, K. L., H’ng, P. S., Hafizuddin, M. S., & Khoo, P. S. (2022). Valorisation of underutilized grass fibre (stem) as a potential material for paper production. Polymers, 14(23), 5203. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14235203

Lemma, H. B., Steffen, F., Ali, A. Y., & Saake, B. (2024). Production of long-fiber pulp from Enset plant residues by soda pulping. Molecules, 29(20), 4874. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29204874

Iglesias, A., Cancela, Á., Soler Baena, A., & Sánchez, Á. (2023). Characterization of cellulose derived from invasive alien species plant waste for application in the papermaking industry: Physic-mechanical, optical, and chemical property analysis. Applied Sciences, 13(20), 11568. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132011568

Divya, R., Indumathi, T. R., Venugopal, T., & Prakash, C. (2024). Investigation on potential application of non-wood pulp for hygiene products as absorbent core substantial. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 14(14), 16363–16368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03725-1

Said, A. E. A. A., Aly, A. A., Mostafa, A. H., Ahmed, H. S., & Goda, M. N. (2023). An approach for application of ozone bleaching and nano‐filler loading on quality of papermaking from sorghum bagasse as a promise alternative non‐wood fiber. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 42(5), e14159. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.14159

Jurado, J., Huilcapi, V., Suarez, I., & Lopez, A. (2026). A sustainable approach to paper production from Eichhornia crassipes to strengthen the non-wood fiber industry. Fibers, 14(6), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib14060068

Melesse, E. Y., Bedru, T. K., & Meshesha, B. T. (2022). Production and characterization of pulp from banana pseudo stem for paper making via soda anthraquinone pulping process. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 58, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.58.63

Worku, L. A., Bachheti, R. K., Tadesse, M. G., Bachheti, A., Alshammari, A., Albekairi, N. A., Kabra, A., & Alemu, W. K. (2024). Exploring Oxytenanthera abyssinica as a sustainable alternative for pulp and paper production: A response surface methodology approach for optimized soda pulping. Journal of King Saud University - Science, 36, 103230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2024.103230

Khan, M. U., Rehman, A., Khan, M. A., Khan, A. R., Ali, S., & Ahmad, Z. (2024). Utilization of non-wood fibers as raw materials for pulp and paper production in Pakistan: A review. Pakistan Journal of Forestry, 74(2), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.PJF/2024/74.2.53.62

Kanbar, A., Lemma, H. B., Saake, B., Stolzenburg, K., & Nick, P. (2026). Potential of sorghum stalk as climate resilient resource for paper production. BioResources, 21(3), 7247–7263. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.21.3.7247-7263

Hájková, K., Bárta, J., Filipi, M., & Sikora, A. (2026). Comparative evaluation of soda and nitrate-alkaline pulping of hemp, flax, and sisal post-harvest biomass. ChemistryOpen, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/open.202500614

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

How to Cite

Panichjarern, O., Tinnasulanon, P. ., Khamthawee, S. ., & Sitichai, S. . (2026). Evaluation of Sorghum Residues Valorization as an Alternative Non Wood Raw Material for Soda Pulp Production. Journal of Applied Science &Amp; Process Engineering, 13(2), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.33736/jaspe.13204.2026