Anthropomorphism And Authenticity Exploring The Dynamics Of Virtual Influencers In Contemporary Marketing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.7631.2024Keywords:
virtual influencer, influencer marketing, anthropomorphism, perceived authenticity, intention to engageAbstract
This study investigates the influence of Virtual Influencers (VIs) on consumer behaviour and their implications for brands. The objective is to understand how consumers perceive and interact with VIs compared to traditional human influencers. Findings reveal that VIs offer unique advantages, including constant availability, adaptability, and cost-effectiveness, which can enhance brand engagement. However, concerns about authenticity, trustworthiness, and ethical implications persist. Utilizing anthropomorphism theory, the study demonstrates that brands can foster consumer connection and trust by imbuing VIs with human-like traits. Detailed analysis indicates that while VIs can effectively engage consumers, the perceived lack of authenticity poses a challenge. Nevertheless, when VIs are strategically integrated into marketing campaigns, they can significantly influence consumer behaviour and brand perception. Ultimately, these insights enable companies to develop targeted marketing strategies, leveraging VIs to shape consumer culture and brand narratives effectively. This research underscores the potential of VIs in modern marketing, providing a framework for brands to navigate the evolving digital landscape.
References
Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Is that car smiling at me? schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 468-479. https://doi.org/10.1086/518544
https://doi.org/10.1086/518544
Amelina, D., & Zhu, Y.-Q. (2016). Investigating effectiveness of source credibility elements on social commerce endorsement: The case of Instagram in Indonesia. Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems 2016, 232-242.
Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2020). The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1
Baron-Cohen, S., Ring, H., Moriarty, J., Schmitz, B., Costa, D., & Ell, P. (1994). Recognition of mental state terms. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165(5), 640-649.
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.165.5.640
Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S. (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3
Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x
Bergkvist, L., & Zhou, K. Q. (2016). Celebrity endorsements: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Advertising, 35(4), 642-663. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1137537
https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1137537
Bianchi, C., & Andrews, L. (2018). Consumer engagement with retail firms through social media: An empirical study in Chile. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 46(4), 364-385. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-02-2017-0035
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-02-2017-0035
Bodenhausen, G. V., Kramer, G. P., & Süsser, K. (1994). Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 621-632. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.621
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.621
Carter, D. (2016). Hustle and brand: The sociotechnical shaping of influence. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 205630511666630. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116666305
https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116666305
Chang, S. E., Shen, W.-C., & Liu, A. Y. (2016). Why mobile users trust smartphone social networking services? A PLS-SEM approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4890-4895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.048
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.048
Conti, M., Gathani, J., & Tricomi, P. P. (2022). Virtual influencers in online social media. IEEE Communications Magazine, 60(8), 86-91. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2100786
https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2100786
Cornelis, E., & Peter, P. C. (2017). The real campaign: The role of authenticity in the effectiveness of advertising disclaimers in digitally enhanced images. Journal of Business Research, 77, 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.018
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.018
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
DiSalvo, C., & Gemperle, F. (2003). From seduction to fulfillment: The use of anthropomorphic form in design. Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1145/782896.782913
https://doi.org/10.1145/782896.782913
Douglass, R. (2022). The rise of virtual influencers: The phenomena taking over fashion marketing. Retrieved 22 February, 2024, from fashionunited.com: https://fashionunited.com/news/business/the-rise-of-virtual-influencers-the-phenomena-taking-over-fashion-marketing/2022122051334
Duffy, B. R. (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3-4), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864-886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
Evers, V., Maldonado, H. C., Brodecki, T. L., & Hinds, P. J. (2008). Relational vs. group self-construal: Untangling the role of national culture in HRI. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, 255-262. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349856
https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349856
Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279-305. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04
https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
He, Y., Li, W., & Xue, J. (2022). What and how driving consumer engagement and purchase intention in officer live streaming? A two-factor theory perspective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 56, 101223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101223
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101223
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
Jacks, C. (2023). What Is An Influencer?. Retrieved March 31, 2024, from hireinfluence.com: https://hireinfluence.com/blog/what-is-an-influencer/
Kádeková, Z., & Holienčinová, M. (2018). Influencer marketing as a modern phenomenon creating a new frontier of virtual opportunities. Communication Today, 9(2), 90-105.
Kesmodel, U. S. (2018). Cross‐sectional studies - what are they good for? Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 97(4), 388-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13331
https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13331
Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H.-Y. (2021). Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. Journal of Business Research, 134, 223-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.024
Koles, B., Audrezet, A., Moulard, J. G., Ameen, N., & McKenna, B. (2024). The authentic virtual influencer: Authenticity manifestations in the metaverse. Journal of Business Research, 170, 114325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114325
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114325
Lee, J. A., & Eastin, M. S. (2021). Perceived authenticity of social media influencers: Scale development and validation. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(4), 822-841. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-12-2020-0253
https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-12-2020-0253
Lim, R. E., & Lee, S. Y. (2023). "You are a virtual influencer!": Understanding the impact of origin disclosure and emotional narratives on parasocial relationships and virtual influencer credibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 148, 107897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107897
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107897
Lloyd, A. E., & Luk, S. T. K. (2011). Interaction behaviors leading to comfort in the service encounter. Journal of Services Marketing, 25(3), 176-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041111129164
https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041111129164
Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501 Machneva, M., Evans, A. M., & Stavrova, O. (2022). Consensus and (lack of) accuracy in perceptions of avatar trustworthiness. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 107017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107017
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107017
Malhotra, G., & Ramalingam, M. (2023). Perceived anthropomorphism and purchase intention using artificial intelligence technology: Examining the moderated effect of trust. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2022-0316
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2022-0316
Masuda, H., Han, S. H., & Lee, J. (2022). Impacts of influencer attributes on purchase intentions in social media influencer marketing: Mediating roles of characterizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121246
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121246
Miao, F., Kozlenkova, I. V., Wang, H., Xie, T., & Palmatier, R. W. (2022). An emerging theory of avatar marketing. Journal of Marketing, 86(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242921996646
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242921996646
Miller, F. M. (2015). Ad authenticity: An alternative explanation of advertising's effect on established brand attitudes. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 36(2), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2015.1023871
https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2015.1023871
Mori, M., MacDorman, K., & Kageki, N. (2012). The uncanny valley [From the Field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19(2), 98-100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811
https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811
Moustakas, E., Lamba, N., Mahmoud, D., & Ranganathan, C. (2020). Blurring lines between fiction and reality: Perspectives of experts on marketing effectiveness of virtual influencers. 2020 International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberSecurity49315.2020.9138861
https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberSecurity49315.2020.9138861
Muniz, F., Stewart, K., & Magalhães, L. (2024). Are they humans or are they robots? The effect of virtual influencer disclosure on brand trust. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(3), 1234-1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2271
https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2271
Na, Y., Kim, Y., & Lee, D. (2023). Investigating the effect of self-congruity on attitudes toward virtual influencers: Mediating the effect of emotional attachment. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2238365
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2238365
Puspitasari, A. F. (2014). Brand awareness, ad attitudes and ad features toward engagement on Youtube: an empirical study of green automobiles. Asia Pacific Management and Business Application, 2(3), 170-183. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.apmba.2014.002.03.3
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.apmba.2014.002.03.3
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of Market Research (pp. 587-632). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15
Schallehn, M., Burmann, C., & Riley, N. (2014). Brand authenticity: Model development and empirical testing. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 23(3), 192-199. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2013-0339
https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2013-0339
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Shen, Z. (2024). Shall brands create their own virtual influencers? A comprehensive study of 33 virtual influencers on Instagram. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02698-y
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02698-y
Stockemer, D. (2019). Quantitative Methods for the Social Sciences: A Practical Introduction with Examples in SPSS and Stata. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99118-4
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99118-4
Timpano, K. R., & Shaw, A. M. (2013). Conferring humanness: The role of anthropomorphism in hoarding. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 383-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.007 Torres, P., Augusto, M., & Matos, M. (2019). Antecedents and outcomes of digital influencer endorsement: An exploratory study. Psychology & Marketing, 36(12), 1267-1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21274
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21274
Tran, V. D., & Nguyen, T. D. (2022). The impact of security, individuality, reputation, and consumer attitudes on purchase intention of online shopping: The evidence in Vietnam. Cogent Psychology, 9(1), 2035530. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2022.2035530
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2022.2035530
Waytz, A., Heafner, J., & Epley, N. (2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005
Yang, J., Chuenterawong, P., Lee, H., & Chock, T. M. (2023). Anthropomorphism in CSR endorsement: A comparative study on humanlike vs. cartoonlike virtual influencers' climate change messaging. Journal of Promotion Management, 29(5), 705-734. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2022.2163041
https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2022.2163041
Yogeeswaran, K., Złotowski, J., Livingstone, M., Bartneck, C., Sumioka, H., & Ishiguro, H. (2016). The interactive effects of robot anthropomorphism and robot ability on perceived threat and support for robotics research. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 5(2), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.5.2.Yogeeswaran
https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.5.2.Yogeeswaran
Yoon, D., & Kim, Y.-K. (2016). Effects of self-congruity and source credibility on consumer responses to coffeehouse advertising. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 25(2), 167-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2014.1001932
https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2014.1001932
Young, J. E., Sung, J., Voida, A., Sharlin, E., Igarashi, T., Christensen, H. I., & Grinter, R. E. (2011). Evaluating human-robot interaction: Focusing on the holistic interaction experience. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0081-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0081-8
Złotowski, J., Proudfoot, D., Yogeeswaran, K., & Bartneck, C. (2015). Anthropomorphism: Opportunities and challenges in human-robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(3), 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0267-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
