THE EFFECT OF AUDIT CHARACTERISTICS ON FINANCIAL REPORTING QUALITY AND THE MEDIATING ROLE OF AUDIT QUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM MALAYSIAN PUBLIC COMPANIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.6920.2024Keywords:
Audit characteristics, Financial reporting quality, Audit quality, Malaysian companiesAbstract
Our paper examines the effect of audit characteristics on financial reporting quality (FRQ) and the role of audit quality (AQ) as a mediator. The study adopted 201 companies listed in Malaysian Bursa from 2017 to 2019 to achieve our objective. The study used Stata to analyze the data to estimate the effect proposed in the hypotheses. Findings show that only audit fees affected FRQ positively. At the same time, audit fees and company size have positively influenced AQ. On the other hand, AQ has improved the link between audit characteristics and FRQ since the results show a positive effect of audit tenure, audit fees, and audit company size on FRQ through the mediator. This research can help the Institute of Internal Auditors and the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners improve their rules and regulations by enhancing audit characteristics, technical competence, and functionality to help organizations improve AQ. The study's findings are relevant to governments and investors worldwide worried about FRQ and want to guarantee that operations in Malaysia and other emerging markets are closely monitored.
References
Aguilar, N., Biedma López, E., & Ruiz Barbadillo, E. (2018). The effect of audit partner rotation on audit quality. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 21(1), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2017.03.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2017.03.001
Ahmed, M. G., Ganesan, Y., Hashim, F., & Sadaa, A. M. (2021). The Effect of Chairman Tenure on Governance and Earnings Management: A Case Study in Iraq. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 1205-1215. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.1205
Aldegis, A. M., Ganesan, Y., & Sadaa, A. M. (2023). Nomination and remuneration committee and firm performance: Evidence from jordan. International Journal of Business and Society, 1-18.
Asthana, S., Khurana, I., & Raman, K. (2019). Fee competition among Big 4 auditors and audit quality. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 52(2), 403-438.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0714-9
Azzam, M., Alrabba, H., AlQudah, A., & Mansur, H. (2020). A study on the relationship between internal and external audits on financial reporting quality. Management Science Letters, 10(4), 937-942.
https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.10.001
Cahan, S. F., & Sun, J. (2015). The effect of audit experience on audit fees and audit quality. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 30(1), 78-100.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X14544503
Carcello, J. V., & Nagy, A. L. (2004). Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing, 23(2), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.2.55
https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.2.55
Cho, M., Kwon, S. Y., & Krishnan, G. V. (2021). Audit fee lowballing: Determinants, recovery, and future audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(4), 106787.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106787
Choi, J.-H., Kim, C., Kim, J.-B., & Zang, Y. (2010). Audit office size, audit quality, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 73-97.
https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.73
Christ, M. H., Masli, A., Sharp, N. Y., & Wood, D. A. (2015). Rotational internal audit programs and financial reporting quality: Do compensating controls help? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 44, 37-59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.05.004
Chu, L., Dai, J., & Zhang, P. (2018). Auditor tenure and quality of financial reporting. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 33(4), 528-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X16665701
https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X16665701
Comprix, J., & Huang, H. (2015). Does auditor size matter? Evidence from small audit firms. Advances in accounting, 31(1), 11-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2015.03.007
Dechow, P. M., & Dichev, I. D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The accounting review, 77(s-1), 35-59.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35
DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of accounting and economics, 58(2-3), 275-326.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
El Guindy, M. N., & Trabelsi, N. S. (2020). IFRS adoption/reporting and auditor fees: the conditional effect of audit firm size and tenure. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 28(4), 639-666. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-09-2019-0107
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-09-2019-0107
Francis, J. R., & Yu, M. D. (2009). Big 4 office size and audit quality. The accounting review, 84(5), 1521-1552.
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1521
Fredriksson, A., Kiran, A., & Niemi, L. (2018). Reputation Capital of Directorships and Audit Quality. European Accounting Review, 29(5), 901-926. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1724550.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1724550
Ganesan, Y., Narayanan, R., Haron, H., & Allah Pitchay, A. (2019). Does Audit Fees and Non-Audit Fees Matters in Audit Quality? KnE Social Sciences, 2019(1981), 1074-1083. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i22.5112.
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i22.5112
Hamilton, J. M., Ruddock, C. M. S., Stokes, D. J., & Taylor, S. L. (2005). Audit Partner Rotation, Earnings Quality and Earnings Conservatism. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-42. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.740846
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.740846
Horton, J., Livne, G., & Pettinicchio, A. (2021). Empirical evidence on audit quality under a dual mandatory auditor rotation rule. European Accounting Review, 30(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1747513
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1747513
Huang, T. C., Chang, H., & Chiou, J. R. (2015). Audit market concentration, audit fees, and audit quality: Evidence from China. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(2), 121-145.
https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51299
Jain, S., & Agarwalla, S. K. (2022). Big-4 auditors and audit quality: a novel firm life-cycle approach. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(5), 1436-1452. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2021-1344. .
https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2021-1344
Kalabeke, W., Sadiq, M., & Keong, O. C. (2019). Auditors tenure and financial reporting quality: Evidence from a developing country. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 9(5), 335-341. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2019.95.335.341
https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2019.95.335.341
Kasznik, R. (1999). On the association between voluntary disclosure and earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(1), 57-81.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2491396
Kim, S., Cho, H., Cho, M., Lee, B. B. H., & Lee, W. J. (2023). Flexible CPA staffing in non‐Big 4 audit firms: Its determinants and implications for audit fees and audit quality. International Journal of Auditing. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12335.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12335
Kusnadi, Y., Leong, K. S., Suwardy, T., & Wang, J. (2016). Audit committees and financial reporting quality in Singapore. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(1), 197-214.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2679-0
Lin, C. J., Lin, H. L., & Yen, A. R. (2014). Dual audit, audit firm independence, and auditor conservatism. Review of Accounting and Finance, 13(1), 65-87.
https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-06-2012-0053
Mahama, M. (2015). Detecting corporate fraud and financial distress using the Atman and Beneish models. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(1), 1-18.
Martani, D., Rahmah, N. A., Fitriany, F., & Anggraita, V. (2021). Impact of audit tenure and audit rotation on the audit quality: Big 4 vs non big 4. Cogent Economics and Finance, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.1901395
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.1901395
Nation. (2018, 27 Jun 2018). Auditors: No 1MDB accounts are true and fair. The Star Online. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2018/06/27/auditors-no-1mdb-accounts-are-true-and-fair/
Ngo, D. N. P., & Van Nguyen, C. (2022). Does the CEO's financial and accounting expertise affect the financial reporting quality? Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-09-2021-0301.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-09-2021-0301
Nguyen, Q. K. (2023). Women in top executive positions, external audit quality and financial reporting quality: evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-03-2023-0059
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, P. (2011). Improving the transparency of audits: proposed amendments to pcaob auditing standards and form 2 (Vol. 53, Issue 9). www.pcaobus.org
Rong, Q. (2017). Mandatory Audit Firm and Audit Partner Rotation. Honors Theses and
Capstones. 351. https://scholars.unh.edu/honors/351.
Sadaa, A. M., Ganesan, Y., & Ahmed, M. G. (2023a). The effect of earnings quality and bank continuity: the moderating role of ownership structure and CSR. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(1), 366-386.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1858690
Sadaa, A. M., Ganesan, Y., Khaw, W. K., Alnoor, A., & Abbas, S. (2022). Based on the perception of ethics in social commerce platforms : Adopting SEM and MCDM approaches for benchmarking customers in rural communities. In Current Psychology. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04069-9
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04069-9
Sadaa, A. M., Ganesan, Y., Yet, C. E., Alkhazaleh, Q., Alnoor, A., & aldegis, A. M. (2023b). Corporate governance as antecedents and financial distress as a consequence of credit risk. Evidence from Iraqi banks. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100051
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100051
Salehi, M., Zimon, G., Tarighi, H., & Gholamzadeh, J. (2022). The Effect of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation on Earnings Management and Audit Fees: Evidence from Iran. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(3), 102.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15030102
Singh, K. S. D., Ravindran, S., Ganesan, Y., Abbasi, G. A., & Haron, H. (2021). Antecedents and internal audit quality implications of internal audit effectiveness. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 16(2), 1-21.
Sukumaran, T. (2019, 30/Jan/2019). Malaysia fines auditor Deloitte US$535,000 for 1MDB breaches. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/southeast-asia/article/2184302/malaysia-fines-audit-firm-deloitte-serious-breaches-linked
Timothy, B., Doogar, R., & Solomon, I. (2008). Audit Labor Usage and Fees under Business Risk Auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(4), 729-760. doi:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00291.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00291.x
Xu, H., Dao, M., & Sun, H. (2023). Accounting firms' employee satisfaction and audit fees. Accounting and Business Research, 53(7), 821-852.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2022.2049193
Yatim, P., Kent, P., & Clarkson, P. (2006). Governance structures, ethnicity, and audit fees of Malaysian listed firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(7), 757-782.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900610680530
Zarinah, A. (2007). Future Direction of the Legal and Regulatory Framework for Malaysia's Capital Market. Retrieved from http://www.sc.com.my/post_archive/keynote-address-by-ybhg-dato-zarinah-anwar-chairman-securitiescommission-at-the-miba-regional-capital-market-conference/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
