TO WHAT EXTENT DOES SPIRITUALITY IN THE WORKPLACE AFFECT MEANINGFULNESS IN WORK? SELF-TRANSCENDENCE AND PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT AS MEDIATOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.6917.2024Keywords:
Workplace Spirituality, Self-Transcendence, Person-Organization Fit, Meaningful WorkAbstract
The goal of this research was to investigate and analyze the relationship between spirituality in the workplace and self-transcendence, Person-Organization Fit, and achieving meaningful work (Meaningful Work). This study's population consisted of employees of the Public Works and Public Housing Office of Bengkulu Province, with a planned sample size of 258 respondents using the census method. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is used in this study to test construct validity (convergent validity and discriminant validity) and reliability. Then, using SmartPLS 3.0, an explanation of statistical descriptions related to respondent profiles, hypothesis testing with path analysis, and testing of indirect effects are provided. According to the study's findings, spirituality in the workplace can increase a person's compatibility with their organization and self-transcendence. However, spirituality at work cannot increase work meaning. Meaning at work cannot be increased by self-transcendence, despite the fact that P-O fit can increase meaning at work. Self-transcendence cannot mediate the relationship between spirituality at work and increasing meaningfulness at work in the mediating relationship. This is inversely proportional to the P-O fit, which can act as a bridge between the influence of spirituality at work and meaningfulness at work.
References
Afsar, B., & Rehman, M (2015). The relationship between workplace spirituality and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of perceived person-organization fit. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 12, 329-353.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2015.1060515
Afsar, B., Badir, Y., & Kiani, U. S. (2016). Linking spiritual leadership and employee pro- environmental behavior: The influence of workplace spirituality, intrinsic motivation, and environmental passion. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 79-88.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.011
Ashfaq, B., & Hamid, A. (2021). Person-organization fit and organization citizenship behavior: modeling the work engagement as a mediator as a mediator. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 13(1), 19-39.
https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-12-2019-0255
Bailey, C., & Madden, A. (2016). What makes work meaningful-or meaningless?. MIT Sloan management review, 57(4).
Banyhamdan, K. M. T., Harrim, H., & Al-Qutop, M. A. Y. (2012). Transforming an organizational into a spiritual one: A five-pathway integrated framework. International Journal of Business and Management, 7, 74 - 86. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n11p74
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n11p74
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bochner, A. P. (1997). It's about time: Narrative and the divided self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(4), 418-438.
https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049700300404
Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2009). Calling and vocation at work: Definitions and prospects for research and practice. The counseling psychologist, 37(3), 424-450.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000008316430
Driscoll, C., McIsaac, E. M., & Wiebe, E. (2019). The material nature of spirituality in the small business workplace: from transcendent ethical values to immanent ethical actions. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 16(2), 155-177. Duchon, D., & Plowman, A. T. (2005). Nurturing the spirit at work: Impact on work unit performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 807-833.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2019.1570474
Ghozali, I. (2008). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS.Semarang:UNDIP Press.
Hyland, M. E., Masters, K. S., Wheeler, P., & Kamble, S. (2010). A sense of 'special connection', self-transcendent values and a common factor for religious and non-religious spirituality. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 32(3), 293-326.
https://doi.org/10.1163/157361210X533265
Kendall, M. (2019). Workplace Spirituality and the Motivational Impact of Meaningful Work: An Experimental Study. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 19(2), 74-92.
https://doi.org/10.33423/jop.v19i2.2045
Klaus, L & Fernando, M. (2016). Enacting spiritual leadership in business through ego- transcendence. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 37. 71-92. 10.1108/LODJ-04-2014-0078
https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2014-0078
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, persongroup, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281-342.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
Miller, D. W., & Ngunjiri, F. W. (2015). Leadership views on corporate chaplains: Business, sociocultural, and spiritual justifications. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 12(2), 129-155.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2014.950318
Milliman, J., Ausar, K., & Bradley-Geist, J. C. (2017). The implications of workplace spirituality for person-environment fit theory. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(1), 1.
https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000068
Milliman, J., Ferguson, J., Trickett, D. and Condemi, B. (1999), Spirit and community at Southwest Airlines: an investigation of a spiritual values-based model, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(3), 221-33.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09534819910273928
Nikkhah, Z., & Bagherieh-mashhadi, A. (2017). The Impact of Person-Organization Fit and Organizational Commitment on Counterproductive Work Behavior: An Empirical Study on Health Sector." 13Th International Conference on Knowledge, Economy & Management Proceedings (May): 69-76
Pandey, A. (2017). Workplace spirituality: Themes, impact and research directions. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 4(2), 212-217.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2322093717732630
Pawar, B. S. (2014). Leadership spiritual behaviors toward subordinates: An empirical examination of the effects of a leader's individual spirituality and organizational spirituality. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(3), 439-452
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1772-5
Pawar, Badrinaraya. (2009). Individual spirituality, workplace spirituality and work attitudes: An empirical test of direct and interaction effects. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 30. 759-777. 10.1108/01437730911003911.
https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730911003911
Petchsawang, P., & McLean, G. N. (2017). Workplace spirituality, mindfulness meditation, and work engagement. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 14(3), 216-244.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2017.1291360
Pfeffer, J. (2003), "Business and spirit: management practices that sustain values", in Giacalone, R.A. and Jurkiewicz, C.L. (Eds), The Handbook of Workplace Spirituality and Organizational Performance, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY.
Rath, T., & Harter, J. (2010). Wellbeing: The five essential elements. Gallup Press.
Rego, A., & Pina e Cunha, M. (2008). Workplace spirituality and organizational commitment: An empirical study. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21(1), 53-75.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810810847039
Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2013). Greening organizations through leaders' influence on employees' pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 176e194. Saks, A. M. (2011). Workplace spirituality and employee engagement. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 8(4), 317-340.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1820
Steger, M. F. (2016). Creating meaning and purpose at work. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Positivity and Strengths‐Based Approaches at Work, 60-81.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118977620.ch5
Steger, M.F., & Dik, B.J. (2009). If one is looking for meaning in life, does it help to find meaning at work? Applied Psychology: Health and Wellbeing, 1, 303-320.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01018.x
Steger, M.F., Dik, B.J., & Duffy, R.D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 20, 322-337.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711436160
Venter, H. J. (2016). Self-transcendence: Maslow"s answer to cultural closeness. Journal of Innovation Management, 4(4), 3-7.
https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_004.004_0002
Verquer, M. L., Beehr, T. A., & Wagner, S. H. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person-organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 473-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00036-2.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00036-2
Wheeler, P., & Hyland, M. E. (2008). The development of a scale to measure the experience of spiritual connection and the correlation between this experience and values. Spirituality and Health International, 9(4), 193-217.
https://doi.org/10.1002/shi.348
Whitaker, B. G., & Westerman, J. W. (2014). Linking spirituality and values to personal initiative through psychological empowerment. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 11, 269 -291. http://dx.doi .org/10.1080/14766086.2014.905221
https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2014.905221
Zou, W. C., & Dahling, J. (2017). Workplace spirituality buffers the effects of emotional labour on employee well-being. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(5), 768-777.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
