THE RECEPTIVENESS PUZZLE: UNDERSTANDING WHY SMALL FAMILY BUSINESSES STRUGGLE WITH ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING ADOPTION
Abstract
This study examines the challenges associated with the adoption of activity-based costing (ABC) in a small family business in a less developed country. Through a case study of PT XYZ, a logistic company, the study found that technical factors, including unpredictable customer requests, varying duration of activities, and uncertainty around distance and fuel consumption for each truck, make adopting the ABC method challenging. Organizational factors, such as a top-down hierarchy and the negative perception of the owner affecting the rest of the hierarchy, also contribute to the non-acceptance of ABC. Additionally, key agents within the company did not demonstrate enthusiasm toward changes. The cultural and contextual factors and unique characteristics of small family businesses further make them less receptive to adopting new ideas or changes, including the ABC method. This study offers practical implications for introducing changes, such as improving data collection processes, establishing better communication channels with family business owners, and seeking external expertise or advice from professionals with experience in family business management. The study expands the current discussion on ABC implementation and contributes to the family business literature by linking family business characteristics with the adoption of the ABC method.
References
Akyol, D. E., Tuncel, G., & Bayhan, G. M. (2007). A comparative analysis of activity-based costing and traditional costing. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation, 1(3), 136-139.
Alsayegh, M. F. (2020). Activity based costing around the world: Adoption, implementation, outcomes and criticism. Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies, 6(1), 251-262.
https://doi.org/10.26710/jafee.v6i1.1074
Altawati, N. O. M. T., Kim-Soon, N., Ahmad, A. R., & Elmabrok, A. A. (2018). A review of traditional cost system versus activity based costing approaches. Advanced Science Letters, 24(6), 4688-4694.
https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.11682
Askarany, D., Yasdifar, H., & Askary, S. (2010). Supply chain management, activity-based costing and organisational factors. International Journal of Production Economics, 127(238-248).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.08.004
Berliner, C., & Brimson, J. A. (1988). Cost Management for Today's Advanced Manufacturing: The CAM-I Conceptual Design. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Bjørnenak, T., & Mitchell, F. (2002). The development of activity-based costing journal literature, 1987-2000. European Accounting Review, 11(3), 481-508.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818022000001019
Bokor, Z., & Markovits-Somogyi, R. (2015). Applying activity-based costing at logistics service providers. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 43(2), 98-105.
https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.7700
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brewer, P. C. (1998). National culture and activity-based costing systems: a note. Management Accounting Research, 9(2), 241-260.
https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1998.0077
Brown, D. A., Booth, P., & Giacobbe, F. (2004). Technological and organizational influences on the adoption of activity-based costing in Australia. Accounting and Finance, 44(3), 329-356.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629x.2004.00118.x
Charaf, K., & Bescos, P.L. (2013). The Role of Organizational and Cultural Factors in the Adoption of Activity-based Costing: The Case of Moroccan Firms. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 12(1), 4-21.
Chen, T. Y., Dasgupta, S., & Yu, Y. (2014). Transparency and Financing Choices of Family Firms. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(2), 381-408.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109014000313
Chongruksut, W., & Brooks, A. (2005). The adoption and implementation of activity-based costing in Thailand. Asian Review of Accounting, 13(2), 1-17.
https://doi.org/10.1108/eb060784
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publication Ltd.
Dias, M., & Davila Junior, E. (2018). Overcoming Succession Conflicts in a Limestone Family Business in Brazil. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 6(7), 58-73.
Fei, Z. Y., & Isa, C. R. (2010). Factors influencing activity-based costing success a research framework. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 1(2), 144-151.
https://doi.org/10.7763/IJTEF.2010.V1.26
Hammami, H., Al-Omiri, M., Bouraoui, T., & Ousama, A. A. (2019). Target Costing: Adoption and its Relationships with Competition Intensity, Intended Strategy and Firm Size. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 14(3), 223-250.
https://doi.org/10.24191/APMAJ.v14i3-10
Kakkonen, M.-L. (2011). Intuition of Family Entrepreneurs: An Exploratory Study of Perceptions and Experiences. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 13(01), 47-67.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495805000057
Kennedy, T., & Affleck-Graves, J. (2001). The impact of activity-based costing techniques on firm performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13(1), 19-41.
https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2001.13.1.19
Krumwiede, K. R. (1998). The implementation stages of activity-based costing and the impact of contextual and organizational factors. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10, 239-277.
Kumar, N., & Mahto, D. (2013). A Comparative Analysis and Implementation of Activity Based Costing (ABC) and Traditional Cost Accounting (TCA) Methods in an Automobile Parts Manufacturing Company: A Case Study. Global Journal of Management and Business Research Accounting and Auditing, 13(4), 31-43.
Lien, Y. C., & Li, S. (2014). Professionalization of Family Business and Performance Effect. Family Business Review, 27(4), 346-364.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486513482971
Liu, L. Y. J., & Pan, F. (2007). The implementation of Activity-Based Costing in China: An innovation action research approach. The British Accounting Review, 39(3), 249-264.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2007.05.003
Lueg, R., & Storgaard, N. (2017). The Adoption and Implementation of Activity-Based Costing: a Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Strategic Management, 17(2), 7-24.
https://doi.org/10.18374/IJSM-17-2.1
Maelah, R., & Ibrahim, D. N. (2006). Activity Based Costing (ABC) Adoption Among Manufacturing Organizations - The Case of Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Society, 7(1), 70-101.
Manesh, M. F., Flamini, G., Damiano Petrolo, & Palumbo, R. (2022). A round of dancing and then one more: embedding intuition in the ballet of entrepreneurial decision making. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18, 499-528.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00752-8
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation (Second). John Wiley & Sons.
Pazarceviren, S. Y., & Celayir, D. (2013). Target Costing Based on the Activity-Based Costing Method and a Model Proposal. European Scientific Journal, 4, 1-21.
Pietrzak, Z., Wnuk-Pel, T., & Christauskas, C. (2020). Problems with activity-based costing implementation in Polish and Lithuanian companies. Engineering Economics, 31(1), 26-38.
https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.31.1.24339
Pope, C., & Mays, N. (2000). Observational methods in health care settings. Qualitative research in health care, 2, 30-39.
Prasad, K. D., Mubeen, S. A., & Rajani, B. (2021). Activity-based Costing (ABC) for Better Cost Management. Business Studies Journal, 13(1), 1-8.
Qian, L., & Ben-Arieh, D. (2008). Parametric cost estimation based on activity-based costing: A case study for design and development of rotational parts. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(2), 805-818.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.08.010
Quesado, P., & Silva, R. (2021). Activity-based costing (ABC) and its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 1-20.
https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010041
Rankin, R. (2020). The Predictive Impact of Contextual Factors on Activity-based Costing Adoption. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 20(1), 66-81.
https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v20i1.2742
Raucci, D., & Lepore, D. (2020). A Simplified Activity-Based Costing Approach for SMEs: The Case Study of an Italian Small Road Company. European Research Studies Journal, 1, 198-214.
https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1545
Roztocki, N. (2010). Activity-based management for electronic commerce: A structured implementation procedure. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 5(1), 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762010000100002
Sarihan, A.Y, & Marsap, B. (2019). Costing logistics activities of logistics service companies: A case study and a model proposal. Journal of Accounting & Finance, 301-312.
Sartorius, K., Eitzen, C., & Kamala, P. (2007). The design and implementation of activity-based costing (ABC): A South African survey. Meditari Accountancy Research, 15(2),1-21. Research Journal of the School of Accountancy Sciences (15)2, 1-21.
https://doi.org/10.1108/10222529200700008
Scott, M., & Bruce, R. (1987). Five stages of growth in small business. Long Range Planning, 20(3), 45-52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(87)90071-9
Shields, M. D. (1995). An empirical analysis of firms implementation experiences with activity-based costing. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7,148-166.
Singer, M., & Donoso, P. (2006). Strategic decision-making at a steel manufacturer assisted by linear programming. Journal of Business Research, 59(3), 387-390.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.09.017
Tam, N. T., & Tuan, L. A. (2020). Factors influencing adoption of activity-based costing in developing country. Management Science Letters, 10(14), 3331-3338.
https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.6.004
Tien, N. H., Minh, H. T. T., Ngoc, N. M., & Nhan, V. K. (2019). Family Business in Vietnam and in Poland: Review of Characteristics and Trends of Development. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 54(6), 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.54.6.20
Vizcaino, F. V., Lanchimba, C., Contreras, O. L., & Alonso-Dos-Santos, M. (2021). Personalized service and brand equity in family business a dyadic investigation. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 31(2), 62-79.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research Design and Methods (Fourth). SAGE Publication Ltd.
Zhang, Y. F., Hoque, Z., & Isa, C. R. (2015). The effects of organizational culture and structure on the success of activity-based costing implementation. In Advances in Management Accounting, 25,229-256.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
