SMES’ ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT: THE ROLES OF KNOWLEDGE, GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL NORMS
Abstract
Energy efficiency is like the ‘low hanging fruit’ in which improving energy efficiency is one of the easiest ways to lessen energy demand. Firms, large or small, can make a major positive contribution to energy sustainability by improving energy efficiency. This research attempts to examine the effects of SMEs’ perceptions in terms of knowledge, government intervention and personal norms on their support for energy efficiency improvement. A survey was carried out to collect data and empirical testing of the research model was conducted. The estimated results suggest that the factors of knowledge and government intervention have significant effects on SMEs’ support for energy efficiency improvement. In addition, the results show that personal norms is an important mediator variable in influencing SMEs’ decision to improve energy efficiency. The findings of this research provide some fresh insights on energy efficiency improvement of SMEs and several notable implications can be drawn from this research.
References
Abadie, L. M., Ortiz, R. A., & Galarraga, I. (2012). Determinants of energy efficiency investments in the US. Energy Policy, 45(0), 551-56.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.002
Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2009). How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households' direct and indirect energy use and savings? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 711-720.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.05.006
Alvonitis, G. J., & Salavou, H. E. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs, product innovativeness and performance. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 566-575.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.001
Apeaning, R.W., & Thollander, P. (2013). Barriers to and driving forces for industrial energy efficiency improvements in African industries: A case study of Ghana's largest industrial area. Journal of Cleaner Production, 53, 204-213.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.003
Arens, M., Worrell, E., & Eichhammer, W. (2017). Drivers and barriers to the diffusion of energy-efficient technologies: A plant-level analysis of the German steel industry. Energy Efficiency, 10, 441-457.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9465-4
Blass, V., Corbett, C.J., Delmas, M.A. & Muthulingam, S. (2014). Top management and the adoption of energy efficiency practices: Evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturing firms in the US. Energy, 65, 560-571.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.030
Brosch, T., Patel, M.K., & Sander, D. (2014). Affective influences on energy-related decisions and behaviors. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2, Article 11, 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2014.00011
Brown, M. A. (2001). Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies. Energy Policy, 29(14), 1197-1207.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00067-2
Brunke, J. C., Johansson, M. & Thollander, P. (2014). Empirical Investigation of barriers to the adoption of energy conservation measures, energy management practices and energy services in the Swedish iron and steel industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84(1), 509-525.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.078
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Cagno, E. & Trianni, A. (2014). Evaluating the barriers to specific industrial energy efficiency measures: An exploratory study in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 82, 70-83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.057
Cagno, E., Trianni, A., Spallina, G., & Marchesani, F. (2017). Drivers for energy efficiency and their effect on barriers: Empirical evidence from Italian manufacturing enterprises. Energy Efficiency, 10, 855-869.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9488-x
Chai, K.H., & Baudelaire, C. (2015). Understanding the energy efficiency gap in Singapore: A motivation, opportunity, and ability perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 100, 224-234.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.064
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112 (1), 155-159.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
DeCanio, S. J. (1998). The efficiency paradox: bureaucratic and organizational barriers to profitable energy-saving investments. Energy Policy, 26(5), 441-454.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00152-3
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2021). Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Performance 2020. Ministry of Economy, Malaysia.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). (3rd Ed). SAGE Publications, Inc. Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2007). Situational and Personality Factors as Direct or Personal Norm Mediated Predictors of Pro-environmental Behavior: Questions Derived From Norm-Activation Theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29(4), 323-334.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701665058
Harris, R. G. (2001). The knowledge-based economy: Intellectual origins and new economic perspectives. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(1), 21-40.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00052
Hasanbeigi, A., Menke, C., & du Pont, P. (2010). Barriers to energy efficiency improvement and decision-making behavior in Thai industry. Energy Efficiency, 3, 33-52.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-009-9056-8
Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Hrovatin, N., Dolšak, N., & Zoric', J. (2016). Factors impacting investments in energy efficiency and clean technologies: Empirical evidence from Slovenian manufacturing firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, 475-486.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.039
Kinzig, A. P., Ehrlich, P.R., Alston, L. J., Arrow, K., Barrett, S., Buchman, T. G., Daily, G. C., Levin, B., Levin, S., Oppenheimer, M., Ostrom, E., & Saari, D. (2013). Social Norms and Global Environmental Challenges: The Complex Interaction of Behaviors, Values, and Policy. BioScience, 63(3), 164-175.
https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.3.5
Kounetas, K., & Tsekouras, K. (2008). The energy efficiency paradox revisited through a partial observability approach. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2517-2536.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.03.002
Kulin, J., & Sevä, I. J. (2021). Quality of government and the relationship between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: a cross-national study. Environmental Politics, 30(5), 727-752.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1809160
Lyon, D. W., Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2000). Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation research: operationalizing and measuring a key strategic decision making process. Journal of Management, 26(5), 1055-1085.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600503
May, G., Barletta, I., Stahl, B. & Taisch, M. (2015). Energy management in production: A novel method to develop key performance indicators for improving energy efficiency. Applied Energy, 149, 46-61.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.065
Nickerson, J. A. & Zenger, T. R. (2004). A knowledge-based theory of the firm: The problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, 15(6), 617-632.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0093
Nyborg, K. (2003). The Impact of Public Policy on Social and Moral Norms: Some Examples. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26, 259-277.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025622223207
Oikonomou, V., Becchis, F., Steg, L., & Russolillo, D. (2009). Energy Saving and Energy Efficiency Concepts for Policy Making. Energy Policy, 37, 4787-4796.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.035
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in simple and multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Pye, M., & McKane, A. (2000). Making a stronger case for industrial energy efficiency by quantifying non-energy benefits. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 28, 171-183.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00042-7
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S. & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS. Retrieved from www.smartpls.de.
Ryan, L. & Campell, N. (2012). Spreading the net: The multiple benefits of energy efficiency improvements. Insights Series. International Energy Agency.
Sandberg, P., & Söderström, M. (2003). Industrial energy efficiency: The need for investment decision support from a manager perspective. Energy Policy, 31, 1623-1634.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00228-8
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221-279. SME Corporation Malaysia. (2013). Guideline for New SME Definition. SME Corporation Malaysia.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 415-425.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2008). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(30), 309-317.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.
https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
Thollander, P., Danestig, M., & Rohdin, P. (2007). Energy policies for increased industrial energy efficiency: Evaluation of a local energy programme for manufacturing SMEs. Energy Policy, 35(11), 5774-5783.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.06.013
Trianni, A., & Cagno, E. (2012). Dealing with barriers to energy efficiency and SMEs: Some empirical evidences. Energy, 37(1), 494-504.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
