THE ROLE OF PERSONALITY AS A MEDIATOR IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE AND JOB PERFORMANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.6372.2023Keywords:
LMX, personality, job performance,, academic staffAbstract
Academic staffs are the main asset to Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) since education is the institution's core business. The ability of academic staff to meet the goals set by the HEIs is of utmost importance. They must possess strong competencies and excellent personality to improve their performance and achieve the desired target. Although the effect of organizational and individual factors has been verified in previous studies, it remains unclear what underlying mechanisms explain the relationship. This study examined the role of personality as a mediator in the relationship between leader-member exchange (LMX) and job performance. This research used a quantitative method with a total sample of 260 academic staff in private HEIs, which were analyzed using the SEM Amos software. The findings showed that LMX and job performance (β= -0.26) and LMX and personality (β= 0.42) were significantly related, and academic staff personality was found to have the most substantial effect on job performance (β= 1.07). The result also indicated that personality partially mediates the relationship between LMX and job performance. The study's findings propose that the management of HEIs can improve the organizational factors through the proper implementation of LMX, which will nurture individual factors' effectiveness and improve academic staff job performance.
References
Abdulsalam, D., & Mawoli, M. A. (2012). Motivation and job performance of academic staff of State Universities in Nigeria: The Case of Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Lapai, Niger State. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(14), 142-148.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n14p142
Abu bakr M. Suliman, Abdel Rahman A. Abdel Rahman & Adeija Abdalla. (2010). Personality traits and work performance in a Duty-Free Industry. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 20(1), 64-82.
https://doi.org/10.1108/10569211011025961
Agow, F. M., & Dotulong, L. O. (2020). Pengaruh kualitas kehidupan kerja, komunikasi organisasi dan kepuasan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan pada Pt. Pln Ulp Airmadidi. Jurnal Emba: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 8(1), 116-125. Altinay, L., Dai, Y. D., Chang, J., Lee, C. H., Zhuang, W. L., & Liu, Y. C. (2019). How to facilitate hotel employees' work engagement: The roles of leader-member exchange, role overload, and job security. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(3), 1525-1542.
Aremu, M. A., Olaonipekun, W. D., & Mu'azu, K. L. (2018). Effects of Big Five Personality Traits on group performance in Al-Hikmah. Amity Business Review, 19(2), 11-20.
Asim, A., & Kumar, N. (2018). Service quality in Higher Education: Expectations and perceptions of students. Asian Journal of Contemporary Education, 2(2), 70-83. Imam, A., Abbasi, A. S., & Muneer, S. (2013). The impact of Islamic work ethics on employee performance: testing two models of personality X and personality Y. Science International (Lahore), 25(3), 611-617. Awang, Z., Lim, S. H. & Zainudin, N. F. S. (2018). Pendekatan Mudah SEM- Structural Equation Modelling. Bandar Baru Bangi, MPWS Rich Resources. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Nassen, K. D. (1998). Representation of measurement error in marketing variables: Review of approaches and extension to three-facet designs. Journal of Econometrics, 89(1-2), 393-421.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00068-2
Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51,(6), 1173-1182.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Barrick, M. R. & Ryan, A. M. A. M. (Eds). (2003). Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in work. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Basarudin, N. A., Yeon, A. L., Yaacob, N., & Yusof, R. (2016). Faculty workload and employment benefits in public universities. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(S7), 73- 82.
Bhal, K. T. & Ansari, M.A. (2007). LMX-subordinate outcomes relationship: Role of voice and justice. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 28(1), 20-35. Biao, L. U. O., & Cheng, S. (2014). LMX, efficacy and job performance: A cognitive perspective interpretation. Canadian Social Science, 10(5), 244-248.
https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730710718227
Bieschke, K. J. (2006). Research self-efficacy beliefs and research outcome expectations: Implications for developing scientifically minded psychologists. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(1), 77-91.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072705281366
Brown, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long. Testing Structural Equation Models (pp.136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. Personnel selection in organizations, 3570, 35-70.
Press.Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 687-732). Consulting Psychologists Press.
Campbell J. P. (2012). Behavior, performance, and effectiveness in the twenty-first century. See S. W. J. Kozlowski, The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology, 1, 159-194).
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928309.013.0006
Carnevale, J., Huang, L., Cred_e, M., Harms, P. and Uhl-Bien, M. (2017). Leading to stimulate employees' ideas: a quantitative review of leader-member exchange, employee voice, creativity, and innovative behavior. Applied Psychology: International Review, 66, 517-552.
https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12102
Cheng-Liang, Y. & Mark, H. (2014). Personality traits and simultaneous reciprocal influences between job performance and job satisfaction. Chinese Management Studies, 8(1), 6-26. Chin, W. S., & Rasdi, R. M. (2014). Protean career development: Exploring the individuals, organizational and job-related factors. Asian Social Science, 10(21), 203.Choy, J., McCormack, D., & Djurkovic, N. (2016). LMX and job performance: The mediating roles of delegation and participation. Journal of Management Development, 35(1), 104-119. Chua, B. S. (2011). Hubungan Di Antara Personaliti, Motivasi dan Prestasi Kerja Dalam Kalangan Belia Sabah (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah).
Clarke, M., Koch, L., & Hill, E. (2004). The work-family interface: Differentiating balance and fit. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 33(2), 121-140.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X04269610
Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage
Dienesch, R. M. & Liden, R.C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618-634. Dorenkamp, I., & Ruhle, S. (2019).Work-life conflict, professional commitment, and job satisfaction among academics. The Journal of Higher Education, 90(1), 56-84.
https://doi.org/10.2307/258314
Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta- analysis of antecedents and consequences of LMX: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715-1759.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415280
Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2010). Differentiated LMXs: The buffering role of justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1104-1120.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020578
Erdogan, B., & Enders, J. (2007). Support from the top: Supervisors' perceived organizational support as a moderator of LMX to satisfaction and performance relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 321.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.321
Farrukh, M., Meng, F. & Raza, A. (2021), Believe they can succeed, and they will: intrapreneurial behavior and leadership. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(3), 661-679.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2020-0393
Feist, J. & Feist, G. J. (2006). Theories of personality. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Education. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In Mervielde, I., Deary, I., De Fruyt, F. & Ostendorf, F. (Eds), Personality psychology in Europe, 7, Tilburg University Press, Tilburg, 7-28.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl‐Bien, M. (1995). Relationship‐Based approach to leadership: Development of Leader‐Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi‐level multi‐domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247.
https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
Graen, G. B. & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In Cummings, L.L. & Staw, B.M. (Eds), research in organizational behavior (pp. 175-208), Vol. 9, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
Guidelines to Good Practice Academic Staff. (2014). Malaysian Qualifications Agency. Retrieved from http://www.mqa.gov.my/
Gupta, N., & Gupta, A. K. (2020). Big Five Personality Traits and their impact on job performance of managers in FMCG sector. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(5), 3104-3109.
https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.E6406.018520
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th Ed. Cengage Learning. Hampshire, United Kingdom.
Hakim, Wardhani & Adji Fernandes. (2017). Moderation effect of organizational citizenship behaviour on the performance of lecturers. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(7), 1136-1148.Handayani, I., & Purwanto, E. (2018). Pengaruh leader member exchange terhadap niatan berhenti kerja dengan mediasi kepuasan kerja dan kinerja karyawan. Journal of Business & Applied Management, 11(1), 038-055. He, J., Morrison, A. M., & Zhang, H. (2021). How High-Performance H.R. Practices and LMX affect employee engagement and creativity in hospitality. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 45(8), 1360-1382. Hendri, N. (2019). The impact of organizational commitment on job performance. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 7(2), 189-206
Hsiung, H.H. & Tsai, W.C. (2009). Job definition discrepancy between supervisors and subordinates: The antecedent role of LMX and outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(1), 89-112. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off Criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X292374
Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J .D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). LMX and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 269-277.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.269
Ingarianti & Tri Muji. (2014). Hubungan antara kepribadian (The big five factor personality) dengan organizationasl citizenship behaviour pada karyawan.
Ioannis Nikolaou. (2003), Fitting the person to the organization: Examining the personality-job performance relationship from a new perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(7), 639-648.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940310502368
Jalaluddin, Munawar, & Azwir. (2021). The effects of leadership and commitment on the job performance of lecturers at university. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 1494-1502. Janib, J., Rasdi, R. M., Omar, Z., Alias, S. N., Zaremohzzabieh, Z., & Ahrari, S. (2021). The relationship between workload and performance of Research University Academics in Malaysia: The mediating effects of career commitment and job satisfaction. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(2), 85-99.
https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i2.13394
Kalyar, M.N., Usta, A. & Shafique, I. (2020). When ethical leadership and LMX are more effective in prompting creativity: the moderating role of psychological capital. Baltic Journal of Management, 15(1), 61-80.
https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-02-2019-0042
Kappagoda, U.W.M.R. & Sampath. (2013). The Impact of Five Factor Model Personality on organizational citizenship behaviour of non-managerial employees in the banking sector in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Research in Computer Application and Management, 3(6), 168-173.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2223077
Katou, A., & Budhwar, P. (2014). HRM and firm performance. In J. R. Crawshaw, B. Budhwar, & A. Daviss. Human Resource Management: Strategic and international perspectives (pp. 26-47). London: Sage. Kenny, J. (2018). Re-empowering academics in a corporate culture: An exploration of workload and performativity in a university. Higher Education, 75, 365-380. Kim, M. S., & Koo, D. W. (2017). Linking LMX, engagement, innovative behavior, and job performance in hotel employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(12), 3044-3062.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2016-0319
Kluemper, D.H., DeGroot, T. & Choi, S. (2013). Emotion management ability: Predicting task performance, citizenship, and deviance. Journal of Management, 39(4), 878-905.Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college student's academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 47-52. Kostiani, N., & Galanakis, M. (2022). Organizational psychology in the 21st century: The Big Five Theory contribution in the modern workplace. Psychology, 12(6), 323-328. Laporan Pencapaian JPT Tahun (2021). Retrieved from https://jpt.mohe.gov.my/portal/Laporan_Pencapaian_2021_JPT/index.html#page/17 Lebowitz, M. S. (2016). Stigmatization of ADHD: A developmental review. Journal of Attention Disorders, 20 (3), 199-205.
Lee, S. H. (2020). Achieving corporate sustainability performance: The influence of corporate ethical value, and LMX on employee behaviors and organizational performance. Fashion and Textiles, 7(1), 25. Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & de Vries, R. E. (2005). Predicting workplace delinquency and integrity with the HEXACO and Five-Factor Models of personality structure. Human Performance, 18(2), 179-197.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1802_4
Martin, R., Epitropaki, O., Thomas, G., & Topakas, A. (2010). A critical review of Leader-Member Relationship (LMX) research: Future prospects and directions. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 25, 61-91.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470661628.ch2
Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A. & Epitropaki, O. (2016). Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67-121. Massoudi, A. H., Jameel, A. S., & Ahmad, A. R. (2020). Stimulating organizational citizenship behavior by applying organizational commitment and satisfaction. International Journal of Social Sciences and Economic Review, 2(2), 20-27.
https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12100
Mawoli, M. A. & Babandako, A.Y. (2011). An evaluation of staff motivation, dissatisfaction and job performance in an academic setting. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1, 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.52283/NSWRCA.AJBMR.20110109A01
McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. Jr (1999). A Five-Factor Theory of personality. Handbook of personality: Theory and Research, Guilford Press, New York.
Mehmet Kahya & Faruk Şahin. (2018). The effect of leader personality on follower behaviour the mediating role of LMX. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 39(1), 14-33.
https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-08-2016-0206
Melin, M., Astvik, W., & Bernhard-Oettel, C. (2014). New work demands in higher education. A study of the relationship between excessive workload, coping strategies and subsequent health among academic staff. Quality in Higher Education, 20(3), 290-308.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2014.979547
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. (n.d.). Malaysia Education Development Plan 2015-2025. Retrieved from: https://jpt.mohe.gov.my/portal/index.php/en/corporate/development-plan/16-malaysia-education-development-plan-2015-2025
Moeheriono. (2012). Competency-based Performance Measurement. Ghalia Indonesia Publishers: Bogor Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (2014). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10(2), 71-83.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_1
Nailah Ayub, Suzan M. Al Qurashi & Wafa A. Al-Yafi. (2017). Personality traits and conflict management styles in predicting job performance and conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 28(5), 671-694.Nikolaou, I., & Robertson IV, I. T. (2001). The Five-Factor Model of Personality and work behavior in Greece. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 161-186.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-12-2016-0105
Olukemi O. Sawyerr, Shanthi Srinivas & Sijun Wang. (2009). Call center employee personality factors and service performance. Journal of Services Marketing, 23(5), 301-317. Pang, D., & Ruch, W. (2019). Fusing character strengths and mindfulness interventions: Benefits for job satisfaction and performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24(1), 150.
https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000144
Papanthymou, A., & Darra, M. (2018). The implementation of Total Quality Management in Greek Higher Education: The case of electronic administrative services. International Education Studies, 11(7), 26-42.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n7p26
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 35, 322-338.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996
Qu, R., Janssen, O. & Shi, K. (2017), Leader-member exchange and follower creativity: The moderating roles of leader and follower expectations for creativity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(4), 603-626.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1105843
Rahman, A. (2020). Lecturers' performance in increasing of learning quality through self-monitoring evaluation. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(2), 492-501.
https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v12i2.303
Raja, U., Johns, G., & Bilgrami, S. (2011). Negative consequences of felt violations: The deeper the relationship, the stronger the reaction. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 60, 397-420.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00441.x
Rhee, J., Zhao, X., & Kim, C. (2014). Effects of HRM Practices on Chinese firms' organizational performance: The moderating effect of CEO support. Asian Social Science, 10(13), 210-221.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n13p210
Robertson, I.T. & Callinan, M. (1998). Personality and Work Behaviour. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 7(3), 317-340.
https://doi.org/10.1080/135943298398736
Runhaar, P., Konermann, J. & Sanders, K. (2013). Teachers' organizational citizenship behaviour: Considering the roles of their work engagement, autonomy, and LMX. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30(1), 99-108. Sa'adah, N., & Rijanti, T. (2022). The role of knowledge sharing, leader-member exchange (LMX) on organizational citizenship behavior and employee performance: An empirical study on public health Center of Pati 1, Pati 2 and Trangkil in Central Java. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 3(1), 112-131. Said Sife, A., & Tandi Lwoga, E. (2014). Publication productivity and scholarly impact of academic librarians in Tanzania: A scientometric analysis. New Library World, 115(11/12), 527-541.
Sameena, T. K. (2020). Students' perception on core service quality in Higher Education Institutions in UAE. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(2), 43-49. Sawyerr, O. O., Srinivas, S., & Wang, S. (2009). Call center employee personality factors and service performance. Journal of Services Marketing, 23(5), 301-317.
https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i2.1877
Schuh, S.C., Zhang, X.A., Morgeson, F.P., Tian, P. & van Dick, R. (2018). Are you really doing good things in your boss's eyes? Interactive effects of employee innovative work behavior and leader-member exchange on supervisory performance ratings. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 397-409. Schyns, B. (2006). Are group consensus in leader-member exchange (LMX) and shared work values related to organizational outcomes? Small Group Research, 37(1), 20-35.Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skills building approach. West Sussex: Wiley.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21851
Sekiguchi, T. (2010). Career development of college students through part time work: the role of LMX and taking charge behavior. Discussion Papers in Economics and Business, OSIPP, Osaka University, Osaka.
Seyyed, F.J., Al-Haji Umar, Y. & Al-Hajji, M. (2004). Determinants of business faculty research productivity in the Middle East. In Ogunmokun, G., Gabbay, R. & McPhail, J. (Eds), The Challenges of inter-disciplinary perspectives and globalization in the 21st century. Proceedings of the Inaugural Academy of World Business (pp.1 108-1 123), Marketing and Management Development Conference, Gold Coast, Australia.
Shantz, A., Alfes, K., & Arevshatian, L. (2016). HRM in healthcare: The role of work engagement. Personnel Review, 45(2), 274-295. Shariffuddin, S. A., Razali, J. R., Ghani, M. A., Shaaidi, W. R., & Ibrahim, I. S. A. (2017). Transformation of higher education institutions in Malaysia: A review. Journal of Global Business and Social Entrepreneurship (GBSE), 1(2), 126-136. Sharma, N. P., Sharma, T., & Nanda Agarwal, M. (2022). Relationship between perceived performance management system (PMS) effectiveness, work engagement, and turnover intention: Mediation by psychological contract fulfillment. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(9), 2985-3007.
https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2021-0008
Spitzmuller, M., Sin, H., Howe, M., & Fatimah, S. (2015). Investigating the uniqueness and usefulness of proactive personality in organizational Research: A meta-analytic review. Human Performance, 28(4), 351-379.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2015.1021041
Srivastava, E. & Agarwal, N. (2012). The emerging challenges in HRM. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 1(6), 46-48. Su, F., & Wood, M. (2012). What Makes a Good University Lecturer? Students' Perceptions of Teaching Excellence. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 4.2, 142-155
https://doi.org/10.1108/17581181211273110
Suherman, A., Mulyasana, D., Mulyasana, & Sudrajat, A. (2018). Faktor-faktor determinan terhadap kinerja dosen dalam meningkatkan mutu layanan akademik pendidikan tinggi. Kajian Manajemen Pendidikan, 2(1), 1-10.
Student Information & Guide. (2022). A glance at the Malaysian education system. StudyMalaysia.com. Retrieved from: https://studymalaysia.com/education/higher-education-in-malaysia/a-glance-at-the-malaysian-education-system Tisu, L., Lupșa, D., Vîrgă, D., & Rusu, A. (2020). Personality characteristics, job performance, and mental health: the mediating role of work engagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 153, 109644.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109644
Universiti Sains Malaysia. (n.d.). Accelerated Programme for Excellence (APEX). Retrieved from: https://www.usm.my/my-usm/apex
Van Dyne, L., Kamdar, D. & Joireman, J. (2008). In-role perceptions buffer the negative impact of low LMX on helping and enhance the positive impact of high LMX on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1195-1207.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.6.1195
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216-226.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00151
Volmer, J., Spurk, D. & Niessen, C. (2012). Leader-member Exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 456-465.Williams, L. J., Vandenberg, R.J., Edwards, J.R. (2009). Structural Equation Modeling in Management Research: A Guide for Improved Analysis. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 543-604.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.10.005
Yusaini, Y., & Utama, I. (2020). Pengaruh iklim kerja terhadap produktivitas kerja dosen Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Aceh. Al-Tanzim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 107-118. Zhang, L. F. (2003). Does the big five predict learning approaches? Personality and Individual Differences, 34(8), 1431-1446.
https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v4i1.979
Zhang, X., Li, N. & Harris, T. B. (2015). Putting non-work ties to work: The case of guanxi in supervisor-subordinate relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 37-54.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
