UNDERSTANDING THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL INFLUENCE ON ENGAGEMENT IN IOT SPORTS TECHNOLOGY: A MEDIATION ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.6366.2023Keywords:
Social influence, User engagement, User Trust, Sport, Internet of thingsAbstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) is a major revolution that is transforming the world of sports and enabling athletes to improve their physical performance. The use of IoT devices for sports is based primarily on the sharing of athletes' achievements online and the interaction between them, which allows them to motivate and encourage each other to improve their physical performance. Our research analyzes the influence of family and friends (INF_SOC) on engagement (ENGAG) in the ongoing and long-term use of these IoT devices and studies the mediating effect of perceived control (CP), perceived provider credibility (CRD), and trust (CONF) in this relationship. The population is the athletes who use IoT to measure their performance. Convenience sampling was deployed to collect the data using a questionnaire. 313 respondents participated in this study. To analyze our theoretical model, we used the method of partial least squares under SmartPls. The results confirmed all the theoretical hypotheses introduced and validated the mediating effects. They allowed us to generate interesting recommendations for IoT providers and users to reinforce engagement in the use of the Internet of Things for sports.
References
Ahmad, W. N. W., Adib, M. A. H. M., & Txi, M. R. S. (2022). Enhanced the anxiety monitoring system among athletes with IoT for sports performance: a review. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 22(11), 2700-2707. doi:10.7752/jpes.2022.11344
https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.11344
Allagui, A., & Temessek, A. (2005). La fidélité des utilisateurs des services d'un portail Internet : Proposition et test d'un modèle intégrateur. Recherche et Application en Marketing, 19-23.
Anis, A., & Azza, T. (2005). La fidélité des utilisateurs des services d'un portail Internet: Proposition et test d'un modèle intégrateur. Recherche et Applicatiοn en Marketing, 19−23.
Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, Evaluation, and Interpretation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 8-34. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x
Balaji, M. S., & Roy, S. K. (2017). Value co-creation with the Internet of Things technology in the retail industry. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(1-2), 7-31. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2016.1217914
https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1217914
Boswarthick, D., Elloumi, O., & Hersent, O. (2012). M2M Communications: A Systems Approach. United Kingdom: Wiley Publishing. doi:10.1002/9781119974031
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119974031
Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Juric, B., & Ilic, A. (2011). Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions and implications for research in service marketing. Journal of Service Research, 14, 352-371. doi:10.1177/1094670511411703
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670511411703
Brown, I., Zaheeda, C., Douglas, D., and Stroebel, S., (2003). Cell phone banking: predictors of adoption in South Africa - an exploratory study. International Journal of Information Management, 23, 381-394. doi:10.1016/S0268-4012(03)00065-3
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-4012(03)00065-3
Cenamor, J., Sjödin, D. R., & Parida, V. (2017). Adopting a platform approach in servitization: Leveraging the value of digitalization. International Journal of Production Economics, 192, 54-65. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.033
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.033
Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81-93. doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255
https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255
Chaumon, M. E., & Ciobanu, R. O. (2009). Les nouvelles technologies au service des personnes âgées: entre promesses et interrogations une revue de questions. Psychologie Française, 54(3), 271-285. doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2009.07.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2009.07.001
Chin, W. (1998). Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7-25.
Chong, A. Y., Chan, F. T., & Ooi, K. B. (2012). Predicting consumer decisions to adopt mobile commerce: Cross-country empirical examination between China and Malaysia. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 34−43. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.12.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.12.001
Chopdar, P. K., & Sivakumar, V. J. (2019). Understanding continuance usage of mobile shopping applications in India: the role of espoused cultural values and perceived risk. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(1), 42-64. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2018.1513563
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1513563
Chu, S. C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75. doi:10.2501/IJA-30-1-047-075Daniel, P.E.-Z. and Jonathan, A. (2013), "Factors affecting the adoption of online banking in Ghana: implications for bank managers", International Journal of Business and Social Research, 3 (6), 94-108. doi:10.18533/ijbsr.v3i6.49
https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-30-1-047-075
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Delouvée, S. (2015). Répéter n'est pas croire. Sur la transmission des idées conspirationnistes. Diogène 1-2 (249-250), 88-98. doi:10.3917/dio.249.0088
https://doi.org/10.3917/dio.249.0088
Dessart, L., Velοutsou, C., & Mοrgan-Thοmas, A. (2015). Cοnsumer engagement in οnline brand cοmmunities: a sοcial media perspective. Jοurnal οf Prοduct & Brand Management, 24(1), 28-42. doi:10.1108/JPBM-06-2014-0635
https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2014-0635
Doorn, V., Lemon, N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef., P. C. (2010). Customer engagement behaviour: Theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 253-266. doi:10.1177/1094670510375599
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670510375599
Durand-Mégret, B., & Vanheems, R. (2019). Adolescents connectés : comment réinventent-ils les relations au sein de la famille et la conversation avec les marques ? Recherches en Sciences de Gestion, 130(1), 85-106. doi:10.3917/resg.130.0085
https://doi.org/10.3917/resg.130.0085
Erdem, T., and Swait, J. (2004). Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. Journal of consumer Research, 31(1), 191-198. doi:10.1086/383434.
https://doi.org/10.1086/383434
Evrard, Y., B., P., Roux, E., Desmet, P., Dussaix, A.-M., & Lilien, G. (2009). Market : Fondements et méthodes de recherche en marketing (éd. 4e édition). Paris: Dunod.
Fantana, N. K., Riedel, T., Schlick, J., Ferber, S., Hupp, J., Miles, S., . . . Svensson, S. (2013). IoT applications-value creation for industry. Internet of Things: Converging Technologies for Smart Environments and Integrated Ecosystems, 153.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003338659-3
Fernandes, V. (2012). En quoi l'approche PLS est-elle une méthode a (re)-découvrir pour les chercheurs en management? M@n@gement, 15(1), 102-123.
https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.151.0102
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press. doi:10.4324/9780203838020
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838020
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:10.2307/3151312
https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Frisou, J. (2000). Confiance interpersonnelle et engagement: une réorientation béhavioriste. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Édition), 15(1), 63-80.
https://doi.org/10.1177/076737010001500104
Gao, L., & Bai, X. (2014). A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of Internet of Things technology. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26(2), 211−231. doi:10.1108/APJML-06-2013-0061
https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-06-2013-0061
Gao, L., Waechter, K. A., & Bai, X. (2015). Understanding consumers' continuance intention toward mobile purchase: A theoretical framework and empirical study-A case of China. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 249-262. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.014
Gao, S., Krogstie, J., & Siau, K. (2011). Developing an instrument to measure the adoption of mobile services. Mobile information systems, 7(1), 45-67. doi:10.3233/MIS-2011-0110
https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/831018
Garnier, C. (2016, octobre 27). Les objets connectés sont-ils bons pour notre santé ? Récupéré sur https://www.bienetre-et-sante.fr/objets-connectes-bons-sante/
Gavard-Perret, M.-L., Gotteland, D., Haon, C., Jolibert, A., Aubert, B., Avenier, M.-J., & Duymedjian, R. (2012). Méthodologie de la recherche en sciences de gestion : réussir son mémoire ou sa thèse (éd. 2e Édition). Montreuil: Pearson.Giquel, C., & Guyot, P. (2015). Quantified Self, les apprentis sorciers du "moi connecté". Limoges, France: FYP éditions.
Gleizes, F., & Pénicaud, E. (2017). Pratiques physiques ou sportives des femmes et des hommes : des rapprochements mais aussi des différences qui persistent. (1675) Paris, France: INSEE.
Greenough, J., & Camhi, J. (2015). The Internet of Things 2015: Examining How the OT Will Affect the World. BI Intelligence Report. Récupéré sur https://www.businessinsider.com/internet-of-things-2015-forecasts-of-the-industrial-iot-connected-home-and-more-2015-10
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139-151. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis, Second Edition: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Publications.
Hidoussi, K. D., Dubois, M., Gandit, M., & El Methni, J. (2016). L'effet du contrôle comportemental, l'auto-efficacité et la charge subjective de travail sur l'intention d'usage d'un progiciel de gestion intégré. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisation, 22(1), 22-38. doi:10.1016/j.pto.2015.12.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pto.2015.12.004
Hikkerova, L., Pupion, P. C., & Sahut, J. M. (2015). Fidélisation et fidélité dans l'hôtellerie : une comparaison franco-slovaque 1. Revue management et avenir, (4), 161-181. doi:10.3917/mav.078.0161
https://doi.org/10.3917/mav.078.0161
Höller, J., B. D., Karnouskos, S., Avesand, S., Mulligan, C., & Tsiatsis, V. (2014). From machine-to-machine to the Internet of things. Cambridge: Academic Press, 1-331. doi:10.1016/C2012-0-03263-2
https://doi.org/10.1016/C2012-0-03263-2
Honneth, A. (2013). La lutte pour la reconnaissance. Folio essais (576). Paris, France: Gallimard.
Hsu, C. L., & Lu, H. P. (2004). Why do people play online games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management, 41(7), 853-868. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.014
Islam, J. U., & Rahman, Z. (2016). Linking customer engagement to trust and word-of-mouth on Facebook brand communities: An empirical study. Journal of Internet Commerce, 15(1), 40-58. doi:10.1080/15332861.2015.1124008
https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2015.1124008
Jang, S. H., Kim, R. H., & Lee, C. W. (2016). Effect of u-healthcare service quality on usage intention in a healthcare service. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 396-403. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.030
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.030
Karale, A. (2021). The Challenges of IoT Addressing Security, Ethics, Privacy, and Laws. Internet of Things, 15, 100420. doi:10.1016/j.iot.2021.100420
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2021.100420
Keller, K. L. (2013). Strategic brand management. Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. Harlow, UK: Edinburgh Gate.
Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., Oghazi, P., Gebauer, H., & Baines, T. (2019). Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm. Journal of Business Research, 104, 380-392. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.027
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.027
Li, Y.-M., & Yeh, Y.-S. (2010). increasing trust in mobile commerce through design aesthetics. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 673-684. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.004
Lin, X., Spence, P. R., & Lachlan, K. A. (2016). Social media and credibility indicators: The effect of influence cues. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 264-271. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.002Link, M. W., Armsby, P. P., Hubal, R. C., & Guinn, C. I. (2006). Accessibility and acceptance of responsive virtual human technology as a survey interviewer training tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3), 412-426. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.09.008
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.09.008
Luarn, P. and Lin, H. H., (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 873-891. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.003
Marinković, V., Đorđević, A., & Kalinić, Z. (2020). The moderating effects of gender on customer satisfaction and continuance intention in mobile commerce: a UTAUT-based perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(3), 306-318. doi:10.1080/09537325.2019.1655537
https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1655537
Martínez-López, F. J., Anaya-Sánchez, R., Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., & Esteban-Millat, I. (2017). Consumer engagement in an online brand community. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 23, 24-37. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2017.04.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2017.04.002
Morgan, R., & Hunt, S. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38. doi:10.2307/1252308
https://doi.org/10.2307/1252308
Muniz Jr, A. M., & Schau, H. J. (2005). Religiosity in the abandoned Apple Newton brand community. Journal of consumer research, 31(4), 737-747. doi:10.1086/426607
https://doi.org/10.1086/426607
Palattella, M. R., Accettura, N., Vilajosana, X., Watteyne, T., Grieco, L. A., Boggia, G., & Dohler, M. (2013). Standardized protocol stack for the Internet of (important) things. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(3), 1389-1406. doi:10.1109/SURV.2012.111412.00158
https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2012.111412.00158
Palau-Saumell, R., Forgas-Coll, S., Sánchez-García, J., & Robres, E. (2019). User acceptance of mobile apps for restaurants: An expanded and extended UTAUT-2. Sustainability, 11(4), 1210. doi:10.3390/su11041210
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041210
Palazzolo, J., & Arnaud, J. (2015). Contrôle perçu et lieu de contrôle: une approche plurifactorielle. In Annales Médico-psychologiques. revue psychiatrique, 173(5), 412-418. doi:10.1016/j.amp.2014.07.012
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2014.07.012
Pansari, A., & Kumar, V. (2017). Customer engagement: the construct, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(3), 294-311. doi:10.1007/s11747-016-0485-6
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0485-6
Plouffe, C. R., Hulland, J. S., & Vandenbosch, M. (2001). Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions-understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system. Information systems research, 12(2), 208-222. doi:10.1287/isre.12.2.208.9697
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.2.208.9697
Ray, P. P. (2015). Internet of Things for Sports (IoTSport): An architectural framework for sports and recreational activity. Proceeding of IEEE EESCO, Vizag, 79-83. https://www.academia.edu/download/39953440/10.1109_EESCO.2015.7253963.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1109/EESCO.2015.7253963
Richter, N., Cepeda Carrión, G., Roldán, J. L., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). European Management Research Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). European Management Journal, 34(6), 589-597. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2014.12.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.12.001
Rouvroy, A. (2014, Juin). "Avant propos", Le corps, nouvel objet connecté, du quantified self à la santé: les nouveaux territoires de la mise en données du monde. Cahiers IP, 2, CNIL. https://www.cnil.fr/sites/cnil/files/typo/document/CNIL_CAHIERS_IP2_WEB.pdf
Samer, A. A. (2004). La crédibilité perçue comme facteur explicatif du comportement des internautes. Sourbonne, université Paris, Paris.
Samhale, K., & Ladwein, R. (2019). L'impact de l'influence sociale sur l'intention d'usage des objets connectés pour le sport. Revue française des sciences de l'information et de la communication, 16. doi:10.4000/rfsic.5966Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2001). What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidates psychological needs. Journal of personality and social psychology, 80(2), 325. doi:10.1037//O022-3514.80.2.325
Soulard, O. (2015). La crédibilité des avis en ligne: une revue de littérature et un modèle intégrateur. Management & Avenir, (8), 129-153. doi:10.3917/mav.082.0129
https://doi.org/10.3917/mav.082.0129
Suh, B., & Han, I. (2003). The impact of customer trust and perception of security control on the acceptance of electronic commerce. International Journal of electronic commerce, 7(3), 135-161. doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044270
https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044270
Tarhini, A., El-Masri, M., Ali, M., & Serrano, A. (2016). Extending the UTAUT model to understand the customers' acceptance and use of Internet banking in Lebanon: A structural equation modelling approach. Information Technology & People, 29(4), 830-849. doi:10.1108/ITP-02-2014-0034
https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2014-0034
Thakur, R. (2018). Customer engagement and online reviews. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 48-59. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.002
Tian, J., Coreynen, W., Matthyssens, P., & Shen, L. (2022). Platform-based servitization and business model adaptation by established manufacturers. Technovation, 118, 102222. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102222
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102222
Van Der Merwe, R., & Van Heerden, G. (2009). Finding and utilizing opinion leaders: Social networks and the power of relationships. South African Journal of Business Management, 40(3), 65-76. doi:10.4102/sajbm.v40i3.545
https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v40i3.545
Wang, Y. S., Wang, Y.-M., Lin, H. H., and Tang, T. I. (2003). Determinants of user acceptance of the internet banking: An empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5), 501-519. doi:10.1108/09564230310500192.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230310500192
Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195. doi:10.2307/20650284
https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
Yu, B., Wright, J., Nepal, S., Zhu, L., Liu, J., & Ranjan, R. (2018). IoTChain: Establishing Trust in the Internet of Things Ecosystem Using Blockchain. IEEE Cloud Computing, 5(4), 12-23. doi:10.1109/MCC.2018.043221010
https://doi.org/10.1109/MCC.2018.043221010
Yuan, S., Liu, Y., Yao, R., & Liu, J. (2016). An investigation of users' continuance intention toward mobile banking in China. Information Development, 32(1), 20-34. doi:10.1177/0266666914522140
https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666914522140
Yuen, Y. Y., Yeow, P. H. P., Lim, N., and Najib S. (2010). Internet banking adoption: Comparing developed and developing countries. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51(1), 52-61. doi:10.1080/08874417.2010.11645449
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
