ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES AND TRADE COMPETITIVENESS: THE MALAYSIAN PALM OIL DOWNSTREAM INDUSTRY
Abstract
This paper explore how export competitiveness in the Malaysian palm oil downstream industry is affected by European Union (EU) environmental regulation. Porter (1990) suggests that environmental policies may foster international competitiveness. To investigate the impact of EU environmental policies on trade competitiveness in the Malaysian palm oil downstream industry, the dynamic generalized method of moments (DGMM) is employed. The final results reveal that EU environmental regulations have a positive impact on palm oil industry competitiveness. This result is consistent with the Porter Hypothesis, which argues that a more stringent environmental regulation can trigger innovation to non-compliance cost. Palm oil downstream innovation is crucial to improve the overall competitiveness of the industry, including the smallholders’ sector. This implies that the Malaysian government may want to introduce certain measures, such as energy taxes to promote the use of renewable energy. This may lead to more sustainable palm oil production which may improve the overall competitiveness of the palm oil downstream industry.
References
Alam, A. F., Er, A. C., & Begum, H. (2015). Malaysian oil palm industry: Prospect and problem. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 13(2), 143-148.
Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), 2-22.
https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/res016
Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2004). A new indicator of technological capabilities for developed and developing countries (ArCo). World development, 32(4), 629-654.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.10.008
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
Bahta, Y. T., & Willemse, J. (2016). The comparative advantage of South Africa soybean production. Oilseeds and fats, Crops and Lipids., 23(3), A301.
https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2015069
Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and "revealed" comparative advantage. The Manchester School, 33(2), 99-123.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x
Balkyte, A., & Tvaronaviciene, M. (2010). Perception of competitiveness in the context of sustainable development: Facets of "sustainable competitiveness". Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 341-365.
https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.17
Baltagi, B. H., Demetriades, P. O. & Law, S. H. (2008). Financial development and openness: Evidence from panel data. Center for Policy Research. 60. Syracuse, New York.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1808903
Balu, N., Azman, I., Norfadilah, H., Nazlin, I., Dayang, N. S., Nik, A., ... & Kushairi, A. (2018). Malaysia: 100 years of resilient palm oil economic performance. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 30(1), 13-25.
https://doi.org/10.21894/jopr.2018.0014
Basiron, Y. (2007). Palm oil production through sustainable plantations. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 109(4), 289-295.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200600223
Brue, S., & Grant, R. (2012). The evolution of economic thought. Mason, USA: Cengage Learning.
Butler, R. A. (2014). New palm oil sustainability manifesto met with criticism from environmentalists. Mongabay. https://news.mongabay.com/2014/07/new-palm-oil-sustainability-manifesto-met-with-criticism-from-environmentalists/
Chobanyan, A., & Leigh, L. (2006). The Competitive Advantage of Nation Applying The "Diamond" Model to Armenia. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 1(2), 147‐64.
https://doi.org/10.1108/17468800610658316
Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic literature, 42(1), 7-71.
https://doi.org/10.1257/.42.1.7
Costantini, V., & Mazzanti, M. (2012). On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research policy, 41(1), 132-153.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.004
Dai, F., Wu, S., Liang, L., & Qin, Z. (2016). Bilateral trade under environmental pressure: Balanced growth. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 16(2), 209-231.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-015-0205-9
Dalum, B., Laursen, K., & Villumsen, G. (1998). Structural Change in OECD Export specialisation patterns: De-specialisation and 'stickiness'. International Review of Applied Economics, 12(3), 423-443.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02692179800000017
Davis, D. R., & Weinstein, D. E. (2003). Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: An empirical test. Journal of International Economics, 59(1), 1-23.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00088-0
De Benedictis, L., & Tamberi, M. (2004). Overall specialization empirics: Techniques and applications. Open Economies Review, 15(4), 323-346.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:OPEN.0000048522.97418.99
Economic Transformation Programme (ETP) Annual Report 2013. Retrieved October 13, 2015, from https://www.pmo.gov.my/dokumenattached/NTP-Report-2013/ETP_2013_ENG.pdf
Filippini, C., & Molini, V. (2003). The determinants of east asian trade flows: A gravity equation approach. Journal of Asian Economics, 14(5), 695-711.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2003.10.001
Foong, S. Z., Goh, C. K., Supramaniam, C. V., & Ng, D. K. (2019). Input-output optimisation model for sustainable oil palm plantation development. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 17(1), 31-46.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.08.010
Gonseth, C., Cadot, O., Mathys, N. A., & Thalmann, P. (2015). Energy-tax changes and competitiveness: The role of adaptive capacity. Energy Economics, 48, 127-135.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.12.010
Hameed, A. A. A., & Arshad, F. M. (2009). The impact of petroleum prices on vegetable oils prices: Evidence from co-integration tests. Oil Palm Industry Economic Journal, 9(2), 31-40.
Hunegnaw, F. B. (2017). Real exchange rate and manufacturing, export competitiveness in Eastern Africa. Journal of Economic Integration, 32(4), 891-912.
https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2017.32.4.891
Indahsari, G. K., & Wibowo, R. (2013). Toward Indonesia's agroindustries competitiveness: The case of bioethanol development from sugarcane based industries. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 9(21), 491-502.
Jambor, A. (2013). Comparative advantages and specialisation of the Visegrad countries agri-food trade. Acta Oeconomica et Informatica, 16(1), 22-34.
https://doi.org/10.15414/raae.2013.16.01.22-34
Jin, B. & Moon , H. C. (2006). The diamond approach to the competitiveness of Korea's apparel industry: Michael porter and beyond. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management. 10(2), 195 - 208.
https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020610667504
Ketels, C. H. (2006). Michael Porter's competitiveness framework-recent learnings and new research priorities. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 6(2), 115-136.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-9474-7
Kharub, M., & Sharma, R. K. (2016). investigating the role of porter diamond determinants for competitiveness in MSMEs. International Journal for Quality Research, 10(3), 471-486.
Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness - A dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73 (2), 28-44.
https://doi.org/10.2307/20045917
Kumaran, S. (2019). The Dynamics for Mandatory MSPO certification scheme to be successfully implemented. Journal of Oil Palm, Environment & Health, 10, 1-7.
Laurance, W. F., Koh, L. P., Butler, R., Sodhi, N. S., Bradshaw, C. J., Neidel, J. D., ... & Vega, J. M. (2010). Improving the performance of the roundtable on sustainable palm oil for nature conservation. Conservation Biology, 24(2), 377-381.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01448.x
Law, S. H., & Azman-Saini, W. N. W. (2012). Institutional quality, governance and financial development. Economics of Governance, 13(3), 217-236.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-012-0112-z
Letchumanan, R., & Kodama, F. (2000). Reconciling the conflict between the 'pollution-haven' hypothesis and an emerging trajectory of international technology transfer. Research policy, 29(1), 59-79.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00033-5
Levinson, A. (2010). Offshoring pollution: Is the United States increasingly importing polluting goods? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(1), 63-83.
https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rep017
Mahat, S. B .A. (2012). The palm oil industry from the perspective of sustainable development: A case study of malaysian palm oil industry. Master Thesis, Graduate School of Asia Pacific Studies Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University Japan.
Malaysian Palm Oil Board. (2015). Review of the Malaysian oil palm industry 2014, 34th Edition. Economic and Industry Development Division, MPOB.
Mansur, K. H. M., Gope, J., &Afzal, M. N. I. (2017). An investigation of national innovation system (nis) using porter's diamond model: An empirical study to measure competitiveness in ASEAN-5. Proceedings of International Conference on Economics 2017 (ICE 2017).
Muradian, R., O'Connor, M., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2002). Embodied pollution in trade: Estimating the 'environmental load displacement'of industrialised countries. Ecological Economics, 41(1), 51-67.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00281-6
Naidu, L., & Moorthy, R. (2021). A review of key sustainability issues in Malaysian palm oil industry. Sustainability, 13(19), 10839.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910839
Nesti, L., Tan, F., & Hadiguna, R. A. (2020). Competitive analysis of crude palm oil (CPO) in West Sumatera Province to other provinces in Sumatera Island in domestic market. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 583, No. 1, p. 012015). IOP Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/583/1/012015
Oil, I. S. P. (2016). Comparison of the ISPO, MSPO and RSPO Standards. https://www.sustainablepalmoil.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/09/Efeca_PO-Standards-Comparison.pdf
Othman, N., Tahir, M. S., & Joremi, L. (2022). On the duration of trade competitiveness: the case of the Malaysian palm-based oleochemical industry. Heliyon, 8(11), e11903.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11903
Othman, N., Yusop, Z., Ismail, M. M., & Afandi, S. H. M. (2020). The trade competitiveness of palm-biodiesel in renewable energy market. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 54(1), 33-42.
https://doi.org/10.17576/JEM-2020-5401-3
Porter, M. E. & Linde, C. V. D. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. The Free Press: New York.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1
Qiang, O., Tian-Tian, W., Ying, D., Zhu-Ping, L., & Jahanger, A. (2021). The impact of environmental regulations on export trade at provincial level in China: evidence from panel quantile regression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17676-z
Qiu, Y. (2014). The substitution effect between soybean oil and palm oil and global carbon emissions. Georgetown University.
Ramdani, F., & Hino, M. (2013). Land use changes and GHG emissions from tropical forest conversion by oil palm plantations in Riau Province, Indonesia. PLOS ONE, 8(7), e70323. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070323
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070323
Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation. New York.
Rubashkina, Y., Galeotti, M., & Verdolini, E. (2015). Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy, 83, 288-300.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.014
Setyawan, A. A. (2011). Global crisis and country's competitiveness: Lessons from Indonesia and Malaysia. European Research Studies Journal, 14(3), 103-118.
https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/329
Sharma, P., Patel, R. M., & Srivastava, S. K. (2014). Comparative advantage of Indian soymeal vis-à-vis major exporters. Soybean Research, 12(1), 129-143.
Sime Darby Plantation (2014). Sime Darby plantation and its sustainability journey (p. 8). Paper presented at Affin Investment Conference Series 2014: Look East Policy (LEP) 2.0 Forum. Kuala Lumpur.
Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations. Random House, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1937
Sobrino, F. H., Monroy, C. R., & Perez, J. L. H. (2010). Biofuels in Spain: Market penetration analysis and competitiveness in the automotive fuel market. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9), 3076-3083.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.06.017
Songsiengchai, P., Sidique, S. F., Djama, M., & Azman-Saini, W. N. W. (2018). A cointegration analysis of crude palm oil price in Thailand. In E3S Web of Conferences,52: 00035. EDP Sciences.
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20185200035
Stone, H. B., & Ranchhod, A. (2006). Competitive advantage of a nation in the global arena: A quantitative advancement to Porter's diamond applied to the UK, USA and BRIC nations. Strategic Change, 15(6), 283-284.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.770
Uzik, M., & Vokorokosova, R. (2007). Labour Productivity as a factor of Competitiveness-a Comparative Study. Narodohogospadarski obzor, 3, 58-68.
Užík, M., & Vokorokosová, R. (2007). Labour productivity as a factor of competitiveness-a comparative study. Národnohospodářsky Obzor, 3, 58-68.
Vu, H. T., & Pham, L. C. (2016). A dynamic approach to assess international competitiveness of Vietnam's garment and textile industry. Springer Plus, 5(1), 203.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1912-3
Wijnands, J. H. M., van Berkum, S., & Verhoog, D. (2015). Competitiveness of CIS and EU agrifood chains, Quantifying Porter's diamond. LEI Wageningen University, 74.
Zhang, P. & London, K. (2013). Towards an internationalized sustainable competitiveness model. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 23(2), 95-113.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
