A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF HRM SYSTEMS AND FIRM INNOVATION
Abstract
In this paper, we explored the bibliometric network structure in the major literature on human resource management (HRM) systems and firm innovation. In the search of Web of Science, we identified 173 unique papers, including quantitative papers, qualitative papers, literature review, editorial letters, etc. The VOS viewer bibliometric results showed three clusters of firm innovation from the HRM systems perspective: innovation in products or services, innovation in processes, and innovation in people and organizations. Our paper also described the number of publications, co-authorship information, and affiliated universities and countries per firm innovation cluster.
References
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Boehm, S. A., Kunze, F., & Bruch, H. (2014). Spotlight on age‐diversity climate: The impact of age inclusive HR practices on firm‐level outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 667-704.
https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12047
Bretz Jr, R. D., Ash, R. A., & Dreher, G. F. (1989). Do people make the place? An examination of the attraction‐selection‐attrition hypothesis. Personnel Psychology, 42(3), 561-581.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1989.tb00669.x
Cefis, E., & Marsili, O. (2019). Good times, bad times: innovation and survival over the business cycle. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(3), 565-587.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty072
Ceylan, C. (2013). Commitment-based HR practices, different types of innovation activities and firm innovation performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(1), 208-226.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.680601
Chadegani, A. A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18-26.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18
Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544-560.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794671
Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787-804.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
Howard, J., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J., & Van den Broeck, A. (2016). Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95, 74-89.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.004
Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.88
Huber, S., van Wijgerden, I., de Witt, A., & Dekker, S. W. (2009). Learning from organizational incidents: Resilience engineering for high‐risk process environments. Process Safety Progress, 28(1), 90-95.
https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.10286
Jacsó, P. (2010). Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar. Online Information Review, 34(1), 175-191.
https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521011024191
Jacsó, P. (2012). Google scholar metrics for publications. Online Information Review, 36(4), 604-619.
https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521211254121
Jimenez-Jimenez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2005). Innovation and human resource management fit: An empirical study. International journal of Manpower, 26(4), 364-381.
https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720510609555
Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 1(2), 75-130.
Knight, K. E. (1967). A descriptive model of the intra-firm innovation process. The Journal of Business, 40(4), 478-496.
https://doi.org/10.1086/295013
Ko, Y. J., & Ma, L. (2019). Forming a firm innovation strategy through commitment-based human resource management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(12), 1931-1955.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1308415
Liu, D., Gong, Y., Zhou, J., & Huang, J. C. (2017). Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 1164-1188.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0230
Lopez-Illescas, C., de Moya-Anegón, F., & Moed, H. F. (2008). Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 304-316.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.08.001
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018). Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A multidisciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 116(3), 2175-2188.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2820-9
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303
Petri, H. L., & Govern, J. M. (2012). Motivation: Theory, research, and application. Cengage Learning.
Pradhan, P. (2016). Science mapping and visualization tools used in bibliometric & scientometric studies: An overview. Inflibnet, 23(4), 19-33.
Prins, A. A., Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Wouters, P. F. (2016). Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 264-270.
https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv049
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437-453.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x
Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Shapiro, D. L. (2004). The future of work motivation theory. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 379-387.
https://doi.org/10.2307/20159049
Vera-Baceta, M. A., Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2019). Web of Science and Scopus language coverage. Scientometrics, 121(3), 1803-1813.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03264-z
Wang, E. T., Lin, C. C. L., Jiang, J. J., & Klein, G. (2007). Improving enterprise resource planning (ERP) fit to organizational process through knowledge transfer. International Journal of Information Management, 27(3), 200-212.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.02.002
Wang, Q., & Waltman, L. (2016). Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 347-364.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.003
Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123, 1-15.
Copyright (c) 2023 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
