A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF HRM SYSTEMS AND FIRM INNOVATION

Authors

  • Yang Zhang School of Business, Indiana University Southeast, New Albany, Indiana, U.S.
  • Stephen J. J. McGuire College of Business and Economics, California State University, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, U.S.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.5604.2023

Keywords:

Human resource management systems, firm innovation, bibliometric analysis

Abstract

In this paper, we explored the bibliometric network structure in the major literature on human resource management (HRM) systems and firm innovation.  In the search of Web of Science, we identified 173 unique papers, including quantitative papers, qualitative papers, literature review, editorial letters, etc. The VOS viewer bibliometric results showed three clusters of firm innovation from the HRM systems perspective: innovation in products or services, innovation in processes, and innovation in people and organizations. Our paper also described the number of publications, co-authorship information, and affiliated universities and countries per firm innovation cluster.

References

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Boehm, S. A., Kunze, F., & Bruch, H. (2014). Spotlight on age‐diversity climate: The impact of age inclusive HR practices on firm‐level outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 667-704.

https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12047

Bretz Jr, R. D., Ash, R. A., & Dreher, G. F. (1989). Do people make the place? An examination of the attraction‐selection‐attrition hypothesis. Personnel Psychology, 42(3), 561-581.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1989.tb00669.x

Cefis, E., & Marsili, O. (2019). Good times, bad times: innovation and survival over the business cycle. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(3), 565-587.

https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty072

Ceylan, C. (2013). Commitment-based HR practices, different types of innovation activities and firm innovation performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(1), 208-226.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.680601

Chadegani, A. A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18-26.

https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18

Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544-560.

https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794671

Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787-804.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9

Howard, J., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J., & Van den Broeck, A. (2016). Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95, 74-89.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.004

Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115.

https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.88

Huber, S., van Wijgerden, I., de Witt, A., & Dekker, S. W. (2009). Learning from organizational incidents: Resilience engineering for high‐risk process environments. Process Safety Progress, 28(1), 90-95.

https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.10286

Jacsó, P. (2010). Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar. Online Information Review, 34(1), 175-191.

https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521011024191

Jacsó, P. (2012). Google scholar metrics for publications. Online Information Review, 36(4), 604-619.

https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521211254121

Jimenez-Jimenez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2005). Innovation and human resource management fit: An empirical study. International journal of Manpower, 26(4), 364-381.

https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720510609555

Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 1(2), 75-130.

Knight, K. E. (1967). A descriptive model of the intra-firm innovation process. The Journal of Business, 40(4), 478-496.

https://doi.org/10.1086/295013

Ko, Y. J., & Ma, L. (2019). Forming a firm innovation strategy through commitment-based human resource management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(12), 1931-1955.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1308415

Liu, D., Gong, Y., Zhou, J., & Huang, J. C. (2017). Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 1164-1188.

https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0230

Lopez-Illescas, C., de Moya-Anegón, F., & Moed, H. F. (2008). Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 304-316.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.08.001

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.

https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71

Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018). Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A multidisciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 116(3), 2175-2188.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2820-9

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.

https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303

Petri, H. L., & Govern, J. M. (2012). Motivation: Theory, research, and application. Cengage Learning.

Pradhan, P. (2016). Science mapping and visualization tools used in bibliometric & scientometric studies: An overview. Inflibnet, 23(4), 19-33.

Prins, A. A., Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Wouters, P. F. (2016). Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 264-270.

https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv049

Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437-453.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x

Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Shapiro, D. L. (2004). The future of work motivation theory. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 379-387.

https://doi.org/10.2307/20159049

Vera-Baceta, M. A., Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2019). Web of Science and Scopus language coverage. Scientometrics, 121(3), 1803-1813.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03264-z

Wang, E. T., Lin, C. C. L., Jiang, J. J., & Klein, G. (2007). Improving enterprise resource planning (ERP) fit to organizational process through knowledge transfer. International Journal of Information Management, 27(3), 200-212.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.02.002

Wang, Q., & Waltman, L. (2016). Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 347-364.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.003

Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123, 1-15.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8

Downloads

Published

2023-04-07

How to Cite

Yang Zhang, & Stephen J. J. McGuire. (2023). A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF HRM SYSTEMS AND FIRM INNOVATION. International Journal of Business and Society, 24(1), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.5604.2023