Signalling Strategy and Success of Crowdfunding Campaign
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.5220.2022Keywords:
crowdfunding, success factors, signalling theory, information asymmetryAbstract
Improving the funding results of crowdfunding campaigns is a pivotal point for entrepreneurs, investors, and platforms. Building upon previous research in the field of crowdfunding and signaling theory, we propose a logistic regression to identify the determinants of the success of 5228 KissKissBankBank crowdfunding. The main focus is on estimating the role of signalling opportunities provided to project initiators and funders in mitigating the harmful consequences of asymmetric information. Our main results reveal that, as expected, the success of crowdfunding campaigns is promoted by the signal of identity, patience, pointing, reciprocity, intention and interactivity. The ambition signal is a factor that hinders funding success. Contrary to our research hypotheses, the signal of reputation and social capital has a negative impact on the probability of crowdfunding projects' success. The findings provide not only empirical evidence to understanding the importance of the role of signals in determining the success of crowdfunding campaigns but also useful tools for stakeholders in developing their own crowdfunding strategies at an early stage.
References
Abdul-Rahman A., Hailes S. (2000). Supporting trust in virtual communities. Proceedings of the 2000 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2000.926814
Ahlers, G., K., C., Cumming, D., Günther, C., & Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), 955- 980. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12157
Allison, T. H., Davis, B. C., Webb, J. W., & Short, J. C. (2017). Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(6), 707-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.09.002
Audretsch, D., Acs Z., Braunerhjelm P., & Carlsson B. (2012). Growth and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 39(2), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9307-2
Bade, M., & Walther M. (2021). Local preferences and the allocation of attention in equity-based crowdfunding. Review of Managerial Science, 15(1), 2501-2531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00429-6
Barbi, M., & Bigelli, M. (2017). Crowdfunding practices in and outside the US. Research in International Business and Finance, 42(2), 208- 223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.05.013
Baucus, M., & Mittenessb C. (2016). Crowdfrauding: Avoiding Ponzi entrepreneurs when investing in new ventures. Business Horizons, 59(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.08.003
Beier, M., & Wagner K. (2015). Crowdfunding Success: A Perspective from Social Media and E-Commerce. Proceedings of the 2015 Thirty Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2013). Individual crowdfunding practices. Venture Capital, 15(4), 313-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2013.785151
Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003
Bergh, D., Connelly, L., Ketchen J., & Shannon M. (2014). Signalling Theory and Equilibrium in Strategic Management Research: An Assessment and a Research Agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 51(8), 1334-1360. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12097
Bernardo, A.E., Welch, I. (2001). On the evolution of overconfidence and entrepreneurs. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(3), 1-52. https://doi.org/10.1162/105864001316907964
Block, J., Hornuf, L., & Moritz, A. (2018). Which updates during an equity crowdfunding campaign increase crowd participation?. Small Business Economics, 50(1), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9876-4
Block, J. H., Groh, A., Hornuf, L., Vanacker, T., & Vismara, S. (2020). The entrepreneurial finance markets of the future: a comparison of crowdfunding and initial coin offerings. Small Business Economics, 57(1), 865-882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00330-2
Bretschneider, U., & Leimeister, J.M. (2017). Not just an ego-trip: Exploring backers' motivation for funding in incentive-based crowdfunding. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26(4), 246-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.02.002
Burgoon, J., Bonito, J., Ramirez, A. & Dunbar, N. (2002). Testing the Interactivity Principle: Effects of Mediation, Propinquity, and Verbal and Nonverbal Modalities in Interpersonal Interaction. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 657-677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02567.x
Butticè, V., & Vismara, S. (2021). Inclusive digital finance: The industry of equity crowdfunding. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1-18.
Cerpentier, M., Vanacker, T., Paeleman, I. & Bringman, K. (2021). Equity crowdfunding, market timing, and firm capital structure. The Journal of Technology Transfer, Forthcoming (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09893-y
Chan, K. W., & Li, S. Y. (2010). Understanding consumer-to-consumer interactions in virtual communities: The salience of reciprocity. Journal of Business Research, 63(9-10), 1033-1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.08.009
Chen, Y., & Barnes, S. (2007). Initial trust and online buyer behavior. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 107(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570710719034
Chen, K., & Yen, D. (2004). Improving the quality of online presence through interactivity. Information & Management, 42(1), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.01.005
Cohen B., & Dean T. (2005). Information asymmetry and investor valuation of IPOs: top management team legitimacy as a capital market signal. Strategic Management Journal, 26(7), 683-690. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.463
Colombo, M.G., Franzoni, C., & Rossi Lamastra, C. (2015). Internal Social Capital and the Attraction of Early Contributions in Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 75-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12118
Colombo, M. G., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2020). Signaling in science-based IPOs: The combined effect of affiliation with prestigious universities, underwriters, and venture capitalists. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(1), 141-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.009
Colombo, O. (2021). The use of signals in new-venture financing: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 47(1), 237-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320911090
Connelly, B.L., Certo, S.T., Ireland, R.D., & Reutzel, C.R. (2011). Signalling theory: a review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419
Cordova, A., Dolci, J., & Gianfrate, G. (2015). The Determinants of Crowdfunding Success: Evidence from Technology Projects. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.872
Courntey, C., Dutta S., & Li, Y. (2017). Resolving Information Asymmetry: Signaling, Endorsement, and Crowdfunding Success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12267
Cumming, Douglas J., Leboeuf, G., & Schwienbacher, A. (2017). Crowdfunding Cleantech. Energy Economics Forthcoming, 65( c), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.030
Cumming, D. J., Vanacker, T., & Zahra, S. A. (2021). Equity crowdfunding and governance: Toward an integrative model and research agenda. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(1), 69-95. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0208
Davies, W. E., & Giovannetti, E. (2018). Signalling experience and reciprocity to temper asymmetric information in crowdfunding evidence from 10,000 projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133, 118-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.011
Fang, Y. (2012). Does online interactivity matter? Exploring the role of interactivity strategies in consumer decision making. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1790-1804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.019
Fisher, I. (1930). Theory of interest: as determined by impatience to spend income and opportunity to invest it. Augustus M. Kelley Publishers, 602 p.
Gu, B., Huang, Y., Duan, W., and Whinston, A. (2009). Indirect reciprocity in online social networks-a longitudinal analysis of individual contributions and peer enforcement in a peer-to peer music sharing network, Information system research 23(1), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1327759
Guiso, L., Paola, S., & Luigi, Z. (2004). The Role of Social Capital in Financial Development. American Economic Review, 94(3), 526-556. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041464498
Hasson, O. (1997). Towards a general theory of biological signaling. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 185(2), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1996.0258
Hou, J., Wang, N. and Ge, S. (2015). Antecedents of crowdfunding project success: an empirical study. Proceedings of the 2015 Wuhan International Conference on e-Business, "Emerging Operations & Services Management".
Johnson, J., Whittington, R., Angwin, D., Scholes, D., & Regnér, P. (2014). Exploring Strategy. Pearson, 2014. 816 p.
Johan, S., & Y. Zhang (2020). Quality revealing versus overstating in equity crowdfunding. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65(c), 101-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101741
Kirmani, A., & Rao, A. (2000). No Pain, No Gain: A Critical Review of the Literature on Signaling Unobservable Product Quality. Journal of Marketing, 64(2), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.2.66.18000
Koch, J.-A., Siering, M. (2015). Crowdfunding success factors: the characteristics of successfully funded projects on crowdfunding platforms. Proceedings of the 2015 Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2015); Muenster, Germany.
Koch, J., & Cheng, Q. (2016). The Role of Qualitative Success Factors in the Analysis of Crowdfunding Success: Evidence from Kickstarter. Proceedings of the 2016 20th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2016); Chiayi, Taiwan.
Kreps, D. M., & Wilson, R. (1982). Reputation and imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory, 27(2), 253-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(82)90030-8
Kromidha, E., & Robson, P. (2016). Social identity and signalling success factors in online crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28, 605-629. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1198425
Krueger, N., Reilly, M., & Carsrud, A. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 411-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0
Lin, M., Prabhala, N., & Viswanathan, S. (2013). Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending. Management Science, 59(1), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1560
Mitra, T., Gilbert, E., (2014). The language that gets people to give. Proceedings of the 2014 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531656
Mollick, E., (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. Journal of Bussiness Venturing, 29(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005
Moritz, A., & Block, J. H. (2014). Crowdfunding and Crowdinvesting: A Review of the Literature. ZfKE-Zeitschrift fur KMU und Entrepreneurship,62(3), 57-89. https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.62.1.57
Moysidou, K. (2016). Motivations to contribute financially to crowdfunding projects. In: Salampasis, D., Mention, A.L. (Eds.), Open Innovation: Unveiling the Power of the Human Element: World Scientific Publishing, 2017, 283-318. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813140851_0011
Nguyen, V.A., Lim, E.P., Tan, H.H., Jiang, J., & Sun, A. (2010). Do You Trust to Get Trust? A Study of Trust Reciprocity Behaviors and Reciprocal Trust Prediction. Proceedings of SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611972801.7
Nikiema, P. (2016). Typologie des signaux de crowdfunding et l'analyse de leur presence sur le financement des projets. Mémoire de la Maitrise des sciences de la gestion. Montréal : Université Du Québec à Montréal, 2016,1-101.
Petitjean, M. (2017). What explains the success of reward-based crowdfunding campaigns as they unfold? Evidence from the French crowdfunding platform Kisskissbankbank. Finance Research Letters, 26(C), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.11.005
Ross. S. (1977). The determination of financial structure: The incentive-signaling approach. Bell Journal of Economics, 8(1), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003485
Song, Y., Berger, R., Yosipof, A., & Barnes, B. R. (2019). Mining and investigating the factors influencing crowdfunding success. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, p.119723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119723
Spence, M., (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
Spence, M. (1974). Competitive and optimal responses to signals: an analysis of efficiency and distribution. J. Econ. Theory, 7(3), 296-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(74)90098-2
Spence, M. (2002). Signaling in Retrospect and the Informational Structure of Markets. The American Economic Review, 92(3), 434-459. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260136200
Stiglitz, J.E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 71(3), 393-410.
Thaler, R. (1997). Irving Fisher: Modern Behavioral Economist. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 439-441.
Townsend, R. M. (1979). Optimal Contracts and Competitive Markets with Costly State Veri- fication. Journal of Economic Theory, 21, 93-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(79)90031-0
Vismara, S. (2018). Signaling to Overcome Inefficiencies in Crowdfunding Markets. Innovation Finance & Accounting eJournal, 29-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66119-3_3
Wessel, M., Thies, F., Benlian, A. and Rudolph, J. (2016). Personality Matters: How Signaling Personality Traits Can Influence the Adoption and Diffusion of Crowdfunding Campaigns. Proceedings of the 2016 Twenty-Fourth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) on "Personality Traits in Crowdfunding", (pp. 1-18). İstanbul, Turkey.
Wang T., Zheng H., Xu Y. and Xu B. (2017). An Empirical Study of Sponsor Satisfaction in Reward-Based Crowdfunding. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 18(3), 178-193.
Xu, A., Yang, X., Rao, H., Fu, W.-T., Huang, S.-W., & Bailey, B.P. (2013). Show Me the Money! An Analysis of Project Updates during Crowdfunding Campaigns. Proceedings of 2014 thirty-two Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557045
Zvilichovsky, D., Inbar, Y., & Barzilay, O. (2015). Playing both sides of the market: Success and reciprocity on crowdfunding platforms. SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2304101
Zhang, Y., Tan, C., Sun, J., & Yang, Z. (2020). Why do people patronize donation-based crowdfunding platforms? An activity perspective of critical success factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, p.106470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106470
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
