Embracing Hybridity: A Business Model Innovation for Sustainable Social Enterprises
Abstract
Unlike commercial enterprises, social enterprises are required to generate both social and economic value. Hence, the sustainability of social enterprises must be considered from a dual perspective: generating and sustaining the envisioned social impact and sustain financially over time to make the social impact continuous. Prioritising social objectives over financial endurance can be suicidal as it may jeopardise the long-term financial viability of the enterprise. Hence, both business and social impact dimensions are to be given equal weightage and incorporated into the enterprise business model, considering the frictions that may exist during their co-existence and finding ways to balance both in long term. The paper starts with an analysis of various dimensions and interpretations of social enterprises followed by a review of literature on business models. The need of innovating the conventional business models used by commercial enterprises to suit social enterprises are then discussed and a business model canvas for social enterprises is proposed, suiting the dual objectives of the enterprise. The paper concludes with the case of a social enterprise, set up for the upliftment of urban poor, to illustrate the application of the proposed social business model canvas.
References
Agafonow, A. (2015). Value creation, value capture, and value devolution: Where do social enterprises stand?. Administration & Society, 47(8), 1038 - 1060. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714555756
Alter, S. K. (2007). Social enterprise typology. Virtue Ventures LLC. http://www.4lenses.org/setypology
Battilana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10, 51-55. https://doi.org/10.48558/WF5M-8Q69
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing-Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397-441. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.893615
Brouard, F., & Larivet, S. (2011). Essay of clarifications and definitions of the related concepts of social enterprise, social entrepreneur and social entrepreneurship. In A. Fayolle, & H. Matlay (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Social Entrepreneurship (pp. 29-56). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849804684.00008
Burkett, I. (n.d). Using the business model canvas for social enterprise design. Knode. Retrieved November 10, 2022, from https://cscuk.fcdo.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/BMC-for-Social-Enterprise.pdf
Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin‐off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529-555. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.3.529
Clohesy, S. J., & Reis, T. K. (1999). Unleashing new resources and entrepreneurship for the common good: A scan, synthesis, and scenario for action. W.K. Kellogg Foundation.
Dahan, N. M., Doh, J. P., Oetzel, J., & Yaziji, M. (2010). Corporate-NGO collaboration: Co-creating new business models for developing markets. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 326-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.11.003
Davies, I. A., & Chambers, L. (2018). Integrating hybridity and business model theory in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 378-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.196
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442053
Dentchev, N., Rauter, R., Jóhannsdóttir, L., Snihur, Y., Rosano, M., Baumgartner, R., Nyberg, T., Tang, X., van Hoof, B., & Jonker, J. (2018). Embracing the variety of sustainable business models: A prolific field of research and a future research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 194, 695-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.156
European Commission (2017). Social Enterprises. Retrieved June 25, 2021, from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/social-economy/enterprises_en
Grabowska, S. (2020). Changes in the social architecture of business model in the perspective of the Industry 4.0 concept. Management, 24(1), 130-142. https://doi.org/10.2478/manment-2019-0039
Kerlin, J. A. (2013). Defining social enterprise across different contexts: A conceptual framework based on institutional factors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(1), 84-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011433040
Margiono, M. A., Zolin, R., & Chang, A. (2018). A typology of social venture business model configurations. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 24(3), 626-650. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-09-2016-0316
Marquez, P., Reficco, E., & Berger, G. (2010). Socially inclusive business: Engaging the poor through market initiatives in Iberoamerica. Harvard University Press.
Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), 28-39.
Matzembacher, D. E., Raudsaar, M., Barcellos, M. D. D., & Mets, T. (2020). Business models' innovations to overcome hybridity-related tensions in sustainable entrepreneurship. Sustainability, 12(11), 4503. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114503
Michelini, L., & Fiorentino, D. (2012). New business models for creating shared value. Social Responsibility Journal, 8(4), 561-577. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111211272129
Mills-Scofield, D. (2013, January 14). Every business is (or should be) a social business. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2013/01/every-business-is-or-should-be
Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur's business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726-735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.001
Müller, S. (2012) Business models in social entrepreneurship. In C. K. Volkmann, K. O. Tokarski, K. Ernst (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship and Social Business (pp. 105-131). Gabler Verlag Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-7093-0_6
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons.
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 1. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01601
Richardson, J. (2008). The business model: An integrative framework for strategy execution. Strategic Change, 17(5-6), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.821
Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019). Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318793196
Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2016). Business models for sustainability: A co-evolutionary analysis of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and transformation. Organization and Environment, 29(3), 264-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026616633272
Shaughnessy, D. (2013). How to build financially sustainable social enterprises. SEI at Northeastern. Retrieved March 8, 2017, from https://www.northeastern.edu/sei/2013/09/how-to-build-financially-sustainable-social-enterprises/
Teasdale, S. (2011). What's in a name? Making sense of social enterprise discourses. Public Policy and Administration, 27(2), 99-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076711401466
Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy, and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 172-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
Timmers, P. (1998). Business models for electronic markets. Electronic Markets, 8(2), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10196789800000016
Vial, V. (2016). A business model canvas for social enterprises. Sains Humanika, 8(1/2). 1-8. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v8n1-2.825
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 308-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.005
Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007
Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 216-26.
Copyright (c) 2022 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
