State-Owned Holding Company and Value of Cash Holdings in Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.5175.2022Keywords:
Corporate Governance, State-Owned Holding Company, Ownership Structure, Cash Holdings, Value of Cash HoldingsAbstract
Ownership structure, which specifies the owners of the firm, is crucial to corporate governance as it one of the foundation explanation sources of agency conflicts. Roles and impacts of different corporate owners on corporate governance have been studied worldwide, but are not as popular for the role of a State-Owned Holding Company (SOH) as a model of state capital investment agency. This study examines the role of SOH in the management and governance of listed companies with state capital in Vietnam through cash holdings models. SOH-linked companies (SLCs) are found to hold more cash and the shareholders appreciate the cash hold by the SLCs as robust to the firms’ characteristics. SOH ownership significantly increases the value of cash holding, and the better value of cash holdings in SLCs is supposed to be a result coming from good corporate governance. This study contributes to the literature of ownership structure and corporate governance and provides evidence for SOH as a positive ownership and monitoring mechanism in improving corporate governance and firm performance in companies with state-owned capital in Vietnam.
References
Al-Najjar, B., & Clark, E. (2017). Corporate governance and cash holdings in MENA: Evidence from internal and external governance practices. Research in International Business and Finance, 39, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.07.030
Ang, J. S., & Ding, D. K. (2006). Government ownership and the performance of government-linked companies: The case of Singapore. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 16(1), 64-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2005.04.010
Bates, T., Kahle, K., & Stulz, R. (2009). Why do U. S. firms hold so much than they used to? The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 1985-2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01492.x
Bortolotti, B., Fantini, M., & Scarpa, C. (2002). Why do governments privatize abroad? International Review of Finance, 3(2), 131-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2443.00036
Bortolotti, B., & Faccio, M. (2008). Government control of privatized firms. Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 2907-2939. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40247651 https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn077
Chen, C. C. (2013, September 30). Corporate governance of state-owned enterprises: An empirical survey of the model of Temasek Holdings in Singapore (Research paper No. 6/2104) [Paper presentation]. 21st Century Commercial Law Forum: 13th International Symposium 2013, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2366699
Chen, C. (2016). Solving the puzzle of corporate governance of state-owned enterprises: The path of the Temasek model in Singapore and lessons for China. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 36(2), 303-370.
Chen, R. (Ryan), El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Nash, R. (2018). State ownership and corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53(5), 2293-2334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109018000236
Chen, Y. R., & Chuang, W. T. (2009). Alignment or entrenchment? Corporate governance and cash holdings in growing firms. Journal of Business Research, 62(11), 1200-1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.004
Dang, L. N., Nguyen, D. D., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2021). State-owned enterprise reform in Viet Nam: Progress and challenges. In F. Taghizadeh-Hesary, N. Yoshino, C. J. Kim, & K. Kim (Eds.), Reforming state-owned enterprises in Asia (pp. 231-254). ADB Institute Series on Development Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8574-6_12
Dittmar, A. , Mahrt-Smith, J., & Servaes, H. (2003). International corporate governance and corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 111-133. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126766
Dittmar, A., & Mahrt-Smith, J. (2007). Corporate governance and the value of cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 83(3), 599-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.12.006
Doan, T. (2020). The effect of cash holdings on firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam listed firms. Accounting, 6(5), 721-726. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.6.012
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/258191
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
Faulkender, M. W., & Wang, R. (2006). Corporate financial policy and the value of cash. Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1957-1990. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00894.x
Ferreira, M., & Vilela, A. (2004). Why do firms hold cash? Evidence from EMU countries. European Financial Management, 10(2), 295-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-7798.2004.00251.x
Gugler, K., & Weigand, J. (2003). Is ownership really endogenous? Applied Economics Letters, 10(8), 483-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350485032000095357
Gujarati, D. (1995). Basic econometrics (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Companies.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818789
Kim, H., & Chung, K. H. (2018). Can state-owned holding (SOH) companies improve SOE performance in Asia? Evidence from Singapore, Malaysia and China. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 11(2), 206-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2018.1450624
Ku, C., Lee, T. H., Chen, H., & Chang, D. Q. (2013). Excess cash holding and corporate governance: A comparative study of Taiwan and Mainland China firms. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(21), 53-70.
Lin, K. J., Lu, X., Zhang, J., & Zheng, Y. (2020). State-owned enterprises in China: A review of 40 years of research and practice. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13, 31-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2019.12.001
Loncan, T. (2020). Foreign institutional ownership and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from emerging economies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 71, 101295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.12.003
Martínez-Sola, C., García-Teruel, P. J., & Martínez-Solano, P. (2018). Cash holdings in SMEs: Speed of adjustment, growth and financing. Small Business Economics, 51, 823-842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-9990-y
Nurgozhayeva, R. (2017). State ownership in terms of transition: Curse or blessing. Cornell International Law Journal, 50(1), 47-73. https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/58zwc
Nguyen Thi, Q. N., Tran, Q. T., & Doan, H. P. (2021). Foreign ownership, state ownership and cash holdings under the global financial crisis: Evidence from the emerging market of Vietnam. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(2), 214-236. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-03-2020-0303
Nguyen, T. T., & Nguyen, H. T. (2020). State ownership and firm performance in Vietnam: The role of state-owned holding company. Asian Journal Of Business And Accounting, 13(2), 181-212. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol13no2.7
Opler, K., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holding. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(1), 3-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00003-3
Pei, C., Yang C., Yang X. (2019) The SOE reform in China's new normal: Problems and suggestions. In The Basic Economic System of China: China Governance System Research Series (pp. 193-205). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6895-0_9
Peng, M. W., Bruton, G. D., Stan, C. V., & Huang, Y. (2016). Theories of the (state-owned) firm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(2), 293-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-016-9462-3
Sam, C. Y. (2008). Partial privatization, corporate governance, and the role of state-owned holding companies. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 13(1), 63-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860701731895
Sam, C, Y. (2010). Globalizing partially privatized firms in Singapore: The role of government as a regulator and a shareholder. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 45(3), 258-273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909610364778
Sam, C. Y. (2013). Partial privatisation and the role of state owned holding companies in China. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(3), 767-789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9190-5
Schauten, M. B. J., Dijk, D. V., & Waal, J. P. V. D. (2011). Corporate governance and the cost of debt of large European firms. European Financial Management, 19(5), 991-1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2011.00615.x
Seifert, B., & Gonenc, H. (2018). The effects of country and firm-level governance on cash management. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 52, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.12.001
Tan, C. H., Puchniak, D. W., & Varottil, U. (2015). State-Owned Enterprises in Singapore: Historical Insights into a Potential Model for Reform. Colum. J. Asian L., 61, 77-91. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580422
Wang, L., & Judge, W. Q. (2012). Managerial ownership and the role of privatization in transition economies: The case of China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(2), 479-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9205-9
Wong, S. C. Y. (2004). Improving corporate governance in SOEs: An integrated approach. Corporate Governance International, 7(2), 5-15.
Wicaksono, A. (2008). Indonesian state-owned enterprises: The challenge of reform. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2008, 146-167. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27913357 https://doi.org/10.1355/SEAA08I
Yu, H. (2019). Reform of state-owned enterprises in China: The Chinese Communist Party strikes back. Asian Studies Review, 43(2), 332-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2019.1590313
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
