Corruption and Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.5168.2022Keywords:
Entrepreneurship, corruption, developing countries, GMMAbstract
The importance of entrepreneurship as a driver of economic development cannot be denied. Nevertheless, developing countries suffer from unsatisfactory entrepreneurship level, partially explained the low economic growth. Given the main attribute of developing countries, which is highly corrupted, this study empirically investigates the effect of corruption on entrepreneurship in 48 developing countries from 2008-2016. By using Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimator, the results show that an increase in corruption will promote more new business start-ups suggesting that in highly corrupted countries, potential entrepreneurs may observe that the only way to start a business is to bribe government officers to get licenses, permits and business approval. Therefore, a proactive role of government in effectively reducing and eventually eliminating corruption to create a more conducive environment for entrepreneurs to grow up is very critical.
References
Acs, Z. J., Desai, S., & Klapper, L. F. (2008). What does entrepreneurship data really show? Small Business Economics, 31(3), 265-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9137-7
Acs, Z. J., Szerb, L. & Lloyd, A. (2017). Global entrepreneurship and development index 2017. Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65903-9
Acs, Z. J., & Varga. (2005). Entrepreneurship, agglomeration and technological change. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1998-4
Aidis, R., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2008). Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 656-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.005
Aparicio, S., Urbano, D. & Audretsch, D. (2016). Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102, 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.04.006
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. R. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error-components models, Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
Aterido, R., Hallward-Driemeier, M., & Pages, C. (2011). Big constraints to small firms' growth? Business environment and employment growth across firms. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 59(3), 609-647. https://doi.org/10.1086/658349
Audretsch, D. B., Bönte, W., & Keilbach, M. (2008). Entrepreneurship capital and its impact on knowledge diffusion and economic performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 687-698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.006
Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2013). The China syndrome: Local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2121-2168. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.6.2121
Avnimelech, G., Zelekha, Y., & Sharabi, E. (2014). The effect of corruption on entrepreneurship in developed vs non-developed countries. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 20(3), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-10-2012-0121
Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C., & Fiet, J. O. (2014). The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: A meta-analytic review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 217-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12095
Bologna, J., & Ross, A. (2015). Corruption and entrepreneurship: evidence from Brazilian municipalities. Public Choice, 165(1), 59-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0292-5
Bjornskov, C., & Foss, N, J. (2008). Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity: Some cross-country evidence. Public Choice, 134(3), 307-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9229-y
Bloom, N., Draca, M., & Van Reenen, J. (2016). Trade induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(1), 87-117. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdv039
Blundell, R. W., & Bond, S. R. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models, Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
Castano, M. S., Méndez, M. T., & Galindo, M. A. (2015). The effect of social, cultural, and economic factors on entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1496-1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.040
Chowdhury, F., Desai, S., Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2015). Does corruption matter for international entrepreneurship? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 959-980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-015-0372-5
Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2010). On growth drivers of high-tech start-ups: Exploring the role of founders' human capital and venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 610-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.005
Congregado, E., Golpe, A. A., & Parker, S. C. (2012). The dynamics of entrepreneurship: Hysteresis, business cycles and government policy. Empirical Economics, 43(3), 1239-1261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0516-6
Cueto, B., Mayor, M., & Suárez, P. (2015). Entrepreneurship and unemployment in Spain: A regional analysis. Applied Economics Letters, 22(15), 1230-1235. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1021450
De Clercq, D. D., & Arenius, P. (2006). The role of knowledge in business start-up activity. International Small Business Journal, 24(4), 339-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242606065507
De Loecker, J., Goldberg, P. K., Khandelwal, A. K., & Pavcnik, N. (2016). Prices, markups, and trade reform. Econometrica, 84(2), 445-510. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA11042
Doms, M., Lewis, E., & Robb, A. (2010). Local labor force education, new business characteristics, and firm performance. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.10.002
Dreher, A. & Gassebner, M. (2013). Greasing the wheels - The impact of regulations and corruption on firm entry. Public Choice, 155(3), 413-432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9871-2
Dutta, N. & Sobel, R. (2016). Does corruption ever help entrepreneurship? Small Business Economics, 47(1), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9728-7
Dvouletý, O. (2017). Determinants of Nordic entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(1), 12-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-07-2016-0104
Estrin, S., Korosteleva, J., & Mickiewicz, T. (2013). Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations? Journal of Business Venturing, 28(4), 564-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.05.001
Fernandes, A. M., & Paunov, C. (2010). Does trade stimulate innovation? Evidence from firm-product data (OECD Development Centre Working Paper No. 286). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/5kmmp8g92x34-en
Fritsch, M., Kritikos, A., and Pijnenburg, K. (2015). Business cycles, unemployment and entrepreneurial entry - Evidence from Germany. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(2), 267-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0326-3
Fuentelsaz, L., González, C., Maícas, J. P., & Montero, J. (2015). How different formal institutions affect opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 18(4), 246-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2015.02.001
Ghani, E., Kerr, W. R., & O'connell, S. (2014). Spatial determinants of entrepreneurship in India. Regional Studies, 48(6), 1071-1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.839869
Gomes-Casseres, B. (1997). Alliance strategies of small firms. Small Business Economics, 9(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007947629435
Guerrero, M., Perez, S., & Guerrero, I (2017). How economic freedom affects opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship in the OECD countries. Journal of Business Research, 73, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.017
Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50(4), 1029-1054. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912775
Hoogendoorn, B. (2016). The prevalence and determinants of social entrepreneurship at the macro level. Journal of Small Business Management, 54, 278-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12301
Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W. & Rosen, H. (1988). Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica, 56(6), 1371-1395. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913103
Koellinger, P. M., & Thurik, A. R. (2012). Entrepreneurship and the business cycle. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(4), 1143-1156. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00224
Kreiser, P. M., Louis, D., Marino, L. M., Kuratko, D. F., & Mark Weaver, K. M. (2013). Disaggregating entrepreneurial orientation: the non-linear impact of innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking on SME performance. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 273-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9460-x
Kristjánsdóttir, H., Guðlaugsson, B. O., Guðmundsdóttir, S., & Aðalsteinsson, G. D. (2017). Hofstede national culture and international trade, Applied Economics, 49(57), 5792-5801. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1343446
Leff, N. H. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426400800303
Masron, T. A., & Nor, E. (2013). FDI in ASEAN-8. Does institutional quality matter? Applied Economics Letters, 20(2), 186-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2012.687090
Masron, T. A., & Subramaniam, Y. (2020). Threshold effect of institutional quality and the validity of environmental Kuznets curve. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 57(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.22452/MJES.vol57no1.5
Naude, W. A., & Rossouw, S. (2010). Early international entrepreneurship in China: Extent and determinants. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-010-0049-7
Noorderhaven, N., Thurik, R., Wennekers, S., & Van Stel, A. (2004). The role of dissatisfaction and per capita income in explaining self-employment across 15 European countries. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(5), 447-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00057.x
Oosterbeek, H., Van Praag, M., & Ijsselstein, A. (2010). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. European Economic Review, 54, 442-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.08.002
Pathak, S., Oliveira, E. M., & Laplume, A. O. (2015). Entrepreneurship in transition economies: The role of corruption and individual attributes. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 17(4), 427-446. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2015.1063307
Park, C. (2017). A study on effect of entrepreneurship on entrepreneurial intention: Focusing on ICT majors. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-08-2017-024
Phillips, J., & Land, K. C. (2012). The link between unemployment and crime rate fluctuations: An analysis at the county, state, and national levels. Social Science Research, 41(3), 681-694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.01.001
Puffer, S. M., McCarthy, D. J., & Boisot, M. (2010). Entrepreneurship in Russia and China. The impact of formal institutional voids. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 441-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00353.x
Sara, T. S., & Newhouse, B. (1995). Transaction costs and foreign direct investment in developing countries. International Advances in Economic Research, 1(4), 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295784
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into pro-fits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Ward University Press.
Simón-Moya, V. S., Revuelto-Taboada, L. R., & Guerrero, R. F. (2014). Institutional and economic drivers of entrepreneurship: An international perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 715-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.033
Sobel, R. S., Clark, J. R., & Lee, D. R. (2007). Freedom, barriers to entry, entrepreneurship, and economic progress. The Review of Austrian Economics, 20(4), 221-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-007-0023-3
Stuetzer, M., Audretsch, D. B., Obschonka, M., Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, J. P., & Potter, J. (2018). Entrepreneurship culture, knowledge spillovers & the growth of regions. Regional Studies, 52(5), 603-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1294251
Transparency International. (2017). Corruption Perception Index (Online). http://www.transparency.org.
Van Der Sluis, J., Van Praag, M., & Vijverberg, W. (2008). Education & entrepreneurship selection & performance: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(5), 795-841. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2008.00550.x
Verheul, I., Wennekers, S., Audretsch, D., & Thurik, R. (2002). An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: Policies, institutions & culture. In D. Audretsch, R. Thurik, I. Verheul, S. Wennekers (Eds.), Entrepreneurship: Determinants & policy in a European-US comparison. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47556-1_2
World Bank. (2017a). World development indicators. The World Bank. Retrieved March 20, 2017 from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
World Bank. (2017b). Worldwide governance indicators. The World Bank. Retrieved March 20, 2017 from https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi.
World Bank. (2017c). Doing business. The World Bank. Retrieved March 20, 2017 from https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/business-enabling-environment/doing-business-legacy.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
