Does Audit Committee Moderate the Relationship Between Auditor Independence and Earnings Management During Initial Implementation of MFRS in Malaysia?
Abstract
This paper presents an evaluation of auditor independence concerns against the backdrop of current Malaysian corporate financial scandals by examining the relationship between auditor independence and earnings management, and the role of audit committees in overseeing auditor independence. The study used 1,035 firm-year data in the main market of Bursa Malaysia from 2012 to 2014 and employed multivariate regression analyses. The results revealed that when non-audit fees and total fees were higher, it could reduce the auditor’s independence as higher fees can create economic dependency on his clients. This study found that audit committee size and the frequency of meetings were positively related to earnings management. When testing the audit committee moderation on auditor independence, the study found that audit committee size and its frequency of meetings weaken the positive relationships between lower auditor independence and earnings management. These findings help regulators and professional bodies think about the impact of audit and NAS fees on auditor independence and the audit committee's oversight responsibility. To assess auditor independence, companies should form a fully independent audit committee in accordance with the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance 2021 (Securities Commission of Malaysia, 2021).
References
Abbott, L. J., Park, Y., & Parker, S. (2000). The effects of audit committee activity and independence on corporate fraud. Managerial Finance, 26(11), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350010766990
Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F., & Raghunandan, K. (2003a). An empirical investigation of audit fees, non-audit fees, and audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(2), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.1506/8YP9-P27G-5NW5-DJKK
Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F., & Raghunandan, K. (2003b). The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 22(2), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2003.22.2.17
Abdul Wahab, E. A., Nik Abdul Majid, W. Z., Harymawan, I., & Agustia, D. (2020). Characteristics of auditors' non-audit services and accruals quality in Malaysia. Pacific Accounting Review, 32(2), 147-175. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-10-2018-0072
Adam, S., & Arnold, L. (2018, May 24). The story of Malaysia's 1MDB, the scandal that shook the world of finance. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-24/ how-malaysia-s-1mdb-scandal-shook-the-financial-world-quicktake
Ahmad, A. C., Shafie, R., & Yusof, N. Z. M. (2006). The provision of non-audit service, audit fee and auditor independence. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 2(1), 21-40.
Bakar, N. B. A., & Ahmad, M. (2009). Auditor independence: Malaysian accountants' perceptions. International Journal of Business and Management, 2(12), 129-141.
Bamahros, H. M., & Wan-Hussin, W. N. (2015). Non-audit services, audit firm tenure and earnings management in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 11(1), 145-168.
Barrock, J. (2021, July 5). The drama at Serba Dinamik continues. The Edge. https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/drama-serba-dinamik-continues
Bavly, D. A. (1999). Corporate governance, and accountability: What role for the regulator, director, and auditor? Greenwood Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/1079/43262.28.5.20001101/30364.4
Beattie, V., & Fearnley, S. (2002). Auditor independence and non-audit services: A literature review. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
Beattie, V., Brandt, R., & Fearnley, S. (1999). Perceptions of auditor independence: U.K. evidence. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 8(1), 67-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1061-9518(99)00005-1
Bliss, M. A., Gul, F. A., & Majid, A. (2011). Do political connections affect the role of independent audit committees and CEO duality? Some evidence from Malaysian audit pricing. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 7(2), 82-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2011.10.002
Bontje, C. (2015). Client importance and earnings management: The moderating role of corporate governance (Unpublished master thesis), University of Amsterdam.
Bursa Malaysia. (2020). Main market listing requirements, chapter 15 - corporate governance. https://www.bursamalaysia.com/sites/5bb54be15f36ca0af339077a/content_entry5ce3b50239fba2627b2864be/5ce3b5ce5b711a163beae1bd/files/MAIN_Chap15__Anti-corruption_1June2020.pdf?1590748016
Cassell, C. A., Myers, L. A., Seidel, T. A., & Jian, Z. (2016). The effect of lame duck auditors on management discretion: An empirical analysis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 35(3), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51378
Cheong, P. C., Teh, B. H., Ong, T. S., & Hoe, H. Y. (2015). The relationship among audit quality, earnings management, and financial performance of Malaysian public listed companies. International Journal of Economics and Management, 9(1), 211-231.
Choong, E. H. (2012, August 6). Silver bird's suit shocks accountants; may result in higher audit fees. The Business Star Online. https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2012/08/06/silver-birds-suit-shocks-accountants-may-result-in-higher-audit-fees
Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. Accounting Review, 70(2), 193-225.
Ebrahim, A. (2007). Earnings management and board activity: An additional evidence. Review of Accounting and Finance, 6(1), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/14757700710725458
Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Asia Higher Education.
Gul, F. A., Srinidhi, B., & Ng, A. C. (2011). Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 314-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.01.005
Haji-Abdullah, N. M., Othman, R., & Marzuki, M. M. (2017). Non-audit services, audit opinion, cultural, affiliated directors and fraudulent financial reporting: Evidence from Malaysia. Advanced Science Letters, 23(1), 665-669. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7291
Hoitash, R., Markelevich, A., & Barragato, C. A. (2007). Auditor fees and audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(8), 761-786. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710819634
Ianniello, G. (2010). Disclosure of non-audit services in annual reports and auditor independence: Evidence from Italy. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 85(2), 573-605.
Johl, S., Subramaniam, N., & Mat Zain, M. (2012). Audit committee and CEO ethnicity and audit fees: Some Malaysian evidence. The International Journal of Accounting, 47(3), 302-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2012.07.002
Kanagaretnam, K., Krishnan, G. V., & Lobo, G. J. (2010). An empirical analysis of auditor independence in the banking industry. Accounting Review, 85(6), 2011-2046. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.6.2011
Kasznik, R. (1999). On the association between voluntary disclosure and earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(1), 57-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491396
Kulik, B. W. (2005). Agency theory, reasoning and culture at Enron: In search of a solution. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-7308-2
Larcker, D. F., Richardson, S. A., & Tuna, I. (2007). Corporate governance, accounting outcomes, and organizational performance. The Accounting Review, 82(4), 963-1008. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.4.963
Malaysian Accounting Standard Board. (2014). MASB announces the effective date of MFRS framework for transitioning entities. http://www.masb.org.my/press_list.php?id=16.
Malaysian Institute of Accountants. (2018). By-laws (on professional ethics, conduct and practice) of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants. Malaysian Institute of Accountants.
Mansor, N., Che-Ahmad, A., Ahmad-Zaluki, N. A., & Osman, A. H. (2013). Corporate governance and earnings management: A study on the Malaysian family and non-family owned PLCs. Procedia Economics and Finance, 7, 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00238-4
Mardjono, E. S., & Chen, Y-S. (2020). Earning management and the effect characteristics of audit committee, independent commissioners: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Society, 21(2), 569-587. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3272.2020
Masmoudi, S. M. (2021). The Effect of audit committee characteristics on financial reporting quality: The moderating role of audit quality in the Netherlands. Corporate Ownership & Control, 18(3), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv18i3art2
Menon, K., & Deahl Williams, J. (1994). The use of audit committees for monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 13(2), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(94)90016-7
Nik Abdul Majid, W.Z., Abdul Wahab, E.A., Haron, H., Agustia, D. & Nasih, M. (2021). Non-audit services, audit committee characteristics and accruals quality in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-09-2020-0090
Peasnell, K. V., Pope, P. F., & Young, S. (2000). Detecting earnings management using cross-sectional abnormal accruals models. Accounting and Business Research, 30(4), 313-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2000.9728949
Safari Gerayli, M., Rezaei Pitenoei, Y. and Abdollahi, A. (2021). Do audit committee characteristics improve financial reporting quality in emerging markets? Evidence from Iran. Asian Review of Accounting, 29(2), 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-10-2020-0155
Saleh, N. M., Iskandar, T. M., & Rahmat, M. M. (2007). Audit committee characteristics and earnings management: Evidence from Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 15(2), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1108/13217340710823369
Securities Commission of Malaysia. (2007). Malaysian code on corporate governance (revised 2007). Securities Commission of Malaysia. https://ecgi.global/sites/default/files/codes/documents/cg_code_malaysia_2007_en.pdf.
Securities Commission of Malaysia. (2012). Malaysian code of corporate governance. Securities Commission of Malaysia.
Securities Commission of Malaysia. (2017). Malaysian code on corporate governance (revised 2017). Securities Commission of Malaysia.
Securities Commission of Malaysia. (2021). Malaysian code on corporate governance (as at 30 April 2021). Securities Commission of Malaysia. https://www.sc.com.my/api/documentm s/download.ashx?id=239e5ea1-a258-4db8-a9e2-41c215bdb776
Setiawan, D., Phua, L.K., Chee, H.K. and Trinugroho, I. (2020). The effect of audit committee characteristics on earnings management: The case of Indonesia. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 10(4), 447-463. https://doi.org/10.1504/AAJFA.2020.110488
Sharma, V. D., Sharma, D. S., & Ananthanarayanan, U. (2011). Client importance and earnings management: The moderating role of audit committees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 30(3), 125-156. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10111
Sidik Jaafar, H. M., & Abd Rahim, R. (2012). The benefits and challenges of financial reporting standards in Malaysia: Accounting practitioners' perceptions. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(7), 98-108.
Simunic, D. A. (1990). Discussion of external audit and asymmetric information. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 9, 243-248.
Siregar, S. V., & Utama, S. (2008). Type of earnings management and the effect of ownership structure, firm size, and corporate-governance practices: Evidence from Indonesia. The International Journal of Accounting, 43(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2008.01.001
Song, J., & Windram, B. (2004). Benchmarking audit committee effectiveness in financial reporting. International Journal of Auditing, 8(3), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2004.00090.x
Sulong, Z., & Nor, F. M. (2008). Dividends, ownership structure and board governance on firm value: Empirical evidence from Malaysian listed firms. Malaysian Accounting Review, 7(2), 55-94.
Verschoor, C. C. (2008). Audit committee essentials. John Wiley & Sons.
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1983). Agency problems, auditing, and the theory of the Firm: some evidence. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(3), 613-633. https://doi.org/10.1086/467051
Wu, C. Y. H., Hsu, H.-H., & Haslam, J. (2016). Audit committees, non-audit services, and auditor reporting decisions prior to failure. The British Accounting Review, 48(2), 240-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2015.03.001
Xie, B., Davidson, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(02)00006-8
Zhou, J. (2008). Financial reporting after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Conservative or less earnings management? Research in Accounting Regulation, 20, 187-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1052-0457(07)00210-X
Copyright (c) 2022 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
