The Impact of Innovation, Organizational, Technological Capital on Innovation Performance of SMEs: The Mediating Effect of Innovative Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.4623.2022Keywords:
Entrepreneurship, structural capital, technological capital, innovation capital, organizational capital, SMEs, innovative intelligenceAbstract
Innovation is crucial for SMEs to survive and impacts the national economy. The present study is conducted in the context of knowledge-based SMEs in Malaysia concerning structural capital (technology capital, innovation capital, and organizational capital), innovative intelligence, and innovation performance. A survey was carried out through a face-face interview and online. A total of 136 usable questionnaires were then analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). This study has shed light on the role of the structural capital of knowledge-based SMEs on innovation performance. While structural capital is significant for organizations to achieve their competitive advantage and should be given necessary attention compared to human capital, innovation and technological capital were not fully capitalized. The presence of innovative intelligence in SMEs helps to be innovative. This result will be encouraging to SMEs in other developing countries. The results obtained are useful for SMEs, especially knowledge-based firms where technology and innovation are critical to achieving a competitive advantage. The results are also significant for agencies that handle SMEs in high-tech and policymakers to increase performance and promote economic stability.
References
Abd Razak, A., Rowling, M., White G., & Mason-Jones, R. (2018). Public Sector Supply Chain Management: A Triple Helix Approach to Aligning Innovative Environmental Initiatives. Foresight and STI Governance, 10(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459x.2016.1.43.52
Alazzawi, A. A., Upadhyaya, M., EL-Shishini,, H. M., & Alkubaisi, M. (2018). Technological Capital and Firm Financial Performance: Quantitative Investigation On Intellectual Capital Efficiency Coefficient. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 22(2), 1-10.
Akman, G., & Yilmaz, C. (2008). Innovative capability, innovation strategy and market orientation: An empirical analysis in Turkish software industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(1), 69-111. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919608001923
Alegre, J., Sengupta, K., & Lapiedra, R. (2011). Knowledge management and innovation performance in a high-tech SMEs industry. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 31(4), 454-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242611417472
Al‐kalouti, J., Kumar, V., Kumar, N., Garza‐Reyes, J., Upadhyay, A., & Zwiegelaar, J. B. (2020). Investigating innovation capability and organizational performance in service firms. Briefings in Entrepreneurial Finance, 29, 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2314
Aramburu, N., Sáenz, J., & Blanco, C. E. (2015). Structural capital, innovation capability, and company performance in technology-based colombian firms. Cuadernos de Gestión, 15(1), 39-60. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.130427na
Asim, Z., & Sorooshian, S. (2019). Technology, Market, and Complexity Review Exploring the Role of Knowledge, Innovation and Technology Management (KNIT) Capabilities that Influence Research and Development. Journal of Open Innovation. Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5, 21-47. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5020021
Azyabi, N., & Fisher, J. (2014, December 8-10). Exploration and Exploitation as Knowledge Management Strategic Approaches in Saudi Arabian SMEs. 25th Australasian Conference on Information Systems: Exploration and Exploitation as KM strategy in SMEs. Auckland, New Zealand.
Barbieri, B., Buonomo, I., Farnese, M. L., & Benevene, P. (2021). Organizational Capital: A Resource for Changing and Performing in Public Administrations. Sustainability, 13, 5436. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105436
Benevene, P., Kong, E., Barbieri, B., Lucchesi, M., & Cortini, M. (2017). Representation of intellectual capital's components amongst Italian social enterprises. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18, 564-587. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-12-2016-0127
Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual Capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810204142
Bontis, N., Keow, C. C., & Richardson, S. (2000). Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian Industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1) 85-100 https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930010324188
Bowen, F. E., Rostami, M., & Steel, P. (2010) Timing is everything: A meta-analysis of the relationships between organizational performance and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 63, 1179-1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.10.014
Cardoni, A., Zanin, F., Corazza, G., & Paradis, A. (2020). Knowledge Management and Performance Measurement Systems for SMEs' Economic Sustainability, Sustainability, 12, 2594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072594
Castaneda, D. I., & Cuellar, S. (2020). Knowledge sharing and innovation: A systematic review. Knowledge Process Management. 27, 159-173. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1637
Chaoji, P., & Martinsuo, M. (2019). Creation processes for radical manufacturing technology innovations. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(7), 1005-1033. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2018-0233
Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 655-690). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29
Cohen, S., & Kaimenakis, N. (2007). Intellectual Capital and corporate performance in knowledge-intensive SMEs. The Learning Organization, 14(3), 241-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470710739417
Curado, C., Muñoz-Pascual, L., & Galende, J. (2018). Antecedents to innovation performance in SMEs: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Business Research, 89, 206-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.056
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (DOSM) (2020). Economic Census 2016. https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cone&menu_id=RDRSYVRzK1JFcmh0dm5mV1I4NkFJQT09#:~:text=Economic%20Census%20is%20a%20statistical,once%20in%20every%20five%20years.
Dessein, W., & Prat, A. (2017). Organizational Capital, Corporate Leadership, and Firm Dynamics. Columbia Business School Research Paper, 17-89. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3024285
Dyer, J., Furr, N., & Lefrandt, C. (2019). Innovation Capital: An Emerging Source of Competitive Advantage. Chief Executive. https://chiefexecutive.net/innovation-capital-an-emerging-source-of-competitive-advantage/
Duran, D. C., Gogan, M. L., & Duran, V. (2014). Innovation Capital - A Possible Approach in Evaluation the Intangibles Assets. Network Intelligence Studies, 2(2), 217-222.
Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. (1997). Intellectual Capital. Harper Business, New York.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd Ed). Sage: Thousand Oaks.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2018). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Han, Y., & Li, D. (2015). Effects of intellectual capital on innovative performance: The role of knowledge-based dynamic capability. Management Decision, 53(1), 40-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2013-0411
Hanifah, H., Abdul Halim, H., Ahmad, N. H., & Vafaei-Zadeh, A. (2020). Can internal factors improve innovation performance via innovation culture in SMEs? Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(1), 382-405. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2018-0174
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares pathmodeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), Advances in international marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277-320). Bingley: Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. A (2015). New criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Ghazilla, A., Sakundarini, N., Abdul-Rashid, S. H., Ayub, N. S., & Olugu, E. U. (2015). Drivers and barriers analysis for green manufacturing practices in Malaysian SMEs: A Preliminary Findings. Procedia CIRP, 26(2015), 658 - 663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.085
Kang, M. (2016, February 29). Time to upskill SMEs. The Star Online. https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/smebiz/columns/2016/02/29/time-to-upskill-smes/
Kline, R.B. (2011). Principle s and practice of structural equaiton modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Kijek, T. (2012). Innovation Capital and its Measurement. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 8(4). https://jemi.edu.pl/vol-8-issue-4-2012/innovation-capital-and-its-measurement https://doi.org/10.7341/2012844
Kull, T. J., Kotlar, J., & Spring, M. (2017), Small and Medium Enterprise Research in Supply Chain Management: The Case for Single-Respondent Research Designs. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 54(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12157
Kumar, A., & Kalse, A. (2021). Usage and adoption of artificial intelligence in SMEs. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.595
Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge Management Enablers. Process and organizational performance; an integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045756
Levy, M., Loebbecke, C., & Powell, P. (2003). SMEs, co-opetition and knowledge sharing: the role of information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 12, 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000439
McGrattan, E. R., & Prescott, E. C. (2009). Openness, technology capital, and development. Journal of Economic Theory, 144, 2454-2476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2008.05.012
Martı'n-de-Castro, G., Navas-Lo'pez, J. E., Lo'pez-Sa'ez, P., & Alama-Salazar, E. (2006). Organizational capital as competitive advantage of the firm. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(3), 324-337. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930610681438
Marzetti, G. V., & Tronconi, C. (2009). Organizational Capital and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence for European Firms. Economics Letters, 112(2), 141-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.04.004
Mohsin, A. A., Halim H. A., & Ahmad N. H. (2015) Competitive Intelligence Among SMEs: Assessing the Role of Entrepreneurial Attitude Orientation on Innovation Performance. In M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, E. Demir, & C. K. M. Lau (Eds.), Innovation, Finance, and the Economy, Proceedings of the 13th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15880-8_2
Muhammad, M. Z., Char, A. K., Yasoa, M. R., & Hassan, Z. (2010). Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Competing in the Global Business Environment: A Case of Malaysia. International Business Research, 3(1),66-75. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v3n1p66
Ngah, R., & Wong, K. Y. (2020). Linking knowledge management to competitive strategies of knowledge-based SMEs. The Bottom Line, 33(1), 42-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-08-2019-0105
Ngah, R., Abd Wahab, I., & Salleh, Z. (2015). The Sustainable Competitive Advantage of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) with Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Innovative Intelligence: Building A Conceptual Framework. Advanced Science Letters, 21(5), 1325-1328. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2015.6018
Ngah, R., Salleh, Z., & Ab Wahab, I. (2016, August 29-30). Knowledge management, innovative intelligence and sustainable competitive advantage in Small and Medium Enterprises. In Knowledge Management International Conference (KMICe). Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (OECD) (2017). Enhancing the Contributions of SMEs In A Global And Digitalised Economy. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/industry/C-MIN-2017-8-EN.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (OECD) (2018). OECD science, technology and innovation outlook 2018. OECD Publishing. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-andtechnology/oecd-science-technology-and-innovation-outlook -2018_sti_in_outlook-2018-en#page1
Papachristodoulou, E., Koutsaki, M., & Kirkos, E. (2017). Business intelligence and SMEs: Bridging the gap. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 7, 70-78. https://doi.org/10.37380/jisib.v7i1.216
Papula, J., & Volná, J. (2013). Core Competence for Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Multidisciplinary Academic Research. Praha: MAC Prague.
Placer-Maruri, E., Pérez-González, D., & Soto-Acosta, P. (2016). Effects of the use of competitive intelligence in industrial SMEs. Intangible Capital, 12(4), 923-941. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.750
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 6(3), 539-569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Popovič, A., Puklavec, B., & Oliveira, T. (2019). Justifying business intelligence systems adoption in SMEs: Impact of systems use on firm performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(1), 210-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-02-2018-0085
Ren, S., Eisingerich, A. B., & Tsai, H.-T. (2014). How do marketing, research and development capabilities, and degree of internalization synergistically affect the innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)? A panel data study of Chinese SMEs. International Business Review, 24(4), 642-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.11.006
Roberts, N., & Grover, V. (2012). Investigating firm's customer agility and firm performance: The importance of aligning sense and respond capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 65(5), 579-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.009
Saadi, I. A., & Che Razak (2019). Technological Capability, Innovative Human Capital and Organizational Sustainability: A Proposed Framework. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 10(6), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijimt.2019.10.6.864
Salavou, H., & Avlonitis, G. (2008). Product innovativeness and performance: a focus on SMEs Management Decision, 46(7), 969-985. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810890168
Serrat, O. (2017). A Primer on Intellectual Capital. In: Knowledge Solutions. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_20
Shaari, J. b., Md Isa, A. b., & Khalique, M. (2018). Impact of Intellectual Capital on Organizational Performance of ICT SMEs in Penang, Malaysia. Market Forces: College of Management Sciences, 13(2), 1-20.
SME Insights. (2021). SMEs in the new normal: Rebuilding the economy. https://www.smecorp.gov.my/images/pdf/2021/LTPKS/BI/Main%20Report/Full%20Report_SME%20Insights%202019.20.pdf
Stewart, T. A. (2000). Intellectual Capital: The new wealth of organizations. London, Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Stjepi'c, A., Bach, A. P., & Vukši'c, B. S. (2021). Exploring Risks in the Adoption of Business Intelligence in SMEs Using the TOE Framework. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14020058
Teo, T. S. H., Srivastava, S. C., & Jiang, L. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: an empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99-132. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303
Ünay, F. G., & Zehir, C. (2012). Innovation intelligence and entrepreneurship in the fashion industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 315 - 321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.036
Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems With Applications, 39, 8899- 8908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.017
Weiss, D. S., & Legrand, C. (2011). Innovative Intelligence: The Art and Practice of Leading Sustainable Innovation in Your Organization. John Wiley & Sons.
Wu, X., & Sivalogathasan, V. (2013). Intellectual Capital for Innovation Capability: A Conceptual Model for Innovation. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 4(3), 139-144. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJTEF.2013.V4.274
Wu, H., Chen, J., & Jiao, H. (2016). Dynamic capabilities as a mediator linking international diversification and innovation performance of firms in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2678-2686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.003
Wu, S. H., Lin, L. Y., & Hsu, M. Y. (2007). Intellectual capital, dynamic capabilities and innovative performance of organizations. International Journal of Technology Management, 39(3/4), 279-282. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2007.013496
Zambon, S., & Monciardini, D. (2015). Intellectual capital and innovation. A guideline for future research. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 17, 13-26. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.017.0013
Zakery, A., & Saremi, M. S. (2021). Knowledge and intellectual capital in internationalizing SMEs, case study in technology-based health companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(2), 219-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-02-2020-0048
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
