Strategic Agility: Linking People and Organisational Performance of Private Higher Learning Institutions in Malaysia
Strategic agility arises from the capabilities of people. Ultimately, in today’s turbulent business landscape, organisations need strategic agility to acquire the dynamism to achieve their goals. The main purpose of the study is to examine the relationship between people, strategic agility, and organisational performance. The partial least squares equation modelling technique (PLS-SEM) was utilised on a dataset of 155 private higher learning institutions in Malaysia. The results did not support the direct relationship between people and organisational performance. Instead, it confirmed the mediating effect of strategic agility in the relationship. This finding provided significant contribution as strategic agility, created by people, was empirically proven as a crucial link that needs to be prioritised by private higher learning institutions in Malaysia. With strategic agility, private higher learning institutions will be able to optimise their performance in order to attain business sustainability in the current dynamic market.
Ahmad, A. R., & Ng, K. S. (2015, August 25-27). Balanced Scorecard in Higher Education Institutions: What Should Be Consider? (pp. 64-68). Proceedings from International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET). Langkawi, Kedah: Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTMET.2015.7359002
Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kallenberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.
Ashford, S. J., Wellman, N., de Luque, M. S., de Stobbeleir, K. E. M., & Wollan, M. (2017). Two roads to effectiveness: CEO feedback seeking, vision articulation, and firm performance. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 39(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2211
Astakhova, M. N., & Porter, G. (2015). Understanding the work passion - performance relationship: The mediating role of organisational identification and moderating role of fit at work. Human Relations, 68(8), 1315-1346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714555204
Barney, J. B., & Arikan, A. M. (2001). The resource-based view: Origins and implications. In M.A. Hitt., R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), Handbook of Strategic Management (pp. 124-188). Blackwell.
Boehm, S. A., Dwertmann, D. J., Bruch, H., & Shahmir, B. (2015). The missing link? Investigating organisational identity strength and transformational leadership climate as mechanisms that connect CEO charisma with firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly 26, 156-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.07.012
Branham, L. (2001). Keeping the people who keep you in business: 24 ways to hang on to your most valuable talent. American Management Association.
Chan, J. I. L., & Muthuveloo, R. (2018). Key success factors for organisational performance of private HLIs in Malaysia. Strategic Direction, 34(8), 7-9. https://doi.org/10.1108/SD-03-2018-0041
Chen, S. H., Wang, H. H., & Yang, K. J. (2009). Establishment and application of performance measure indicators for universities. The TQM Magazine, 21(3), 220-235. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542730910953004
Chow, I. H. S., Teo, S. T. T., & Chew, I. K. H. (2013). Human Resource Management systems and firm performance: The mediation role of strategic orientation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30, 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9288-6
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Cruke, S., & Decramer, A. (2016). The development of a measurement instrument for the organisational performance of social enterprises. Sustainability, 8(2), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020161
Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
Engelen, A., Gupta, V., Strenger, L., & Brettel, M. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation, firm performance, and the moderating role of transformational leadership behaviors. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1069-1097. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312455244
Filley, A. C., & Aldag, R. (1978). Characteristics and measurement of an organisational typology. The Academy of Management Journal, 21(4), 578-591. https://doi.org/10.2307/255701
Gardner, T., Wright, P., & Moynihan, L. M. (2011). The impact of motivation, empowerment, and skill-enhancing practices on aggregate voluntary turnover: The mediating effect of collective affective commitment. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 315-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01212.x
Ghasemy, M., Hussin, S., Megat Daud, M. A. K., Md Nor, M., Ghavifekr, S., & Kenayathulla, H. B. (2018). Issues in Malaysian higher education: A quantitative representation of the top five priorities, values, challenges, and solutions from the viewpoints of academic leaders. SAGE Open, 8(1), 1 - 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018755839
Green, S. (1991). How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis?. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26 (2), 499-510. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7
Guay, R. P., Choi, D. J., Oh, I. S., Mitchell, M. S., Mount, M. K., & Shin, K. H. (2016). Why people harm the organisation and its members: Relationships among personality, organisational commitment, and workplace deviance. Human Performance, 29(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2015.1120305
Ha, S. H., & Lo, M. C. (2018). An empirical examination of knowledge management and organisational performance among Malaysian manufacturing SMEs. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 17(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2018.094196
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.15358/9783800653614
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hyland, P. K., Lee, R. A., & Mills, M. J. (2015). Mindfulness at work: A new approach to improving individual and organisational performance. Industrial and Organisational Psychology, 8(4), 576-602. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.41
Jabatan Pendidikan Tinggi (2018). Senarai daftar IPTS 31 Disember 2018. Arkib JPT. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/16HLYe3_FamSpdHTsFZP81Sg6Ejza3mp1
Junni, P., Sarala, R., Tarba, S., & Weber, Y. (2015). The role of strategic agility in acquisitions. British Journal of Management, 26(4), 596-616. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12115
Khavari, S. A., Arasteh, H., & Jafari, P. (2016). Assessing the level of organisational universities agility: Case study of Islamic Azad University in Mazandaran. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 112-117. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n3s2p112
Kroon, B., Voorde, K. V. D., & Timmers, J. (2013). High performance work practices in small ﬁrms: A resource-poverty and strategic decision-making perspective. Small Business Economies, 41(1), 71-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9425-0
Lewin, K. M. (2015). Educational access, equity, and development: Planning to make rights realities. UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning.
Lim, P., & Williams, G. (2015). Private higher education in Malaysia - Avoiding a hidden crisis? [PowerPoint slides]. Penang Institute. https://penanginstitute.org/programmes/penang-institute-in-kuala-lumpur/private-higher-education-in-malaysia-avoiding-a-hidden-crisis/
Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Tomas, J. M. (2016). Deconstructing AMO framework: A systematic review. Intangible Capital, 12(4), 1040-1087. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.838
Menon, S., & Suresh, M. (2020). Factors influencing organisational agility in higher education. Benchmarking: An International Journal, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2020-0151
Mir, A. A., & Mufeed, U. (2016). Employee retention - A key tool for achieving competitive advantage. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 6(6), 334-337.
Mukerjee, S. (2014). Agility: A crucial capability for universities in times of disruptive change and innovation. Australian Universities' Review, 56(1), 56-60. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/154480/
Murray, R., Barrick, G. R., Thurgood, T. A., & Smith, S. H. (2015). Collective organisational engagement: Linking motivational antecedents, strategic implementation, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 111-135. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0227
Muthuveloo, R. (2015). SWIM: Crafting winning corporate strategy for business sustainability. Pearson Malaysia Sdn Bhd.
Muthuveloo, R., Shanmugam, N., & Teoh, A. P. (2017). The impact of tacit knowledge management on organisational performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 22(4), 192-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.07.010
Muthuveloo, R., & Teoh, A. P. (2017, October 12). Managing Employees' Irrational Behaviour Through Employees' Classifications. Paper presented at Conference on Management and Behavioural Studies. Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta.
Navarro, J. G. C., Soto, P. S., & Wesley, A. K. P. (2016). Structured knowledge processes and firm performance: The role of organisational agility. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1544-1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.014
Ngoc-Tan, N., & Gregar, A. (2019). Knowledge management and its impacts on organisational performance: An empirical research in public higher education institutions of Vietnam. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 18(02), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649219500151
O'Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994-1009. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S00487333(05)00 116-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011
Oyedijo, A. (2012). Strategic agility and competitive performance in the Nigerian telecommunication industry. Business and Management Review, 1, 39-50.
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, Y. L., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Pucciarelli, F., & Kaplan, A. (2016). Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty. Business Horizon, 59(3), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.01.003
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. https://www.smartpls.com/
Souitaris, V., & Maestro, B. M. M. (2010). Polychronicity in top management teams: The impact on strategic decision processes and performance of new technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 31(6), 652-678. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.831
Trinh, P. T. (2015). Building enterprise systems infrastructure - Flexibility as enabler of organisational agility: Empirical evidence. European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) 2015 Completed Research Papers, 185, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.18151/7217506
Valmohammadi, C., & Roshanzamir, S. (2015). The guidelines of improvement: Relations among organisational culture, TQM and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 164(C), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.028
Verma, V., Bharadwaj, S. S., & Nanda, M. (2017). Comparing agility and absorptive capacity for superior firm performance in dynamic environment. International Journal of Business Environment, 9(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBE.2017.10005662
Walter, A. T. (2020). Organisational agility: ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization. Management Review Quarterly, 1-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00186-6
Wu, S. P. J., Straub, D. W., & Liang, T. P. (2015). How IT governance mechanisms and strategic alignment influence organisational performance: Insights from a matched survey of business and IT managers. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 497-518. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.10
Yusoff, Y., Alias, Z., Abdullah, M., & Mansor, Z. (2019). Agile marketing conceptual framework for private higher education institutions. International Journal of Academic Research Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 1418-1426. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i1/5896
Copyright (c) 2022 Josephine Ie Lyn Chan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.