The Mediating Role of Continuous Improvement on the Relationship between Workplace Learning Dimensions and Sustainable Lean Manufacturing
Abstract
The main objective of this paper was to study the mediating role of continuous improvement on the relationship between learning dimensions at the workplace and sustainable Lean implementations. Embedded systems, system connections and support leadership, were the learning dimensions included in this study. The participation in this study of eight Lean manufacturing companies based in Malaysia contributed to 219 survey responses from employees with a background in Lean. The presence of continuous improvement initiatives, as a mediator, was seen to significantly influence the relationship between the dimensions of workplace learning and sustainable Lean manufacturing in Malaysia. The empirical findings from this study can serve as a source of reference, not only for operational specialists but also for human resources practitioners and strategic leaders seeking sustainable Lean benefits. This research provides a synergistic approach between operations management and human resource practices to advance Lean-related interventions for future research or practical implementations.
References
Ali, A. J., Islam, M. A., & Lim, P. H. (2013). A study of sustainability of continuous improvement in the manufacturing industries in Malaysia: Organisational self- assessment as a mediator. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 24(3), 408-426. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777831311322695
Aminuddin, M. (2018). Human Resource Management: Principles and Practices (4th ed.). Malaysia: Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd.
Angelis, J., & Fernandes, B. (2012). Innovative lean: Work practices and product and process improvements. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 3(1), 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1108/20401461211223740
Awasthy, R., & Gupta, R. K. (2012). Dimensions of the learning organization in an Indian context. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 7(3), 222-244. https://doi.org/10.1108/17468801211236956
Bakar, N. A. A., Mat, T. Z. T., Fahmi, F. M., & Urus, S. T. (2017). Lean management practices and its effect in Malaysian local government performance. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 12(2), 79-104.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Barney, J. B., & Clark, D. N. (2007). Resource-Based Theory: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psycology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bateman, N. (2005). Sustainability: The elusive element of process improvement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(3), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510581862
Bhasin, S. (2011). Measuring the leanness of an organisation. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 2(1), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/20401461111119459
Bhasin, S. (2012). An appropriate change strategy for lean success. Management Decision, 50(3), 439-458. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211216223
Bhasin, S. (2015). Lean Management Beyond Manufacturing: A Holistic Approach. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17410-5
Cadden, T., Millar, K., Treacy, R., & Humphreys, P. (2020). The mediating influence of organisational cultural practices in successful lean management implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107744
Chauhan, G., & Singh, T. P. (2012). Measuring parameters of lean manufacturing realization. Measuring Business Excellence, 16(3), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683041211257411
Coakes, S. J., Steed, L., & Ong, C. (2010). SPSS Version 17.0 for Windows: Analysis without Anguish. Milton Qld 4064: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Comm, C. L., & Mathaisel, D. F. X. (2005a). A case study in applying lean sustainability concepts to universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6(2), 134-146. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370510589855
Comm, C. L., & Mathaisel, D. F. X. (2005b). An exploration study of best lean sustainability practices in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(3), 227-240. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880510607963
Eaidgah, Y., Maki, A. A., Kurczewski, K., & Abdekhodaee, A. (2016). Visual management, performance management and continuous improvement: A lean manufacturing approach. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 7(2), 187-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-09-2014-0028
Flor Vallejo, V., Antony, J., Douglas, J. A., Alexander, P., & Sony, M. (2020). Development of a road map for lean six sigma implementation and sustainability in a Scottish packaging company. The TQM Journal, 32(6), 1263-1284. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-02-2020-0036
Gupta, S., Modgil, S., & Gunasekaran, A. (2019). Big data in lean six sigma: A review and further research directions. International Journal of Production Research, 58(3), 947- 969. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1598599
Habtoor, N. (2016). Influence of human factors on organisational performance: Quality improvement practices as mediator variable. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(4), 406-484. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-02-2014-0016
Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Celsi, M. W., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2011). Essentials of Business Research Methods (2nd ed.). NY10017: Taylor & Francis.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. NY: The Guilford Press.
Hines, P., Holweg, M., & Rich, N. (2004). Learning to evolve: A review of contemporary lean thinking. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(10), 994- 1011. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570410558049
Hirzel, A., Leyer, M. & Moormann, J. (2017). The role of employee empowerment in the implementation of continuous improvement: Evidence from a case study of a financial service provider. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(10), 1563-1579. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-12-2015-0780
Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: (Ky'zen), The Key to Japan's Competitive Success. US: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
Ingelsson, P. & Mårtensson, A. (2014). Measuring the importance and practices of lean values. The TQM Journal, 26(5), 463-474. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-07-2012-0047
Jadhav, J. R., Mantha, S. S., & Rane, S. B. (2014a). Development of framework for sustainable lean implementation: An ISM approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 10(3), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-014-0072-8
Jadhav, J. R., Mantha, S. S. & Rane, S. B. (2014b). Exploring barriers in lean implementation. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 5(2), 122-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-12-2012-0014
Jayaraman, K., Teo, L. K., & Keng, L. S. (2012). The perceptions and perspectives of Lean Six Sigma (LSS) practitioners: An empirical study in Malaysia. The TQM Journal, 24(5), 433-446. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542731211261584
Jönsson, S. & Schölin, T. (2014). Potentials facilitators of workplace learning in a TPS based company. Journal of Management Development, 33(10), 1004-1018. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-10-2012-0130
Jørgensen, F., Mathiessen, R., Nielson, J., & Johansen, J. (2007). Lean maturity, lean sustainability. In J. Olhager and F. Persson (Ed.s), IFIP International Federation for Information Processing: Vol. 246. Advances in Production Management Systems (pp. 371-378). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74157-4_44
Kelendar, H., Faisal, M., & Mohammed, M. A. (2020). The need for lean thinking in the Kuwaiti healthcare system. Health Science Journal, 14(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2019.0095
Knowles, M. S., & Associates. (1984). Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning. London: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Education and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Lam, M., O'Donnell, M., & Obertson, D. (2015). Achieving employee commitment for continuous improvement initiatives. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(2), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2013-0134
Legge, K. (1998). Is HRM ethical? Can HRM be ethical?. In M. Parker (Ed.), Ethics and Organisations (pp. 150-172). Sage, London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280171.n7
Leksic, I., Stefanic, N., & Veza, I. (2020). The impact of using different lean manufacturing tools on waste reduction. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 15(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2020.1.351
Lindskog, P., Vänje, A., Törnkvist, Å., & Eklund, J. (2016). Sustainable lean in psychiatry? assessment through socio-technical principles. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 8(1), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-07-2015-0056
Love, P. E. D., & Gunasekaran, A. (1999). Learning alliances: A customer-supplier focus for continuous improvement in manufacturing. Industrial and Commercial Training, 31(3), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197859910269167
Madsen, D. Ø., Berg, T., Stenheim, T., Moum, J. V., Bordewich, I. O., & Storsveen, M. (2019). The long-term sustainability of lean as a management practice: Survey evidence on diffusion and use of the concept in Norway in the period 2015-2017. Sustainability 2019, 11(11), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113120
Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organisation's learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organisation questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422303005002002
Merriam, S. B. (2001), Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Direction for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.3
Minh, K. S., Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M., & Heidari, S. (2018). Do lean manufacturing practices have negative impact on job satisfaction?. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 10(1), 257-274. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-11-2016-0072
Mohd-Zainal, A., Goodyer, J., & Grigg, N. (2011). Organizational Learning to Sustain Lean Implementation in New Zealand Manufacturing Companies. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Information and Financial Engineering, Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.ipedr.com/vol12/27-C029.pdf https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2011.6117953
Muijs, D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209014
Muraliraj, J., Kuppusamy, S., Suhaiza Zailani, Santha, C. (2019). Lean, six sigma and its influence on potential and realized absorptive capacity. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 11(1), 84-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-03-2018-0020
Oon, F. Y., Aziati, A. H. N. & Abu, A. S. E. (2021). Business Excellence, Leadership and Lean: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(1), 332-345. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3178.2021
Orji, I. J. & Liu, S. (2020). A dynamic perspective on the key drivers of innovation-led lean approaches to achieve sustainability in manufacturing supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 480-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.12.002
Papadopoulos, T. (2011). Continuous improvement and dynamic actor associations: A study on lean thinking implementation in the UK National Health Service. Leadership in Health Services, 24(3), 207-227. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511871111151117
Penrose, E. (2009). The Theory of The Growth of The Firm. In C. Pitelis (Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press Inc. (Original work published 1959).
Psomas, E. Antony, J. & Bouranta, N. (2018). Assessing lean adoption in food SMEs: Evidence from Greece. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35(1), 64-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-05-2016-0061
Raweewan, M. & Kojima, F. (2020). Digital lean manufacturing - collaborative University- industry education in systems design for lean transformation. Procedia Manufacturing, 45, 183-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.092
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for Business Students (5th ed.). England: Pearson Education Limited.
Savolainen, T. & Haikonen, A. (2007). Dynamics of organisational learning and continuous improvement in six sigma implementation. The TQM Magazine, 19(1), 6-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780710720808
Sisson, K. (1994). Personnel management: Paradigms, practice and prospects. In Sisson, K. (Ed.), Personnel Management: A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and Practice in Britain (pp. 3-50). Oxford OX4 1JF, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
Sony, M. (2018). Industry 4.0 and lean management: A proposed integration model and research propositions. Production & Manufacturing Research, 6(1), 416-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2018.1540949
Sun, H., Ho, K. & Ni, W. (2008). The empirical relationship among organisational learning, continuous improvement and performance improvement. International Journal of Learning and Change, 3(1), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLC.2008.018871
Tan, O. K., Lim, K. Y., Ong, C. H., Goh, C. F., & Choi, S. L. (2019). Lean six sigma implementation: Does success means sustainability?. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(6), 907-914. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i6/6051
Tortorella, G. L., Fettermann, D., Miguel, P. A. C., & Sawhney, R. (2020). Learning organisation and lean production: An empirical research on their relationship. International Journal of Production Research, 58(12), 3650-3666. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1633028
Unzueta, G., Esnola, A., & Eguren, J. A. (2020). Continuous improvement framework to develop cultural change: Case study, capital goods company. The TQM Journal, 32(6), 1327- 1348. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-02-2019-0051
van Dun, D. H., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2016). Lean-team effectiveness through leader values and members' informing. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(11), 1530-1550. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2015-0338
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T. & Roos, D. (1990). The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Yang, B., Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (2004). The construct of the learning organisation; dimensions, measurement, and validation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(1), 31-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1086
Yushak, M. S., Dolah, R. & Bakar, N. A. (2018). Lean Principles Reduces Resistance to Change in Transforming A Shipyard Operations. International Journal of Business and Society, 19(2), 274-286.
Zahraee, S. M. (2016). A survey on lean manufacturing implementation in a selected manufacturing industry in Iran. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 7(2), 136-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-03-2015-0010
Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J, C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business Research Methods (9th ed.). USA: Cengage Learning.
Copyright (c) 2022 Agnes Siang-Siew Lim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
