Factors Motivating the Adoption of Geographical Indication-Based Quality Standards among Robusta Coffee Farmers in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.4609.2022Keywords:
geographical indications, motivational factors, farmer, robusta coffeeAbstract
Robusta coffee is one of the superior commodities of the Temanggung Regency. As the quality of a coffee determines its market competitiveness, geographical indications (GIs) are one of the quality standards used in coffee cultivation and post-harvest processing to indicate the quality of a good Robusta coffee. However, most Robusta coffee farmers in Indonesia do not practice the production methods required to meet these standards. Therefore, the produced coffee does not meet the quality standards of consumers. As such, this study aimed to analyse the factors that may motivate or dissuade farmers from adopting GI-based quality standards for Robusta coffee in Temanggung Regency. A descriptive method; specifically, a survey; was used for data collection. This data was then analysed using the partial least squares (PLS) method. The findings of this study revealed that, while knowledge did not motivate the adoption of GI standards, optimising collaboration between farmers and relevant associations may increase the adoption of GI-based quality standards among Robusta coffee farmers in Temanggung Regency.
References
Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. C. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7
Adesina, A. A., & Zinnah, M. M. (1993). Technology characteristics, farmers' perceptions and adoption decisions: A Tobit model application in Sierra Leone. Agricultural Economics, 9(4), 297-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1993.tb00276.x
Alfidella, S., Kusumo, D. S., & Suwawi, D. D. J. (2015). Pengukuran Usability I-Caring Berbasis ISO 9241-11 Dengan Menggunakan Partial Least Square (PLS). EProceedings of Engineering, 2(1), 1747-1735.
Backer, T. E., Liberman, R. P., & Kuehnel, T. G. (1986). Dissemination and Adoption of Innovative Psychosocial Interventions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(1), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.54.1.111
Barjolle, D., Quiñones-Ruiz, X. F., Bagal, M., & Comoé, H. (2017). The Role of the State for Geographical Indications of Coffee: Case Studies from Colombia and Kenya. World Development, 98, 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.006
Belletti, G., Marescotti, A., & Touzard, J. M. (2015). Geographical Indications, Public Goods, and Sustainable Development: The Roles of Actors' Strategies and Public Policies. World Development, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.004
Berta, W., Teare, G. F., Gilbart, E., Ginsburg, L. S., Lemieux-Charles, L., Davis, D., & Rappolt, S. (2005). The Contingencies of Organizational Learning in Long-Term Care : Factors That Affect Innovation Adoption. Health Care Management Review, 30(4), 282-292. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004010-200510000-00002
Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y., & Lee, J. (2005). Behavuiral Intention Formation In Knowledge Sharing : Examining The Roles of Extrinsic Motivators , Social-Psychological Forces, And Organizational Climate. Special Issue on Information Technologies and Knowledge Management, 29(1), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669
BPS-Statistic Indonesia. (2020). Statistics Indonesia. https://www.bps.go.id/subject/54/perkebunan.html#subjekViewTab3
Chabrol, D., Mariani, M., & Sautier, D. (2017). Establishing Geographical Indications without State Involvement? Learning from Case Studies in Central and West Africa. World Development, 98, 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.023
Chennamaneni, A. (2006). Determinants of knowledge sharing behaviors: developing and testing an integrated theoretical model. In The University of Texas At Arlington. The University of Texas At Arlington.
Chou, C. J., Chen, K. S., & Wang, Y. Y. (2012). Green practices in the restaurant industry from an innovation adoption perspective: Evidence from Taiwan. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3), 703-711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.09.006
Community Protection Geographical Indication of Robusta Temanggung Coffee. (2015). Kopi Robusta Temanggung.
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization and top managers. British Journal of Management, 17(3), 215-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00498.x
Frambach, R. T., & Schillewaert, N. (2002). Organizational innovation adoption: A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00152-1
Gallivan, M. J. (2001). Organizational Adoption and Assimilation of Complex Technological Innovations: Development and Application of a New Framework. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 51-85. https://doi.org/10.1145/506724.506729
Giovannucci, D., Josling, T. E., Kerr, W. A., O'Connor, B., & Yeung, M. T. (2009). Guide to Geographical Indications: Linking Products and Their Origins (Summary). SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1736713
Glanz, K., Rimer, B. k., & Viswanath, K. (2008). Health Behavior and Health Education Theory, Research, and Practice ( c T. Orleans (ed.); fourth).
Godin, G., Bélanger-Gravel, A., Eccles, M., & Grimshaw, J. (2008). Healthcare professionals' intentions and behaviours: A systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implementation Science, 3(36), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-36
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x
Hair Jr., J. . et al. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Hou, J., & Hou, B. (2019). Farmers' adoption of low-carbon agriculture in China: An extended theory of the planned behavior model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051399
Ibragimova, B. (2006). Propensity For Knowledge SHaring: An Organizational Justice Perspective [University of North Texas]. In ProQuest Information and Learning Company. https://search.proquest.com/openview/f95648a5fdc7ef40c1aad2af66633455/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Joao, A. R. B., Luzardo, F., & Vanderson, T. X. (2015). An interdisciplinary framework to study farmers decisions on adoption of innovation: Insights from Expected Utility Theory and Theory of Planned Behavior. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(29), 2814-2825. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2015.9650
Marie-Vivien, D., & Biénabe, E. (2017). The Multifaceted Role of the State in the Protection of Geographical Indications: A Worldwide Review. World Development, 98, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.035
Martono, S., Nurkhin, A., Lutfhiyah, F., Fachrurrozie, Rofiq, A., & Sumiadji. (2019). The relationship between knowledge, trust, intention to pay zakah, and zakah-paying behavior. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(2), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v10n2p75
Mendel, P., Meredith, L. S., Schoenbaum, M., Sherbourne, C. D., & Wells, K. B. (2008). Interventions in organizational and community context: A framework for building evidence on dissemination and implementation in health services research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35, 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-007-0144-9
Neilson, J., Wright, J., & Aklimawati, L. (2018). Geographical indications and value capture in the Indonesia coffee sector. Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.01.003
Pavlou, P. a, & Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption : An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior Qjarteny and Predicting Understanding Electronic An Extension of Commerce Adoption : the Theory of Planned formed. Manajement Information Systems Research Center, 30(1), 115-143. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25148720 https://doi.org/10.2307/25148720
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Setyowati, N., Ihsaniyati, H., & Pardono. (2020). Adopsi Standar Indikasi Geografis oleh Petani Kopi Robusta di Kabupaten Temanggung. AGRISEP, 19(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.19.1.1-14
Shah Alam, S., Fauzi Mohd Jani, M., Asiah Omar, N., Hossain, T., & Ahsan, M. N. (2012). Empirical Study of Theory of Reason Action (TRA) Model for ICT Adoption among the Malay Based SMEs in Malaysia. Business Management and Strategy, 3(2), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.5296/bms.v3i2.2911
Simpson, D. D. (2002). A conceptual framework for transferring research to practice. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22(4), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-5472(02)00231-3
Solomons, N. M., & Spross, J. A. (2011). Evidence-based practice barriers and facilitators from a continuous quality improvement perspective: An integrative review. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(1), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01144.x
Statistics of Temanggung Regency. (2020a). Planted Area of Estate Crops by Subdistrict and Type of Crops (ha) in Temanggung Regency, 2018 dan 2019. https://temanggungkab.bps.go.id/statictable/2020/09/02/318/luas-area-tanaman-perkebunan-menurut-kecamatan-dan-jenis-tanaman-ha-di-kabupaten-temanggung-2018-dan-2019-.html
Statistics of Temanggung Regency. (2020b). Production of Estate by Subdistrict and Type of Crops (ton) in Temanggung Regency, 2018 and 2019. https://temanggungkab.bps.go.id/statictable/2020/09/02/319/produksi-perkebunan-menurut-kecamatan-dan-jenis-tanaman-ton-di-kabupaten-temanggung-2018-dan-2019-.html
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(2), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(94)00019-K
Teuber, R. (2010). Geographical Indications of Origin as a Tool of Product Differentiation: The Case of Coffee. Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing, 22(3-4), 277-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974431003641612
Valente, T. W. (1996). Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social Networks, 18(1), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(95)00256-1
Wauters, E., Bielders, C., Poesen, J., Govers, G., & Mathijs, E. (2010). Adoption of soil conservation practices in Belgium: An examination of the theory of planned behaviour in the agri-environmental domain. Land Use Policy, 27(1), 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.009
Wejnert, B. (2002). Integrating Models of Diffusion of Innovations: A Conceptual Framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 297-326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141051
Wisdom, J. P., Chor, K. H. B., Hoagwood, K. E., & Horwitz, S. M. (2013). Innovation adoption: A review of theories and constructs. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services ResearchPolicy Mental Health, 41(4), 480-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0486-4
Wisdom, J. P., Chor, K. H. B., Hoagwood, K. E., & Horwitz, S. M. (2014). Innovation adoption: A review of theories and constructs. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41(4), 480-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0486-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
