Politically Connected Firms and Their Stock Return Volatility during High-Visibility Events: Evidence from Malaysia
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between political connection and firm stock volatility. We examine whether stock return volatility of politically connected firms differ from non-connected firms during four events. These four events are general election, change of leadership, announcement of government budget, and announcement of policies by the government. This paper uses a volatility event study technique to calculate the abnormal stock return volatility during the four events. We use the data of public-listed firms in Malaysia from 2002 to 2013. The result shows that political connection is associated with higher stock volatility in certain events. They appear to be the most volatile in the event of general election and least volatile during budget announcement. Besides budget announcement, the other three events showed a stronger volatility as they are considered as more of a surprise announcement rather than scheduled announcement. The paper adds to a limited body of literature investigating the relationship between political connection and market behavior in Malaysia and hopes to show that political connection can impact the stock return volatility of firms during high-visibility events in Malaysia.
References
Bartov, E. (1991). Open-market stock repurchases as signals for earnings and risk changes. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14(3), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(91)90015-G
Baxter, M. & Jermann, U. J. (1997). The international diversification puzzle is worse than you think. American Economic Review, 87, 170 - 180.
Berry, C. R., Burden, B. C., & Howell, W. G. (2010). The president and the distribution of federal spending. American Political Science Review, 104(4), 783-799. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000377
Bhagat, S., Brickley, J. A., & Loewenstein, U. (1987). The pricing effects of interfirm cash tender offers. The Journal of Finance, 42(4), 965-986. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb03922.x
Bialkowski, J., Gottschalk, K., & Wisniewski, T. P. (2008). Stock market volatility around national elections. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1941-1953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.021
Blomberg, S. B., & Hess, G. D. (1997). Politics and exchange rate forecasts. Journal of International Economics, 43(1), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(96)01466-3
Bomfim, A. N. (2003). Pre-announcement effects, news effects, and volatility: Monetary policy and the stock market. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(1), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00211-4
Boutchkova, M., Doshi, H., Durnev, A., & Molchanov, A., (2012). Precarious politics and return volatility. Review of Financial Studies, 25(4), 1111-1154. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr100
Brogaard, J., & Detzel, A. (2015). The Asset-Pricing Implications of Government Economic Policy Uncertainty. Management Science, 61(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2044 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2044
Brown, K. C., Harlow, W. V., & Tinic, S. M. (1988). Risk aversion, uncertain information, and market efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 22(2), 355-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90075-X
Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90042-X
Chan, D., Kohn, R., & Kirby, C. (2003). Multivariate stochastic volatility with leverage. (Unpublished paper) School of Economics, University of New South Wales.
Chau, F., Deesomsak, R., & Wang, J. (2014). Political uncertainty and stock market volatility in the Middle East and North African (MENA) countries. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 28, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2013.10.008
Civilize, S., Wongchoti, U., & Young, M. (2015). Political connection and stock returns: A longitudinal study. Financial Review, 50(1), 89-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12061
Clayton, M. C., Hartzell, J. C., & Rosenberg, J. (2005). The Impact of CEO Turnover on Equity Volatility. The Journal of Business, 78(5), 1779-1808. https://doi.org/10.1086/431442
Cornell, B. (1978). Using the options pricing model to measure the uncertainty producing effect of major announcements. Financial Management, 7, 54-59. https://doi.org/10.2307/3664906
Donders, M. W., & Vorst, T. C. (1996). The impact of firm specific news on implied volatilities. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20(9), 1447-1461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(96)00011-8
Dubofsky D. (1991). Volatility increases subsequent to NYSE and AMEX stock splits. Journal of Finance, 46, 421-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03759.x
Ederington, L. H., & Lee, J. H. (1993). How markets process information: News releases and volatility. The Journal of Finance, 48(4), 1161-1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04750.x
Engle, R. F., & Ng, V. K. (1993). Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility. The Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1749-1778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05127.x
Fails, M. D. (2014). Leader turnover, volatility, and political risk. Politics & Policy, 42(3), 369-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12078
Freeman, J. R., Hays, J. C., & Stix, H. (2000). Democracy and markets: The case of exchange rates. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 449-468. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669258
French, K. R., Leftwich, R. H., & Uhrig, W. (1989). The effect of scheduled announcements on futures markets. (Working Paper Series No. 273). Center for Research in Security Prices, University of Chicago.
Goldman, E., Rocholl, J., & So, J., (2009). Do politically connected boards affect firm value? Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2331-2360. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn088
Gomez, E.T., & Jomo K. S. (1997). Malaysia's Political Economy: Politics, Patronage and Profits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Goodell, J. W., & Vahamaa, S. (2013). US presidential elections and implied volatility: The role of political uncertainty. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(3), 1108-1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.12.001
Granberg, D., & Holemberg, S. (1991). Election campaign volatility in Sweden and the United States. Electoral Studies, 10(3), 208-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(91)90013-I
Harvey, C. R., & Huang, R. D. (1991). Volatility in the foreign currency futures market. Review of Financial Studies, 4(3), 543-569. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/4.3.543
Hermes, N., & Lensink, R. (2001). Capital flight and the uncertainty of government policies. Economics letters, 71(3), 377-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00392-5
Hussain, S. M. (2011). Simultaneous monetary policy announcements and international stock markets response: an intraday analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(3), 752-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.09.002
Idris, A. N. (2018). FBM KLCI down ahead of Budget 2019. The Edge Markets. Retrieved September 22, 2020, from https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/fbm-klci-down-ahead-budget-2019
Kalay, A., & Loewenstein, U. (1986). The informational content of the timing of dividend announcements. Journal of Financial Economics, 16(3), 373-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)90035-8
Lean, H. H., & Yeap, G. P. (2016). Asymmetric 13 effect of political elections on stock returns and volatility in Malaysia. In Q. Munir & S. C. Kok (Eds.), Information Efficiency and Anomalies in Asian Equity Markets: Theories and Evidence (pp. 228-247). NY: Routledge.
Leblang, D., & Bernhard, W. (2000). The politics of speculative attacks in industrial democracies. International Organization, 54(2), 291-324. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551181
Leblang, D., & Mukherjee, B. (2004). Presidential elections and the stock market: Comparing Markov-switching and fractionally integrated GARCH models of volatility. Political Analysis, 12(3), 296-322. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mph020
Liew, V. K. S., & Rowland, R. (2016). The effect of Malaysia general election on stock market returns. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1975. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3648-5
Lin, C. T., & Wang, Y. H. (2007). The impact of party alternative on the stock market: The case of Japan. Applied Economics, 39(1), 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500427882
Lim, J. (2019). KLCI flat, builders rise ahead of Budget 2020. The Edge Markets. Retrieved September 22, 2020, from https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/klci-flat-builders-rise-ahead-budget-2020
Mayhew, S. (1995). Implied volatility. Financial Analysts Journal, 51(4), 8-20. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v51.n4.1916
Mei, J., & Guo, L. (2004). Political uncertainty, financial crisis and market volatility. European Financial Management, 10(4), 639-657. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-7798.2004.00269.x
Neuhierl, A., Scherbina, A., & Schlusche, B. (2013). Market Reaction to Corporate Press Releases. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(4), 1207-1240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002210901300046X
Oliveira, A. S. D. (2014). The effect of government budget on Portuguese stock market (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Universidade Catolica Portuguesa.
Opare, A. (2012). Effects of General Elections on the Return and Volatility of Stocks: The Evidence from Europe. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2224033
Pantzalis, C., Stangeland, D. A., & Turtle, H. J. (2000). Political elections and the resolution of uncertainty: The international evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 24(10), 1575-1604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00093-X
Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2013). Political uncertainty and risk premia. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(3), 520-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.08.007
Santa‐Clara, P., & Valkanov, R. (2003). The presidential puzzle: Political cycles and the stock market. The Journal of Finance, 58(5), 1841-1872. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00590
Suleman, M. T. (2014). Political Risk and Volatility Spillover of Stock Returns: India and Asian Markets. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2485157
Vahamaa, S., & Aijo, J. (2011). The Fed's policy decisions and implied volatility. Journal of Futures Markets, 31(10), 995-1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.20503
Wang, Y. H., Lee, M. Y., & Lin, C. Y. (2008). General election, political change and market efficiency: Long-and short-term perspective in developed stock market. Journal of Money, Investment and Banking, 3, 58-67.
Winifred, A., & Perez, J. (2018). Malaysia shares buck gains in Asia ahead of 2019 budget. Nikkei Markets. https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Markets/Nikkei-Markets/Malaysia-shares-buck-gains-in-Asia-ahead-of-2019-budget
Wong, W. Y., & Hooy, C. W. (2018). Do types of political connection affect firm performance differently? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 51, 297-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.08.009
Wong, W. Y. (2016). The performance of politically connected firms in long-run and short-run: Evidence from Malaysia [Unpublished Master's thesis]. Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Copyright (c) 2021 Chee-Wooi Hooy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
