From Lab to Market: Challenges Faced By Academic Entrepreneur in Technology Transfer Pursuit

  • Noorlizawati Abd Rahim Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Zainai B. Mohamed Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Astuty Amrin Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Keywords: Academic entrepreneur, academic entrepreneurship, knowledge transfer, technology commercialization


The development of academic entrepreneurship is often benchmarked by the rate of patenting, licensing and spin-offs creation. However, these traditional indicators inherently require a long gestation period to materialize, thus creating a challenge to gauge the progress of novice universities. This paper preliminarily assesses the nature of academic entrepreneurship from a developing economy perspective and explore common challenges faced by academic entrepreneurs in bringing research discoveries from lab to market. Survey questionnaires were distributed to academic entrepreneurs of a public university in Malaysia and a series of answers to an open-ended question were analysed through content analysis. Although the results showed the rate of patents, licensing and start-up creations are modest, however, most of the scientists have made significant progress to the pre-commercialization stage by developing prototypes with commercial potential. The content analysis revealed that scientists’ entrepreneurial characteristics and institutional support were among the main factors that affect the commercialization of research discoveries. These findings suggest for the relevant authority to take improvement measures to enhance the efficiency of Technology Transfer Office and for the private funders and government disbursing agencies to provide more transparency in decision criteria and to reduce the period of application process and approval results. Avenues for future research are recommended based on the findings derived from this single case study.


Abreu., M., & Grinevich, V. (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42(2), 408-422.

Abd Rahim, N., Mohamed, Z. B., & Amrin, A. (2015). Commercialization of emerging technology: The role of academic entrepreneur. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169 (2015), 53-60.

Adams, W. W., & Baughman. R. H. (2005). Richard E. Smalley (1943-2005). Science, 310(5756), 1916-1916.

Aldridge, T. T., & Audretsch, D. (2011). The Bayh-Dole act and scientist entrepreneurship. Research policy, 40(8), 1058-1067.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Barth, T. D., & Schlegelmilch, W. (2013). Academic entrepreneur, academic entrepreneurship. Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1-18.

Bercovitz., J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69-89.

Bradley, S. R., Christopher, S. H., & Albert, N. L. (2013). Models and methods of university technology transfer. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 9(6), 571-650.

Brookfield, S. D. (2009). Self-directed learning. In R. Maclean & D. Wilson (Eds.), International Handbook of Education for The Changing World of Work (pp. 2615-2627). Springer, Dordrecht.

Budyldina, N. (2018). Entrepreneurial universities and regional contribution. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 1-13.

Chrisman, J. J., Timothy H., & Shelby, F. (1995). Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: The case of the University of Calgary. Journal of business venturing, 10(4), 267-281.

Clarysse. B., Valentina T., & Ammon S. (2011). The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1084-1093.

D'Este, P., Mahdi, S., Neely, A., & Rentocchini, F. (2012). Inventors and entrepreneurs in academia: What types of skills and experience matter? Technovation, 32(5), 293-303.

Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research policy, 32(2), 209-227.

Feldmann, B. D. (2014). Dissonance in the academy: the formation of the faculty entrepreneur. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 20(5), 453-477.

Fernández-Pérez, V., Alonso-Galicia, P. E., Rodríquez-Ariza, L., & Fuentes-Fuentes, M. d. M. (2015). Professional and personal social networks: A bridge to entrepreneurship for academics? European Management Journal, 33(1), 37-47.

Franklin, S. J., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2001). Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 127-141.

George, N. M., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2014). A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: insights on influencing factors. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 309-350.

Ismail, K., Mason, C., Cooper, S., Omar, W., & Majid, I. (2015). The actors involved and the decision-making process used in the exploitation of university patents. International Journal of Business and Information, 3(2), 165-192.

Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research policy, 38(6), 922-935.

Jensen, R. A., Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2003). Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: 'The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with'. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1271-1300.

Keith, N., Unger, J. M., Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2016). Informal learning and entrepreneurial success: a longitudinal study of deliberate practice among small business owners. Applied Psychology, 65(3), 515-540.

Kirchberger, M. A., & Pohl, L. (2016). Technology commercialization: a literature review of success factors and antecedents across different contexts. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(5), 1077-1112.

Kirkman, D. M. (2013). Survival and growth motivations as predictors of university-biotechnology technology transfer activities. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 16(S), 33-58.

Lacetera, N. (2009). Academic entrepreneurship. Managerial and Decision Economics, 30(7), 443-464.

Lam, A. (2010). From 'ivory tower traditionalists' to 'entrepreneurial scientists'? Academic scientists in fuzzy university-Industry boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 40(2), 307-340.

Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre MASTIC (2013a). National Research and Development Studies. Putrajaya: MOSTI.

Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre MASTIC (2013b). Science and Technology Inventory, TECHMart. Putrajaya: MOSTI.

Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre MASTIC. (2016). Bibliometric Study Science and Technology Knowledge Productivity in Malaysia 2015, TECHMart. Putrajaya: MOSTI.

Malaysian Technology Development Corporation. (MTDC) (2015). Commercialization Process From Value Analysis to Value Realization.

Marion, T. J., Dunlap, D. R., & Friar, J. H. (2012). The university entrepreneur: a census and survey of attributes and outcomes. R&D Management, 42(5), 401-419.

Matveev, A. G. (2002). Faculty as Entrepreneurs. In J. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., pp. 769-772). New York: Macmillan References.

Mitchell, W., & Singh, K. (1996). Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods. Strategic management journal, 17(3), 169-195.<169::AID-SMJ801>3.0.CO;2-#

Moog, P., Werner, A., Houweling, S., & Backes-Gellner, U. (2015). The impact of skills, working time allocation and peer effects on the entrepreneurial intentions of scientists. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(3), 493-511.

Nurul, I. D. & Ng, J. Y. (2014, January 24). MOSTI to Push for Commercialization in 2014. The Edge.

O'shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research policy, 34(7), 994-1009.

Reynolds, P. D., Carter, N. M., Gartner, W., & Greene, P. G. (2004). The prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs in the United States: Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. Small business economics, 23(4), 263-284.

Roland, X., Noorseha A., Leilanie M. N., & Mohar Y. (2011). Entrepreneurship in Malaysia. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Malaysian Report.

Shibayama, S. (2012). Conflict between entrepreneurship and open science, and the transition of scientific norms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(4), 508-531.

Siegel, D. S. (2018). Academic Entrepreneurship: Lessons Learned for Technology Transfer Personnel and University Administrators. World Scientific Reference on Innovation, 1-21.

Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26(4), 582-595.

Singer, S., Amorós, J. E., & Arreeola, D. M. (2015). 2014 Global Report. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor.

Tseng, C. C. (2013). Connecting self-directed learning with entrepreneurial learning to entrepreneurial performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 19(4), 425-446.

Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33(3), 425-441.

Wood, M. S. (2011). A process model of academic entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 54(2), 153-161.

World Intellectual Property Organization. (WIPO) (2016). Fields of Intellectual Property Protection. Geneva, Switzerland.

Wright, M., Mosey, S., & Noke, H. (2012). Academic entrepreneurship and economic competitiveness: rethinking the role of the entrepreneur. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(5-6), 429-444.

How to Cite
Noorlizawati Abd Rahim, Zainai B. Mohamed, & Astuty Amrin. (2021). From Lab to Market: Challenges Faced By Academic Entrepreneur in Technology Transfer Pursuit. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(3), 1256-1268.