Political Connection and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Indonesia
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate the influence of political connection on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expense in Indonesia. We use a sample of 682 firm-year observations between 2010 and 2015. Using the individual-level of political connections, we find that the political connection is an important determinant of CSR expense. The political connection effect is analyzed based on the different characteristics of ownership structure, board structure, and affiliated party. We find that state-owned enterprises and privately-owned enterprises that politically connected are positively associated with CSR expenses. Interestingly, the evidence shows that politically connected board of commissioners are more willing to spend in CSR activities, while politically connected board of directors have no significant concern regarding CSR. Furthermore, politically connected firms that contribute to CSR are from government-leaning firms, while opposition-leaning firms show different matters. The findings are robust using different measures of political connection and controls.
References
Arendt, S., & Brettel, M. (2010). Understanding the influence of corporate social responsibility on corporate identity, image, and firm performance. Management Decision, 48(10), 1469-1492. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011090289
Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00843.x
Benlemlih, M., & Bitar, M. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(3), 647-671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3020-2
Benjamin, S., Zain, M. M., & Wahab, E. A. (2016). Political Connections and Dividend Payouts in Malaysia : the Influence of Institutional Investors. Pacific Accounting Review, 28(2), 153-179. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-06-2015-0023
Boubakri, N., Cosset, J., & Saffar, W. (2008). Political connections of newly privatized firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14, 654-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.08.003
Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2008). Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(2), 120-136. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.506
Brown, A. D., & Humphreys, M. (2006). Organizational identity and place: A discursive exploration of hegemony and resistance. Journal of management studies, 43(2), 231-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00589.x
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, 32(3), 946-967. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
Chen, C. J. P., Li, Z., Su, X., & Sun, Z. (2011). Rent-seeking incentives, corporate political connections, and the control structure of private firms: Chinese evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(2), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.09.009
Chen, Y. R. R., & Hung-Baesecke, C. J. F. (2014). Examining the internal aspect of corporate social responsibility (CSR): Leader behavior and employee CSR participation. Communication research reports, 31(2), 210-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.907148
Chih, H. L., Chih, H. H., & Chen, T. Y. (2010). On the determinants of corporate social responsibility: International evidence on the financial industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0186-x
Claessens, S., Feijen, E., & Laeven, L. (2008). Political connections and preferential access to finance: The role of campaign contributions. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 554-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.11.003
Den Hond, F., Rehbein, K. A., de Bakker, F. G., & Lankveld, H. K. V. (2014). Playing on two chessboards: Reputation effects between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate political activity (CPA). Journal of Management Studies, 51(5), 790-813. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12063
Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. The American Economic Review, 96, 369-385. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157704
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
Fields, T. D., Lys, T. Z., & Vincent, L. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 255-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00028-3
Frederick, W. (1960). The growing concern over business responsibility. California Management Review, 2(4), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165405
Friedman, M. (1970). A Friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13(1970), 32-33.
Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5(2), 233-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-010-0052-3
Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic management journal, 12(6), 433-448. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120604
Giuli, A., & Kostovetsky, L. (2014). Are red or blue companies more likely to go green ? Politics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 158-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.002
Gnanaweera, K. A. K., & Kunori, N. (2018). Corporate sustainability reporting: Linkage of corporate disclosure information and performance indicators. Cogent Business and Management, 5(1), 1423872. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1423872
Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479-485. https://doi.org/10.5465/256971
Hovey, M., & Naughton, T. (2007). A survey of enterprise reforms in China: The way forward. Economic Systems, 31(2), 138-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2006.09.001
Huang, C. (2010). Board, ownership and performance of banks with a dual board system : Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Management and Organization, 16(2), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.16.2.219
Huang, H., & Zhao, Z. (2016). The influence of political connection on corporate social responsibility--evidence from listed private companies in China. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0007-3
Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 106(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1052-1
Kim, J. S., Koo, K., & Paz, M. (2017). Politician's equity holdings and corporate social responsibility (SHA Working Paper). School of Hotel Administration Collection, Cornell University. https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/71359
Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking Finance, 43, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.02.013
Kubik, J. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Hong, H. G. (2011). Financial constraints on corporate goodness. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1734164
Lee, W. J., & Choi, S. U. (2018). Effects of corporate life cycle on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103794
Leuz, C., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (2006). Political relationships, global financing, and corporate transparency: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(2), 411-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.06.006
Li, D., Lin, H., & Yang, Y. (2016). Does the stakeholders - corporate social responsibility (CSR) relationship exist in emerging countries? Social Responsibility Journal, 12(1), 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-01-2015-0018
Li, H., Meng, L., Wang, Q., & Zhou, L. A. (2008). Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Journal of Development Economics, 87(2), 283-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.03.001
Li, W., & Zhang, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and political interference: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0488-z
Lin, K., Tan, J., Zhao, L., & Karim, K. (2015). In the name of charity : Political connections and strategic corporate social responsibility in a transition economy. Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, 327-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.10.007
Ma, D., & Parish, W. L. (2006). Tocquevillian moments: Charitable contributions by Chinese private entrepreneurs. Social Forces, 85(2), 943-964. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2007.0016
Malinn, C., & Michelon, G. (2011). Board reputation attributes and corporate social performance: an empirical investigation of the US best corporate citizens. Accounting and Business Research, 41(2), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2011.550740
Ministry of Industry. (2012). Industrial Sector Performance and Ministry of Industry Performance Report. Jakarta: Ministry of Industry.
Monzur, M., & Habib, A. (2017). Corporate life cycle , organizational financial resources and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 13(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2017.01.002
Nainggolan, Y., Famiola, M., Siahaan, A. R., & Trihermanto, F. (2017). The importance of corporate social responsibility: the case of Indonesian firms in 2008 - 2015. Working Paper, Institut Teknologi Bandung.
Nietsch, M. (2005). Corporate governance and company law reform: A German perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(3), 368-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00431.x
Ofoegbu, G. N., Odoemelam, N., & Okafor, R. G. (2018). Corporate board characteristics and environmental disclosure quantity: Evidence from South Africa (integrated reporting) and Nigeria (traditional reporting). Cogent Business and Management, 5(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1551510
Post, C., Rahman, N., & McQuillen, C. (2014). From board composition to corporate environmental performance through sustainability-themed alliances. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2231-7
Rahman, I. M. A., & Ismail, K. N. I. K. (2016). The effects of political connection on corporate social responsibility disclosure - Evidence from listed companies in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 5(2), 16-21.
Schilling, F. (2002). Corporate governance in Germany: The move to shareholder value. Corporate Governance, 9(3), 148-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00242
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Politicians and firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 995-1025. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118354
Su, Z. Q., Fung, H. G., Huang, D. Shi, & Shen, C. H. (2014). Cash dividends, expropriation, and political connections: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics and Finance, 29, 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2013.05.017
Trihermanto, F., & Nainggolan, Y. A. (2019). Corporate life cycle , CSR , and dividend policy: empirical evidence of Indonesian listed firms. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(2), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2017-0186
Trinugroho, I. (2017). A recent literature review on corporate political connections. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 8(2), 269-278. https://doi.org/10.15294/jdm.v8i2.12766
Whetten, D. A. (2006). Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of management inquiry, 15(3), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492606291200
White, H. (1980). A heterokedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heterokedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817-838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934
Wooldridge, J. (2012). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Mason, OH, USA: South-Western.
Yu, S., & Lee, N. (2016). Financial crisis, politically connected CEOs, and the performance of state-owned enterprises: evidence from Korea. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(9), 2087-2099. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2016.1186445
Zhao, M. (2012). CSR-based political legitimacy strategy: Managing the state by doing good in China and Russia. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), 439-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1209-6
Zhuang, Y., & Chang, X. (2018). Board composition and corporate social responsibility performance: Evidence from Chinese public firms. Sustainability, 10(8), 2752. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082752
Zivin, J. G., & Small, A. (2005). A Modigliani-Miller theory of altruistic corporate social responsibility. Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy, 5(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0653.1369
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
