Challenges of Women Leaders in Female and Male Dominated Occupations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3349.2020Keywords:
women's leadership, gender equality, male and female dominated occupation, stereotypes, leadership challenges, public administration organizations, business organizationsAbstract
The article presents the results of research revealing the challenges faced by women leaders during their career in public administration and business organisations and highlighting the peculiarities of women's experience in female and male dominated occupation areas. The study has shown that that stereotypes still do not disappear despite legislative institutionalization of gender equality in professional career. In most cases, women face constraints such as widespread stereotypes in society, negative attitudes of colleagues and behaviour related to that, doubts of women-leaders themselves about their opportunities, and conflict between family and work roles.
References
Andrikienė, L., & Vaičiūnienė, R. (2016). Lyčių nelygybė Lietuvoje: analizė ir vertinimas remiantis Lyčių lygybės indeksu (EIGE). [= Gender inequality in Lithuania. Analysis and evaluation based on the Gender Equality Index 2015 (by EIGE)] Kultūra ir visuomenė, 7(1), 33-52.
Appelbaum, Steven H., Audet, L., & Miller, J.C. (2003). Gender and leadership? Leadership and gender? A journey through the landscape of theories. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 24(1), 43 – 51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730310457320
Barbieri, D., Franklin P., Janeckova, H., Karu, M., Lelleri, R., Riobóo Lestón, I., Luminari, D., Madarova, Z., Maxwell, K., Mollard, B., Osila, L., Paats, M., Reingardė, J., & Salanauskaitė, L. (2017). Gender Equality Index 2017: Measuring Gender Equality in the European Union 2005-2015, European Institute for Gender Equality.
Barth, J.M, Kim, H., Eno, H.K, & Guadagno, E.R. (2018). Matching Abilities to Careers for Others and Self: Do Gender Stereotypes Matter to Students in Advanced Math and Science Classes? Sex Roles, 79(1–2), 83–97.
Beeson, J., & Valerio, A. M. (2012). The executive leadership imperative: A new perspective on how companies and executives can accelerate the development of women leaders. Business Horizons, 55(5), 417-425.
Belasen, A.T. (2017). Women in Management – A Framework for Sustainable Work–Life Integration. New York: Routledge.
Bothwell, E. (2017). World’s top 10 universities led by women 2016, The World University Rankings. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/worlds-top-10-universities-led-women-2016
Bureau of Labor Staistic. (2018). Charts by topic: household activities. American Time Use Survey. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/tus/charts/household.htm
Campuzano, M. V. (2019). Force and Inertia: A Systematic Review of Women’s Leadership in Male-Dominated Organizational Cultures in the United States, Human Resource Development Review, 18(4), 437-469.
Catalyst (2020). Historical List of Women CEOs of the Fortune Lists: 1972-2020. Retrieved from https://www.catalyst.org/research/historical-list-of-women-ceos-of-the-fortune-lists-1972-2020/
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). The landscape of qualitative research. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Diskienė, D., & Jaškevičiūtė, V. (2017). Y kartos požiūris į vyrų ir moterų vadovavimą organizacijose [= The attitude of millennials towards the leadership of men and women in organizations], Informacijos mokslai, 77, 90-105. doi: 10.15388/Im.2017.77.10708.
Dromantaitė-Stancikienė, A., & Gineitienė Z. (2010). Moterų padėtis Lietuvoje siekiant karjeros. [= Situation of Women Seeking a Career in Lithuania] Socialinių mokslų studijos, 4(8), 69-88.
Eagly, A. H., & Sczesny, S. (2009). Stereotypes about women, men, and leaders: Have times changed? In M. Barreto, M. K. Ryan, & M. T. Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality, Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Eagly, A., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.233
Eagly, A.H., & Carli, L.L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807–834.
Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719
Endendijk, J., Derks, B., & Mesman, J. (2018). Does Parenthood Change Implicit Gender-Role Stereotypes and Behaviors? Journal of Marriage and Family, 80, 61–79.
European Commission (2010a). A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM/2010/2020, Document 52010DC2020. Retrieved from https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52010DC2020
European Commission (2010b). Strategy for Equality between Women and Men 2010-2015. Document SEC(2010) 1080 final. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2010/1080/COM_SEC%282010%291080_EN.pdf
European Institute for Gender Equality (2013). A study of collected narratives on gender perceptions in the 27 EU Member States. Synthesis report. Retrieved from https://eige.europa.eu/publications/study-collected-narratives-gender-perceptions-27-eumember-states
European Pillar of Social Rights (2017). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/social-summit-european-pillarsocial-rights-booklet_en.pdf
Foels, R., Driskell, J. Mullen, B., & Salas, E. (2000). The Effects of Democratic Leadership on Group Member Satisfaction: An Integration. Small Group Research, 31(6), 676–701. doi: 10.1177/104649640003100603
Forkuor J. B., Buari M. A., & Aheto C. K. A. (2019). Breaking Barriers: The Experiences of Women in Male Dominated Informal Sector Occupations in Urban Ghana. Gender Issues, 37, 25-43.
Gender Equality Index (2019). Index score for Lithuania for 2019. European Institute for Gender Equality.
Hegewisch A., Phil M., & Tesfaselassie A. (2019). The Gender Wage Gap by Occupation 2018 and by Race and Ethnicity, The Institute for Women's Policy Research.
Hegewisch, A., Phil., M., & Williams-Baron E. (2018). The Gender Wage Gap by Occupation 2017 and by Race and Ethnicity, The Institute for Women’s Policy Research, ID: C467.
Helgesen, S. (1990). The Female Advantage: Women’s Ways of Leadership (2nd Ed). New York: Doubleday Currency.
Janušauskienė, D. (2016). Moterų diskriminacija moksle: „stiklinės lubos“, „stiklinės uolos“, „ugnies sienos“ ir „motinystės sienos“ [= Discrimination of women in Academia:“Glass Ceilings” and “Cliffs”, “Firewalls” and “Maternal Walls”]. Filosofija ir sociologija, 27(2), 132–139.
Judson E., Ross L., & Glassmeyer K. (2019). How Research, Teaching, and Leadership Roles are Recommended to Male and Female Engineering Faculty Differently. Research in Higher Educatio,. 60(7) 1025–1047.
Kanter, R. (1977). Some Effects on Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965–990. doi:10.1086/226425
Kollmayer, M., Schober, B., & Spiel, CH. (2018). Gender stereotypes in education: Development, consequences, and interventions. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(4), 361-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2016.1193483
Kossek, E. E., Su, R., & Wu, L. (2016). “Opting Out” or “Pushed Out”? Integrating Perspectives on Women’s Career Equality for Gender Inclusion and Interventions. Journal of Management, 43(1), 228-254. doi:10.1177/0149206316671582.
Lavassani K.M., & Movahedi B. (2014). Developments in theories and measures of work-family relationships: from conflict to balance. Contemporary Research on Organization Management and Administration, 2(1), 6-19.
Lietuvos Respublikos lygių galimybių įstatymas, ID 1031010ISTA0IX-1826 (2003, November 18). Retrieved from https://www.etar.lt/portal/legalAct.html?documentId=TAR.0CC6CB2A9E42
Mažeikienė, N., & Dorelaitienė, A. (2012). Darbo rinkos segregacija pagal lytį ar lyčių vaidmenų detradicionalizacija? [= Detradicionalization of Gender Roles in Biographical
Trajectories of Male Social Workers. Acta pedagogica Vilnensia, 29, 144-159. doi: 10.15388/ActPaed.2012.29.1184
Mollie, A. (2017). Gender Stereotypes in Mathematics and Women’s Motivation Toward a STEM Career. McNair Scholars Journal, 18, 64-85.
Moterų ir vyrų gyvenimas Europoje. Statistinis portretas, (2018). [Life of women and men in Europe. Statistical portrait] Statistikos departamentas. Retrieved from https://osp.stat.gov.lt/infographs/images/pdf/WomenMenEurope-DigitalPublication-2018_lt.pdf?lang=lt html
Northouse, P. G. (2009). Lyderystė: teorija ir praktika. [=Leadership: Theory and Practice] Kaunas: Poligrafija ir informatika.
Official Journal of the European Union (2019, March 22). Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on “Gender equality in European labour markets”. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018AE2567&from=SL
Olsson, M., & Martiny, S., E. (2018). Does Exposure to Counterstereotypical Role Models Influence Girls’ and Women’s Gender Stereotypes and Career Choices? A Review of Social Psychological Research. Frontier in. Psychology, 9, 1-15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02264
Petruškevičius, D., & Bakanauskienė, I. (2014). Kauno miesto SVV organizacijų analizė vadovų lyčių lyderystės aspektu, [= Empirical investigation of managers’ leadership gender aspects in small and medium enterprises of Kaunas city] Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai, 72, 63-77.
Py, J., Lapan, R.T., & Tate, K. (2004). Vocational interests and career efficacy expectations in relation to occupational sex-typing beliefs for eighth grade students. Journal of Career Development, 31(2), 143–154.
Rakauskienė, O. G., Štreimikienė D., Žalėnienė I., Kiaušienė I., Lisauskaitė V., & Krinickienė E. (2014). Lyčių ekonomika: monografija. [= Gender Economy: the monograph] Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University, ISBN 978-9955-19-672-3, p. 762.
Ramaci, T., Pellerone, M., Ledda, C., Prest, G., Squatrito, V., & Rapisarda, V. (2017). Gender stereotypes in occupational choice: a cross-sectional study on a group of Italian adolescents. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 10, 109–117. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S134132
Reingardienė, J. (2004). Dillemas of Women’s Career and Family Roles, Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas, 130, 59-72. doi: 10.15388/SocMintVei.2004.1.5949.
Riggio, R. E. (2008). Leadership Development: The Current State and Future Expectations. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 60(4), 383–392. doi: 10.1037/1065-9293.60.4.383
Sandberg, S, & Scovell, N. (2013). Lean in: women, work, and the will to lead, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Schwanke, D. A. (2013). Barriers for Women to Positions of Power: How Societal and Corporate Structures, Perceptions of Leadership and Discrimination Restrict Women's Advancement to Authority. Earth Common Journal, 3(2), 1-2.
Seaton C. L., Bottorff J. L., Oliffe J. L., Medhurst K., & DeLeenheer, D. (2019). Mental health promotion in male-dominated workplaces: Perspectives of male employees and workplace representatives. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 20(4), 541-552.
Šilingienė, V. (2012). Lyderystė. Kaunas: Technologija.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2019). Delivered by women, led by men: A gender and equity analysis of the global health and social workforce. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/hrh/resources/health-observer24/en/
Women and Men in Lithuania 2016 (2017). Statistics Lithuania. e-ISSN 2029-588X. https://osp.stat.gov.lt/statistikos-leidiniu-katalogas?eventId=158501
Žukauskienė R., & Šakalytė J. (2003). Moterų profesinė karjera. [= Women’s career success: summary of literature overview and research findings] Lietuvos nacionalinė UNESCO komisija, Vilnius.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
