Women on Boards of Philippine Corporations: Quantitative Explorations
Abstract
This inductive study explored the likelihood and correlates of gender diversity in corporate boards in the Philippines. The improvement of gender diversity on boards is of advocacy and policy interest as the country emergesto middle-high income status. Logistic regression analyses from individuals’ (in a directors’ talent pool) responses to an online survey showed that females had a likely odds of 0.10 to be on the boards, compared to males. For every one female getting onto boards, 9 would be unable to.Females with advanced degrees were 7x likely to be on boards than female and male counterparts. The odds of a board seat is significantly likely for individuals in some industries compared to a referent industry (government). At the firm level, controlling other variables in the model, as the size of boards are increased by a unit, the odds of having a woman on board increase 1.3 times.This implies that the likelihood of having a woman board of director rises if the size of boards is raised by a third. Corroboration from text mining technique applied to survey responses showed strong correlation across academic degrees (both bachelor’s and advanced), industry, and job title; pointing that having more women in C-roles increase the odds of increasing their numbers on corporate boards. Gender diversity on boards have been studied largely fromthedeveloped economy lens and/or international comparisons. These quantitative explorations showed pathways that can advance not only understanding and support for extant theories (human capital, resource dependence), but also point to further work (institutional, industry) that can provide levers for policy and advocacy, for countries with similar challenges.
References
Abdullah, S. N., Ismail, K. N. I. K., & Nachum, L. (2016). Does having women on boards create value? The impact of societal perceptions and corporate governance in emerging markets: Women on Boards. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3), 466–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2352
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
Ahern, K. R., & Dittmar, A. K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 137–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr049
Al-Bassam, W. M., Ntim, C. G., Opong, K. K., & Downs, Y. (2018). Corporate boards and ownership structure as antecedents of corporate governance disclosure in Saudi Arabian publicly listed corporations. Business & Society, 57(2), 335–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315610611
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1496221
Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 544–557.
Bulaong Jr., O., & del Rosario-Rondilla, A. (2018). Understanding Board Seat Membership of Women in Philippines Companies: Qualitative explorations [Unpublished manuscript, Ateneo Graduate School of Business, Institute of Corporate Directors].
Burgess, Z., & Tharenou, P. (2002). Women Board Directors: Characteristics of the Few. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(1), 39-49.
Cabrera-Fernandez, A. I., Martinez-Jimenez, R., & Hernandez-Ortiz, M. J. (2016). Women’s participation on boards of directors: A review of the literature. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-02-2015-0008
Deloitte Global Center for Corporate Governance. (2017). Women in the boardroom: A global perspective-5th edition. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/risk/articles/women-in-the-boardroom5th-edition.html
Erkut, S., Kramer, V. W., & Konrad, A. (2008). Critical mass: Does the number of women on a corporate board make a difference? Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Research and Practice, 350–366.
Galbreath, J. (2018). Is board gender diversity linked to financial performance? The mediating mechanism of CSR. Business & Society, 57(5), 863–889. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316647967
Grant Thornton. (2016). Women in business: Turning promise into practice-Grant Thornton International Business Report 2016. Grant Thornton International Ltd.
Grosvold, J. (2011). Where are all the women? Institutional context and the prevalence of women on the corporate board of directors. Business & Society, 50(3), 531–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650311408791
Grosvold, J., Rayton, B., & Brammer, S. (2016). Women on corporate boards: A comparative institutional analysis. Business & Society, 55(8), 1157–1196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315613980
Hearst, M. A. (1999). Untangling Text Data Mining. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Computational Linguistics, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.3115/1034678.1034679
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800603
Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence Theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469
Hillman, A., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941–952.
Kang, L. S., & Payal. (2012). Women on corporate boards: A literature review. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 5(1), 33–49.
Kolev, K., Hughes-Morgan, M., & Rehbein, K. (2019). The role of female directors in the boardroom: Examining their impact on competitive dynamics. Business & Society, 000765031984747. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319847477
Mckinsey Global Institute. (2018). The power of parity: Advancing women’s equality in Asia Pacific. Mckinsey & Company.
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G. C., & Guarino, A. J. (2016). Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation (Third edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Osborne, J. W. (2015). Best Practices in Logistic Regression. SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483399041
Pett, M. A. (2016). Nonparametric Statistics for Health Care Research: Statistics for Small Samples and Unusual Distributions (Second edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Pfeffer, J. (1972). Merger as a Response to organizational interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 382–394. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392151
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1 edition). Stanford Business Books.
Singh, V. (2008). Contrasting Positions of Women Directors in Jordan and Tunisia. In Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Perspectives and Challenges. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781847204806.00019.xml
Terjesen, S., Couto, E., & Francisco, P. M. (2015). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management and Governance.
Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x
Terjesen, S., & Singh, V. (2008). Female presence on corporate boards: A multi-country study of environmental context. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9656-1
Unite, A. A., Sullivan, M. J., & Shi, A. A. (2016). Women on Top: Diversity in Gender and Education Profiles of Top Management and Board of Directors of Philippine Publicly Traded Firms. Presented at the DLSU Research Congress 2016, 6.
Unite, A., Sullivan, M., & Shi, A. (2016). Gender diversity in boards and performance of Philippine publicly traded firms: Do women matter? Angelo King Institute. http://www.pes.org.ph/files/Gender-Diversity-in-Boards-and-Performance-of-Philippine-Publicly-Traded-Firms-Do-Women-Matter-Unite-et-al.pdf
Wagana, D. M., & Nzulwa, J. D. (2016). Corporate governance, board gender diversity and corporate performance: A critical review of literature. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 12(7), 221. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n7p221
World Economic Forum. (2017). The global gender gap report: 2017. World Economic Forum.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
