The Assessment of Direct Agricultural Investment and Cash Transfer on Households in Malaysia: An Evidence of Compensation Mechanisms for Fuel Subsidy Removal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3253.2020Keywords:
Fuel subsidy removal, Compensation mechanism, Saving reallocation on agricultural investment, Saving reallocation on direct cash transfer, Computable general equilibrium (CGE) modelAbstract
The objective of this study was to examine the impacts of introducing compensation mechanisms of direct agricultural investment and cash transfer for fuel subsidy removal, with particular focus on the income and consumption of all household segments in Malaysia. A computable general equilibrium (CGE) model was built on the basics of the standardized LöfgrenCGE model to conduct this study. The subsidy removal, without integrating any compensation mechanism, imposed additional burdens of living cost on households as fuel was one of the important elements of the consumption basket especially during the period of transition, thus indicating a need for this study. The ultimate results revealed that the introduction of direct cash transfer was more desirable for both the low-and the medium-income segments to live with high prices where their existing consumption level would be maintained. Comparatively, the direct agricultural investment by increasing the use of intermediate inputs in the production did not seem to be enough to help the rural low-income segment within the period, mainly because of reducing the factor income (factor reallocation effect), and exaggerating consumption expenditure subsequently. Thus, direct cash transfer was considered a direct and faster way to help the needy in the short term. However, the direct agricultural investment remained the best approach to gain long-lasting impacts; not only in helping the rural poor, who mostly dealt in agricultural activities, but also in motivating overall economic activities
References
Akinyemi, O., Alege, P. O., Ajayi, O. O., Adediran, O. S., & Urhie, E. (2017). A simulation of the removal of fuel subsidy and the performance of the agricultural sector in Nigeria using a dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Approach. Covenant Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 8(1), 60-70.
Anand, R., Coady, D., Mohammad, A., Thakoor, V., & Walsh, J. P. (2013). The fiscal and welfare impacts of reforming fuel subsidies in India (IMF Working Paper No. WP/13/128).
Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/The-Fiscal-and-Welfare-Impacts-of-Reforming-Fuel-Subsidies-in-India-40593
Arze del Granado, J., Coady, D., & Gillingham, R. (2010). The unequal benefits of fuel subsidies: A review of evidence for developing countries (IMF Working Paper No.WP/10/202). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Bekhet, H. A. (2010). Ranking sectors changes of the Malaysian economy: Input-output approach. International Business Research, 3(1), 134-143.
Bekhet, H. A., & Yusop, N. Y. M. (2009). Assessing the relationship between oil prices, energy consumption and macroeconomic performance in Malaysia: Co-integration and vector error correction model (VECM) approach. International Business Research, 2(3), 152-175.
Cervantes-Godoy, D. & Dewbre, J. (2010). Economic importance of agriculture for poverty reduction (OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, No. 23). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Coady, D., Flamini, V., & Sears, L. (2015). The unequal benefits of fuel subsidies revisited: Evidence for developing countries (IMF Working Paper No. WP/15/250). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Coady, D., Parry, I., Sears, L., & Shang, B. (2015). How large are global energy subsidies (IMF Working Paper No. WP/15/105)? Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/How-Large-Are-Global-Energy-Subsidies-42940
Cockburn, J., Robichaud, V., & Tiberti, L. (2018). Energy subsidy reform and poverty in Arab countries: A comparative CGE-microsimulation analysis of Egypt and Jordan. Review of Income and Wealth, 64(1), 1-31.
Cooke, E. F. A., Hague, S., Tiberti, L., Cockburn, J., & Lahga, A. R. E. (2016). Estimating the impact on poverty of Ghana’s fuel subsidy reform and a mitigating response. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 8(1), 105-128.
Dabla-Norris, E., Kochhar, K., Suphaphiphat, N., Ricka, F., & Tsounta, E. (2015). Causes and consequences of income inequality: A global perspective (IMF Staff Discussion Note No. 15/13). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Staff-Discussion-Notes/Issues/2016/12/31/Causesand-Consequences-of-Income-Inequality-A-Global-Perspective-42986
Hakim, R. A., Ismail, R., & Razak, N. A. A. (2014). Fuel subsidy rationalization: The perils of the middle class in Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 48(2), 83-97.
Hamid, K. A., & Rashid, Z. A. (2012). Economic impacts of subsidy rationalization Malaysia. In Wu, Y., X. Shi, and F. Kimura (Eds.), Energy market integration in East Asia: Theories, electricity sector and subsidies (ERIA Research Project Report 2011-17). Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia. Retrieved from http://www.eria.org/Chapter%209-Economic%20Impacts%20of%20Subsidy%20Rationalization%20in%20Malaysia.pdf
Harun, M., Mat, S. H. C., Fadzim, W. R., Khan, S. J. M., & Noor, M. S. Z. (2018). The effects of fuel subsidy removal on input costs of productions: Leontief input-output price model. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(5), 529-534.
Harun, M., Sallahuddin, H, & Che Mat, S. H. (2018). Pursuing more sustainable energy consumption by analyzing sectoral direct and indirect energy use in Malaysia: An inputoutput analysis. International Journal of Economics and Management, 12(2), 501-210.
Harun, M., Zakariah, A. R., & Azali, M. (2012). Constructing a social accounting matrix framework to analyse the impact of public expenditure on income distribution in Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 46(2), 63-83.
Hassan, A. A. G., Saari, M. Y., Utit, C., Hassan, A., & Harun, M. (2016). Penganggaran impak pelaksanaan CBP ke atas kos pengeluaran dan kos sara hidup di Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 50(2), 15-30. doi: 10.17576/JEM-2016-5002-02
Hena, S., Luan, J. D., Rehman, A., & Zhang, O. X. (2019). A comparative analysis of agricultural development and modernization between China and Pakistan. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 6(4), 81-94.
Holland, D., Figueroa, E., & Gilbert, J. (2001). The role of agriculture and food processing in the Chilean economy: Results from an input-output analysis. Estudios de Economia, 28(2), 293-308.
Khazanah Research Institute (2018). The state of households 2018: Different realities (3rd ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Author.
Laderchi, C. R. (2014). Transitional policies to assist the poor while phasing out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Lofgren, H., Lee, R. H., & Robinson, S. (2002). A standard computable general equilibrium (CGE) model in GAMS. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Loo, S. Y. & Harun, M. (2019). Fuel subsidy abolition and performance of the sectors in Malaysia: A computable general equilibrium approach. Malaysia Journal of Economic Studies, 56(2), 303-326.
Malaysia, Department of Statistics (2016). Report of Household Income and Basic Amenties Survey 2016. Retrieved from https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=120&bul_id=RUZ5REwveU1ra1hGL21JWVlPRmU2Zz09&menu_id=amVoWU54UTl0a21NWmdhMjFMMWcyZz09
Nejadrezaei, N. & Ben-Othmen, M. A. (2019). Rural development as a key to achieve zero hunger in 2030. In Filho, W.L., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L., Ӧzuyar, P.G., & wall (Eds.), Zero Hunger. Cham: Springer.
Rehman, A., Luan, J. D., Khatoon, R., Iqbal, M. S., & Hussain, I. (2016). Effect of agricultural growth on poverty reduction, its importance, suggestions. Transylvanian Review, XXIV(5), 449-454.
Rentschler, J. & Bazilian, M. (2017). Principles for designing effective fossil fuel subsidy reforms. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(1), 138-155.
Rentschler, J. (2016). Incidence and impact: The regional variation of poverty effects due to fossil fuel subsidy reform. Energy Policy, 96, 491-503.
Samanta, S. K. & Cerf, J. G. (2009). Income distribution and the effectiveness of fiscal policy: Evidence from some transitional economies. East-West Journal of Economics and Business, XII(1), 29-45.
Sayed, L. E., Sayegh, W., Saliba, E., & Stephen, J. (2015). Fossil fuel subsidies in Lebanon: Fiscal, equity, economic and environmental impacts. Lebanon: United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from http://climatechange.moe.gov.lb/viewfile.aspx?id=218
Siddiq, K., Aguiar, A., Grethe, H., Minor, P., & Walmsley, T. (2014). Impacts of removing fuel import subsidies in Nigeria on poverty. Energy Policy, 69(C), 165-178.
Solaymani, S., Kardooni, R., Kari, F., & Yusoff, S. (2014). Economic and environmental impacts of energy subsidy reform and oil price shock on the Malaysian transport sector. Trade Behaviour and Society, 2(2).
Solaymani, S., Kari, F., & Zakaria, R. H. (2013). Evaluating the role of subsidy reform in addressing poverty levels in Malaysia: A CGE poverty framework. The Journal of Development Studies, 50(4), 556-569. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2013.841888
Thiessen, C. (2015). Money in the pocket, food on the table: The economic case for investing in agricultural development. Canadian: Canadian Foodgrains Bank.
Widodo, T., Sahadewo, G. A., Setiastuti, S. U., & Chaerriyah, M. (2012). Energy market integration in East Asia: Theories, electricity sector and subsidies. In Wu, Y., Shi, X., &
Kimura, F. (Eds), Cambodia’s electricity sector in the context of regional electricity market integration (ERIA Research Project Report 2011-17). Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia. World Bank (2019). Agriculture and food. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/overview
Yahoo, M., Zulkeffeli, Z., Rashid, Z. A., & Puasa, A. F. (2017). A CGE model for assessing the economy-wide effects of removing the cooking oil subsidy in Malaysia. International
Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 25(3), 491-511. Retrieved from https://journals.iium.edu.my/enmjournal/index.php/enmj/article/view/467
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
