Beliefs and Attitude towards Political Advertising During Malaysia's GE14 Political Tsunami
Abstract
The recent General Election in Malaysia has seen the opposition alliance form the government for the first time in its history. The tsunami that changed the country's political landscape has largely been attributed to the participation of young voters and the effect of political advertising transmitted through social media. Drawing upon the theory of reasoned action, the study tests the scale of beliefs about political advertising in relation to attitude towards political advertising among young voters. While the first phase of the study validated the belief components, the second phase tested and confirmed the effect of the belief components on attitude. As a result, three belief components of political advertising were extracted, including core values, actual values,andexternal values. The findings indicated that young Malaysian voters hold unfavourablebeliefs aboutpolitical advertising. Moreover, the beliefs about advertising’s core and external values have a direct effect on attitude towards political advertising. Given young voters use social media for nearly every aspect of their lives, the findings underscore the importance of understanding the potential effect of negative political advertising and its external elements during election campaigns.
References
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396-402.
Ashworth, S., & Mesquita, E. B. D. (2014). Is voter competence good for voters? Information, rationality, and democratic performance. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 565-587.
Azeem, A., & Haq, Z. U. (2012). Perception towards internet advertising: A study with reference to three different demographic groups. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 4(1), 28-45.
Banda, K. K., & Windett, J. H. (2016). Negative advertising and dynamics of candidate support. Political Behaviour, 38(3), 747-766.
Banker, S. (1992). The ethics of political marketing practices, the rhetorical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(11), 843–848.
Belch, G., & Belch, M. (2008), Advertising and promotion: An integrated marketing communication perspective. California, CA: McGraw-Hill.
Benedict, B. (2009, August 15). Political parodies and priceless ads. The Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/data/archives/2013/06/24/03/04/political-parodies-andpriceless-ads/
Borah, P., Fowler, E., & Ridout, T. N. (2018). Television vs. YouTube: Political advertising in the 2012 presidential election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 15(3), 1-15.
Chang, C. (2003). Party bias in political-advertising processing--Results from an experiment involving the 1998 Taipei mayoral election. Journal of Advertising, 32(2), 55-67.
Channel News Asia (2018). Malaysian politicians woo youth vote in 14th general election. Retrieved from https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/malaysia-general-electionyouth-vote-khairy-10124682
Chu, M. M. (2018, May 9). Big data and the big day: Tech’s effect on GE14. The Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2018/05/09/big-data-and-the-big-daytechs-effect-on-ge14/
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.
Cuneo, A. Z. (2006, March 20). Verizon's fightin'words: Rivals are'un-American'. Advertising Age. Retrieved from https://www.adage.com/article/news/verizon-s-fightin-words-rivalsamerican/107289
Dermawan, A. M. (2013). Wooing the kingmakers in Perak Election Battle. Retrieved from: http/Wooing%20the%20'kingmakers'%20in%20Perak%20election%20battle%2%20Columnist%20-%20New%20Straits%20Times
de Run, E. C., & Ting, H. (2014). Determining attitudinal beliefs about controversial advertising. International Journal of Business and Society, 15(3), 465-476.
de Run, E. C., Weng, J. T., & Lau, W. M. (2013). Negative political advertising: It's impact on voters. Asian Journal of Business Research, 3(1), 85-96.
Deuze, M. (2016). Living in media and the future of advertising. Journal of Advertising, 45(3), 326-333.
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 263-282.
Donahue, S. (2011). The effects of negative political advertising on young college-educated voters. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.bryant.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=honors_history
Ellyatt, H. (2017). How I helped get Trump elected: The president’s digital guru. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/08/how-i-helped-get-trump-elected-the-presidentsdigital-guru-brad-parscale.html.
Eze, U. C., & Lee, C. H. (2012). Consumers’ attitude towards advertising. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(13), 94-108.
Faiz Ahmad, M. A. (2018). Sarawak, the election kingmaker. Retrieved form https://www.nst.com.my/news/politics/2018/03/348694/sarawak-election-kingmaker.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioural, and biomedical sciences. Behaviour research methods, 39(2), 175-191.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Massachusetts, US: Addison-Wesley.
Franklin, B. (1994). Packaging politics: Political communications in Britain’s media democracy. London: Edward Arnold.
Fridkin, K., Kenney, P. J., & Wintersieck, A. (2015). Liar, liar, pants on fire: How fact-checking influences citizens’ reactions to negative advertising. Political Communication, 32(1), 127-151.
Foley, J. P., & Pastore, P. (1997). Pontifical council for social communications ethics in advertising. Retrieved from http://www.vatican.com
Green, J. P., Tonidandel, S., & Cortina, J. M. (2016). Getting through the gate: Statistical and methodological issues raised in the reviewing process. Organizational Research Methods, 19(3), 402-432.
Gorman, M. M. (1993). Hume’s theory of belief. Hume Studies, 19(1), 89-102.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM): Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Harris, P., Lock, A., Harris, P., & Lock, A. (2010). “Mind the gap”: the rise of political marketing and a perspective on its future agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 44(3/4), 297-307.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
Homer, P. M., & Batra, R. (1994). Attitudinal effects of character-based versus competence-based negative political communications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3(2), 163-185.
Holbert, R. L., Benoit, W., Hansen, G., & Wen, W. C. (2002). The role of communication in the formation of an issue-based citizenry. Communication Monographs, 69(4), 296-310.
Holtz-Bacha, C., Novelli, E., & Rafter, K. (Eds.). (2017). Political advertising in the 2014 European parliament elections: London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Housholder, E., Watson, B.R., & Lorusso, S. (2018). Does political advertising lead to online information seeking? A real-world test using Google search data. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 62(2), 337-353.
James, K. E. & Hensel, P. J. (1991). Negative advertising: The malicious strain of comparative advertising. Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 53-69.
Jennings, F. J., Coker, C. R., Bramlett, J. C., Reed, J. L., & Bolton, J. P. (2018). An Unprecedented Election: Media, Communication, and the Electorate in the 2016 Campaign. Santa Barbaara, CA: Praeger.
Johnson-Cartee, K. S., & Copeland, G. (2013). Negative political advertising: Coming of age. UK: Routledge.
Johan, S. (2018). Young people have a key role in GE14. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/columnists/a-humblesubmission/2018/04/30/young-people-have-a-key-role-in-ge14/
Jones, J. P. (1991). Over-promise and under-deliver. Marketing and Research Today, November, 195-203.
Jun, J., & Lee, S. (2007) Mobile media use and its impact on consumer attitudes toward mobile advertising. International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 2(1), 50-58.
Kaid, L. L., & Holtz, B. C. (1995). Political Advertising in Western Democracies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Kaid, L. L., & Holtz-Bacha, C. (2006). The Sage handbook of political advertising: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Kaid, L. L., Nimmo, D., & Sanders, K. R. (1986). New Perspectives on Political Advertising. Illinois, US: Southern Illinois University Press.
Kim, H. (2005). Repetition Effect of Positive and Negative Political Advertising with the Presence Or Absence of Disclaimer: Recall, Attitude, Voting Intention. Georgia, US: University of Georgia.
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration. 11(4), 1-10. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management. (15th ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson.
Konitzer, T., Rothschild, D., Hill, S., & Wilbur, K. C. (2018). Using big data and algorithms to determine the effect of geographically targeted advertising on vote intention: Evidence from the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Political Communication, 1-18.
Lee, S., Khang, H., & Kim, Y. (2015). A cross-cultural perspective on televised political advertising during the presidential election between the US and South Korea: 1992-2012. Asian Journal of Communication. 26(2), 133-152.
Leong, T. (2019). Malaysia’s MP approve amendment to lower voting age from 21 to 18. Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com.
Lupia, A., & Philpot, T. S. (2005). Views from inside the net: How websites affect young adults' political interest. The Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1122-1142.
McGinnis, J. (1969). The selling of the president. New York, US: Simon & Shuster.
Munira, S. (2012). Political advertising. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/munirasulaiman/political-advertising10835175.com
Munusamy, J., & Wong, C. H. (2007). Attitude towards advertising among students at private higher learning institutions in Selangor. Unitar E- Journal, 3(1), 31-51.
Natarajan, T., Balasubramanian, S., Balakrishnan, J., & Manickavasagam, J. (2013). Examining beliefs towards social media advertisement among students and working professionals:
An application of discriminant analysis. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(8), 697-705.
New Straits Times. (2018). Sarawak, The election kingmaker. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/news/politics/2018/03/348694/sarawak-election-kingmaker
Newman, B. I., & Sheth, J. N. (Eds.). (1985). Political marketing: Readings and annotated bibliography. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
Norman, G. R., & Streiner, D. L. (2008). Biostatistics: the bare essentials (pp. 31-6). Hamilton: Bc Decker.
Okpanachi, R. A. (2017). Political advertising and voters’ choice of candidates in the 2015 general elections in Kogi State: Evidence from an experiment. International Journal of Communication, 20(1), 76-84.
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 67(4), 420.
Park, A., Philips, M., & Johnson, M. (2004). Young people in Britain: The attitudes and experiences of 12 to 19 year olds. National Centre for Social Research.
Pinkleton, B. (1997). The effects of negative comparative political advertising on candidate evaluations and advertising evaluations, an exploration. Journal of Advertising, 26, 19-29.
Pollay, R. W., & Mittal, B. (1993). Here’s the beef: Factors, determinants, and segment in consumer criticism of advertising. Journal of Marketing, 57, 99-114.
Rafter, K. (2009). Political advertisement: The regulatory position and the public view. Retrieved from http://www.bai.ie/wordpress/wp-RegPositionPublicViewPK.pdf
Rahim, M. H. A., & Mohamed, N. S. P. (2017). Transforming political advertising in Malaysia: Strategizing political advertisements towards first-time and young voters in Malaysian GE14. Malaysian Journal of Communication. 33(1), 356-367.
Ridout, T. N., Fowler, E. F., & Branstetter, J. (2012). Political advertising in the 21st century: The influence of the YouTube ad. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western
Political Science Association. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.469.3525
Robinson, C. (2010). Political advertising and the demonstration of market orientation. European Journal of Marketing, 44(3/4), 451-459.
Sadeghi, T., & Hanzaee, K. H. (2010). Measuring bank’s automated service quality: reexamination and extension in an Islamic country. World Applied Science Journal, 8(7), 874-861.
Sanders, D., & Norris, P. (2005). The impact of political advertising in the UK general election. Political Research Quarterly, 58(4), 525–536.
Shatar, A. (2018). How will young people vote. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/opinion/columnists/2018/02/339403/how-will-young-people-vote.
Surlin, S. H., & Gordon, T. F. (1997). How values affect attitudes toward direct reference political advertising. Journalism Quarterly, 54, 89-98.
The Official Portal of Sarawak Government. (2018). The geography of Sarawak. Retrieved from https://www.sarawak.gov.my/web/home/article_view/159/176
Then, S. (2018). Sarawak to stay politically ‘independent’. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2018/07/09/sarawak-to-stay-politically-independepent/
Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., & Williams, D. (2004). The impact of political advertising on knowledge, internet information seeking, and candidate preference. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 337–354.
Vesnic-Alujevic, L., & Van Bauwel, S. (2014). YouTube: A political advertising tool? A case study of the use of YouTube in the campaign for the European Parliament elections. Journal of Political Marketing, 13(3), 195-212.
Watternberg, M. P., & Brians, C. L. (1999). Negative campaign advertising: Demobilizer and mobilizer? The American Political Science Review, 93(4), 881-899.
Wells, R., Kleshinski, C. E., & Lau, T. (2012). Attitude toward and behavioural intentions to adopt mobile marketing: Comparisons of Gen Y in the United States, France and China. Mobile Marketing Association, 7(2), 5-25.
Yucel-Aybat, O. & Kramer, T. (2018). The impact of competitiveness on consumer responses to comparative advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 47(2). 198-212.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
