Signalling Effect of Auditor Reputation and Lock-Up Period on Over-Subscription Ratio: Evidence from Malaysian Fixed-Price IPOs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3250.2020Keywords:
Auditor reputation, Fixed-price method, Lock-up period, Malaysian IPO market, Oversubscription ratio, Quantile regressionAbstract
This study investigates the signalling effect of auditor reputation and lock-up period on the subscription demand of investors in the Malaysian IPO market that uses the fixed-price method in pricing IPOs. The study sample covers 420 IPOs listedon Bursa Malaysia from January 2000 to December 2015. The present study employsOrdinary Least Square(OLS)andQuantile Regression(QR)methodsin investigating the signalling effect on over-subscription ratio (OSR). The results indicate that auditor reputation has a negative effect and the lock-up period has a positive effect on OSR. This shows that investors’ demand in Malaysia is driven by capital gain and not by the quality of the listing firm. This is also supported by the control variables, where IPOs with low initial return, high offer price, high institutional involvement, and reputable underwriterhave lower OSR because they have lower initial returns.
References
Abdul-Rahim, R., & Che-Embi N. C. E., (2013). Initial returns of Shariah versus non-Shariah IPOs: Are there any differences? Jurnal Pengurusan, 39(1), 1-14.
Abdul-Rahim, R., & Yong, O. (2010). Initial returns of Malaysian IPOs and Shari’a compliant status. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 1(1), 60–74.
Abdul-Rahim, R., & Yong, O., (2008). Initial returns of Shariah-compliant IPOs in Malaysia. Capital Market Review, 16(2), 270–279.
Alanazi, A. S., Liu, B., & Al-Zoubi, H. A. (2016). IPO under-pricing in supply and demand framework: Evidence from a market of retailers. Applied Economics, 48(60), 5835–5849.
Albada, A., Low, S., & Yong, O. (2019a). Prestige signals and heterogeneity of opinion regarding IPO values: Malaysian evidence. International Journal of Emerging Markets. Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. doi: 10.1108/IJOEM-04-2018-0170
Albada, A., Low, S. W., Yong, O., Nassir, A. M., Kamarudin, F., & Anwar, N. A. M. A. (2019b). Heterogeneity of opinion, shareholder retention ratio and lockup period: Malaysian evidence. International Journal of Economics and Management, 13(1), 231-248.
Albada, A., Yong, O., & Low, S. (2019c). Relationship between prestige signals and oversubscription ratio. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 15(4), 564-579.
Albada, A., Yong, O., Hassan, M. E. M, & Abdul-Rahim, R. (2018). Retention ratio, lock-up period and prestige signals and their relationship with initial public offering (IPO) initial return: Malaysian evidence. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 14(2), 1-23.
Allen, F., & Faulhaber, G. R. (1989). Signalling by under-pricing in the IPO market. Journal of Financial Economics, 23(2), 303-323.
Badru, B. O., & Ahmad-Zaluki, N. A. (2018). Explaining IPO initial returns in Malaysia: Ex ante uncertainty vs signalling. Asian Review of Accounting, 26(1), 84-106.
Beatty, R. P., & Ritter, J. R. (1986). Investment banking, reputation, and the under-pricingof initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1–2), 213–232.
Benveniste, L. M., & Busaba, W. Y. (1997). Bookbuilding vs. fixed price: An analysis of competing strategies for marketing IPOs. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 32(4), 383-403.
Bhabra, H. S., & Pettway, R. H. (2003). IPO prospectus information and subsequent performance. Financial Review, 38(3), 369-397.
Boonchuaymetta, E., & Chuanrommanee, W. (2013). Management of the IPO performance in Thailand. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 23(4), 272-284.
Brav, A., & Gompers, P. A. (2003). The role of lock-ups in initial public offerings. Review of Financial Studies, 16(1), 1–29.
Chowdhry, B., & Sherman, A. (1996). International differences in over-subscription and underpricing of IPOs. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2(4), 359–381.
Courteau, L. (1995). Under-diversification and retention commitments in IPOs. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 30(4), 487–517.
Dawson, M. S. (1987). Secondary stock market performance of initial public offers, Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia: 1978-1984. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 14(1), 65–76.
Dimovski, W., Philavanh, S., & Brooks, R. (2011). Underwriter reputation and under-pricing: Evidence from the Australian IPO market. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 37(4), 409–426.
Grinblatt, M., & Hwang, C. Y. (1989). Signalling and the pricing of new issues. Journal of Finance, 44(2), 393-420.
Haman, J., Chalmers, K., & Fang, V. (2017). IPO lock-ups, long-run returns, and growth opportunities. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 49, 184-199.
Huang, H., Chiang, M., Lin, J., & Lin, Y. (2017). Fixed-price, auction, and book-building IPOs: Empirical evidence in Taiwan. Finance Research Letters, 22, 11-19.
Jelic, R., Saadouni, B., & Briston, R. (2001). Performance of Malaysian IPOs: Underwriters reputation and management earnings forecasts. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9(5), 457–486.
Khurana, I., Ni, C., & Shi, C. (2017). The role of big 4 auditors in the global primary market: Does audit quality matter most when investors are protected least? Paper presented at Asian bureau of finance and economic research annual conference, Gardenia, Azalea. Retrieved from http://abfer.org/media/abfer-events-2017/annual-conference/accounting/ac2017p5008_the_role_of_big_4_auditors_in_the_global_primary_market.pdf
Ljungqvist, A. (2008). IPO under-pricing. In: Eckbo, B.E. (Ed.), Handbook of Empirical Corporate Finance (1st Ed., pp. 375–422). North Holland: Elsevier Science.
Loughran, T. & Ritter, J. R. (1995). The new issues puzzle. Journal of Finance, 50(1), 23–51.
Loughran, T., Ritter, J. R., & Rydqvist, K. (1994). Initial public offerings: International insights. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2(2&3), 165-199.
Low, S. W., & Yong, O. (2011). Explaining over-subscription in fixed-price IPOs: Evidence from the Malaysian stock market. Emerging Markets Review, 12(1), 205–216.
Low, S. W., & Yong, O. (2013). Initial public offerings and investor heterogeneity: Evidence from Malaysia. American Journal of Finance and Accounting, 3(1), 41-56.
Lowry, M., Schwert, W.G. (2002). IPO market cycles: Bubbles or sequential learning? Journal of Finance, 57, 1171–1200.
Megginson, L., & Weiss, A. (1991). Venture capitalist certification in initial public offerings. Journal of Finance, 46(3), 879–903.
Michaely, R., & Shaw, W. H. (1994). The pricing of initial public offerings: Tests of adverseselection and signalling theories. Review of Financial Studies, 7(2), 279–319.
Michaely, R., & Shaw, W. H. (1995). Does the choice of auditor convey quality in an initial public offering? Journal of the Financial Management Association, 24(4), 15–30.
Mohan, N., & Chen, C. (2002). Information content of lock-up provisions in initial public offerings. International Review of Economics and Finance, 10(1), 41–59.
Mohd Rashid, R., Abdul-Rahim, R., & Yong, O. (2014). The influence of lock-up provisions on IPO initial returns: Evidence from an emerging market. Economic Systems, 38(4), 487–501.
Moshirian, F., Ng, D., & Wu, E. (2010). Model specification and IPO performance: New insights from Asia. Research in International Business and Finance, 24(1), 62–74.
Ritter, J. R. (1998). Initial public offerings. Contemporary Finance Digest, 2(1), 5–30.
Ritter, J. R., & Welch, I. (2002). A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations. Journal of Finance, 57(4), 1795–1828.
Rock, K. (1986). Why new issues are under-priced. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1–2), 187–212.
Rumokoy, L. J., Neupane, S., Chung, R. Y., & Vithanage, K. (2017). Underwriter network structure and political connections in the Chinese IPO market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 54, 199-214.
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signalling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
Spence, M. (2002). Signalling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review, 92, 434-459.
Sundarasen, S. D., Khan, A., & Rajangam, N. (2017). Signalling roles of prestigious auditors and underwriters in an emerging IPO market. Global Business Review, 19(1), 69–84.
Tajuddin, A. H, Abdullah, N. A. H., & Taufil-Mohd, K. N. (2018). Shariah-compliant status and IPO oversubscriptions. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 3(4), 531-548.
Tajuddin, A. H., Mohd Rashid, R., Abdullah, N. A. H., & Abdul-Rahim R. (2015). An empirical examination of over-subscription in the Malaysian IPO market. International Journal of Economics and Management, 9(S), 81-102.
Taufil-Mohd, K. N. (2007). Regulations and under-pricing of IPOs. Capital Markets Review, 15(1), 1-27.
Vong, A. P. (2006). Rate of subscription and after-market volatility in Hong Kong IPOs. Applied Financial Economics, 16(1), 1217–1224.
Welch, I. (1989). Seasoned offerings, imitation costs, and the under-pricing of initial public offerings. Journal of Finance, 44(2), 421-449.
Yong, O. (2007). A review of IPO research in Asia: What’s next? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 15(3), 253–275.
Yong, O. (2015). What is the “true” value of an initial public offering? Journal of Scientific Research and Development, 2(10), 78–85.
Yong, O., & Albada, A. (2018). Under-pricing and listing board in explaining heterogeneity of opinion regarding values of malaysian IPOs. Jurnal Pengurusan, 51, 63-72.
Yong, O., & Isa, Z. (2003). Initial performance of new issues of shares in Malaysia. Applied Economics, 35(8), 919–930.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
