The Influence of Governance on Intellectual Capital in Textile Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3220.2020Keywords:
Corporate governance, Intellectual capital performance, Related party transactions, Textile industry, Value added intellectual coefficientAbstract
This study is aimed to evaluate the impact of corporate governance index on intellectual capital performance by developing the index from five sub-indices and incorporating the value-added intellectual coefficient (VAIC) methodology for intellectual capital performance. Fixed and Random Effect Regression techniques have been used to analyze the data of the textile sector in Pakistan from 2010 to 2014. The findings suggest a negatively significant impact of corporate governance index on intellectual capital performance while sub-indices give mixed results. The study also investigates the relationship of individual variables in each sub-index with performance and results show a significant relationship for five variables namely independent director, independent audit committee, foreign shareholders ownership, gratuity, and remuneration committee.This study contributed empirical work in the literature of corporate governance and intellectual capital performance.The outcomes of this study can be used by policymakers as an attempt to boost the performance of the textile sector. A modified value-added intellectual coefficient (M-VAIC) methodology can be used in future research.
References
Ab Razak, N. H., Ahmad, R., & Aliahmed, H. (2008). Government ownership and performance: An analysis of listed companies in Malaysia. Corporate Ownership and Control, 6(2), 434-442.
Abdoli, M., Panahi, H., & Rahimiyan, F. (2013). The effect of corporate governance factors on the improvement of intellectual capital. Journal of Social Issues and Humanities, 1(7), 74-80.
Abidin, Z. Z., Kamal, N. M., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Board structure and corporate performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 1(1), 150.
Bebchuk, L. A., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2004). What Matters in Corporate Governance?,” Working Paper, Harvard Law School and NBER.
Al-Musalli, M. A. K., & Ismail, K. N. I. K. (2012). Corporate governance, bank specific characteristics, banking industry characteristics, and Intellectual Capital (IC) performance of banks in Arab Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 8(Supp. 1), 115-135.
Balasubramanian, B. N., Black, B. S., & Khanna, V. S. (2008). Firm-level corporate governance in emerging markets: A case study of India. ECGI-Law Working Paper, 119(2009), 8-11.
Bharathi, K. G. (2010). The intellectual capital performance of banking sector in pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Commerce & Social Sciences, 4(1).
Black, B. S. (2005). How corporate governance affects firm value: Evidence on channels from Korea. School of Law Law and Econ Research Paper Number 09-23 University of Texas School of Law Law and Economics Working Paper No. 51 University of Texas, McCombs School of Business.
Black, B. S., De Carvalho, A. G., & Gorga, É. (2012). What matters and for which firms for corporate governance in emerging markets? Evidence from Brazil (and other BRIC countries). Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(4), 934-952.
Black, B. S., Jang, H., & Kim, W. (2003). Does corporate governance affect firm value?: Evidence from korea.
Brick, I. E., Palmon, O., & Wald, J. K. (2006). CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism? Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 403-423.
Cerbioni, F., & Parbonetti, A. (2007). Exploring the effects of corporate governance on intellectual capital disclosure: an analysis of European biotechnology companies. European Accounting Review, 16(4), 791-826.
Cheung, Y. L., Thomas Connelly, J., Limpaphayom, P., & Zhou, L. (2007). Do investors really value corporate governance? Evidence from the Hong Kong market. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 18(2), 86-122.
Chiraz, D., & Anis, J. (2013). Corporate governance and delisting risk of French IPO firms. International Review of Management and Business Research, 2(1), 117-127.
Ertugrul, M., & Hegde, S. (2009). Corporate governance ratings and firm performance. Financial Management, 38(1), 139-160.
Firer, S. & Williams, S. M. (2003). Intellectual capital and traditional measures of corporate performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(3), 348-360.
Gruszczynski, M. (2006). Corporate governance and financial performance of companies in Poland. International Advances in Economic Research, 12(2), 251-259.
Gujarati, D. N. (2009). Basic econometrics: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Ho, C. A., & Williams, S. M. (2003). International comparative analysis of the association between board structure and the efficiency of value added by a firm from its physical capital and intellectual capital resources. The International Journal of Accounting, 38(4), 465-491.
Hodgson, A., Lhaopadchan, S., & Buakes, S. (2011). How informative is the Thai corporate governance index? A financial approach. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 19(1), 53-79.
Ismail, K., & Karem, M. A. (2011). Intellectual capital and financial performance of banks in Bahrain. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 1(1), 63-77.
Javaid, F., & Saboor, A. (2015). Impact of corporate governance index on firm performance: Evidence from Pakistani manufacturing sector. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 5(2), Pages 1-21.
Keenan, J., & Aggestam, M. (2001). Corporate governance and intellectual capital: Some conceptualisations. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9(4), 259-275.
Korent, D., Đunđek, I., & Čalopa, M. K. (2014). Corporate governance practices and firm performance measured by Croatian Corporate Governance Index (CCGI®). Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 27(1), 221-231.
Makki, M. A. M, & Lodhi, S. A. (2013). Impact of corporate governance on financial performance. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 33(2), 265-280.
Makki, M. A. M., & Lodhi, S. A. (2014). Impact of corporate governance on intellectual capital efficiency and financial performance. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 8(2), 305-330.
Ministry of Finance. (2015a). Federal budget 2015-16. Retrieved April 2016, from http://www.finance.gov.pk/fb_2015_16.html
Ministry of Finance. (2015b). Pakistan Economic Survey 2014-15. Retrieved April 2016, from http://www.finance.gov.pk/survey_1415.html
Page, M. (2009). Corporate governance and corporate performance: UK FTSE 350 companies: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
Pulic, A. (1998). Measuring the performance of intellectual potential in knowledge economy.
Pulic, A. (2004). Intellectual capital-does it create or destroy value? Measuring business excellence, 8(1), 62-68.
Renders, A., Gaeremynck, A., & Sercu, P. (2010). Corporate-governance ratings and company performance: A cross-european study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 87-106.
Sabir, H. M., Arshad, A., Sardar, S., & Latif, B. (2014). VAIC and Firm Performance: Banking Sector of Pakistan. Paper presented at the Information and Knowledge Management.
Shih, K. H., Chang, C. J., & Lin, B. (2010). Assessing knowledge creation and intellectual capital in banking industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(1), 74-89.
Taliyang, S. M., & Jusop, M. (2011). Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure: Evidence in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(12), 109-117.
Tariq, Y. B., & Butt, S. A. (2008). Impact of corporate governance practices on financial performance: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Paper presented at the Paper presented & published in conference proceedings at 8th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Business.
Ulum, I., Ghozali, I., & Purwanto, A. (2014). Intellectual capital performance of Indonesian banking sector: A modified VAIC (M-VAIC) perspective. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 6(2), 103-123.
Usman, M., Akhter, W., & Akhtar, A. (2015). Role of board and firm performance in determination of CEO compensation: Evidence from Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 9(2), 641-657.
Varshney, P., Kaul, V. K., & Vasal, V. (2012). Corporate governance index and firm performance: empirical evidence from India. Available at SSRN 2103462.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
