What Do Consumers Like to See in a Cause-Related Marketing Campaign Board?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3182.2021Keywords:
Cause-related Marketing, Hypermarkets, Corporate Social Responsibility, CRM Communication Board, Participation IntentionAbstract
The purpose of this study is to discover elements or contents of a Cause-Related Marketing (CRM) campaign’s communication board that may attract consumers to participate in the CRM program. This study focuses on the design of a CRM campaign communication board exclusively based on the perceptions of Malaysian consumers in the hypermarket context. Besides that, this study also identifies social causes applicable for hypermarkets in Malaysia. Employing a qualitative approach, the data in this study were obtained through focus group interviews and were analysed using a content analysis method. The study has identified seven themes that Malaysian consumers would like to see in a communication board, which were hypermarket initiative, communication, tagline and logos, timeframe, types of support (funds handled by NGOs), company-cause fit, and CRM products that are not limited to local products. These elements, if incorporated into a CRM communication board, will appeal to Malaysian consumers. The findings provide insights into the study of CRM communication board content that appeals to hypermarket consumers in Malaysia. This study also contributed to the CRM literature by exploring the applicability of a fairly new social cause (e.g. supporting underprivileged individuals) that can be championed and supported by the hypermarket. This research also offers practical implications for hypermarket managers. Hypermarkets can incorporate the seven elements (hypermarket initiative, communication, tagline and logos, timeframe, types of support, company-cause fit, and CRM products that are not limited to local products) while designing a CRM communication board.
References
Abu, N. K., & Roslin, R. M. (2008), Identifying service quality dimensions by understanding consumer preferences in the Malaysian grocery retail sector, Unitar E-journal, 4(2), 57-67.
Alhouti, S., Johnson, C. M., & Holloway, B. B. (2016). Corporate social responsibility authenticity: Investigating its antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1242-1249.
Anselmsson, J., & Johansson, U. (2007), Corporate social responsibility and the positioning of grocery brands: An exploratory study of retailer and manufacturer brands at point of purchase. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(10), 835-856.
Antil, J. H. (1984). Conceptualization and operationalization of involvement. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 203-209.
Anuar, M. M., & Mohamad, O. (2011). Examining the effects of cause-proximity and gender on consumers’ response to cause-related marketing: evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 3(3), 174-181.
Anuar, M. M., Omar, K., & Mohamad, O. (2014). Does Skepticism Influence Consumers Intention to Purchase Cause-related Products? Global Journal of Business and Social Science, 1(9), 94-98.
Barone, M. J., Norman, A. T., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2007). Consumer response to retailer use of cause-related marketing: Is more fit better? Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 437-445.
Buil, I., Martinez, E., & Montaner, T. (2012). The influence of marketing actions with cause in the attitude toward the brand. Notebooks of Economy and Direction of the Company, 15(2), 84-93.
Chang, C. (2012). The effectiveness of advertising that leverages sponsorship and cause-related marketing: A contingency model. International Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 317-338.
Chang, C. T. (2012). Missing ingredients in cause-related advertising: The right formula of execution style and cause framing. International Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 231-256.
Chéron, E., Kohlbacher, F., & Kusuma, K. (2012). The effects of brand-cause fit and campaign duration on consumer perception of cause-related marketing in Japan. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(5), 357-368.
Cui, Y., Trent, E. S., Sullivan, P. M., & Matiru, G. N. (2003). Cause-related marketing: How generation Y responds. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 31(6), 310-320.
Davis, F. D. (1986). Technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results, MA, USA: Massachussetts Institute of Technology.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–339.
Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies, 38, 475–487.
Ellen, P. S., Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2000). Charitable programs and the retailer: do they mix? Journal of retailing, 76(3), 393-406.
Galan Ladero, M. M., Galera Casquet, C., & Singh, J. (2015). Understanding factors influencing consumer attitudes toward cause‐related marketing. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 20(1), 2-70.
Grau, S. L. & Folse, J. A. G. (2007). Cause-related marketing (CRM): The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19-33.
Gupta, S., & Pirsch, J. (2008). The influence of a retailer's corporate social responsibility program on re-conceptualizing store image. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 15(6), 516-526
Hajjat, M. M. (2003). Effect of cause-related marketing on attitudes and purchase intentions: the moderating role of cause involvement and donation size. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 93-109.
Hammad, H., El-Bassiouny, N., Paul, P., & Mukhopadhyay, K. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of consumers’ attitudinal dispositions toward cause-related marketing in Egypt. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 5(3), 414-445.
Hassan, H., Rahman, M. S. & Sade, A. B. (2015). Shopping Day and Time Preferences of Malaysian Hypermarket Consumers. Australian Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 1(1), 61-68.
Hoeffler, S. & Keller, K. (2002). Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(1), 78-89.
Hou, J., Du, L. & Li, J. (2008). Cause's attributes influencing consumer's purchasing intention: empirical evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(4), 363-380.
Kim, N., Sung, Y., & Lee, M. (2012). Consumer evaluations of social alliances: The effects of perceived fit between companies and non-profit organizations. Journal of business ethics, 109(2), 163-174.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Lee, C. (2004). Centre on Regulation and Competition. Working Paper Series Paper No. 68. Competition Policy in Malaysia, Centre on Regulation and Competition.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mendini, M., Peter, P. C., & Gibbert, M. (2018). The dual-process model of similarity in cause-related marketing: How taxonomic versus thematic partnerships reduce skepticism and increase purchase willingness. Journal of Business Research, 91, 195-204.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mimouni Chaabane, A. & Parguel, B. (2016). The double-edge effect of retailers’ cause-related marketing: When scepticism cools the warm-glow effect. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(6), 607-626.
Moosmayer, D. C. & Fuljahn, A. (2013). Corporate motive and fit in cause related marketing. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(3), 200-207.
Myers, B., Kwon, W. S., & Forsythe, S. (2012). Creating effective cause-related marketing campaigns: The role of cause-brand fit, campaign news source, and perceived motivations. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 30(3), 167-182.
Neuman, W. L. (2014), Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. (7th ed.). USA: Pearson New International Edition.
Performance Management and Delivery Unit (PEMANDU) (2010). Economic Transformation Programme, A Roadmap for Malaysia. Retrieved from https://policy.asiapacificenergy.org/sites/default/files/ETP.pdf
QL Resources Bhd. (2012). What’s New: A Good Heart Starts with QL Eggs. Retrieved from http://www.qleggs.com/whats-new.php
Rahim, R. A., Jalaludin, F. W. & Tajuddin, K. (2011). The importance of corporate social responsibility on consumer behaviour in Malaysia. Asian academy of management journal, 16(1), 119-139.
Robinson, S. R., Irmak, C. & Jayachandran, S. (2012). Choice of cause in cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 126-139.
Samu, S. & Wymer, W. (2009). The effect of fit and dominance in cause marketing communications. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 432-440.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research Methods for Business Students (6th Ed.). Italy: Pearson Education Limited.
Schmeltz, L. (2012). Consumer-oriented CSR communication: focusing on ability or morality? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17(1), 29-49.
Schramm-Klein, H., Morschett, D., & Swoboda, B. (2015). Retailer corporate social responsibility: Shedding light on CSR’s impact on profit of intermediaries in marketing channels. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(4/5), 403-431.
Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 1-6. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
Tangari, A. H., Folse, J. A. G., Burton, S. & Kees, J. (2010). The moderating influence of consumers' temporal orientation on the framing of societal needs and corporate responses in cause-related marketing campaigns. Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 35-50.
Terano, R., Yahya, R., Mohamed, Z., & Saimin, S. B. (2014). Consumers’ Shopping Preferences for Retail Format Choice Between Modern and Traditional Retails in Malaysia. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 20, 179-192.
Thaler, J., & Helmig, B. (2013). Promoting good behavior: does social and temporal framing make a difference? VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(4), 1006-1036.
The Center for Advancement of Business, Innovation and Social Entrepreneur (CASE). (2014). Retrieved from http://projects.gobran.my/case/index.html
Malaysia's income distribution inequality 'still high'. (2013, August 3). The Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2013/08/03/malaysias-income-distribution-inequality-still-high/
Supermarkets and hypermarkets in Malaysia going through consolidation. (2019, September 17). The Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2019/09/ 17/supermarkets-and-hypermarkets-in-malaysia-going-through-consolidation
Van den Brink, D., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Pauwels, P. (2006). The effect of strategic and tactical cause-related marketing on consumers' brand loyalty. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(1), 15-25.
Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy.The Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58-74.
Warnaby, G., & Yip, K. M. (2005). Promotional planning in UK regional shopping centres: an exploratory study. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 23(1), 43-57.
Wymer, W., & Drollinger, T. (2015). Charity Appeals Using Celebrity Endorsers: Celebrity attributes most predictive of audience donation intentions. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(6), 2694-2717.
Wymer, W., McDonald, K., & Scaife, W. (2014). Effects of corporate support of a charity on public perceptions of the charity. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(6), 1388-1416.
Yee, W. F., Imm, N. S., & Hwa, L. C. (2018). Cause-Related Marketing: It’s Influence on Consumers’ Choice of Hypermarket. International Journal of Business & Society, 19(3), 616-636.
Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business Research Method (9th Ed.). Singapore: South-Western, Cengage Learning.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
