Bank Liquidity and Lending Behavior: Evidence from the Vietnamese Banking System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3173.2021Keywords:
Bank lending, Capital, Liquidity, State Ownership, VietnamAbstract
The study investigates the impact of liquidity on lending behavior, in the form of loan growth, at Vietnamese commercial banks for the period of 2007–2017. Notably, we also explore heterogeneous effects with the support of the generalized method of moments (GMM) for the dynamic panel data models. The robust result confirmed by alternative techniques indicates that banks with more liquidity tend to expand lending more, implying the precautionary motive of liquidity storage to finance future investments. Further analysis documents that this effect seems to be stronger for state-owned banks and mitigated in the case of banks having higher capital ratios, while we find the inconclusive results for bank size. In addition to extending the existing literature, this study provides insightful implications for bank managers and policymakers in Vietnam and other emerging economies as well.
References
Altunbas, Y., Gambacorta, L., & Marques-Ibanez, D. (2009). Securitisation and the bank lending channel. European Economic Review, 53(8), 996–1009.
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte-Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.
Banerjee, R. N., & Mio, H. (2018). The impact of liquidity regulation on banks. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 35, 30–44.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2011). Basel III: A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking Systems. Bank for International Settlements (BIS) publications.
Batten, J. A., & Vo, X. V. (2016). Bank risk shifting and diversification in an emerging market. Risk Management, 18(4), 217–235.
Batten, J., & Vo, X. V. (2019). Determinants of bank profitability – Evidence from Vietnam. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(6), 1417–1428.
Berger, A. N., & Bouwman, C. H. S. (2009). Bank liquidity creation. Review of Financial Studies, 22(9), 3779–3837.
Berrospide, J. M., & Edge, R. M. (2010). The effects of bank capital on lending: what do we know, and what does it mean? International Journal of Central Banking, 6(4), 5–54.
Bertay, A. C., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (2013). Do we need big banks? Evidence on performance, strategy and market discipline. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22(4), 532–558.
Brei, M., Gambacorta, L., & von Peter, G. (2013). Rescue packages and bank lending. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(2), 490–505.
Carlson, M., Shan, H., & Warusawitharana, M. (2013). Capital ratios and bank lending: A matched bank approach. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22(4), 663–687.
Chen, T. -H., Chou, H.-H, Chang, Y., & Fang, H. (2015). The effect of excess lending on bank liquidity: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics and Finance, 36, 54–68.
Cornett, M. M., McNutt, J. J., Strahan, P. E., & Tehranian, H. (2011). Liquidity risk management and credit supply in the financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2), 297–312.
Dang, V. D. (2019). The effects of loan growth on bank performance: Evidence from Vietnam. Management Science Letters, 9(6), 899–910.
DeYoung, R., Distinguin, I., & Tarazi, A. (2018). The joint regulation of bank liquidity and bank capital. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 34, 32–46.
Diamond, D. W., & Rajan, R. G. (2000). A theory of bank capital. Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2431–2465.
Diamond, D. W., & Rajan, R. G. (2001). Liquidity risk, liquidity creation, and financial fragility: A theory of banking. Journal of Political Economy, 109(2), 287–327.
Distinguin, I., Roulet, C., & Tarazi, A. (2013). Bank regulatory capital and liquidity: Evidence from US and European publicly traded banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9), 3295–3317.
Drehmann, M., & Gambacorta, L. (2012). The effects of countercyclical capital buffers on bank lending. Applied Economics Letters, 19(7), 603–608.
Fama, E. F. (2013). Was there ever a lending channel? European Financial Management, 19(5), 837–851.
Gambacorta, L. (2005). Inside the bank lending channel. European Economic Review, 49(7), 1737–1759.
Gambacorta, L., & Mistrulli, P. E. (2004). Does bank capital affect lending behavior? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13(4), 436–457.
Gozgor, G. (2014). Determinants of domestic credit levels in emerging markets: The role of external factors. Emerging Markets Review, 18, 1–18.
Kim, D., & Sohn, W. (2017). The effect of bank capital on lending: Does liquidity matter? Journal of Banking & Finance, 77, 95–107.
Košak, M., Li, S., Lončarski, I., & Marinč, M. (2015). Quality of bank capital and bank lending behavior during the global financial crisis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 37, 168–183.
Le, T. D. (2018). Bank risk, capitalisation and technical efficiency in the Vietnamese banking system. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 12(3), 41–61.
Leung, S. (2009). Banking and financial sector reforms in Vietnam. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 26(1), 44–57.
Louhichi, A., & Boujelbene, Y. (2017). Bank capital, lending and financing behaviour of dual banking systems. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 41, 61–79.
Nguyen, T. P. T., Nghiem, S. H., Roca, E., & Sharma, P. (2016). Bank reforms and efficiency in Vietnamese banks: evidence based on SFA and DEA. Applied Economics, 48(30), 2822–2835.
Qian, J., Strahan, P. E., & Yang, Z. (2015). The impact of incentives and communication costs on information production and use: Evidence from bank lending. Journal of Finance, 70(4) 1457–1493.
Roulet, C. (2018). Basel III: Effects of capital and liquidity regulations on European bank lending. Journal of Economics and Business, 95, 26–46.
Sarath, D., & Pham, V. D. (2015). The determinants of Vietnamese banks’ lending behavior. Journal of Economic Studies, 42(5), 861–877.
Sawada, M. (2010). Liquidity risk and bank portfolio management in a financial system without deposit insurance: Empirical evidence from prewar Japan. International Review of Economics and Finance, 19(3), 392–406.
Stewart, C., Matousek, R., & Nguyen, T. N. (2016). Efficiency in the Vietnamese banking system: A DEA double bootstrap approach. Research in International Business and Finance, 36, 96–111.
VanHoose, D. (2007). Theories of bank behavior under capital regulation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(12), 3680–3697.
Vo, X. V. (2016). Finance in Vietnam - An overview. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(3), 202–209.
Vo, X. V. (2018a). Bank lending behavior in emerging markets. Finance Research Letters, 2, 129–134.
Vo, X. V. (2018b). Do firms with state ownership in transitional economies take more risk? Evidence from Vietnam. Research in International Business and Finance, 46, 251–256.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
