Bank Liquidity and Lending Behavior: Evidence from the Vietnamese Banking System

  • Van Dan Dang Banking University of Ho Chi Minh City
Keywords: Bank lending, Capital, Liquidity, State Ownership, Vietnam

Abstract

The study investigates the impact of liquidity on lending behavior, in the form of loan growth, at Vietnamese commercial banks for the period of 2007–2017. Notably, we also explore heterogeneous effects with the support of the generalized method of moments (GMM) for the dynamic panel data models. The robust result confirmed by alternative techniques indicates that banks with more liquidity tend to expand lending more, implying the precautionary motive of liquidity storage to finance future investments. Further analysis documents that this effect seems to be stronger for state-owned banks and mitigated in the case of banks having higher capital ratios, while we find the inconclusive results for bank size. In addition to extending the existing literature, this study provides insightful implications for bank managers and policymakers in Vietnam and other emerging economies as well.

References

Altunbas, Y., Gambacorta, L., & Marques-Ibanez, D. (2009). Securitisation and the bank lending channel. European Economic Review, 53(8), 996–1009.

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte-Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.

Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.

Banerjee, R. N., & Mio, H. (2018). The impact of liquidity regulation on banks. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 35, 30–44.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2011). Basel III: A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking Systems. Bank for International Settlements (BIS) publications.

Batten, J. A., & Vo, X. V. (2016). Bank risk shifting and diversification in an emerging market. Risk Management, 18(4), 217–235.

Batten, J., & Vo, X. V. (2019). Determinants of bank profitability – Evidence from Vietnam. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(6), 1417–1428.

Berger, A. N., & Bouwman, C. H. S. (2009). Bank liquidity creation. Review of Financial Studies, 22(9), 3779–3837.

Berrospide, J. M., & Edge, R. M. (2010). The effects of bank capital on lending: what do we know, and what does it mean? International Journal of Central Banking, 6(4), 5–54.

Bertay, A. C., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (2013). Do we need big banks? Evidence on performance, strategy and market discipline. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22(4), 532–558.

Brei, M., Gambacorta, L., & von Peter, G. (2013). Rescue packages and bank lending. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(2), 490–505.

Carlson, M., Shan, H., & Warusawitharana, M. (2013). Capital ratios and bank lending: A matched bank approach. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22(4), 663–687.

Chen, T. -H., Chou, H.-H, Chang, Y., & Fang, H. (2015). The effect of excess lending on bank liquidity: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics and Finance, 36, 54–68.

Cornett, M. M., McNutt, J. J., Strahan, P. E., & Tehranian, H. (2011). Liquidity risk management and credit supply in the financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2), 297–312.

Dang, V. D. (2019). The effects of loan growth on bank performance: Evidence from Vietnam. Management Science Letters, 9(6), 899–910.

DeYoung, R., Distinguin, I., & Tarazi, A. (2018). The joint regulation of bank liquidity and bank capital. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 34, 32–46.

Diamond, D. W., & Rajan, R. G. (2000). A theory of bank capital. Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2431–2465.

Diamond, D. W., & Rajan, R. G. (2001). Liquidity risk, liquidity creation, and financial fragility: A theory of banking. Journal of Political Economy, 109(2), 287–327.

Distinguin, I., Roulet, C., & Tarazi, A. (2013). Bank regulatory capital and liquidity: Evidence from US and European publicly traded banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9), 3295–3317.

Drehmann, M., & Gambacorta, L. (2012). The effects of countercyclical capital buffers on bank lending. Applied Economics Letters, 19(7), 603–608.

Fama, E. F. (2013). Was there ever a lending channel? European Financial Management, 19(5), 837–851.

Gambacorta, L. (2005). Inside the bank lending channel. European Economic Review, 49(7), 1737–1759.

Gambacorta, L., & Mistrulli, P. E. (2004). Does bank capital affect lending behavior? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13(4), 436–457.

Gozgor, G. (2014). Determinants of domestic credit levels in emerging markets: The role of external factors. Emerging Markets Review, 18, 1–18.

Kim, D., & Sohn, W. (2017). The effect of bank capital on lending: Does liquidity matter? Journal of Banking & Finance, 77, 95–107.

Košak, M., Li, S., Lončarski, I., & Marinč, M. (2015). Quality of bank capital and bank lending behavior during the global financial crisis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 37, 168–183.

Le, T. D. (2018). Bank risk, capitalisation and technical efficiency in the Vietnamese banking system. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 12(3), 41–61.

Leung, S. (2009). Banking and financial sector reforms in Vietnam. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 26(1), 44–57.

Louhichi, A., & Boujelbene, Y. (2017). Bank capital, lending and financing behaviour of dual banking systems. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 41, 61–79.

Nguyen, T. P. T., Nghiem, S. H., Roca, E., & Sharma, P. (2016). Bank reforms and efficiency in Vietnamese banks: evidence based on SFA and DEA. Applied Economics, 48(30), 2822–2835.

Qian, J., Strahan, P. E., & Yang, Z. (2015). The impact of incentives and communication costs on information production and use: Evidence from bank lending. Journal of Finance, 70(4) 1457–1493.

Roulet, C. (2018). Basel III: Effects of capital and liquidity regulations on European bank lending. Journal of Economics and Business, 95, 26–46.

Sarath, D., & Pham, V. D. (2015). The determinants of Vietnamese banks’ lending behavior. Journal of Economic Studies, 42(5), 861–877.

Sawada, M. (2010). Liquidity risk and bank portfolio management in a financial system without deposit insurance: Empirical evidence from prewar Japan. International Review of Economics and Finance, 19(3), 392–406.

Stewart, C., Matousek, R., & Nguyen, T. N. (2016). Efficiency in the Vietnamese banking system: A DEA double bootstrap approach. Research in International Business and Finance, 36, 96–111.

VanHoose, D. (2007). Theories of bank behavior under capital regulation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(12), 3680–3697.

Vo, X. V. (2016). Finance in Vietnam - An overview. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(3), 202–209.

Vo, X. V. (2018a). Bank lending behavior in emerging markets. Finance Research Letters, 2, 129–134.

Vo, X. V. (2018b). Do firms with state ownership in transitional economies take more risk? Evidence from Vietnam. Research in International Business and Finance, 46, 251–256.

Published
2021-03-24
How to Cite
Van Dan Dang. (2021). Bank Liquidity and Lending Behavior: Evidence from the Vietnamese Banking System. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(1), 240-256. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3173.2021