The Role of Technical Innovation and Development of Industrial Sector in Korean International Business
With the pace of development and competitiveness, innovation plays an important role to capture the market share. Various countries have effective strategies to enhance Research and Development (R&D) and exchange value added products in international market. So, based on this the aim of this research is to examine the role of R&D, industrial design and charges for intellectual property in innovative exports in South Korean economy. Time series data for the period 1998 to 2017, Ordinary Least Square (OLS) and Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) models are used to determine the dynamic interrelationship among the study variables. In summary, the overall results show that there is co-integration rank of in both trace test and value test at 1% significance level. Moreover, OLS and GMM findings depict that there is significant and positive coefficient for ID & RD which represent that they have positive impact on HT. Whereas, the IP displays a negative and significant relationship with high technology exports accordingly. Lastly, the diagnostic tests show that model is stable for the study time period and result is reliable. The current study also suggests some policy implications which can enhance innovative export products of South Korea while enhancing R&D.
Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Aaboen, L., Cova, B., & Rolfsen, A. (2018). Building B2B relationships via initiation contributors: Three cases from the Norwegian-South Korean international project business. Industrial Marketing Management, 68, 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.027
Acemoglu, D., Gancia, G., & Zilibotti, F. (2012). Competing engines of growth: Innovation and standardization. Journal of Economic Theory, 147(2), 570-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2010.09.001
Al-Shawaf, A. M. K., & Almsafir, M. K. (2016). Economic globalization: role of inward and outward FDI with economic growth - evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 10(2), 64-74.
Archibugi, D., & Filippetti, A. (2013). Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation? Research Policy, 42(2), 303-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.002
Auriol, E., Biancini, S., & Paillacar, R. (2019). Universal Intellectual Property Rights: Too Much of a Good Thing? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 65, 51-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2019.01.003
Azar, G., & Ciabuschi, F. (2017). Organizational innovation, technological innovation, and export performance: The effects of innovation radicalness and extensiveness. International Business Review, 26(2), 324-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.09.002
Barbu, A., & Militaru, G. (2019). The Moderating Effect of Intellectual Property Rights on Relationship between Innovation and Company Performance in Manufacturing Sector. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 1077-1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.324
Bekhet, H. A., & Al-Smadi, R. W. (2016). The dynamic causality between FDI inflow and its determinants in Jordan. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 11(1), 26-47. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEBR.2016.074427
Bekhet, H. A., & Mugableh, M. I. (2012). Investigating Equilibrium Relationship between Macroeconomic Variables and Malaysian Stock Market Index through Bounds Tests Approach, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(10), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v4n10p69
Bekhet, H. A., Matar, A., & Yasmin, T. (2017). Exploring the relationship between CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in GCC countries: Econometric Analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.089
Bekhet, H. A., Othman, N. S., & Yasmin, T. (2020). Interaction Between Environmental Kuznet Curve and Urban Environment Transition Hypotheses in Malaysia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(1), 384-402. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.8389
Bernier, M., Plouffe, M. (2019). Financial innovation, economic growth, and the consequences of macroprudential policies. Research in Economics, 73(2), 162-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2019.04.003
Boateng, A., Hua, X., Nisar, S., & Wu, J. (2015). Examining the determinants of inward FDI: Evidence from Norway. Economic Modelling, 47, 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.02.018
Bodlaj, M., Kadic-Maglajlic, S., & Vida, I. (2018). Disentangling the impact of different innovation types, financial constraints and geographic diversification on SMEs' export growth. Journal of Business Research, 108, 466-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.043
Branstetter, L. G., & Kwon, N. (2018). South Korea's transition from imitator to innovator: The role of external demand shocks. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 49, 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2018.01.004
Brooks, C. (2014). Introductory Econometrics for Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139540872
Buryi, P., & Lahiri, S. (2019). Research and development and trade policies for product innovation in the presence of foreign competition. Economic Modelling, 80, 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.11.026
Choi, K., Narasimhan, R., & Kim, S. W. (2016). Opening the technological innovation black box: The case of the electronics industry in Korea. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(1), 192-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.054
Cimoli, M., Fleitas, S.& Porcile, G. (2013). Technological intensity of the export structure and the real exchange rate. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22(4), 353-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2012.748504
Coad, A., & Vezzani, A. (2019). Three cheers for industry: Is manufacturing linked to R&D, exports, and productivity growth? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 50, 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.04.006
Dai, X., Sun, Z., & Liu, H. (2018). Disentangling the effects of endogenous export and innovation on the performance of Chinese manufacturing firms. China Economic Review, 50, 42-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2018.03.007
de Oliveira, J.A.S., Basso, L.F.C., Kimura, H., & Sobreiro, V.A. (2018). Innovation and financial performance of companies doing business in Brazil. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2(4), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2019.03.001
Deligonul, S. D. (2020). Multinational country risk: Exposure to asset holding risk and operating risk in international business. Journal of World Business, 55(2), 101041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2019.101041
Dizaji, S. F. (2014). The effects of oil shocks on government expenditures and government revenues nexus (with an application to Iran's sanctions), Economic Modelling, 40, 299-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.04.012
Doh, S., & Kim, B. (2014). Government support for SME innovations in the regional industries: The case of government financial support program in South Korea. Research Policy, 43(9), 1557-1569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.05.001
Elliot, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root Econometrica, 64, 813-836. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171846
Ershova, N. (2017). Investment climate in Russia and challenges for foreign business: The case of Japanese companies. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 8(2), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2017.03.001
Export.gov. (2019). Korea Manufacturing Technology, Smart Factory. Retrieved from https://www.export.gov/article?id=Korea-Manufacturing-Technology-Smart-Factory
García-Quevedo, J., Segarra-Blasco, A., & Teruel, M. (2018). Financial constraints and the failure of innovation projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.029
Ghosh, A., Morita, H., & Nguyen, X. (2018). Technology spillovers, intellectual property rights, and export-platform FDI. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 151, 171-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.03.016
Gkypali, A., Arvanitis, S., & Tsekouras, K. (2018). Absorptive capacity, exporting activities, innovation openness and innovation performance: A SEM approach towards a unifying framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.025
Godin, B. (2002). Technological Gaps: Quantitative Evidence and Qualitative Arguments, Technology in Society, 24, 387-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00032-5
Godin, B. (2006). The Linear Model of Innovation: The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework, Science, Technology, and Human, 31 (6), 639-667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906291865
Godin, B. (2008). In the Shadow of Schumpeter: W. Rupert Maclaurin and the Study of Technological Innovation, Minerva, 46(3), 343-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-008-9100-4
Godin, B. (2010). National Innovation System: A Note on the Origins of a Concept, Working Paper, Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation, Montreal: INRS
Godin, B. (2011). The Linear Model of Innovation: Maurice Holland and the Research Cycle, Social Science Information, 50(3-4), 569-581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018411411032
Godin, B. (2012). Innovation Studies: The Invention of a Specialty, Minerva, 50(4), 397-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9212-8
Gujarati, D., & Porter, D. (2008). Basic econometrics. (5th ed.). New York, USA, McGraw-Hill companies.
Hjalmarsson, E., & Osterholm, P. (2007). A Residual-Based Cointegration Test for Near Unit Root Variables. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1066746. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1066746
Holcombe, R. G. (2013). South Korea's economic future: Industrial policy, or economic democracy? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 88, 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.07.021
Hu, M.C., & Mathews, J.A. (2005). National innovative capacity in East Asia, Research Policy, 34(9), 1322-1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.04.009
Huang, C., & Hou, T.C. (2019). Innovation, research and development, and firm profitability in Taiwan: Causality and determinants. International Review of Economics & Finance, 59, 385-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.10.004
Hunt, M. (2019). South Korea commits US$4bn to bolster tech sectors. Global Government Forum. Retrieved from https://www.globalgovernmentforum.com/south-korea-commits-us4bn-to-bolster-tech-sectors/
INSEAD (2019). The Global Talent Competitiveness Index 2019. Retrieved from https://www.insead.edu/sites/default/files/assets/dept/globalindices/docs/GTCI-2019-Report.pdf
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2019a). Korea's Economic Outlook in Six Charts. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2019/05/16/na052119-koreas-economic-outlook-in-6-charts
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2019b). Republic of Korea. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org.
International Trade Administration (2020). Korea Methods of Payment. Retrieved from: https://www.trade.gov/knowledge-product/korea-methods-payment
Jiyoung, L., Chulyeon, K., & Gyunghyun, C. (2019). Exploring data envelopment analysis for measuring collaborated innovation efficiency of small and medium-sized enterprises in Korea. European Journal of Operational Research, 278(2), 533-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.08.044
Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on co-integration-with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x
Kim, H., Shin, J., & Lee, S. (2019). A new approach to efficient ratio: A case of South Korea's research and development investment. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 51, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.12.001
Kishi, K. (2016). Technology Diffusion, Pareto Distribution, and Patent Policy. Discussion Papers No 16-31 in Economics and Business. Osaka University, Toyonaka, Japan.
Kishi, K. (2019). Technology diffusion, innovation size, and patent policy. European Economic Review, 118, 382-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.05.012
Kukharskyy, B. (2020). A tale of two property rights: Knowledge, physical assets, and multinational firm boundaries. Journal of International Economics, 122, 103262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2019.103262
Larson, J. F., & Park, J. (2014). From developmental to network state: Government restructuring and ICT-led innovation in Korea. Telecommunications Policy, 38(4), 344-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2013.10.001
Lechevalier, S., Debanes, P., & Shin, W. (2019). Financialization and industrial policies in Japan and Korea: Evolving institutional complementarities and loss of state capabilities. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 48, 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2017.08.003
Lhermie, G., Tauer, L. W., & Gröhn, Y. T. (2018). An assessment of the economic costs to the U.S. dairy market of antimicrobial use restrictions. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 160(15), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.09.028
Lim, J., & Lee, K. (2019). Employment effect of innovation under different market structures: Findings from Korean manufacturing firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 606-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.022
Maclaurin, W. R. (1946). Investing in Science for the future. Technology Review May, 423-454.
Maclaurin, W. R. (1950). The process of technological innovation: The launching of a new scientific industry. American Economic Review, 40, 90-112.
Makri, K., Theodosiou, M., & Katsikea, E. (2017). An empirical investigation of the antecedents and performance outcomes of export innovativeness. International Business Review, 26(4), 628-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.12.004
Maradana, R. P., Pradhan, R. P., Dash, S., Zaki, D. B., Gaurav, K., Jayakumar, M., & Sarangi, A. K. (2019). Innovation and economic growth in European Economic Area countries: The granger causality approach. IMB Management Review, 31(3), 268-282. doi: 10.1016/j.iimb.2019.03.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.03.002
Ministry of Economy and Finance (2020). Economic Policies, H2 2020. Retrieved from https://english.moef.go.kr/pc/selectTbPressCenterDtl.do?boardCd=N0001&seq=4913
Muhammad, B., & Khan, S. (2019). Effect of bilateral FDI, energy consumption, CO2 emission and capital on economic growth of Asia countries. Energy Reports, 5, 1305-1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.09.004
Nuruzzaman, N., Singh, D., & Pattnaik, C. (2019). Competing to be innovative: Foreign competition and imitative innovation of emerging economy firms. International Business Review, 28(5), 101490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.03.005
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2019). Korea Economic Snapshot. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/economy/korea-economic-snapshot/
Patel, P. C., Guedes, M. J., Soares, N., & Gonçalves, V. C. (2018). Strength of the association between R&D volatility and firm growth: The roles of corporate governance and tangible asset volatility. Journal of Business Research, 88, 282-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.033
Pérez, J. A. H., Geldes, C., Kunc, M. H., & Flores, A. (2019). New approach to the innovation process in emerging economies: The manufacturing sector case in Chile and Peru. Technovation, 79, 35-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.012
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Nair, M., Bennett, S. E., Bahmani, S., & Hall, J. H. (2018). Endogenous dynamics between innovation, financial markets, venture capital and economic growth: Evidence from Europe. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 45, 15-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2018.01.002
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. P., & Bahmani, S. (2018). Are innovation and financial development causative factors in economic growth? Evidence from a panel granger causality test. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 130-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.024
Putzhammer, M., Slangen, A., Puck, J., & Lindner, T. (2019). Multinational firms' pace of expansion within host countries: How high rates of pro-market reform hamper the local exploitation of foreign expansion knowledge. Journal of International Management, 26(1), 100703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2019.100703
Rodil, O., Vence, X., & Sánchez, M. (2016). The relationship between innovation and export behaviour: The case of Galician firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113(PB), 248-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.002
Russ, K. N., & Swenson, D. L. (2019). Trade Diversion and Trade Deficits: The Case of the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 52, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2019.02.001
Schott, J. J., & Jung, E. (2018). 18-22 KORUS Amendments: Minor Adjustments Fixed What Trump Called "Horrible Trade Deal", Peterson Institute for International Economics, Retrieved from https://www.piie.com/system/files/documents/pb18-22.pdf
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Seo, B. K., & Joo, Y. (2019). Innovation or episodes? Multi-scalar analysis of governance change in urban regeneration policy in South Korea. Cities, 92, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.010
Silva, G. M., Gomes, P. J., & Lages, L. F. (2019). Does importer involvement contribute to product innovation? The role of export market factors and intra-firm coordination. Industrial Marketing Management, 78, 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.05.008
Singhai, S. (2019). A report on WIPO-CNIPA Training Course on Management and Commercialization of Intellectual Property Assets. World Patent Information, 57, 35-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2019.03.007
Štěrbová, M., Stojanovski, V., Weiss, G., & Šálka, J. (2019). Innovating in a traditional sector: Innovation in forest harvesting in Slovakia and Macedonia. Forest Policy and Economics, 106, 101960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101960
Švarc, J., Lažnjak, J., & Dabić, M. (2019). Regional innovation culture in innovation laggard: A case of Croatia. Technology in Society, 58, 101123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.03.006
The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2019a). Trade and Development Report 2019. United Nations Publication, ISSN: 0255-4607; eISSN: 2225-3262
The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2019b). Digital Economy Report, 2019. United Nations Publication, ISSN 2664-2255, eISSN 2664-2263.
Zhu, X., Zheng, W., Zhang, H., & Guo, Y. (2019). Time-varying international market power for the Chinese iron ore markets. Resources Policy, 64, 101502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101502
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.