ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND PROVINCIAL SKILL DIVERSITY IN THAILAND
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.14351.2026Keywords:
skill diversity, entrepreneurship, workforce heterogeneity, Thailand, provincial analysisAbstract
This study investigates the relationship between provincial workforce skill diversity and entrepreneurship in Thailand using pooled cross-sectional data from the 2013 and 2022 Thai Labour Force Surveys, covering 77 provinces, with approximately 270,000 individual observations across the two waves; the regression sample after standard restrictions comprises around 175,000 observations. Provincial skill diversity is operationalised through four distinct indices measuring workforce heterogeneity: (1) educational attainment levels, (2) educational fields among highly educated workers, (3) occupational categories, and (4) industrial sectors. These indices are computed using fractionalisation index. The empirical strategy combines probit regressions to estimate the probability of entrepreneurship with instrumental variable (IV) techniques to address potential endogeneity. Furthermore, a generalised structural equation model (GSEM) was employed to examine indirect mechanisms through three mediators: entrepreneur skill diversity, employee skill diversity, and consumption diversity. The results show that provinces with greater skill diversity exhibit a significantly higher likelihood of entrepreneurship: a one-standard-deviation increase in skill diversity raises the probability of entrepreneurial activity by approximately 0.09-1.06 percentage points in 2013 and 0.003-0.50 percentage points in 2022. Indirect effects operate mainly through entrepreneur skill diversity, consistent with knowledge spillover theory. Conversely, employee skill diversity reduces entrepreneurial activity, while lower consumption diversity is positively associated with entrepreneurship through a necessity-driven channel, both patterns reflecting the informal and survival-oriented nature of Thailand's labour market. Policy implications emphasise inclusive education, balanced regional industrial strategies, and labour mobility to leverage workforce diversity for sustainable, innovation-driven entrepreneurship.
References
Acs, Z. (2006). How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth? Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(1), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.1.97
https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.1.97
Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3
Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Ethnic diversity and economic performance. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(3), 762-800. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205105774431243
https://doi.org/10.1257/002205105774431243
Alesina, A., Spolaore, E., & Wacziarg, R. (2000). Economic integration and political disintegration. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1276-1296. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.5.1276
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.5.1276
Åstebro, T., & Thompson, P. (2011). Entrepreneurs, jacks of all trades or hobos? Research Policy, 40(5), 637-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.010
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.010
Audretsch, D. B. (2007). Entrepreneurship capital and economic growth. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(1), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm001
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm001
Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030-1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8
Bellini, E., Ottaviano, G. I. P., Pinelli, D., & Prarolo, G. (2013). Cultural diversity and economic performance: Evidence from European regions. In R. Crescenzi & M. Percoco (Eds.), Geography, institutions and regional economic performance (pp. 121-141). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33395-8_7
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33395-8_7
Berliant, M., & Fujita, M. (2011). The dynamics of knowledge diversity and economic growth. Southern Economic Journal, 77(4), 856-884. https://doi.org/10.4284/0038-4038-77.4.856
https://doi.org/10.4284/0038-4038-77.4.856
Berliant, M., & Fujita, M. (2012). Culture and diversity in knowledge creation. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(4), 648-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.02.008
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.02.008
Braunerhjelm, P., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2010). The missing link: Knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Business Economics, 34(2), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9235-1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9235-1
Bublitz, E., & Noseleit, F. (2014). The skill balancing act: When does broad expertise pay off? Small Business Economics, 42(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9474-z
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9474-z
Ciccone, A., & Hall, R. E. (1996). Productivity and the density of economic activity. The American Economic Review, 86(1), 54-70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118255
Combes, P.-P., & Duranton, G. (2006). Labour pooling, labour poaching, and spatial clustering. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2005.06.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2005.06.003
Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945-974. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.945
https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.945
Dincer, O. C. (2011). Ethnic diversity and trust. Contemporary Economic Policy, 29(2), 284-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2010.00215.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2010.00215.x
Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2000). Diversity and specialisation in cities: Why, where and when does it matter? Urban Studies, 37(3), 533-555. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098002104
https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098002104
Eeckhout, J., Pinheiro, R., & Schmidheiny, K. (2014). Spatial sorting. Journal of Political Economy, 122(3), 554-620. https://doi.org/10.1086/676141
https://doi.org/10.1086/676141
Garnero, A., Kampelmann, S., & Rycx, F. (2014). The heterogeneous effects of workforce diversity on productivity, wages, and profits. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 53(3), 430-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12064
https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12064
Glaeser, E. L., & Kerr, W. R. (2009). Local industrial conditions and entrepreneurship: How much of the spatial distribution can we explain? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(3), 623-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00225.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00225.x
Hartog, J., van Praag, M., & van der Sluis, J. (2010). If you are so smart, why aren't you an entrepreneur? Returns to cognitive and social ability: Entrepreneurs versus employees. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 19(4), 947-989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00274.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00274.x
Hong, L., & Page, S. E. (2001). Problem solving by heterogeneous agents. Journal of Economic Theory, 97(1), 123-163. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.2000.2709
https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.2000.2709
Ilmakunnas, P., & Ilmakunnas, S. (2011). Diversity at the workplace: Whom does it benefit? De Economist, 159(2), 223-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-011-9161-x
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-011-9161-x
Iranzo, S., Schivardi, F., & Tosetti, E. (2008). Skill dispersion and firm productivity: An analysis with employer-employee matched data. Journal of Labor Economics, 26(2), 247-285. https://doi.org/10.1086/587091
https://doi.org/10.1086/587091
Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. Vintage.
Kemeny, T. (2017). Immigrant diversity and economic performance in cities. International Regional Science Review, 40(2), 164-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017614541695
https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017614541695
Kemeny, T., & Cooke, A. (2018). Spillovers from immigrant diversity in cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 18(1), 213-245. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbx012
https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbx012
Lazear, E. P. (1999). Culture and language. Journal of Political Economy, 107(S6), S95-S126. https://doi.org/10.1086/250105 Lee, N. (2015). Migrant and ethnic diversity, cities and innovation: Firm effects or city effects? Journal of Economic Geography, 15(4), 769-796. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu032
https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu032
Lekfuangfu, N. (2017). Intensive and extensive margins of labour supply in Thailand: Decomposing the pattern of work behaviours (PIER Discussion Paper No. 59). Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.
Lewis, E. (2011). Immigration, skill mix, and capital skill complementarity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(2), 1029-1069. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr011
https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr011
Longhi, S. (2013). Impact of cultural diversity on wages: Evidence from panel data. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(5), 797-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.07.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.07.004
Marino, M., Parrotta, P., & Pozzoli, D. (2012). Does labour diversity promote entrepreneurship? Economics Letters, 116(1), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.01.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.01.004
Marino, M., Parrotta, P., & Pozzoli, D. (2016). Educational diversity and knowledge transfers via inter-firm labour mobility. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 123, 168-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.10.019
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.10.019
Mehta, A., Felipe, J., Quising, P., & Camingue, S. (2013). Where have all the educated workers gone? Services and wage inequality in three Asian economies. Metroeconomica, 64(3), 466-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12014
https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12014
Moretti, E. (2011). Local labor markets. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4B, pp. 1237-1313). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02412-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02412-9
Mueller, P., van Stel, A., & Storey, D. J. (2008). The effects of new firm formation on regional development over time: The case of Great Britain. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9056-z
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9056-z
National Statistical Office of Thailand (NSO). (2023). The informal employment survey 2023. Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. https://www.nso.go.th/nsoweb/storage/survey_detail/2023/20231218155504_43190.pdf
Navon, G. (2010). Human capital spillovers in the workplace: Labour diversity and productivity. Israel Economic Review, 8(1), 69-90. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2187021
Obschonka, M., Hakkarainen, K., Lonka, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2017). Entrepreneurship as a twenty-first century skill: Entrepreneurial alertness and intention in the transition to adulthood. Small Business Economics, 48(3), 487-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9798-6
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9798-6
Ottaviano, G. I. P., & Peri, G. (2005). Cities and cultures. Journal of Urban Economics, 58(2), 304-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2005.06.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2005.06.004
Ottaviano, G. I. P., & Peri, G. (2006). The economic value of cultural diversity: Evidence from US cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(1), 9-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi002
https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi002
Parrotta, P., Pozzoli, D., & Pytlikova, M. (2014a). The nexus between labour diversity and firm's innovation. Journal of Population Economics, 27(2), 303-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-013-0491-7
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-013-0491-7
Parrotta, P., Pozzoli, D., & Pytlikova, M. (2014b). Labour diversity and firm productivity. European Economic Review, 66, 144-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.12.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.12.002
Paweenawat, S. W., & McNown, R. (2018). A synthetic cohort analysis of female labour supply: The case of Thailand. Applied Economics, 50(5), 527-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1324614 Silver, L., Devlin, K., & Tamir, C. (2020). Attitudes toward diversity in 11 emerging economies. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/06/16/attitudes-toward-diversity-in-11-emerging-economies/
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1324614
Spanjer, A., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2017). The entrepreneur's experiential diversity and entrepreneurial performance. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9811-0
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9811-0
Stephens, H. M., Partridge, M. D., & Faggian, A. (2013). Innovation, entrepreneurship and economic growth in lagging regions. Journal of Regional Science, 53(5), 778-812. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12019
https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12019
Sturgis, P., Brunton-Smith, I., Read, S., & Allum, N. (2011). Does ethnic diversity erode trust? Putnam's 'hunkering down' thesis reconsidered. British Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 57-82. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123410000281
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123410000281
Suedekum, J., Wolf, K., & Blien, U. (2014). Cultural diversity and local labour markets. Regional Studies, 48(1), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.697142
https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.697142
Sussangkarn, C. (1996). Macroeconomic impacts of migrant workers: Analyses with a CGE model. TDRI Quarterly Review, 11(3), 3-11.
Tangtipongkul, K. (2015). Rates of return to schooling in Thailand. Asian Development Review, 32(2), 38-64. https://doi.org/10.1162/adev_a_00051
https://doi.org/10.1162/ADEV_a_00051
Trax, M., Brunow, S., & Suedekum, J. (2015). Cultural diversity and plant-level productivity. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 53, 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.05.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.05.004
Vandenberghe, V. (2016). Is workforce diversity good for efficiency? An approach based on the degree of concavity of the technology. International Journal of Manpower, 37(2), 253-267. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-01-2015-0010
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-01-2015-0010
Wasi, N., Paweenawat, S. W., Devahastin Na Ayudhya, C., Treeratpituk, P., & Nittayo, C. (2019). Labour income inequality in Thailand: The roles of education, occupation and employment history (PIER Discussion Paper No. 117). Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.
World Bank. (2016). Getting back on track: Reviving growth and securing prosperity for all (Report No. 110396). https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/855161479736248522
Zhang, C. (2020). Skill diversity of cities and entrepreneurship. Regional Studies, 54(3), 403-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1699236
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 UNIMAS Publisher

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.