MARKET ORIENTATION, INNOVATION, AND TELECOMMUNICATION FIRM’S PERFORMANCE IN AN EMERGING MARKET: THE STRATEGIC NEXUS OF SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.14350.2026Keywords:
Market orientation, innovation capability, sustainable competitive advantage, firm performance, emerging marketAbstract
In today’s volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous environment, sustaining superior performance poses particular challenges for firms in emerging markets, where rapid growth often coexists with institutional instability and resource constraints. Drawing on the resource-based view and dynamic capabilities theory, this study examines how market orientation (MO) and innovation capability (IC) contribute to firm performance in the telecommunications industry. Adopting a mixed-method research design, the study first conducted qualitative interviews with industry experts to refine constructs and contextualize measurement items. Subsequently, a survey of managers from firms in telecommunications was analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The findings reveal three main contributions. First, MO significantly enhances IC, demonstrating the interdependence of dynamic capabilities rather than their isolated effects. Second, MO and IC exert no direct influence on firm performance but instead operate through sustainable competitive advantage (SCA), confirming the full mediating role of SCA. Third, the study reconceptualizes SCA as a two-dimensional construct, namely differentiation-based and innovation differentiation capturing the unique technological and competitive dynamics of telecommunications. By combining qualitative insights with quantitative validation, this study advances theoretical understanding of the capability-advantage-performance nexus and provides practical guidance for emerging-market firms to strategically leverage MO and IC in creating long-term competitiveness.
References
Akman, G., & Yilmaz, C. (2008). Innovative capability, innovation strategy and market orientation: An empirical analysis in Turkish software industry. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(1), 69-111.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919608001923
Al-kalouti, J., Kumar, V., Kumar, N., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Upadhyay, A., & Zwiegelaar, J. B. (2020). Investigating innovation capability and organizational performance in service firms. Strategic Change, 29(1), 103-113.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2314
Alkhatib, A. W., & Valeri, M. (2024). Can intellectual capital promote a competitive advantage? Service innovation and big data analytics capabilities in a moderated mediation model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(1), 263-289.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2022-0186
Annunziata, E., Pucci, T., Frey, M., & Zanni, L. (2018). The role of organizational capabilities in attaining corporate sustainability practices and economic performance: Evidence from Italian wine industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1300-1311.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.035
Appolloni, A., D'Adamo, I., Gastaldi, M., Yazdani, M., & Settembre-Blundo, D. (2021). Reflective backward analysis to assess the operational performance and eco-efficiency of two industrial districts. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2021-0442
Araújo, C. C. S. D., Pedron, C. D., & Bitencourt, C. (2018). Identifying and assessing the scales of dynamic capabilities: A systematic literature review. Revista de Gestão, 25(4), 390-412.
https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-12-2017-0021
Baía, E. P., & Ferreira, J. J. (2024). Dynamic capabilities and performance: How has the relationship been assessed? Journal of Management & Organization, 30(1), 188-217.
https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.88
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Barney, J. (2015). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. In International Business Strategy (pp. 283-301). Routledge.
Cho, H. J., & Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), 555-575.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.461
Cooper, B., Eva, N., Fazlelahi, F. Z., Newman, A., Lee, A., & Obschonka, M. (2020). Addressing common method variance and endogeneity in vocational behavior research: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 121, 103472.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103472
Correia, R. J., Dias, J. G., & Teixeira, M. S. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and competitive advantages as mediator variables between market orientation and business performance. Journal of Strategy and Management, 14(2), 187-206.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-12-2019-0223
Dang, H. C. T., Nguyen, P. L. T., Le, P. L. T., Nguyen, T. T. H., & Vu, B. T. (2025). Impact of Big Data analytics capabilities on sustainable performance of Vietnamese retail companies: The mediating role of innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 100569.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100569
David, O. O. (2019). Nexus between telecommunication infrastructures, economic growth and development in Africa: Panel vector autoregression (P-VAR) analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 43(8), 101816.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.03.005
Ellard-Gray, A., Jeffrey, N. K., Choubak, M., & Crann, S. E. (2015). Finding the hidden participant: Solutions for recruiting hidden, hard-to-reach, and vulnerable populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1609406915621420.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621420
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
Eriksson, T. (2014). Processes, antecedents and outcomes of dynamic capabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(1), 65-82.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.05.001
Foray, C., Baschnonga, A., & Wang, J. (2025). Top 10 risks for telecommunications in 2025. EY. https://www.ey.com/en_gl/insights/telecommunications/top-10-risks-for-telecommunications-in-2025
Hair, J. F., Jr., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hoang, C. L., & Bui, T. T. (2021). Market orientation, corporate social responsibility, and firm performance: The moderating role of relationship marketing orientation. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1926212.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1926212
Hofmann, K. H., Theyel, G., & Wood, C. H. (2012). Identifying firm capabilities as drivers of environmental management and sustainability practices - Evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(8), 530-545.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.739
Inigo, E. A., & Albareda, L. (2019). Sustainability oriented innovation dynamics: Levels of dynamic capabilities and their path-dependent and self-reinforcing logics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, 334-351.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.023
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., & Sinha, A. K. (2024). Digital economy to improve the culture of industry 4.0: A study on features, implementation and challenges. Green Technologies and Sustainability, 100083.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.grets.2024.100083
Kaplinsky, R., Morris, M., & Readman, J. (2002). The globalization of product markets and immiserizing growth: Lessons from the South African furniture industry. World Development, 30(7), 1159-1177.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00029-3
Karia, N., & Asaari, M. H. A. H. (2016). Innovation capability: The impact of teleworking on sustainable competitive advantage. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 16(2), 181-196.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTPM.2016.076318
Karman, A., & Savanevičienė, A. (2020). Enhancing dynamic capabilities to improve sustainable competitiveness: Insights from research on organisations of the Baltic region. Baltic Journal of Management, 16(2), 318-341.
https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-08-2020-0287
Khan, O., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F. (2020). The role of dynamic capabilities in circular economy implementation and performance of companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 3018-3033.
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2020
Khan, S. Z., Yang, Q., & Waheed, A. (2019). Investment in intangible resources and capabilities spurs sustainable competitive advantage and firm performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 285-295.
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1678
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400201
Le, T. T., & Ikram, M. (2022). Do sustainability innovation and firm competitiveness help improve firm performance? Evidence from the SME sector in Vietnam. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 588-599.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.008
Lin, Y., & Wu, L. Y. (2014). Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 407-414.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.019
Malhotra, N. K., Agarwal, J., & Peterson, M. (1996). Methodological issues in cross-cultural marketing research: A state-of-the-art review. International Marketing Review, 13(5), 7-45.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339610131379
Ministry of Information and Communication. (2024). Summary report on 2024 activities and directions, tasks for 2025 [Báo cáo tổng kết công tác 2024, phương hướng, nhiệm vụ năm 2025]. https://mic.mediacdn.vn/639352410187198464/2024/12/29/3-bc-tong-ket-nam-2024-17354306314491651826008.pdf
Ngo, L. V., & O'Cass, A. (2012). In search of innovation and customer-related performance superiority: The role of market orientation, marketing capability, and innovation capability interactions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(5), 861-877.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00939.x
Ngo, L. V., & O'Cass, A. (2013). Innovation and business success: The mediating role of customer participation. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1134-1142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.03.009
Nguyen Van, I., Kotaskova, A., Ferraris, A., & Le, T. T. (2025). Linking innovation and firm performance in an emerging market: does supply chain play a mediation role?. European Journal of Innovation Management, 28(3), 1061-1094.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2023-0302
Osuagwu, C. (2019). Market orientation: Conceptualization, components and performance-impacts: A literature review and conceptual framework. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 11(2), 102-114.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v11n2p102
Pfajfar, G., Mitręga, M., & Shoham, A. (2024). Systematic review of international marketing capabilities in dynamic capabilities view - Calibrating research on international dynamic marketing capabilities. International Marketing Review, 41(1), 237-272.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-12-2022-0276
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1989). From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. In Competitive Strategy (pp. 234-255). Macmillan Education UK.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_17
Opoku, A. S., & Kimani, C. W. (2024). Market orientation and organizational performance in telecommunication: The moderating role of strategic marketing. Innovative Marketing, 20(3), 159-174.
https://doi.org/10.21511/im.20(3).2024.13
Rajapathirana, R. J., & Hui, Y. (2018). Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1), 44-55.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.06.002
Sett, R. K. (2018). Market orientation-firm performance link in a dynamic environment: Looking inside the black box. AMS Review, 8(3), 163-179.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-017-0099-2
Scheuer, L. J., & Thaler, J. (2023). How do dynamic capabilities affect performance? A systematic review of mediators. European Management Journal, 41(6), 914-931.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.12.006
Sovacool, B. K., Axsen, J., & Sorrell, S. (2018). Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design. Energy Research & Social Science, 45, 12-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.007
Su, Z., Guo, H., & Sun, W. (2017). Exploration and firm performance: The moderating impact of competitive strategy. British Journal of Management, 28(3), 357-371.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12218
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31-51.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00201.x
World Bank. (2023). Global economic prospects. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/5443e6bba11cd7fa7c0c678a20edd4dd-0350012023/original/GEP-June-2023.pdf
Wu, L. (2007). Entrepreneurial resources, dynamic capabilities and start-up performance of Taiwan's high-tech firms. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 549-555.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.007
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.007
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.007
Zhou, K. Z., Brown, J. R., & Dev, C. S. (2009). Market orientation, competitive advantage, and performance: A demand-based perspective. Journal of Business Research, 62(11), 1063-1070.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.10.001
Zhou, S. S., Zhou, A. J., Feng, J., & Jiang, S. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(5), 731-747.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
