STRATEGIC INNOVATION AND PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES: MODERATING IMPACT OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN AN EMERGING MARKET
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.12827.2026Keywords:
Organisational Innovation, Firm Performance, Transformational Leadership, Resource-Based View, Malaysian Manufacturing SectorAbstract
The relationship between organisational innovation and firm performance was investigated in this study with transformational leadership as a moderator. Data were collected from 79 respondents across manufacturing firms listed on the main market of Bursa Malaysia using a stratified random sampling approach. Organisational innovation was conceptualised as a second-order construct comprising management, product and process innovation. Structural equation modelling was employed to test the proposed relationships. Results show that organisational innovation has a positive and significant effect on firm performance, whilst transformational leadership strengthens the relationship between organisational innovation and firm performance. These findings support the theoretical premise that firm-level capabilities and leadership behaviours jointly enhance firm performance. For firms seeking to enhance their competitive position, their innovation strategies must be supported by leadership styles that inspire, motivate and stimulate innovation. The empirical insights in this study are taken from an emerging market, making the results particularly relevant to policymakers and industry leaders in the Malaysian manufacturing sector.
References
Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011-1025.Afshari, L. (2022). Idealized influence and commitment: a granular approach in understanding leadership. Personnel Review, 51(2), 805-822.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.331
Agustia, D., Haryanto, S. D., Permatasari, Y., & Midiantari, P. N. (2022). Product innovation, firm performance and moderating role of technology capabilities. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 7(3), 252-265.
https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-12-2021-0266
Ali, M., Kan, K. A. S., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Direct and configurational paths of absorptive capacity and organizational innovation to successful organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4984-4993.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.131
Anand, J., & Delios, A. (2002). A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(2), 105-117.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.213
Asiasi, Y., Ghabari, A., & Yusoff, R. Z. (2021). Challenges in survey-based research among large organisations: A Malaysian perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(4), 52-67.
Aviolo, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2001). Developing Potential Across a Full Range of Leadership: Cases on Transactional and Transformational Leadership. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603975
Awang, Z., Afthanorhan, A., & Mamat, M. (2016). The Likert scale analysis using parametric based Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Computational Methods in Social Sciences, 4(1), 13-21.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relation, 61(8), 1139-1160.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863
Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52(2), 130-139.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.2.130
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (2nd ed.): Mind Garden.
https://doi.org/10.1037/t03624-000
Birasnav, M. (2013). Transformational leadership and supply chain management practices: An empirical study. International Journal of Business Performance & Supply Chain Modelling, 5(4), 361-377.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPSCM.2013.058203
Camisón, C., & López, A. V. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891-2902.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.06.004
Chan, S. W., Andleeb, N., Ahmad, M. F., & Zaman, I. (2019). The Influence of Transformational Leadership on Organization Innovation in Malaysian Manufacturing Industry. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(2), 971-975.
Chen, C. J., Chen, Y. C., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2020). The influence of intellectual capital on new product development performance: The manufacturing sector of China. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107751.
Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modelling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745-783.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y
Chong, C. L., Rasid, A. S. Z., Haliyana, K. T., & Ramayah.T. (2024). Big data analytics capability for competitive advantage and firm performance in Malaysian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(7), 2305-2308.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2022-0567
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.): Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
https://doi.org/10.2307/256406
De Vaus, D., Gray, M., Qu, L., & Stanton, D. (2014). The economic consequences of divorce in Australia. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 28(1), 26-47.
https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebt014
Donbesuur, F., Ampong, G. O. A., & Owusu-Yirenkyi, D. (2020). Technological innovation, organizational innovation and international performance of SMEs: The moderating role of domestic institutional environment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120311.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120252
Foss, N. J., & Lindenberg, S. (2013). Microfoundations for strategy: A goal-framing perspective on the drivers of value creation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 85-102.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0103
Galbreath, J. (2005). Which resources matter the most to firm success? An exploratory study of resource-based theory. Technovation, 25(9), 979-987.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.008
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Danks, N. P. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook: Springer Nature.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Hair, J. J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Hashim, F., Osman, I., & Alhabshi, S. M. (2019). Effects of innovation capabilities on firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian public listed companies. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 16(6), 1950042.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Ho, J. C. (2011). Organizational innovation practices and firm performance in the fashion industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(2), 822-831.
Husseini, S. M. M., Shirmohammadi, M., & Danesh, S. Y. S. (2021). Transformational leadership and innovation: The mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(7), 1601-1621.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0247
Huynh, T. N., Van Nguyen, P., Nguyen, Q. N., & Dinh, P. U. (2023). Technology innovation, technology complexity, and co-creation effects on organizational performance: The role of government influence and co-creation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(4), 100150.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100150
Iranmanesh, M., Khazaei, P., Movahedi, B., & Tahernejad, H. R. (2021). Linking transformational leadership and organizational innovation: The mediating role of knowledge sharing. Management Decision, 16(1), 53-66.
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
Khan, I. U., Amin, R. U., & Saif, N. (2022). Individualized consideration and idealized influence of transformational leadership: Mediating role of inspirational motivation and intellectual stimulation. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1(1), 1-11.
Khan, M. S., Ismail, F. B., Hussain, M., & Alghazali, B. M. (2020). The role of transformational leadership in promoting innovation: Evidence from Malaysian manufacturing SMEs. Global Business Review, 21(4), 1017-1035.
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 17(7), 546-580. Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546-580.
https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Lale, G., & Arzu, A. (2009). Innovation capability, innovation strategy and market orientation: An empirical analysis in Turkish software industry. European Business Review, 21(3), 294-313.
Liao, S. H., Chen, C., Hu, D. C., Chung, Y. C., & Liu, C. L. (2017). Assessing the influence of leadership style, organizational learning and organizational innovation. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 38(5), 560-609.
https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2015-0261
Loong, A. H., Sondoh, S. L., Jr., & Lee, K., H. (2019). Innovation and Performance in Malaysia's Manufacturing Companies: The Control Variable of the Company's Year of Establishment. Malaysian Journal of Business and Economics, 3(1), 47-60.
Merkle, A. C. (2025). Item level correction: detecting, removing, and reporting common methods variance. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-025-00399-2
Mol, M. J., & Birkinshaw, J. (2006). How management innovation happens. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825-845.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.34421969
Mu, J., Bao, Y., K, Sekhon, T., Qi, J., & Love, E. (2018). Outside-in marketing capability and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 75, 37-54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.03.010
Neely, A., & Hill, J. (1998). Innovation and business performance: A literature review. University of Cambridge.
Ng, H. S., Kee, D. M. H., & Ramayah, T. (2019). Examining the mediating role of innovativeness in the link between core competencies and SME performance. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 26(1), 103-129.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-12-2018-0379
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 391-569.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta psychologica, 104(1), 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5
Radicic, D., & Petković, S. (2023). Impact of digitalization on technological innovations in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 19(1), 35-60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122474
Rousseau, M. B., Mathias, B. D., Madden, L. T., & Crook, T. R. (2016). Innovation, Firm Performance, and Appropriation: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(3), 12-24.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391961650033X
Sa'di, A. F., Abdallah, A. B., & Dahiyat, S. E. (2017). The mediating role of product and process innovations on the relationship between knowledge management and operational performance in manufacturing. Business Process Management Journal, 23(2), 349-376.
https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-03-2016-0047
Sandvik, A. M., Croucher, R., Espedal, B., & Selart, M. (2018). Intellectual stimulation and team creative climate in a professional service firm. Evidence-Based HRM. A global forum for empirical scholarship, 6(1), 39-53.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-01-2017-0006
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to Specify, Estimate, and Validate Higher-Order Constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197-211.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003
Sethibe, T. G. (2018). Towards a comprehensive model on the relationship between leadership styles, organisational climate, innovation and organisational performance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(02), 1850021.Tajeddini, K. (2016). Financial orientation, product innovation and firm performance: An empirical study in the Japanese SMEs. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 13(3), 1-30.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618500214
Teece, D. J. (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328-352.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0116
Teng, C. W., & Hassan, Z. (2015). The influence of transformational leadership on innovation: A study of manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia. International Journal of Innovation and Business Strategy, 4(2), 1-16.
Thuan, L. C. (2020). Motivating follower creativity by offering intellectual stimulation. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 28(4), 817-829.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-06-2019-1799
Ting, I. W. K., Asif, J., Kweh, Q. L., & Phuong, T. T. K. (2024). Mediating effect of firm efficiency on the controlling shareholdings-firm performance nexus: evidence from public listed firms in Malaysia. Financial Innovation, 10(47), 1-20.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00518-x
Trinh, Q. L., Morgan, R. E., & Clark, L. (2022). Innovation capability and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from ASEAN manufacturing firms. Journal of Open Innovation, 8(2), 78.
Volberda, H. W., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Heij, C. V. (2013). Management innovation: Management as fertile ground for innovation. European Management Review, 10(1), 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12007
Walker, R. M., Chen, J., & Aravind, D. (2015). Management innovation and firm performance: An integration of research findings. European Management Journal, 33(5), 407-422.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.07.001
Walker, R. M., Damanpour, F., & Devece, C. A. (2011). Management innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of performance management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 367-386.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq043
Yunis, M., El-Kassar, A. N., & Tarhini, A. (2017). Impact of ICT-based innovations on organizational performance: The role of corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(1), 122-141.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-01-2016-0040
Zakaria, N., Abdullah, N. A. C., & Yusoff, R. Z. (2016). Empirical review on innovation-performance linkage in Malaysian manufacturing small and medium enterprises. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(S7), 101-106.
Zhao, Q., Li, X., & Li, S. (2023). Analyzing the Relationship between Digital Transformation Strategy and ESG Performance in Large Manufacturing Enterprises: The Mediating Role of Green Innovation. Sustainability, 15(13), 9998.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139998
Zhu, J., & Huang, F. (2023). Transformational Leadership, Organizational Innovation, and ESG Performance: Evidence from SMEs in China. Sustainability, 15(7), 5756.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075756
Zhu, Q., Zou, F., & Zhang, P. (2019). The role of innovation for performance improvement through corporate social responsibility practices among small and medium-sized suppliers in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 341-350.
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1686
Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business Research Methods (9th ed.): Cencage Learning.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
