BEYOND CREDIBILITY: UNDERSTANDING THE MEDIATORS BETWEEN ELECTRONIC WORD-OF-MOUTH AND PURCHASE INTENTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.12826.2026Keywords:
eWOM credibility, purchase intention, perceived buying risk, emotional response to eWOM, perceived product qualityAbstract
The objective of this study is to examine the mediating role of five variables in the relationship between eWOM credibility and purchase intention. This goal is justified by new trends in e-commerce and social media, where consumer impressions and influences have specific means of transmission and reception. The raw data were collected via an online survey of 359 Romanian participants and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling and specific mediation analysis techniques. The results show that perceived product quality, emotional response to eWOM and perceived buying risk fully mediate this relationship, while brand trust an brand engagement do not. These findings suggest that effective eWOM communication should enhance quality perceptions, evoke positive emotions, and boost customer confidence by reducing perceived purchasing risks. The primary contribution of this study lies in demonstrating that the influence of credibility on buying intent is not direct, but rather mediated by other key factors: perceived product quality, perceived buying risk and emotional reaction of the eWOM recipient. Consequently, a well-crafted eWOM message should address issues of both product quality and buying risks. By directly tackling these critical factors, such a message can reduce customer doubt, build trust and improve the likelihood of influencing purchasing behavior. Since this research assessed purchase intention rather than actual behavior, future investigations could use field studies to explore whether the proposed mediating variables similarly mediate real-world purchasing decisions.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Albayrak, M., & Ceylan, C. (2021). Effect of eWom on purchase intention: meta-analysis. Data Technologies and Applications, 55(5), 810-840. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/DTA-03-2020-0068
https://doi.org/10.1108/DTA-03-2020-0068
Amarullah, D., Handriana, T., & Maharudin, A. (2022). EWOM CREDIBILITY, TRUST, PERCEIVED RISK, AND PURCHASE INTENTION IN THE CONTEXT OF E-COMMERCE: MODERATING ROLE OF ONLINE SHOPPING EXPERIENCE. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 11(1), 61-83.
Bushara, M., Abdou, A., Hassan, T., Sobaih, A., Albohnayh, A., Alshammari, W., . . . Elsaied, M. (2023). Power of Social Media Marketing: How Perceived Value Mediates the Impact on Restaurant Followers' Purchase Intention, Willingness to Pay a Premium Price, and E-WoM? Sustainability, 15(6), 5331. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065331
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065331
Chen, Y., & Zhao, X. (2021). Digital dialogue in online brand communities: Examining the social network outcomes of brands' dialogue with Facebook users. Telematics and Informatics, 57, 101507. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101507 Daowd, A., Hasan, R., Eldabi, T., Rafi-ul-Shan, P., Cao, D., & Kasemsarn, N. (2021). Factors affecting eWOM credibility, information adoption and purchase intention on Generation Y: a case from Thailand. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(3), 838-859. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2019-0118
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2019-0118
Delgado-Ballester, E., Munuera-Alemán, J., & Yagüe-Guillén, M. (2003). Development and validation of a brand trust scale. International Journal of Market Research, 45(1), 35-53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530304500103
https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530304500103
Dodds, W., Monroe, K., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379102800305
https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379102800305
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., Pandey, N., & Mishra, A. (2021). Mapping the electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) research: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 135, 758-773. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.015
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.015
El-Baz, B.-S., Elseidi, R., & El-Maniaway, A. (2022). Influence of Electronic Word of Mouth (e-WOM) on Brand Credibility and Egyptian Consumers' Purchase Intentions. Research Anthology on Social Media Advertising and Building Consumer Relationships, 1626-1641. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6287-4.ch087
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6287-4.ch087
Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2016). The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers' purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 47-55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.003
Filieri, R., Acikgoz, F., Ndou, V., & Dwivedi, Y. (2021). Is TripAdvisor still relevant? The influence of review credibility, review usefulness, and ease of use on consumers' continuance intention. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(1), 199-223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2020-0402
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2020-0402
Furtună, T., Reveiu, A., Dârdală, M., & Smeureanu, I. (2016). Identifying Consumers' Profiles Concerning Residential Lighting. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 50(1), 3-38.
García-Machado, J., Figueroa-García, E., & Jachowicz, A. (2020). Sustainable consumption behaviour in Poland through a PLS-SEM model. Perspectives on Consumer Behaviour: Theoretical Aspects and Practical Applications, 147-172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47380-8_7
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47380-8_7
Gînguță, A., Munteanu, V., Ștefea, P., & Noja, G. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Consultancy Services: Perspectives of Organizational and Ethical Concerns. International Conference on Disruptive Technologies, Tech Ethics and Artificial Intelligence. New Trends in Disruptive Technologies, Tech Ethics and Artificial Intelligence. DiTTEt 2023. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 219-232. Springer, Cham. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38344-1_21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38344-1_21
Gong, M., & Liu, H. (2025). Understanding impulse buying in interest-based e-commerce: the role of content creativity. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 53(2), 182-198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-07-2023-0484 Greenspoon, P., & Saklofske, D. (1998). Confirmatory factor analysis of the multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(5), 965-971. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00115-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00115-9
Gruia, L., Bibu, N., Roja, A., Dănăiață, D., & Năstase, M. (2024). The Future of Innovation and Creativity in an Era of Artificial Intelligence. Reimagining Capitalism in a Post-Globalization World. GSMAC 2023. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59858-6_6
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59858-6_6
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). New York: Pearson.
Hecker, S., & Stewart, D. (1988). Nonverbal communication in advertising. Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hurbean, L. (2020). Innovation in Business Organizations with Blockchain Technology. Innovation in Sustainable Management and Entrepreneurship: 2019 International Symposium in Management (SIM2019), (pp. 601-610). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44711-3_45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44711-3_45
Hussain, S., Ahmed, W., Jafar, R., Rabnawaz, A., & Jianzhou, Y. (2017). eWOM source credibility, perceived risk and food product customer's information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 96-102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.034
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.034
Iqbal, A., Khan, N., & Faridi, M. (2022). E-WOM effect through social media and shopping websites on purchase intention of smartphones in India. Innovative Marketing, 18(2), 13-25. doi:https://doi.org/10.21511/im.18(2).2022.02
https://doi.org/10.21511/im.18(2).2022.02
Jain, M., Dixit, S., & Shukla, A. (2022). Role of e-service quality, brand commitment and e-WOM trust on e-WOM intentions of millennials. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 33(1), 23-43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2022.2070860
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2022.2070860
Jiang, G., Liu, F., Liu, W., Liu, S., Chen, Y., & Xu, D. (2021). Effects of information quality on information adoption on social media review platforms: moderating role of perceived risk. Data Science and Management, 1(1), 13-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2021.02.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2021.02.004
Kushwaha, T., & Shankar, V. (2013). Are Multichannel Customers Really more Valuable? The Moderating Role of Product Category Characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 77(4), 67-85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0297
https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0297
Leong, C., Loi, A., & Woon, S. (2022). The influence of social media eWOM information on purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 10, 145-157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-021-00132-9
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-021-00132-9
Li, S., Chen, J., & Chen, Y. (2023). The effect of repeat purchase information in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) on purchase intention. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 22(6), 1493-1508. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2235
https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2235
Liu, H., Jayawardhena, C., Osburg, V.-S., Yoganathan, V., & Cartwright, S. (2021). Social sharing of consumption emotion in electronic word of mouth (eWOM): A cross-media perspective. Journal of Business Research, 132, 208-220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.030 Mainolfi, G., & Vergura, D. (2022). The influence of fashion blogger credibility, engagement and homophily on intentions to buy and e-WOM. Results of a binational study. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 26(3), 473-494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-03-2020-0050
https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-03-2020-0050
Marsh, H., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562-582. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562
Maslim, H., & Pasaribu, L. (2021). The Influences of Social Media Marketing, Service Quality and EWOM on Purchase Intention. Enrichment : Journal of Management, 12(1), 18-23. doi:https://doi.org/10.35335/enrichment.v12i1.147
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. (1974). An Approach to Environmental Psychology. MIT Press.
Mircea, M., Stoica, M., & Ghilic-Micu, B. (2022). Analysis of the impact of blockchain and internet of things (BIoT) on public procurement. IEEE Access, 10, 63353-63374. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3182656
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3182656
Ngarmwongnoi, C., Oliveira, J., AbedRabbo, M., & Mousavi, S. (2020). The implications of eWOM adoption on the customer journey. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(7), 749-759. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2019-3450
https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2019-3450
Nistor, S., Moca, M., Moldovan, D., Oprean, D., & Nistor, R. (2021). Building a Twitter Sentiment Analysis System with Recurrent Neural Networks. Sensors, 21(7), 2266. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072266
https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072266
Nofal, R., Bayram, P., Emeagwali, O., & Al-Mu'ani, L. (2022). The Effect of eWOM Source on Purchase Intention: The Moderation Role of Weak-Tie eWOM. Sustainability, 14(16), 9959. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169959
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169959
Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39-52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
Ou, C.-C., Chen, K.-L., Tseng, W.-K., & Lin, Y.-Y. (2022). A Study on the Influence of Conformity Behaviors, Perceived Risks, and Customer Engagement on Group Buying Intention: A Case Study of Community E-Commerce Platforms. Sustainability, 14(4), 1941. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su14041941
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14041941
Pangarkar, A., Patel, J., & Kumar, S. (2023). Drivers of eWOM engagement on social media for luxury consumers: Analysis, implications, and future research directions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 74, 103410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103410
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103410
Puriwat, W., & Tripopsakul, S. (2022). Consumers' Attitude towards Digital Social Responsibility: Impacts on Electronic Word of Mouth and Purchase Intention. Emerging Science Journal, 6(1), 64-74. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-01-05
https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-01-05
Reyes-Menendez, A., Saura, J., & Martinez-Navalon, J. (2019). The Impact of e-WOM on Hotels Management Reputation: Exploring TripAdvisor Review Credibility With the ELM Model. IEEE Access, 7, 68868-68877. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919030
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919030
Roy, G., Datta, B., Mukherjee, S., & Basu, R. (2021). Effect of eWOM stimuli and eWOM response on perceived service quality and online recommendation. Tourism Recreation Research, 46(4), 457-472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2020.1809822
https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2020.1809822
Ruiz-Mafe, C., Bigné-Alcañiz, E., & Currás-Pérez, R. (2020). The effect of emotions, eWOM quality and online review sequence on consumer intention to follow advice obtained from digital services. Journal of Service Management, 31(3), 465-487. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-11-2018-0349
https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-11-2018-0349
Schivinski, B., Christodoulides, G., & Dabrowsk, D. (2016). Measuring consumers' engagement with brand-related social-media content: Development and validation of a scale that identifies levels of social-media engagement with brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 56(1), 64-80. doi:https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2016-004
https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2016-004
Seo, E., & Park, J. (2018). A Study on the Influence of the Information Characteristics of Airline Social Media on e-WOM, Brand Equity and Trust. The Open Transportation Journal, 12, 289-300. doi:https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447801812010289
https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447801812010289
Shi, Y., Cui, Y., Chen, J., & Ma, M. (2025). The Mechanism of the Impact of Short Video E-commerce Covert Advertising Features on Consumers' Impulse Buying Intentions. E-Business. Generative Artificial Intelligence and Management Transformation. WHICEB 2025. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. 550, pp. 315-326. Springer, Cham. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-94187-0_26
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-94187-0_26
Srivastava, M., & Sivaramakrishnan, S. (2021). The impact of eWOM on consumer brand engagement. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(3), 469-484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-06-2020-0263
https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-06-2020-0263
Tang, T., & Chung, N. (2025). What makes impulsive buying in tourism live streaming e-commerce? Journal of Vacation Marketing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667251317735
https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667251317735
Wu, W., Lu, H., Wu, Y., & Fu, C. (2011). The effects of product scarcity and consumers' need for uniqueness on purchase intention. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(3), 263-274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01000.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01000.x
Yu, E., Kangmun, L., & Taewoo, R. (2019). The Effect of eWOM on Purchase Intention for Korean-brand Cars in Russia: The Mediating Role of Brand Image and Perceived Quality. Journal of Korea Trade, 23(5), 102-117. doi:https://doi.org/10.35611/jkt.2019.23.5.102
https://doi.org/10.35611/jkt.2019.23.5.102
Zhao, Y., Wang, L., Tang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Electronic word-of-mouth and consumer purchase intentions in social e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 41, 100980. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100980
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
