Redesigning museum display models in the context of digitalization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/ijaca.5819.2024Keywords:
Digital media, Art and design eductaion, development trendsAbstract
After decades of digital tide washing the world, even one of the most sacred existences in human life, art, has to go through evolution and make some adaptions. The materials used in artists' creations, the artworks' presence in time and space as objects, and the economic properties of art have all been changed drastically as a response to the rapidly growing cybernetic world. An increasing number of digital artworks show up on the internet every day, whether they are the documentation of physical artworks in the real world or completely digital pieces that only live in the cybernetic world. Accordingly, the relationship between the online audience and digital works has completely changed their interactions. Museum professionals, public audiences, educators, and so many other roles in the art-viewing activity are having mixed opinions about dealing with art in virtual spaces. They need a more accurate understanding of the meaning and value of the artworks they are viewing. Therefore, how to apply digital media technology to facilitate a better creative experience between viewers and digital physical artworks will be a very important and challenging issue. This paper firstly explains the definition and development history of digital museum exhibition; secondly analyzes the current research status of digital museum exhibition technology and its application areas at home and abroad; then discusses the factors affecting the audience's viewing behavior from the user's perspective, namely: human psychological factors (including cognitive factors, emotional factors, motivation), environmental factors (including social and cultural factors, natural environmental factors); finally The construction method of the virtual exhibition system based on the concept of interaction design is discussed in combination with the above two aspects, and the model can effectively improve the audience's visiting experience through examples.
References
[2] Armstrong, P. B. (2005). Phenomenology. In Johns Hopkins Guide for Literary Theory and Criticism entry (2nd Edition 2005). http://litguide.press.jhu.edu/
[3] Benjamin, W. (1998). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction (H. Zohn, Trans.). Schocken/Random House. (Original work published 1936)
[4] Botticelli, P. (2016). Documentation for Digitized Artworks: The Case of Andy Warhol’s Polaroid Photographs. Art Documentation: Bulletin of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 35(1), 71–85.
[5] Boyland, J. (2021). Digital Art Education Tools Encourage Students' Creativity and Curiosity. EdTech. https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2021/02/digital-art-education-tools-encourage-students-creativity-and-curiosity
[6] Carlson, S. (2002). Few Libraries or Museums Digitize Collections. The Chronicle of Higher Education 48.47. Business Insights: Essentials.
[7] Charitonos, K., Blake, C., Scanlon, E., & Jones, A. (2012). Museum learning via social and mobile technologies: (How) can online interactions enhance the visitor experience? Special Issue: Social Networking and Mobile Learning, 43(5).
[8] Damala, A., Ruthven, I., & Hornecker, E. (2019). The MUSETECH Model: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Museum Technology. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 12(1), 1–22.
[9] Google. (n.d.). Bringing the world’s art and culture online for everyone. Google Arts & Culture. https://about.artsandculture.google.com/
[10] Hylland, O. M. (2017). Even Better than the Real Thing? Digital Copies and Digital Museums in a Digital Cultural Policy. Culture Unbound, 9(1): Theorizing Copies.
[11] Jorgenson, J., Nickerson, N., Dalenberg, D., Angle, J., Metcalf, E., & Freimund, W. (2019). Measuring Visitor Experiences: Creating and Testing the Tourism Autobiographical Memory Scale. Journal of Travel Research, 58(4), 566–578.
[12] Latham, K. F. (2012). Museum object as a document. Journal of Documentation, 68(1), 45-71.
[13] Meehan, N. (2020). Digital Museum Objects and Memory: Postdigital Materiality, Aura and Value. Curator: The Museum Journal, April (2020).
[14] Monod, E. & Klein, H. K. (2005). A phenomenological evaluation framework for cultural heritage interpretation: From e-hs to Heidegger's historicity. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, (Khazanchi D, Zigurs I, Robey D & Santhanam R, Eds), pp 2870-2877, Omaha, USA.
[15] Ogundipe, A. (2018). How Digitized Art May Invite or Inhibit Online Visitor Participation (and Why It Matters for Art Museums). International Journal of the Inclusive Museum, 11(3), 51–72.
[16] Pallud, J., & Monod, E. (2010). User experience of museum technologies: The phenomenological scales. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(5), 562-580.
[17] Quigley, O. (2019). Engaging object visitor encounters at the museum: A phenomenological approach (Order No. 27673026). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
[18] Smith, D. W. (2013). Phenomenology. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/phenomenology/
[19] Tallon, L. (2018, Oct). If Open is the Answer, What Was the Question? xTalk Conferences. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FU2o8YgusaE
[20] Tam, C. O. (2006). Understanding museum visitors' experience of paintings: A phenomenological study of adult non-art specialists (Order No. U219315). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 UNIMAS Publisher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
