Colours, Sounds, Rivers: Descriptive Terms and Informational Priority in Hobongan

Authors

  • Marla Perkins independent scholar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33736/jbk.6453.2024

Keywords:

Hobongan, Hovongan, color, austronesian

Abstract

In this report on descriptors in Hobongan, an Austronesian language spoken by approximately two thousand people on the island of Borneo, I provide the available expressions and note that the expressions are rarely used. The study is theoretically backed by Nexus Theory (Perkins, 2019), a linguistic approach to analysing elements of language in context. Sensory descriptors occur primarily to distinguish unique entities from broader categories, emphasising observed phenomena more than the sensory methods of observation. These patterns of description correlate with the predominantly oral nature of Hobongan currently (Ong, 2003) and with the emphasis on locational and navigational information in narrative discourses (Perkins, 2017). I therefore hypothesise that descriptive expressions, including colour expressions, can be indicators of linguistic-cultural priorities.

References

Berlin, B., & Kay, P. 1969. Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley and Los
Angeles: University of California Press.
Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Culpeper, J. 2011. Impoliteness: Using language the cause offense. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Czaykowska-Higgins, E. 2009. Research models, community engagement, and linguistic fieldwork:
Reflections on working with Canadian indigenous communities. Language Documentation and
Conservation, 3(1), 15-50.
Dimmendaal, G. J. 2001. Places and peoples: Field sites and informants. In P. Newman & M Ratliff
(Eds.), Linguistic Fieldwork (55-75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, R. M. W. 2010. Basic linguistic theory, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dryer, M. 2006. Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and basic linguistic theory. In F. K. Ameka, A. C. Dench, & N. Evans (Eds.), Catching language: The standing challenge of grammar writing (207-234).
Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F., Fennig, C. D. (Eds.). 2021. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 4th ed.
Dallas: SIL International. https://www.ethnologue.com/language/hov.
Evans, V. 2015. The crucible of language: How language and mind create meaning. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Grice, H. P. 1978. Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax
and semantics, 9: Pragmatics (113-127). New York: Academic Press.
Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3:
Speech acts (41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Habermas, J. 1981/1984. Theory of communicative action, vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of
society, T. A. McCarthy (Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. 1981/1987. Theory of communicative action, vol. 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of
functionalist reason, T. A. McCarthy (Trans.). Boston, Beacon Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th ed., C. M. I. M. Matthiessen
(Ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
Hammerström, H, Forkel, R., Haspelmath, M., & Bank, S. 2021. Glottolog. https://glottolog.org/resource/
languoid/id/hovo1239.
Labov, W., & Waltezky, J. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of person experience. Journal of
Narrative Life History, 7(3), 1-4.
Levinson, S. C. 2000. Yeli Dnye and the theory of basic color terms. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology,
10(1), 3-55.
Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Longacre, R. 1968. Discourse, paragraph, and sentence structure in selected Philippine languages.
Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Niditch, S. 1996. Oral world and written word: Ancient Israelite literature. Louisville: Westminster John
Knox Press.
Pascual, E. 2014. Fictive interaction: The conversation frame in thought, language, and discourse.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Perkins, M. 2019. Real Hobongan: Reconsidering REAL and FAKE in the field. Invited presentation at
the Albert Ludwigs Universität Freiburg, 16 January, 2019.
Perkins, M. 2017. Toward a typology or ranking elements of narrative discourse in languages and
cultures: A cross-linguistic survey. International Journal of Literary Linguistics, 6, 1. https://journals.linguistik.de/ijll/index.php/ijll/article/view/101.
Perkins, M. 2009. There and back again: Discourse and pragmatic strategies for describing spatial
locations in narrative fiction. https://www.proquest.com/openview/684e63ba84d2dcdbff3a37d4b4579df3/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750.
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. 1993/2002. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar.
Rutgers Optimality Archive Version: http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/537-0802/537-0802-PRINCE-0-0.PDF.
Sawaki, Y. W. 2016. A grammar of Wooi: An Austronesian language of Yapen Island, Western New
Guinea. Australian National University Ph.D. Thesis: https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/136851.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. 2002. Relevance theory. https://www.phon/ucl/ac.uk/publications/WPL/
02papers/Wilson_Sperber.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Perkins, M. (2024). Colours, Sounds, Rivers: Descriptive Terms and Informational Priority in Hobongan. Journal of Borneo-Kalimantan, 10(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.33736/jbk.6453.2024