Assessing the Influence of Computational Thinking Technique on STEM Based and Non-STEM Based Subjects in Sarawak Schools

Authors

  • Shaadah Shariman BSSc (Social Work Studies)
  • Faizah Hj Mas'ud Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Seleviawati Tarmizi Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology
  • Kartinah Zen Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology
  • Eaqerzilla Phang Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33736/jbk.6209.2024

Keywords:

Computational Thinking and Computer Science, STEM, Non-STEM, education, integration

Abstract

Computational thinking (CT) has gained prominence as an essential skillset in the digital age. This study investigates the influence of integrating CT techniques into both STEM and non-STEM subjects in schools across Sarawak, Malaysia. A mixed methods approach combined surveys of 426 students and 79 teachers with interviews of 5 teachers and 8 students. Results indicate CT integration enhanced problem-solving skills, logical reasoning, and critical thinking. Over 50% of teachers reported improved student performance in STEM and non-STEM subjects with CT techniques. Interviews highlighted benefits like increased engagement, but also challenges faced regarding teacher training, resources, and curriculum integration. Recommendations include focused teacher professional development, ensuring equitable access to technology, tailored curriculum approaches, and cultural sensitivity. This study provides insights into the multifaceted impacts of CT integration in the Sarawak education context. The blended findings underscore the potential of CT to develop relevant 21st century skills, but also highlight the need for systemic support for effective implementation. This research contributes to strategic efforts to nurture computational literacy and harness the power of CT across all subject areas within the region's schools.

References

Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is Involved and What is the Role of the Computer Science Education Community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48-54.

Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA).

Bundy, A. (2007). Computational thinking is pervasive. Journal of Scientific and Practical Computing, 1(2), 67-69.

Cummins, J. (2020). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters.

Dennen, V. P. (2019). Teacher Knowledge for Teaching with Technology: An Investigation of a TPACK-Based Approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3-4), 164-179.

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43.

Krumm, A. E., & Black, J. B. (2017). Making sense of computational thinking. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 96-115.

MyDigital. (2020). National Digital Economy Blueprint (MyDigital). Retrieved from https://www.ekonomi.gov.my/sites/default/files/2021-02/malaysia-digital-economy-blueprint.pdf

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, And Powerful Ideas. Basic Books.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources.

Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., &

Kafai, Y. B. (2014). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60-67.

Smith, A. (2021). Strengthening Teacher Capabilities in Computational Thinking Integration: A Professional Development Approach. Journal of Educational Innovation, 15(3), 87-102.

Smith, J. (2020). Computational Thinking in Education: A Path to Innovation and Problem-Solving. International Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 45-62.

Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715-728.
Vorderstrasse, A. A., Sorenson, D. S., Smith, J., & Phillips, B. (2019). Digital Thinking and Mobile Teaching: Improving the Digital Future for Students. TechTrends, 61(4), 345-352.

Warschauer, M. (2019). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. The MIT Press.

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Shariman, S., Hj Mas’ud, F., Tarmizi, S., Zen, K., & Phang, E. (2024). Assessing the Influence of Computational Thinking Technique on STEM Based and Non-STEM Based Subjects in Sarawak Schools. Journal of Borneo-Kalimantan, 10(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.33736/jbk.6209.2024