Exploring Self-Mention in The Yemeni EFL Argumentative Writing Across Three Proficiency Levels
Abstract
Self-mention used by university-level Yemeni writers is regarded as a challenging task. The overuse use of this feature is often considered as less formal and objective in academic writing. Despite the significance of this feature in academic writing, previous studies were mostly conducted in the Western cultural context. Research on self-mention produced by EFL learners of Arabic cultural background seems to be overlooked. Therefore, this study aimed to explore and compare the use of the first-person pronouns across three proficiency levels in an argumentative paragraph written by 80 third-year undergraduate students. Data were collected, assessed by ELT specialists, and then quantitatively analyzed. The results revealed that Yemeni EFL learners make extensive use of the first-person pronouns in their argumentative paragraphs. Differences were found in the occurrences of the first-person pronouns across three proficiency levels. The results also indicated that learners with a high proficiency level tend to use the first-person pronouns less than learners at low and intermediate proficiency levels. Since low-proficient learners rely more on the use of the first-person pronouns than those at higher levels, learners need to be exposed to a variety of strategies of how they can project their voice appropriately in their written texts.
References
Abdi, J., & Farrokhi, F. (2015). Investigating the projection of authorial identity through first-person pronouns in L1 and L2 English research articles. International Journal of Language and Literature, 3(1), 156-168.
Atkinson, D. (2004). Contrasting rhetorics/contrasting cultures: Why contrastive rhetoric needs a better conceptualization of culture. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(4), 277-289.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.002
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E., & Quirk, R. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Carter-Thomas, S., & Chambers, A. (2012). From text to corpus A contrastive analysis of first person pronouns in economics article introductions in English and French. Corpus-informed Research and Learning in ESP: Issues and Applications, 52(1), 1-28.
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.52.02car
Chafe, W. L. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35-53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Chang, J. Y. (2015). A comparison of the first-person pronoun 'I' in NS and Korean NNS corpora of English argumentative writing. English Teaching, 70(2), 83-106.
https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.70.2.201506.83
Chávez Muñoz, M. (2013). The "I" in interaction: authorial presence in academic writing. Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas, 8(1), 49-58.
https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2013.1162
Choung, Y., & Oh, S. Y. (2017). A systemic functional study of thematic organization in the English writing of Korean college students. English Teaching, 72(3), 1919-144.
Dobakhti, L., & Hassan, N. (2017). A Corpus-based study of writer identity in qualitative and quantitative research articles. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 23(1),1-14.
https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2301-01
Fortanet, I. (2004). The use of 'we' in university lectures: Reference and function. English for Specific Purposes, 23(1), 45-66.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00018-8
Fowler, H. R., & Aaron, J. E. (2010). The little, brown handbook. New York: Pearson Education.
Gilquin, G., & Paquot, M. (2008). Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation. English Text Construction, 1(1), 41-61.
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.1.1.05gil
Hannover, B., & Kühnen, U. (2005). Culture, context, and cognition: The semantic procedural interface model of the self. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(1),297-333.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280440000053
Henry, A. & Roseberry, R. (1997). An investigation of the functions, strategies and linguistic features of the introductions and conclusions of essays. System, 25(4), 479-495.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00047-X
Herriman, J., & Aronsson, M. B. (2009). Themes in Swedish advanced learners' writing in English. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and language teaching (pp. 101-120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.33.11her
Hinkel, E. (1999). Objectivity and credibility in L1 and L2 academic writing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 90-108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hinkel, E. (2005). Hedging, inflating, and persuading in EFL academic writing. Applied Language Learning, 15(1 & 2), 29-53.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for specific purposes, 20(3), 207-226.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0
Hyland, K. & Jiang, F. (2017). 'The fact that': Stance nouns in disciplinary writing. Discourse Studies, 17(5), 529-550.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615590719
Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091-1112.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Hyland, K., & Milton, J. (1997). Hedging in L1 and EFL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 6(2), 183-206.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90033-3
Intraprawat, P. (2000). Writing an argumentative essay. Nakorn-radchasima: Suranaree University of Technology Press.
Ishikawa, S. (2008). Eigo corpus to gengo kyoiku English corpus and language education. Tokyo: Taishukan.
Isler, C. (2018). The use of first-person pronouns in Master's theses written in English by Turkish authors. Journal of English Language and Education, 4(1), 12-20.
https://doi.org/10.26486/jele.v4i1.382
Ismail, A. A. M. (2019). Epistemic stance personal pronouns in Malaysian tertiary level ESL. Islamic based written tasks. Journal of Research and Innovation, 6(1),1-14.
Jacobs, H.L., Zinkgraf, S.A., Wormuth, D.R., Hartfiel, V.F., & Hughey, J.B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.
Kim, C.-K. (2009). Personal pronouns in English and Korean texts: A corpus-based study in terms of textual interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(10), 2086-2099.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.03.004
Korhonen, R., & Kusch, M. (1989). The rhetorical function of the first-person in philosophical texts-The influence of intellectual style, paradigm and language. In M. Kusch & H. Schröder (Eds.), Text, interpretation, argumentation (pp. 61-77). Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
Kuo, C. (1999). The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 121-138.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6
Lau, L. S. W. (2018). First-person pronouns in academic writing: a comparative study of journal articles in literature and computer science. International Journal of Education and Research, 49(11),341-352.
Leedham, M. (2014). Chinese students' writing in English: implications from a corpus-driven study. Oxford University Press: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203797488
Lee, E. K., & Oh, S. Y. (2018). Korean EFL Learners' use of I in English argumentative writing: Focusing on genre-specific and proficiency-specific characteristics. Language Research 54(2), 357-381.
https://doi.org/10.30961/lr.2018.54.2.357
Lee, J. J., & Deakin, L. (2016). Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays. Journal of second language writing, 33(1),21-34.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.06.004
Luzon, M. (2009). The use of we in a learner corpus of reports written by Engineering students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(3),192-206.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.04.001
MacIntyre, R. (2017). The use of personal pronouns in the Writing of argumentative essays by EFL writers. RELC Journal, 50(1),1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217730139
McCann, T. M. (1989). Student argumentative writing: Knowledge and ability at three grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 23(1), 62-75.
McCrostie, J. (2008). Writer visibility in EFL learner academic writing: A corpus-based study. ICAME Journal, 32(1), 97-114.
Martin-Martin, P. (2008). The mitigation of scientific claims in research papers: A comparative study. IJES, 8(2), 133-152.
Matsuda, P.K. (2001). Voice in Japanese written discourse. Implications for second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1-2), 35-53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00036-9
Milton, J (1999). Lexical thickets and electronic gateways: Making text accessible by novice writers. In C. Candlin and K. Hyland (eds.). Writing: Texts, processes and practices, 221-243. London and New York: Longman.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315840390-11
Mur Duenas, P. (2007). 'I/we focus on…': A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(2), 143-162.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.05.002
Na, J., & Choi, I. (2009). Culture and first-person pronouns. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(11), 1492-1499.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209343810
Natsukari, Sayo. (2012). Use of I in essays by Japanese EFL learners. JALT Journal, 34(1), 61-78.
https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ34.1-4
Neff, J., Ballesteros, F., Dafouz, E., Martínez, F., Rica, J. P., Díez, M., & Prieto, R. (2004). Formulating writer stance: A contrastive study of EFL learner corpora. In Applied Corpus Linguistics (pp. 73-89). Brill Rodopi.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004333772_006
Oh, S. Y., & Kang, S. J. (2013). The effect of English proficiency on Korean undergraduates' expression of epistemic modality in English argumentative writing. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 10(4), 97-132.
Oh, S.-Y. (2007). A corpus-based study of epistemic modality in Korean college students' writings in English. English Teaching, 62(2), 147-175.
https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.62.2.200706.147
Oller, J. W., Jr. (Ed.). (1983). Issues in Language testing Research. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.
Overbay, A. S. (2003). Persuasive Developments: Reflective Judgment and College Students' Written Argumentation. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Petch-Tyson, S. (1998). Writer/reader visibility in EFL written discourse. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 107-118). London: Addison-Wesley, Longman.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315841342-8
Plakans, L. (2008). Comparing composing processes in writing-only and reading-to-write test tasks. Assessing Writing, 13(2), 111-129.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2008.07.001
Reid, J. (2001). Advanced EAP writing and curriculum design: What do we need to know? In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 143-160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Riyanti, D. (2015). An exploration of voice in second language writing. The Nebraska Educator: A Student-Led Journal, 2(1), 28-48.
Salager-Meyer F. (1994). Hedges and textual communication function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes 13(2), 149-170.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
Shelton, D. C. (2015). Writing in the first-person for academic and research publication. In Proceedings of the EDSIG Conference (p. n3487).
Smith, Jr., E. L. (1986). Achieving impact through the interpersonal component. In B. Couture (Ed.), Functional approaches to writing: Research perspectives (pp. 108-119). London: F. Pinter.
Storch, N. (2009). The impact of studying in a second language (L2) medium university on the development of L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(2), 103-118.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.003
Tang, R., & John, S. (1999). The ''I'' in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first-person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18(S),23-S39.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5
Tanko, G. & Tamasi, G. (2008). A comprehensive taxonomy of argumentative thesis statements: a preliminary pilot study. Working Papers in Language Pedagogy, 2(1),1-17.
Yoon, H. J., & Polio, C. (2017). The linguistic development of students of English as a second language in two written genres. TESOL Quarterly, 51(2), 275-301.
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
