Kepimpinan Distributif Pengetua dan Efikasi Kendiri Guru di Sekolah Menengah Daerah Saratok, Sarawak

Authors

  • Muhamad Najib Yusuf Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Mohamed Yusof Mohd Noor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33736/tur.6842.2024

Keywords:

Distributif, kepimpinan, efikasi kendiri, pengetua, guru, sekolah menengah.

Abstract

Seorang pemimpin atau ketua mempunyai peranan penting dalam mewujudkan dasar dan matlamat ke arah kemajuan sekolah. Tujuan kajian ini ialah bagi mengetahui kepimpinan distributif pengetua. Selain itu, efikasi kendiri guru perlu diperoleh bagi menentukan hubungan antara kedua-dua pembolehubah. Daerah Saratok Sarawak merupakan tempat kajian. Kajian ini dilaksanakan secara kuantitatif melalui soal selidik ke atas 186 responden dan dianalisis menggunakan SPSS. Dapatan membuktikan bahawa hubungan yang positif signifikan tetapi sederhana telah diperoleh. Bagi tahap kepimpian distributif pengetua dan tahap efikasi kendiri guru pula kedua-duanya menunjukkan nilai yang tinggi. Secara impaknya, kepimpinan distributif perlu dipraktikkan secara menyeluruh di peringkat sekolah agar dapat memberi kesan kepada efikasi kendiri guru di sekolah. Kesimpulannya, pengetua sebagai pemimpin perlu mengamalkan kepimpinan yang berkesan untuk menguruskan sekolah demi mencapai matlamat pendidikan.

 

 

 

References

Abdul-Ghafar, M. N. (2003). Reka Bentuk Tinjauan Soal Selidik Pendidikan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Penerbit UTM.

Ahmad, S., & Hamid, A. H. A. (2021). Amalan kepimpinan distributif guru besar terhadap efikasi kendiri dalam kalangan guru prasekolah. Malaysian journal of social sciences and humanities (MJSSH), 6(1), 140-150.

https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i1.609

Andoh, H., Ompok, C. C., & Sukor, N. S. (2021). Hubungan kelayakan akademik dan pengalaman mengajar dengan tahap efikasi kendiri guru prasekolah menjalankan PDPC pasca pandemik Covid-19. Malaysian of Social Science and Hummanities, 6(10), 65-81.

https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i10.1105

Ashton, P (1984). Teacher Efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher educational. Journal of Teacher Educational, 35(5), 28-32.

https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718403500

Azhar Haron, Ramli Basri, Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pihie & Soaib Asmiran. (2020). Hubungan antara amalan kepimpinan distributif pengetua dan kepimpinan guru di sekolah menengah. International Journal Of Educational and Traning (InjET), 2 (2):13. http://www.injet.upm.edu.my/

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York W.H Freeman. DOI: 10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158

https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158

Bolden . R.(2011). Distributed Leadership in Organization: A review of theory and research international. Jornal of Management Review, 13(3), 251-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x

Bush , T & Glover, D. (2012). Distributed leadership in action: high-performing leadership team in english schools. School Leadership and Management, 32(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.642354

https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.642354

Cansoy, R & Parlar. (2018). Examining the relationship between school pricipals instructional leadership behaviors, teacher self efficacy and collective teacher efficacy. International Journal Of Educational Management, 32(4), 550-567. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2017-0089

https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2017-0089

Dasan, N., & Nawi, M. M. R. M. (2020). Hubungan efikasi kendiri guru dengan prestasi kerja dalam kalangan guru Maktab Rendah Sains Mara (MRSM). e-BANGI, 17(4), 173-187. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/hubungan-efikasi-kendiri-guru-dengan-prestasi/docview/2519894738/se-2.

Davies, J.A (1971). Elementary Survey Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Davis, M.W (2009). Distributed leadership and school perfomance. Thesis and Dissertation. George Washington Universiti, USA.

Elmore R.F (2005). Accountable leadership. The Educational Forum, 69.pp 134-142.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984677

Ghani, A., Khan, M. A., & Khan, S. A. (2018). The role of leadership in organizational change: A review of current approaches. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(3), 456-473.

Gibson, S & Dembo M.H (1984). Teacher efficacy: A contruct validation. Journal Of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569

Gordon Z.V (2005). The effect of distributed leadership on student achievement. phD Dissertation. New Britain Central Connecticut State Universiti.

Hair J. F Black, D.C Babin, J Anderson, R.E Anderson. R.E & Tatham, R.L (2006). Multivate Data Analysis: Sixth Editional. Pearson International Edition, New Jersey. ISBN 9780130329295

Halim, R.A. & Ahmad, H. (phD). 2015. Distributed Leadership, Contextual Factor and Teacher' Self- Efficacy in Malaysia. Malaysian Online Journal Of Educational Management (MOJEM), Volume 3 Issue 3, 1-12.

Halim, R. A. (2017). Kepemimpinan distributif, faktor kontekstual dan efikasi kendiri guru di Malaysia. JuPiDi: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 2(4), 47-61. https://jice.um.edu.my/index.php/JUPIDI/article/view/8358

Harris, A (2012). Distributed Leadership: Implications for the role of the principal. Journal Of Management Development, 31(1), 7-17.

https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711211190961

Jaafar, N., & Tamuri, A. H. (2013). Hubungan antara efikasi kendiri dengan kualiti guru pendidikan Islam Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Malaysia. Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education, 5(1), 41-60.

Jamalulail, A.W., Aida Hanim, A.H., Suriati, Z dan Md Fuad, M.R (2012). The relationsip between headteacher's distributed leadership practices and teachers motivation in national primary schools. Asian Social Science 9, 16.

https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n16p161

Johanson , G. A., & Brooks G.P. (2010). Initial scale development: sample size for pilot studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394-400.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355692

Johnson, M. (2021). The relationship between distributive leadership practices, teacher self-efficacy, and job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Leadership, 18(2), 123-137.

Kalaivani M. A & Azlin. N.B.M (2018). Kepimpinan transformasional guru besar dan hubungannya dengan efikasi kendiri guru. http;// seminar.utmspace.edu.my/lspgabc2018/doc/20/pdf.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 2012. Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025.

Kuppan, R., & Razak, A. Z. B. A. (2021). Kepimpinan distributif guru besar dan komitmen guru di sekolah kebangsaan di daerah Gombak. JuPiDi: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 8(4), 20-35. eISSN: 2289-9669

Krejcie, RV & Mogan, D.W. (1970). Determing Sample Size For Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.

https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Lee, H. K., & Hamzah, M. I. M. (2023). Amalan kepimpinan distributif guru besar dan hubungannya dengan komitmen guru SJKC. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(1), e002073-e002073.

https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i1.2073

Liang, F. S., & Tai, M. K. (2021). Efikasi kendiri guru di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan di Semenanjung Malaysia. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 6(40), 160-167.

https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.640013

Mansor, R., & Mohd Hamzah, M. I. (2015). Kepimpinan berkualiti: perspektif mengenai kompetensi yang diperlukan untuk memimpin dengan berkesan. Jurnal Pengurusan, 45, 1-19

https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2015-45-13

Mayan, M. P., & Mansor, M. (2020). Hubungan antara amalan kepimpinan distributif dengan efikasi kendiri dan komuniti pembelajaran profesional guru di Kuala Lumpur: The relationship between distributive leadership practice and self-efficacy and learning community professional teachers in Kuala Lumpur. Management Research Journal, 9(2), 70-83. https://doi.org/10.37134/mrj.vol9.2.6.2020

Mayan, M. P., & Mansor, M. (2021). distributive leadership practices and teachers' self-efficacy in national school, Selangor: Kepimpinan Distributif dan Efikasi Kendiri Guru-Guru di Sekolah Kebangsaan, Negeri Selangor. Management Research Journal, 10, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.37134/mrj.vol10.sp.2.2021

Mohd, A. B., Nawawi, A. B. M., & Ismail, S. N. B. (2016). Tahap efikasi guru dan hubungannya dengan pencapaian sekolah-sekolah menengah dalam daerah Bachok. International Seminar Through Research, 312-326.

https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.500

Mohd Hamzah, M. I., Muda, Z., & Salwana, B. (2018). Amalan kepimpinan distributif dan hubungannya dengan modal psikologi guru di sekolah menengah Daerah Putrajaya. Jurnal Pengurusan Dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 31(2), 19-27.

Mollenkopf, D. L., Felton, M. K., Karabon, A., & Westerlin, S. A. (2020). Building higher education community: A lesson from Nebraska. In Professional and Ethical Consideration for Early Childhood Leaders (pp. 202-225). IGI Global.

https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5089-2.ch010

Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein I., H, (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Robert N Lussier, Christopher F. Achua (2007). Effective Leadership. Edition 3, Revised. Thompson/South-Western.

Sharan, B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Wiley.

Singh, S. & Esa, A. (2008). Seminar Kebangsaan Pengurusan Pendidikan PKPG.UTHM. Kepimpinan dalam Menghadapi Isu-isu Semasa Pendidikan.

Spillane, J.P (2006) Distributed Leadership. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

Tschannen-Moran M. Woolfolk, A., & Hoy, W.K (1998). Teacher Efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248.

https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and teacher education, 17(7), 783-805.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1

Tukiman, R., & Noor, M. Y. M. (2022). Amalan Kepimpinan Distributif Pengetua Terhadap Autonomi Guru dalam Pembelajaran dan Pemudahcaraan (PDPC) Sekolah Amanah di Kuala Lumpur. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 9 (4),72-78. eISSN: 2289-9669

Wang, X., & Odell, S. J. (2002). Hubungan Antara Kepimpinan Distributif dan Efikasi Kendiri Guru: Satu Meta- Analisis. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, 29(2), 123-137.

Williams, C. G. (2011). Distributed leadership in South African schools: possibilities and constraints. South African Journal of Education, 31(2), 190-200.

https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v31n2a421

Yin, G., & Hamzah, M. I. M. (2023). Amalan Kepimpinan Transformasional Guru Besar dan Efikasi Kendiri Guru SJKC. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(3), e002188-e002188.

https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i3.2188

Yusof, M.M., Muda, A., Makmom, A., Samah, B.A., Basri, R., Rashid, N.A. & Alias, M.K. (2011). Faktor-faktor yang Yang Mempengaruhi Efikasi Kendiri Guru Sekolah Menengah di Malaysia dalam Pelaksanaan Alam Sekitar. Malaysian Journal of Enviromental Management 12(2): 91-111.

Zuraidah Juliana Mohamad Yusoff, Yahya Don & Siti Noor Ismail. (2016). Kepimpinan distributif terhadap pengurusan konflik dalam kalangan pemimpin sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 41(2)(2016): 165-171. ISSN 2600-8823. http://ejournals.ukm.my/jpend/article/view/16021

Zainuddin, Z. A., & Kutty, F. M. (2021). Hubungan antara efikasi kendiri dan motivasi terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar perempuan jurusan STEM. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(3), 180-190.

https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i3.716

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Yusuf, M. N., & Mohd Noor, M. Y. . (2024). Kepimpinan Distributif Pengetua dan Efikasi Kendiri Guru di Sekolah Menengah Daerah Saratok, Sarawak. Trends in Undergraduate Research, 7(1), h1–11. https://doi.org/10.33736/tur.6842.2024

Issue

Section

Social Sciences and Humanities