Foraging Behaviour of Three Sympatric Babblers (Family: Timaliidae)

Authors

  • JONATHON JULIANA Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • DENCY FLENNY GAWIN Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33736/tur.2138.2020

Abstract

We investigated the foraging ecology of three species of babblers in Kampung Gumbang, Kampung Padang Pan and Dered Krian National Park, Bau. Vegetation in Kampung Gumbang include tall trees, shrubs and patches of kerangas. Dered Kerian National Park consists of mixed dipterocarp forest and limestone forest, which is surrounded by orchards and few villages. In Kampung Padang Pan, the vegetation is a mixed fruit orchard and secondary forest. Foraging data were obtained to compare foraging behaviour in three species. From 133 observations, suspended dead leaves was the most frequently used substrate by the three species. Stachyris maculate showed the most general foraging behavior, and it adopted probing strategy. Cyanoderma erythropterum and Mixnornis gularis obtained food items by gleaning. These three babblers utilize different foraging strategies and substrates, irrespective of their resemblances in other characteristics.  C. erythropterum and S. maculate forage mainly among dead and curled, twisted leaves in understory vegetation at significantly different heights. M. gularis forages on dead and living leaves and this species can be found abundantly in disturbed forest and plantation or farm habitats. All the three areas were observed never lacked falling leaves and structural complexity required as foraging substrates by those three babbler species. All three babblers occupy different foraging niches, and therefore interspecific competitions among themselves are minimized.

References

del Hoyo, J., & Collar, N. J. (2016). HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 2: Passerines. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.

DeWalt, S. J., Ickes, K., Nilus, R., Harms, K. E., & Burslem, D. F. (2006). Liana habitat associations and community structure in a Bornean lowland tropical forest. Plant Ecology, 186, 203-216.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9123-6

DeWalt, S. J., Maliakal, S. K., & Denslow, J. S. (2003). Changes in vegetation structure and composition along a tropical forest chronosequence: implications for wildlife. Forest Ecology and Management, 182(1), 139-151.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00029-X

Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 9pp.

Leme, A. (2001). Foraging patterns and resource use in four sympatric species of antwrens. Journal of Field Ornithology, 72, 221-227.

https://doi.org/10.1648/0273-8570-72.2.221

Mansor, M. S., & Mohd. Sah, S. A. (2012). Foraging patterns reveal niche separation in tropical insectivorous birds. Acta Ornithologica, 47, 27-36.

https://doi.org/10.3161/000164512X653890

Mansor, M. S., & Ramli, R. (2017). Foraging niche segregation in Malaysia babblers (Family: Timaliidae). Plos One, 12(3), e0172836. doi:10.1371/Journal.pone.0172836.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172836

Melo, T. N., & Guilherme, E. (2016). The foraging behavior of the Large-headed Flatbill, Ramphotrigon megacephalum and the Dusky-tailed Flatbill, Ramphotrigon fuscicauda (Aves: Tyrannidae). Zoologia, 33(6), e20160104.

https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-4689zool-20160104

Miles, D. B. (1990). A comparison of three multivariate statistical techniques for the analysis of avian foraging data. Studies in Avian Biology, 13, 295-308.

Morrison, M. L. (1984). Influence of sample size and sampling design on analysis of avian foraging behavior.The Condor, 86, 146-150.

https://doi.org/10.2307/1367029

Naoki, K. (2007). Arthropod resource partitioning among omnivorous Tanagers (Tangara spp.) in Western Ecuador. The Auk, 124, 197-209.

https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/124.1.197

Phillips, Q., & Phillips, K. (2011). Phillips' Field Guide to the Birds of Borneo. Oxford, England. John Beaufoy Publishing Ltd. Pp 370.

Remsen, J. V. Jr., & Robinson, S. K. (1990). A classification scheme for foraging behavior of birds in terrestrial habitats. Studies in Avian Biology, 13, 144-160.

Rosenberg, K. V. (1993). Diet selection in Amazonian antwrens: consequences of substrate specialization. The Auk, 110, 36-375.

Sheldon, F. H., Styring, A. R., & Hosner, P. A. (2010). Bird species richness in a Bornean exotic tree plantation: a long-term perspective. Biological Conservation, 143(2), 399-407.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.11.004

Smythies, B. E. (1999). The birds of Borneo. Kota Kinabalu, Sabah: Natural History Publications.

Stratford, J. A., & Stouffer, P. C. (2013). Microhabitat associations of terrestrial insectivorous birds in Amazonian rainforest and second-growth forests. Journal of Field Ornithology, 84, 1-12.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jofo.12000

Styring, A. R., Ragai, R., Unggang, J., Stuebing, R., Hosner, P. A., & Sheldon, F. H. (2011). Bird community assembly in Bornean industrial tree plantations: effects of forest age and structure. Forest Ecology and Management, 261(3), 531-544.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.003

Styring, A. R., Ragai, R., Zakaria, M., & Sheldon, F. H. (2016). Foraging ecology and occurrence of 7 sympatric babbler species (Timaliidae) in the lowland rainforest of Borneo and Peninsular Malaysia. Current Zoology, 62(4), 345-355.

https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zow022

Yong, D. L., Qie, L., Sodhi, N. S., Koh, L. P., Peh, K. S., Lee, T. M., Lim, H. C., & Lim, S. L. (2011). Do insectivorous bird communities decline on land-bridge forest islands in Peninsular Malaysia? Journal of Tropical Ecology, 27(1), 1-14.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467410000520

Published

2020-12-28

How to Cite

JULIANA, J., & GAWIN, D. F. . (2020). Foraging Behaviour of Three Sympatric Babblers (Family: Timaliidae). Trends in Undergraduate Research, 3(2), a26–34. https://doi.org/10.33736/tur.2138.2020

Issue

Section

Resource Science and Technology