Assessment on Physicochemical and Sensory Qualities of Plant-Based Burgers Containing Cauliflower Stalk Powder as Binding Agent

Authors

  • SIAW EN TIAN Department of Technology and Natural Resources, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, UTHM Pagoh Campus, Pagoh Higher Education Hub, KM 1, Jalan Panchor, 84600, Muar, Johor, Malaysia
  • NUR AQILAH BAHARUDDIN Department of Technology and Natural Resources, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, UTHM Pagoh Campus, Pagoh Higher Education Hub, KM 1, Jalan Panchor, 84600, Muar, Johor, Malaysia
  • NORAZLIN ABDULLAH Department of Technology and Natural Resources, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, UTHM Pagoh Campus, Pagoh Higher Education Hub, KM 1, Jalan Panchor, 84600, Muar, Johor, Malaysia
  • NUR HAFIZAH MALIK Department of Technology and Natural Resources, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, UTHM Pagoh Campus, Pagoh Higher Education Hub, KM 1, Jalan Panchor, 84600, Muar, Johor, Malaysia

Keywords:

plant-based burger, cauliflower stalk powder, binding agent, physical properties, sensory properties

Abstract

Plant-based burgers are becoming popular due to their environmental and health benefits, yet achieving the right texture and sensory attributes remains a challenge. This study investigates the potential of cauliflower stalk powder (CSP) as a natural binder and partial substitute for textured vegetable protein (TVP) in plant-based burgers by analyzing their physical and sensory properties. The CSP powder was prepared using microwave drying technology at 420 W for 28 min. The plant-based burgers were mainly formulated with oyster mushroom and TVP with progressive substitution of TVP by CSP powders at levels of 0 – 10% w/w as binding agent. The analysis revealed that springiness of the cooked plant based burgers increased by almost 10% with increasing level of CSP while firmness of the burgers reduced by 2% at increasing level of CSP substitution. Meanwhile, significantly lower cooking loss between 8.3 – 9.5% were observed for burgers with 7.5 and 10% w/w CSP compared to formulation with only 2.5% w/w CSP which recorded 15% cooking loss. Sensory evaluation revealed that burgers with CSP were perceived to have better texture, appearance and overall acceptance than burgers without CSP. Intermediate CSP inclusion (2.5 – 7.5% w/w) showed the most balanced performance, enhancing texture, moisture retention and sensory acceptance accordingly. These findings showed the potential of CSP in improving the textural and sensory quality of plant based burger, highlighting the suitability of cauliflower by product as a sustainable and effective binding agent for plant-based burger.

References

Aamer, R.A. & Hussain E.H. (2016). Effect of using cauliflower (Brassica oleracea) to improve quality characteristics of tuna fish burger. Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 61 (6): 11–626. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.3536.

Abul-Fadl, M. (2012). Nutritional and chemical evaluation of white cauliflower by-products flour and the effect of its addition on beef sausage quality. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8 (2): 693–704.

Alemu, T. (2022). Texture profile and design of food product. Journal of Agriculture Horticulture Research, 6 (2): 272–281. DOI: 10.33140/JAHR.06.02.03.

Babu, A., Shams, R., Dash, K.K., Shaikh, A.M. & Kovács, B. (2024). Protein-polysaccharide complexes and conjugates: structural modifications and interactions under diverse treatments. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 18: 101510. DOI: 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101510.

Bakhsh, A., Lee, S.J., Lee, E.Y., Hwang, Y.H. & Joo, S.T. (2021). Characteristics of beef patties substituted by different levels of textured vegetable protein and taste traits assessed by electronic tongue system. Foods, 10 (11): 2811. DOI: 10.3390/foods10112811.

Baune, M.C., Terjung, N., Tülbek, M.Ç. & Boukid, F. (2022). Textured vegetable proteins (TVP): future foods standing on their merits as meat alternatives. Future Foods, 6: 100181. DOI: 0.1016/j.fufo.2022.100181.

Begum, H.A., Tanni, T.R. & Shahid, M.A. (2021). Analysis of water absorption of different natural fibers. Journal of Textile Science and Technology, 07 (04): 152–160. DOI: 10.4236/jtst.2021.74013.

Bing, H., Xin, H., Hao, S., Yongyi, H. & Fei, L. (2024). Red and processed meat intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 60: 289–297. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.02.014.

Caputo, V., Savari, G. & Van Loo, E.J. (2023). Do plant-based and blend meat alternatives taste like meat? a combined sensory and choice experiment study. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 45 (1): 86–105. DOI: 10.1002/aepp.13247.

Cheng, M., McCarl, B. & Fei, C. (2022). Climate change and livestock production: a literature review. Atmosphere, 13 (1): 140. DOI: 10.3390/atmos13010140.

Dinani, S.T., Zhang, Y., Vardhanabhuti, B. & van der Goot, A.J. (2023). Enhancing textural properties in plant-based meat alternatives: the impact of hydrocolloids and salts on soy protein-based products. Current Research in Food Science, 7: 100571. DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100571.

Fiorentini, M., Kinchla, A.J. & Nolden, A.A. (2020). Role of sensory evaluation in consumer acceptance of plant-based meat analogs and meat extenders: a scoping review. Foods, 9 (9): 1334. DOI: 10.3390/foods9091334.

Godschalk-Broers, L., Sala, G. & Scholten, E. (2022). Mean analogues: relating structure to texture and sensory perception. Foods, 11 (15): 2227. DOI: 10.3390/foods11152227.

González, N., Marquès, M., Nadal, M. & Domingo, J.L. (2020). Meat consumption: which are the current global risks? a review of recent (2010–2020) evidences. Food Research International, 137: 109341. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109341.

Haghighi, H., Belmonte, A.M., Masino, F., Minelli, G., Lo Fiego, D. Pietro & Pulvirenti, A. (2021). Effect of time and temperature on physicochemical and microbiological properties of sous vide chicken breast fillets. Applied Sciences, 11 (7). DOI: 10.3390/app11073189.

Hamid, M.A., Tsia, F.L.C., Okit, A.A.B., Xin, C.W., Cien, H.H., Harn, L.S., Patrick, P.N., Samirin, S., Azizi, W.A.A.W., Irfanian, A. & Yee, C.F. (2020). The application of jackfruit by-product on the development of healthy meat analogue. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 575 (1): 012001. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/575/1/012001.

Hegazy, A.E. & Ammar, M.S. (2019). Utilization of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. ssp. botrytis) stem flour in improving balady bread quality. Journal of Agricultural Research V, 44 (1): 112–118. DOI: 10.21608/ajar.2019.59703.

Herawati, H. & Kamsiati, E. (2021). Characteristics of vegetarian patties burgers made from tofu and tempeh. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 653 (1): 012103. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/653/1/012103.

Hong, S., Shen, Y. & Li, Y. (2022). Physicochemical and functional properties of texturized vegetable proteins and cooked patty textures: comprehensive characterization and correlation analysis. Foods, 11 (17): 2619. DOI: 10.3390/foods11172619.

Husain, H. & Huda-Faujan, N. (2020). Quality evaluation of imitation chicken nuggets from grey oyster mushroom stems and chickpea flour. Malaysian Applied Biology, 49 (3): 61–69. DOI: 10.55230/mabjournal.v49i3.1542.

Hussain, S., Jõudu, I. & Bhat, R. (2020). Dietary fiber from underutilized plant resources-a positive approach for valorization of fruit and vegetable wastes. Sustainability, 12 (13): 5401. DOI: 10.3390/su12135401.

Jean-Baptiste, R.G.S., Benjamin, A.S.D., Geethanjali, S.P., Jack, F., Thomas, J.M. & Theodosiou, E. (2025). Mechanical properties and texture profile analysis of beef burgers and plant-based analogues. Journal of Food Engineering, (385): 112259. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2024.112259.

Karabulut, G., Goksen, G. & Mousavi Khaneghah, A. (2024). Plant-based protein modification strategies towards challenges. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 15: 101017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101017.

Kaur, S., Goswami, M., Kumar, P., Mehta, N. & Sharma, A. (2022). Utilization of cauliflower stems and leaves powder in the development of high fibre spent hen meat cutlets. Journal of Meat Science, 17 (1): 17–24. DOI: 10.48165/gmj.2022.1703.

Kim, T.K., Jang, H.W., Kim, D.H. & Choi, Y.S. (2024). Quality characteristics of meat analogs through the incorporation of textured vegetable protein and Tenebrio molitor larvae in the presence of transglutaminase. Food Science of Animal Resources, 44 (5): 1028–1039. DOI: 0.5851/kosfa.2024.e28.

Kyriakopoulou, K., Keppler, J.K. & van der Goot, A.J. (2021). Functionality of ingredients and additives in plant-based meat analogues. Foods, 10 (3): 600. DOI: 10.3390/foods10030600.

Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Zhang, D., Pan, T., Liu, H., Shen, Q. & Hui, T. (2022). Effect of protein thermal denaturation on the texture profile evolution of Beijing roast duck. Foods, 11 (5): 664. DOI: 10.3390/foods11050664.

Malik, N.H., Roslan, N.A. & Baharuddin, N.A. (2025). Physicochemical and functional properties of microwave-dried cauliflower powder. Food Research, 9 (3): 268–274. DOI: 10.26656/fr.2017.9(3).260.

Marczak, A. & Mendes, A.C. (2024). Dietary fibers: shaping textural and functional properties of processed meats and plant-based meat alternatives. Foods, 13 (12): 1952. DOI: 10.3390/foods13121952.

Michel, F., Hartmann, C. & Siegrist, M. (2021). Consumers’ associations, perceptions and acceptance of meat and plant-based meat alternatives. Food Quality and Preference, 87: 104063. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104063.

Mihafu, F.D., Issa, J.Y. & Kamiyango, M.W. (2020). Implication of sensory evaluation and quality assessment in food product development: a review. Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science, 8 (3): 690–702. DOI: 10.12944/CRNFSJ.8.3.03.

Mishra, B.P., Mishra, J., Paital, B., Rath, P.K., Jena, M.K., Reddy, B.V.V., Pati, P.K., Panda, S.K. & Sahoo, D.K. (2023). Properties and physiological effects of dietary fiber enriched meat products: a review. Frontiers in Nutrition, 10: 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1275341.

O’Flynn, T.D., Hogan, S.A., Daly, D.F.M., O’Mahony, J.A. & McCarthy, N.A. (2021). Rheological and solubility properties of soy protein isolate. Molecules, 26 (10): 3015. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26103015.

Oluwole, O., Ibidapo O., Arowosola, T., Raji, F., Zandonadi R.P., Alasqah, I., Lho, L.H, Han, H. & Raposo, A. (2023) Sustainable transformation agenda for enhanced global food and nutrition security: a narrative review. Frontiers Nutrition, 10: 1226538. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1226538.

Pang, B., Bowker, B., Zhuang, H., Yang, Y. & Zhang, J. (2020). Research note: comparison of 3 methods used for estimating cook loss in broiler breast meat. Poultry Science, 99 (11): 6287–6290. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.038.

Petrat-Melin, B. & Dam, S. (2023). Textural and consumer-aided characterisation and acceptability of a hybrid meat and plant-based burger patty. Foods, 12: 2246. DOI: 10.3390/foods12112246.

Qin, P., Wang, T. & Luo, Y. (2022). A review on plant-based proteins from soybean: health benefits and soy product development. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 7: 100265. DOI: 10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100265.

Rafiuddin, Md., Suneetha, W.J. & Kumari, B.A. (2019). Standardization and evaluation of cauliflower stalks incorporated Phulkas. International Research Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry, 19 (3): 1–6. DOI: 10.973 4/irjpac/2019/v19i330114.

Rajaretnam, S. & Malik, N.H. (2023). Physical and sensory properties of vegetarian burger patty. Enhanced Knowledge in Sciences and Technology, 3 (2): 422–431. https://publisher. uthm.edu.my/periodicals/index.php/ekst/article/view/10698.

Sayem, A.S.M., Talukder, S., Akter, S.S., Alam, M., Rana, M.R. & Alam, M.M. (2024). Utilization of fruits and vegetables wastes for the dietary fiber enrichment of biscuits and its quality attributes. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 15: 101077. DOI: 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101077.

Sellem, L., Srour, B., Javaux, G., Chazelas, E., Chassaing, B., Viennois, E., Debras, C., Druesne-Pecollo, N., Esseddik, Y., Szabo de Edelenyi, F., Arnault, N., Agaësse, C., De Sa, A., Lutchia, R., Huybrechts, I., Scalbert, A., Pierre, F., Coumoul, X., Julia, C., Kesse-Guyot, E., Allès, B., Galan, P., Hercberg, S., Deschasaux-Tanguy, M. & Touvier, M. (2024). Food additive emulsifiers and cancer risk: results from the french prospective nutrinet-santé cohort. PLoS Medicine, 21 (2): 1004338. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004338.

Sharima-Abdullah, N., Hassan, C.Z., Arifin, N. & Huda-Faujan, N. (2018). Physicochemical properties and consumer preference of imitation chicken nuggets produced from chickpea flour and textured vegetable protein. International Food Research Journal, 25 (3): 1016–1025.

Sharma, R. & Prasad, R.N. (2018). Nutritional evaluation of dehydrated stems powder of cauliflower incorporated in Mathri and Sev. Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 8: 1–3. DOI: 10.4172/2155-9600.1000651.

Shinali, T.S., Zhang, Y., Altaf, M., Nsabiyeze, A., Han, Z., Shi, S. & Shang, N. (2024). The valorization of wastes and byproducts from cruciferous vegetables: a review on the potential utilization of cabbage, cauliflower and broccoli byproducts. Foods, 13 (8): 1163. DOI: 10.3390/foods13081163.

Singh, P., Singh, B.R., Singh, S., Chauhan, N., Kumar, R., Kumar, R. & Singh, Y. (2019). Study of drying kinetics of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea) using tray dryer. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8 (9): 2487–2491. DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2019.809.288.

Soner, Ç. (2019). Effect of microwave drying on the drying characteristics, colour, microstructure and thermal properties of trabzon persimmon. Foods, 8 (2): 84–84. DOI: 10.3390/foods8020084.

Tabaldo-Tucar, M. & Solar, M.N.J.B. (2019). Choose your patty: The sensory characterization and consumer acceptance of burger patties with oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) enrichment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1254 (1): 012017. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1254/1/012017.

Theavy Kea, Hun, S., Mazumder, M.A.R., Kingwascharapong, P., Sai-Ut, S., Pongsetkul, J., Jung, Y.H., Zhang, W. & Rawdkuen, S. (2025). Plant-based burger patties: effect of chickpea and textured vegetable protein concentrations on their properties and in vitro digestibility. Applied Food Research, 5 (2): 101270. DOI: 10.1016/j.afres.2025.101270.

Tukassar, A., Shukat, R., Iahtisham-Ul-Haq, M.S., Butt, M.S., Nayik, G.A., Ramniwas, S., Al Obaid, S., Ali Alharbi, S., Ansari, M.J., Konstantinos Karabagias, I. & Sarwar, N. (2023). Compositional profiling and sensory analysis of cauliflower by-products-enriched muffins. Food Science and Nutrition, 11 (10): 6020–6031. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.3536.

Van-Audenhove, T., Bernaerts, J., Putri, N.I., Van-Loey, A.M. & Hendrickx, M.E. (2023). The functionalisation of fruit and vegetable cell wall material as texturizing agent: The role of pectin depletion and particle size reduction techniques. Food Hydrocolloids, 142: 108814. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108814.

Wang, L., Tian, Y., Chen, Y. & Chen, J. (2021). Effects of acid treatment on the physicochemical and functional properties of wheat bran insoluble dietary fibre. Cereal Chemistry, 99 (2): 343–354. DOI: 10.1002/cche.10494.

Woo, M., Lee, S., Jeong, S.K.C., Jeon, H., Han, S., Kim, S., Jung, S. & Jo, K. (2024). Effects of the addition of cauliflower powder on low-fat chicken breast sausage quality. Korean Journal of Poultry Science, 51 (2): 47–56. DOI: 10.5536/kjps.2024.51.2.47.

Yusof, N.N.M., Mazli, N.S., Nordin, R., Madzuki, I.N. & Nor, S.M. (2023). Optimisation and sensory evaluation of nuggets formulated with grey oyster mushroom (Pleurotus pulmonarius) and corn flour. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2703 (1): 080005. DOI: 10.1063/5.0118260.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25

How to Cite

TIAN, S. E., BAHARUDDIN, N. A., ABDULLAH, N., & MALIK, N. H. (2026). Assessment on Physicochemical and Sensory Qualities of Plant-Based Burgers Containing Cauliflower Stalk Powder as Binding Agent. Borneo Journal of Resource Science and Technology, 16(1). Retrieved from https://publisher.unimas.my/ojs/index.php/BJRST/article/view/9528