Effect of Cow Urine on the Biochemical and Microbial Properties of Cow Dung Derived Biogas Slurry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/bjrst.4873.2022Keywords:
Bacterial population; biogas slurry; cow dung; cow urine; enzyme activityAbstract
Biogas slurry (BGS) is an anaerobic digested organic material that can be used as an organic fertiliser. As cow urine (CU) is rich in plant nutrients, it may be used as diluting agent in biogas production to enhance the fertiliser quality of BGS. To explore the potency of CU on the fertiliser quality of BGS, four experimental trials were constructed by mixing cow dung (CD) and CU in varying proportion designated as T0 (50% CD + 50% Water) as control, T1 (50% CD + 50% CU), T2 (40% CD + 60% CU), T3 (30% CD + 70% CU) for biogas production. The quality of BGS was evaluated by studying its biochemical and microbial properties. The enzymatic activities revealed that all the CU amended samples showed better activities than control and were increased with the increase in CU. Compared to the control, the increase in urease, protease and phosphatase activities were 11.6% to 64.6%, 4.6% to 29.6% and 22.1% to 50.0%, respectively while cellulase activities were decreased from 25.9% to 3.1%. Most of the bacterial populations also increased in CU amended samples; total bacteria (TB) 20% to 60%, phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) 33% to 67% and nitrogen fixing bacteria (NFB) 0% to 33%. Phytohormone, indole acetic acid (IAA) content and glycemic index (GI) were also increased with increase in CU (IAA- 23.5% to 59.5% and GI- 6.2% to 100.5%). With respect to all parameters analysed, CU amended samples can be considered superior to the control one except for their cellulase activities. Thus, utilization of cow urine improves the quality of BGS as organic fertiliser. This finding will help in reducing environmental pollution by utilizing hazardous cow urine as well as improving fertiliser quality of biogas slurry for agronomic use.
References
Allen, O.N. (1958). Experiments in soil bacteriology. Soil Science, 85(3): 172.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195803000-00013
Arancon, N.Q., Edwards, C.A., Bierman, P., Metzger, J.D., Lee, S. & Welch, C. (2003). Effects of vermicomposts on growth and marketable fruits of field-grown tomatoes, peppers and strawberries: The 7th international symposium on earthworm ecology Cardiff Wales 2002. Pedobiologia, 47(5-6): 731-735.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-4056(04)70260-7
Behera, S.S. & Ray, R.C. (2021). Bioprospecting of cowdung microflora for sustainable agricultural, biotechnological and environmental applications. Current Research in Microbial Sciences, 2: 100018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2020.100018
Bhunia, S., Bhowmik, A., Mallick, R. & Mukherjee, J. (2021). Agronomic efficiency of animal-derived organic fertilisers and their effects on biology and fertility of soil: A review. Agronomy, 11(5): 823.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050823
Bondarenko, A.M., Lipkovich, E.I. & Kachanova, L.S. (2018). Control of technological processes of organic fertilisers application as a tool to ensure food safety. Journal of Environmental Management & Tourism, 9: 5-11.
https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v9.1(25).01
Bulluck Iii, L.R., Brosius, M., Evanylo, G.K. & Ristaino, J.B. (2002). Organic and synthetic fertility amendments influence soil microbial, physical and chemical properties on organic and conventional farms. Applied Soil Ecology, 19(2): 147-160.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(01)00187-1
Bulluck Iii, L.R. & Ristaino, J.B. (2002). Effect of synthetic and organic soil fertility amendments on southern blight, soil microbial communities, and yield of processing tomatoes. Phytopathology, 92(2): 181-189.
https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.2.181
Chawla, O.P. (1986). Advances in Biogas Technology Publication and Information Division Indian Council of Agricultural Research. New Delhi, India, 75-95.
Devi, S.H., Vijayalakshmi, K., Jyotsna, K.P., Shaheen, S.K., Jyothi, K. & Rani, M.S. (2009). Comparative assessment in enzyme activities and microbial populations during normal and vermicomposting. Journal of Environmental Biology, 30(6): 1013-1017.
FAO, M. (2009). Resource STAT-Fertiliser. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Fardous, M.R., Nasrin, M.S., Shakil, M.E., Islam, M.S., Hoque, M.A. & Islam, M.N. (2020). Cow urine for enhancement of biogas production and fertiliser quality of biogas slurry. Journal of Scientific Research, 12(1): 135-144.
https://doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v12i1.43031
Fawcett, J. & Scott, J. (1960). A rapid and precise method for the determination of urea. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 13(2): 156-159.
https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.13.2.156
Garg, A.K. & Mudgal, V. (2007). Organic and mineral composition of Gomeya (cow dung) from Desi and crossbred cows-A comparative study. International Journal of Cow Science, 3(1 & 2): 17-19.
Gordon, S.A. & Weber, R.P. (1951). Colorimetric estimation of indoleacetic acid. Plant Physiology, 26(1): 192.
https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.26.1.192
Ishikawa, S., Hoshiba, S., Hinata, T., Hishinuma, T. & Morita, S. (2006). Evaluation of a biogas plant from life cycle assessment (LCA). International Congress Series, 1293: 230-233.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2006.02.008
Islam, M.S. & Momin, L. (2004). Organic Farming in Bangladesh: Recent Development at BARI and Future Needs. Gazipur, Bangladesh.
Jain, N.K. Gupta, V.B. Garg, R. & Silawat, N. (2010). Efficacy of cow urine therapy on various cancer patients in Mandsaur District, India- A survey. International Journal of Green Pharmacy, 4(1): 29-35.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-8258.62163
Jia, R., Li, L., Liu, X. & Deng, Y. (2011). Studies on the relationship between urease activity and fertility of the soil in litchi orchard. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 40(6): 79-81.
Joseph, K. & Nair, N.R. (1989). Effect of seed hardening on germination and seedling vigour in paddy. Seed Research, 17(2): 188-190.
Kilande, G., Tenywa, J.S., Rwakaikara-Silver, M.C. & Katushabe, A.A. (2015). Cattle urine as a fertiliser: micro-biochemical changes in fermenting cattle urine and implications on plant nutrient conservation. BMRJ, 11(2): 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.9734/BMRJ/2016/18323
Luo, G., Xue, C., Jiang, Q., Xiao, Y., Zhang, F., Guo, S., Shen, Q. & Ling, N. (2020). Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus Cycling Microbial Populations and Their Resistance to Global Change Depend on Soil C:N:P Stoichiometry. MSystems, 5(3): e00162-20. DOI:10.1128/m Systems.00162-20
https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00162-20
Mdlambuzi, T., Muchaonyerwa, P., Tsubo, M. & Moshia, M.E. (2021). Nitrogen fertiliser value of biogas slurry and cattle manure for maize (Zea mays L.) production. Heliyon, 7(5): e07077.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07077
Miah, M.N.A., Miah, M.R.U. & Alam, M.Z. (2017). Determining chemical composition of cattle urine and indigenous plant extracts. International Annals of Science, 3(1): 23-26.
https://doi.org/10.21467/ias.3.1.23-26
Miller, G.L. (1959). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31(3): 426-428.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030
Misra, R.V., Roy, R.N. & Hiraoka, H. (2003). On-farm composting methods. Rome, Italy: UN-FAO.
Mubarik, N.R. & Maslahah, I.N. (2019). Isolation and Characterization of indole-3-acetic acid producing bacteria from cow urine. Jurnal Biodjati, 4(1): 96-104.
https://doi.org/10.15575/biodjati.v4i1.4481
Nannipieri, P., Ceccanti, B., Cervelli, S. & Matarese, E. (1980). Extraction of phosphatase, urease, proteases, organic carbon, and nitrogen from soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44(5): 1011-1016.
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050028x
Pandey, A., Soccol, C.R. & Mitchell, D. (2000). New developments in solid state fermentation: I-bioprocesses and products. Process Biochemistry, 35(10): 1153-1169.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(00)00152-7
Pikovskaya, R.I. (1948). Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with vital activity of some microbial species. Mikrobiologiya, 17: 362-370.
Randhawa, G.K. & Kullar, J.S. (2011). Bioremediation of pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and petrochemicals with gomeya/cow dung. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2011: 362459.
https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/362459
Rawat, N.S., Lathwal, S.S., Panchbhai, G.J., Sawant, M.N., Jha, A.K. & Gupta, S.K. (2019). Physical and microbial characteristics of fresh urine and dung of heifer and lactating Sahiwal cow. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(1): 2753-2756.
Rokhzadi, A., Asgharzadeh, A., Darvish, F., Nour-Mohammadi, G. & Majidi, E. (2008). Influence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on dry matter accumulation and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under field conditions. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Science, 3(2): 253-257.
Sen, B. & Mahapatra, K. (2009). Functional and Genetic Profiling Tools: Insight to the Black Box of Vermicomposting Process. Dynamic Soil, Dynamic Plant, 1: 53-60.
Subba-Rao, N.S., Mateos, P.F., Baker, D., Stuart Pankratz, H., Palma, J., Dazzo, F.B. & Sprent, J.I. (1995). The unique root-nodule symbiosis between Rhizobium and the aquatic legume, Neptunia natans (L. f.) Druce. Planta, 196(2): 311-320.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00201390
Tabatabai, M.A. & Bremner, J.M. (1969). Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1(4): 301-307.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(69)90012-1
Wu, Q.S., Liu, C.Y., Zhang, D.J., Zou, Y.N., He, X.H. & Wu, Q.H. (2016). Mycorrhiza alters the profile of root hairs in trifoliate orange, Mycorrhiza, 26(3): 237-247.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-015-0666-z
Wu, S.C., Cao, Z.H., Li, Z.G., Cheung, K.C. & Wong, M.H. (2005). Effects of biofertiliser containing N-fixer, P and K solubilizers and AM fungi on maize growth: a greenhouse trial. Geoderma, 125(1-2): 155-166.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.07.003
Zucconi, F. (1981). Evaluating toxicity of immature compost. Biocycle, 22(2): 54-57.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
