Genetic Analysis of Two Sympatric Sea Urchins from Genus Diadema (Echinodermata: Echinoidea: Diadematidae) from Malaysian Borneo

  • Nursyuhaida Md Shahid
  • Raymie Nurhassan
  • Siti Akmar Khadijah Ab Rahim
  • Ruhana Hassan
Keywords: Diadema, sympatric species, phylogenetic, 16S rRNA gene


Genus Diadema (Echinoidea: Diadematidae) has been reported to be the most widespread and ecologically important shallow water tropical sea urchins. Morphological variations and species distributions are complicated to elucidate due to complexity in making reliable identifications. Genus Diadema had involved in many debates, particularly on the mode of speciation and the specific status of Diadema setosum and Diadema savignyi. Therefore, relationships among Diadema species found in Malaysian Borneo have been examined using 16S rRNA gene analysis. Monophyletic clade of genus Diadema with respect to the outgroup was obtained with high bootstrap values of 100% (MP), 100% (NJ), 100% (ML) and Bayesian Posterior Probability is equal to 1.00. Two monophyletic clades were apparent separating D. setosum (Clade I) and D. savignyi (Clade II), with strong support of 100% (MP), 100% (NJ), 80% (ML) and Bayesian Posterior Probability is equal to 1.00. In addition, high genetic variation among species had been recorded (9.85%), suggesting that D. setosum and D. savignyi are two distinct entities. Furthermore, D. setosum and D. savignyi are sympatric species based on their distribution and overlapping ranges in Malaysian Borneo.


Adel, H.A. & Khalid, P.L. (2000). Reproductive cycles of Diadema setosum and Echinometra mathaei (Echinoidea: Echinodermata) from Kuwait (Northern Arabian Gulf). Bulletin of Marine Science, 67(2): 845-856.

Clark, A.M. (1966). Echinoderms from the Red Sea, Part 2. Bulletin of Sea Fisheries Resources Israel, 41: 26-58.

Coppard, S.E. & Campbell, A.C. (2006). Taxonomic significance of test morphology in the echinoid genera Diadema Gray, 1825 and Echinothrix Peters, 1853 (Echinodermata). Zoosystema, 28: 93-112.

Doyle, J.J. & Doyle, J.L. (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin, 1: 11-15.

Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Hillis, D.M. (1993). Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case. Systematic Biology, 42: 247-264.

Kimura, M. (1980). Kimura's two-parameter model of Models of DNA Evolution. In J. Felsenstein (Eds.), Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc.

Leache, A.D. & Reeder, T.W. (2002). Molecular systematics of the eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood and bayesian approaches. Systematic Biology, 51: 44-68.

Lessios, H.A. (2001). Molecular phylogeny of Diadema: Systematic implications. In M. Barker (Eds.), Echinoderms 2000. Lisse: CRC Press. Pp 487-495.

Lessios, H.A. & Pearse, J.S. (1996). Hybridization and introgression between Indo-Pacific species of Diadema. Marine Biology, 126: 715-723.

Lessios, H.A., Kessing, B.D., & Pearse, J.S. (2001). Population structure and speciation in tropical seas: global phylogeography of the sea urchin Diadema. Evolution, 55: 955-975.[0955:PSASIT]2.0.CO;2

Mayr, E. (1954). Geographic speciation in tropical Echinoids. Evolution, 8: 1-18.

McCartney, M.A., Keller, G., & Lessios, H.A. (2000). Dispersal barriers in tropical oceans and speciation in Atlantic and eastern Pacific sea urchins of the genus Echinometra. Molecular Ecology, 9: 1391-1400.

Mortenson, T. (1940). A monograph of the Echinoidea. III(i). Aulodonta. Denmark: Reitzel. Pp 369-379.

Palumbi, S.R. (1996). PCR and molecular systematic. In D. Hillis, C. Moritz, & B. Mable (Eds.), Molecular Systematic, 2nd edition. Sunderland: Sinauer Press.

Pearse, J.S. (1998). Distributions of Diadema savignyi and Diadema setosum in the tropical Pacific. In R. Mooi & M. Telford (Eds.), Echinoderms: San Francisco. Rotterdam: Balkema. Pp 777-782.

Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. (1998). Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14(9): 817-818.

Rahim, S.A.K.A., & Nurhassan, R. (2012). Edible sea urchin species in Sabah waters. Faculty of Resource Science and Technology Bulletin, 1: 2-3.

Rannala, B. & Yang, Z. (1996). Probability distribution of molecular evolution trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 43: 304-311.

Ronquist, F. & Huelsenback, J.P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Version 3.0b4. Bioinformatics, 19: 1572-1574.

Sponer, R., Deheyn, D., & Roy, M.S. (2001). Large genetic distances within a population of Amphipholis squamata (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) do not support color varieties as sibling species. Marine Ecological Progress Series, 219: 169-175.

Stockley, B., Smith, A.B., Littlewood, D.T.J., Lessios, H.A., & MacKenzie-dodds, J.A. (2005). Phylogenetic relationships of spatangoid sea urchins (Echinoidea): taxon sampling density and congruence between morphological and molecular estimates. Zoological Science, 34: 447-468.

Swofford, D.L. (2000). PAUP. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Version 4.0b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.

Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., & Higgins, D.G. (1997). The ClustalX Windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tool. Nucleic Acids Research, 24: 4876-4882.

Yokota, Y., Matranga, V., & Smolenicka, Z. (2002). The sea urchin: From basic biology to aquaculture. Netherlands: A.A Balkema Publication.

How to Cite
Shahid, N. M., Nurhassan, R., Ab Rahim, S. A. K., & Hassan, R. (1). Genetic Analysis of Two Sympatric Sea Urchins from Genus Diadema (Echinodermata: Echinoidea: Diadematidae) from Malaysian Borneo. Borneo Journal of Resource Science and Technology, 5(1), 16-25.