The Relationship between Task Characteristics and Employee Engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33736/tur.1837.2020Abstract
The objective of this study is to identify the relationship between task characteristics (variety of skills, task identity, task significance, autonomy, feedback) and employee engagement. The study was conducted in a healthcare service in Sabah. A self administered questionnaire was used to collect data by using convenience sampling. A total of 78 respondents participated in the study. Data was analyzed using Spearman Correlation. The results revealed a significant and positive relationship between task characteristics (variety of skills, task identity, task significance, autonomy, feedback) and employee engagement in the studied organization. This has important implications to employers. It is recommended that managers, HRD practitioners and supervisors employees with more challenging tasks, autonomy and feedback from time to time. Moreover, work designs should include how the tasks may improve employee identity and significance.
References
Ahmad Zawawi, A., & Mohd Nasurdin, A. (2017). The impact of task characteristics on the performance of nursing teams. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 4, 285-290.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.03.009
Akumina, Inc. (2019). 2019 millenial manager survey. Retrieved from https://letsgo.akumina.com/rs/935-QKG- 213/images/2019-06-04-Millennial-Manager-Survey-New.pdf.
Aon Hewitt (2018). 2018 Employee engagement trends: Singapore employees least engaged among major Asian markets. Retrieved from https://www.asia.aonhumancapital.com/documentfiles/media/march-2018/employee-engagement-trends-singapore_27-march-2018.pdf.
Alzyoud, A. A., Othman, S. Z., & Mohd Isa, M. (2015). Examining the role of job resources on work engagement in the academic setting. Asian Social Science, 11(3), 103-110.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n3p103
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209-223.
https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476
Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Daily self-management and employee work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(1), 31-38.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.11.002
Bon, A. T., & Shire, A. M. (2017). The role of job resources on work engagement: A study on telecommunication sector. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 7(5), 400-405.
Crawford, E. R., Lepine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta‐analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834-848.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019364
Farndale, E., & Murer, I. (2015). Job resources and employee engagement: A cross-national study. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(5), 610-626.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2013-0318
Gallup Organization (2016). How millennials want to work and live. Retrieved from https://enviableworkplace. com/wp-content/uploads/Gallup-How-Millennials-Want-To-Work.pdf.
Ganesan, J., Azli, M. Z., & Fageeh, M. A. (2017). Determinants of employee engagement in the Malaysian health care industry. World Applied Sciences Journal, 35(10), 2180-2186. doi:10.5829/idosi.wasj.2017.2180.2186.
Grant, A. M. (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 108-124.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.108
Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170. doi:10.1037/h0076546.Kim, W., Han, S. J., & Park, J. (2019). Is the role of work engagement essential to employee performance or 'Nice to Have'? Sustainability, 11, 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041050
Krishnan, R., Ismail, S., Ismail, I., Muhammed, R. N., Muthusamy, G., Kanchymalay, K. (2015). Employee work engagement: Understanding the role of job characteristics and employee characteristics. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 4(10S), 58-67.
Luck, D. J., Taylor, W. G., & Robin. (1987). Marketing Research Eaglewood: Prentice Hall.
Luthans, F., & Peterson, S. J. (2002). Employee engagement and manager self-efficacy: implications for managerial effectiveness and development. The Journal of Management Development, 21(5/6), 376-387.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710210426864
Mat Ali, S. A., Said, N. A., Mohamed Yunus, N., Abd Kader, S., Ab Latif, D. S., & Munap, R. (2014). Hackman and Oldham's job characteristics model to job satisfaction. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 46-52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.646
Mohd Nadhir, N. H., & Puteh, F. (2017). Impact assessment of job characteristics model on employee engagement. e-Academi Journal, 6(1), 28-37.
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321-1339.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
Oliveira, J. (2015). Effects of job type and culture on relationships between job characteristics and worker outcomes: A multilevel analysis. CUNY Academic Works, 1-272. Retrieved from https://academicworks. cuny.edu/gc_etds/1078.
Peccei, R. (2013). Employee engagement: An evidence-based review. In S. Bach, & M. R. Edwards, Managing Human Resources: Human Resource Management in Transition (5th ed., pp.336-363). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119208235.ch16
Rad, A. M., & Moraes, A. D. (2009). Factors affecting employees' job satisfaction in public hospitals: Implication for recruitment and retention. Journal of General Management, 34(4), 51-66.
https://doi.org/10.1177/030630700903400404
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2012). Management (11th ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.
Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology,21(7), 600-619.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 116-131.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190701763982
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 25, 293-315.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V. and Bakker, A. (2002) The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Semmer, N. K., Jacobshagen, N., Meier, L. L., Elfering, A., Beehr, T. A., Kälin, W., & Tschan, F. (2015). Illegitimate tasks as a source of work stress. Work & Stress, 29(1), 32-56.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2014.1003996
Sonnentag, S. (2017). A task-level perspective on work engagement: A new approach that helps to differentiate the concepts of engagement and burnout. Burnout Research, 5, 12-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2017.04.001
Suzuki, Y., Tamesue, D., Asahi, K., & Ishikawa, Y. (2015). Grit and work engagement: A cross-sectional study. PloS ONE, 10(9), e0137501.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137501
Torrente, P., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Teams make it work: how team work engagement mediates between social resources and performance in teams. Psicothema, 24(1), 106-112.
Yong, S. M., Suhaimi, M. N., Abdullah, S. S., Abd Rahman, S., Nik Mat, N. K. (2013). Employee engagement: A study from the private sector in Malaysia. Human Resource Management Research, 3(1): 43-48
doi: 10.5923/j.hrmr.20130301.09.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Transfer Statement for Journal
1) In signing this statement, the author(s) grant UNIMAS Publisher an exclusive license to publish their original research papers. The author(s) also grant UNIMAS Publisher permission to reproduce, recreate, translate, extract or summarize, and to distribute and display in any forms, formats, and media. The author(s) can reuse their papers in their future printed work without first requiring permission from UNIMAS Publisher, provided that the author(s) acknowledge and reference publication in the Journal.
2) For open access articles, the author(s) agree that their articles published under UNIMAS Publisher are distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work of the author(s) is properly cited.
3) For subscription articles, the author(s) agree that UNIMAS Publisher holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish. Readers or users may view, download, print, and copy the content, for academic purposes, subject to the following conditions of use: (a) any reuse of materials is subject to permission from UNIMAS Publisher; (b) archived materials may only be used for academic research; (c) archived materials may not be used for commercial purposes, which include but not limited to monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, license, transfer of copyright, loan, etc.; and (d) archived materials may not be re-published in any part, either in print or online.
4) The author(s) is/are responsible to ensure his or her or their submitted work is original and does not infringe any existing copyright, trademark, patent, statutory right, or propriety right of others. Corresponding author(s) has (have) obtained permission from all co-authors prior to submission to the journal. Upon submission of the manuscript, the author(s) agree that no similar work has been or will be submitted or published elsewhere in any language. If submitted manuscript includes materials from others, the authors have obtained the permission from the copyright owners.
5) In signing this statement, the author(s) declare(s) that the researches in which they have conducted are in compliance with the current laws of the respective country and UNIMAS Journal Publication Ethics Policy. Any experimentation or research involving human or the use of animal samples must obtain approval from Human or Animal Ethics Committee in their respective institutions. The author(s) agree and understand that UNIMAS Publisher is not responsible for any compensational claims or failure caused by the author(s) in fulfilling the above-mentioned requirements. The author(s) must accept the responsibility for releasing their materials upon request by Chief Editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
6) The author(s) should have participated sufficiently in the work and ensured the appropriateness of the content of the article. The author(s) should also agree that he or she has no commercial attachments (e.g. patent or license arrangement, equity interest, consultancies, etc.) that might pose any conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. The author(s) also agree to make any relevant materials and data available upon request by the editor or UNIMAS Publisher.
